« First « Previous Comments 32 - 71 of 134 Next » Last » Search these comments
Historically, vaccination laws in the U.S. are passed and monitored at the state level, not mandated or enforced at the federal level. While the groundwork to change all that actually began in the 1940s, on January 28, 2003, during President George W. Bush’s State of the Union address, the creation of Project BioShield was revealed. This new legislation was a comprehensive effort to develop and make available “modern, effective drugs and vaccines to protect against possible attacks by biological and chemical weapons.” The initial stage of the program was estimated to cost $5.6 billion over ten years.
Project BioShield established three major components:
1. The creation of a permanent, ‘indefinite funding authority’ to spur the development of medical countermeasures that enabled the government to purchase vaccines and other therapies as soon as experts believed that they could pass the mantra ‘safe and effective.’ Note: The vaccines were not going to be approved for use after extensive study and testing; they could be put to use with a wink, a wet thumb to the air, and a nod that they were good to go.
2. Grant new authority to the NIH [think NIAID - Fauci] to speed research and development of drugs and vaccines to counter bioterrorism threats and,
3. Develop ‘fast track’ provisions such as the declaration of emergency use authorizations [EUA] for the release of treatments, drugs, and vaccines that were still under FDA consideration. [REF: Office of the Press Secretary. “President Details Project BioShield,” The White House, 3 February 2003.} ...
As sweeping as the provisions were at the time, the legislation failed to include the key provisions sought by the drug companies—complete liability protection for all bioterrorism products.
Throughout 2003, 2004, and 2005, many bills were introduced by both the House and the Senate; in fact, 13 bills were introduced in 2005 alone to achieve this desired goal. But it wasn’t until October 17, 2005, when The Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005 (known as BioShield II) was put on the front burner to ‘make good’ on the promise of protection to drug makers. ...
This legislation was designed to give unprecedented advantages to the industry and would remove or severely weaken all safeguards that had long been in place to prevent dangerous or unapproved vaccines, drugs, and medical devices from reaching consumers. The bill also introduced the creation of a new agency within HHS, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Agency (BARDA), which would be given the responsibility for handling the $5.6B initiative.
BARDA was officially created in 2006 as part of the Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act (PAHPA). To this day, BARDA manages and funds the research, development, and stockpiling of vaccines and treatments that the government could use during public health emergencies such as chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) attacks. For FY2023, BARDA’s budget is $7.345B, a 13% increase over FY2022.
Public outrage against BioShield II began almost immediately. Patriot websites, conservative news outlets, and nationwide talk radio hosts began to decry the unbelievable benefits that the passage of S. 1873 would convey to drug companies. Dozens of activist groups representing thousands of constituents rallied and mounted campaigns to notify Congress of their dissatisfaction with the bill. Faxes, emails, and phone calls to congressional offices conveyed message after angry message, opposing the carte blanche promises about to be handed to the drug makers. Because the outcry against S.1873 was so strong, the possibility of its passage appeared to be difficult at best, impossible at worst.
Successful Sneak Attack; Americans Lose, Forever
To circumvent the public outrage, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist contrived the idea to attach a shortened version of the bill to the 2006 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill. It was literally railroaded through at the eleventh hour, giving sweeping, unprecedented immunity to drug companies.
Called Division E, ‘The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act,’ - or PREP Act for short - Senator Frist added the 40-page addendum to an existing 423-page Defense bill at 11:20 pm on Saturday night, December 17, 2005, well after the House Appropriation Committee members had reached final agreement on the defense bill, had signed off, and most had headed home for the holidays.
Appalled, Representative Dave Obey (D-WI), Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Committee, made the following statement on the floor of the House on December 22, 2005: [NOTE: As far as I can tell, Obey’s response (below) has been completely scrubbed from the Internet]
“When the President requested $7 billion to begin a much-belated crash program to develop a new generation of vaccines and antiviral drugs to combat a potential flu pandemic, the Republican Majority responded by cutting [that request] in half. When I asked Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) in Conference why we shouldn’t fund the rest of the Administration’s request . . . he responded that because liability protection language for manufacturers had not been adopted, long-range funding should be withheld.
“The Conference Committee [on the Defense Appropriations Bill] ended its work with an understanding, both verbal and in writing, that there would be no—I repeat no—legislative liability protection language inserted in this bill. And because the Majority told us it did not want any compensation program for victims to come out of the discretionary portion of the budget, no funding was provided for that either.
“But after the [Committee] finished at 6 p.m., Senator Frist marched over to the House side of the Capitol, about four hours later, and insisted 40 pages of legislation—which I have in my hand— 40 pages of legislation that had never been seen by Conferees be attached to the bill.
“Speaker [Dennis Hastert R-IL] joined Frist’s insistence, and without a vote of the Conferees, the legislation was unilaterally and arrogantly inserted into the bill, after the Conference was over. [This was] a blatantly abusive power play by two of the most powerful men in Congress.
“We then discovered that this language provided all sorts of insulation for pharmaceutical companies and that this insulation applied not just to drugs developed to deal with the [bird] flu, but in fact applied to a far broader range of products.”
After itemizing the problems associated with the “Division E” language, Representative Obey went on to say:
“Mr. Speaker, the Committee system was created years ago to protect the public interest, so legislation would be carefully reviewed before it was placed before the body for consideration. But that protection was arbitrarily bypassed by the Leadership in both Houses.
“This is the second time that this Congress has supinely done the bidding of the pharmaceutical industry in the dead of night. The first time, a vote was held open for three hours while the Republican Majority twisted arms to create the complex and ridiculously confusing prescription drug bill that our seniors are now so desperately trying to understand—a bill that was ushered through this institution by over 600 lobbyists and that protected [drug] companies by preventing the government from even attempting to negotiate lower drug prices.
“If I thought that denying unanimous consent on this bill would force the Majority to eliminate that language I would object. But, Mr. Speaker, it has also been made quite clear to me that the Majority will not relent on the language that insulates drug companies. [Emphasis added.]
“So Mr. Speaker, I want it to be clear that the action to insert this special interest language in the bill is, in my view, a corruption of the legislative practices of the House. When Congress returns in January, I intend to raise a question about the privileges of the House, highlighted by this action, because it has brought discredit to the House and should disturb every Member who serves here. [Note: An objection was never raised…]
“No Member of Congress, no matter how powerful, should be able to unilaterally insist that provisions that were never discussed and never debated in the Conference. [It] should not be slipped into that Conference report without a vote of that same Conference.
“This is what happens when there are no checks and balances, when one party controls the White House, the Senate, and the House and respects no limits on its own use of power. We have been placed in this position because the House Republican Leadership has sent Members home for the Christmas holidays with the message to the Senate that we would not be here [to review the changes]. That was irresponsible and the country will pay the price. This institution will pay a price as well, in terms of diminished respect from the people we were elected to represent. Members on both sides know it and it is time to have a modicum of respect for the way we do the people’s business.
“This is a shameful and shabby way to end the worst session of Congress I’ve experienced in 36 years in Congress. I most reluctantly withdraw my reservation because lodging an objection at this point would simply delay the shameful inevitable.”
The nefarious language that Congressman Obey was objecting to in the “Division E” addendum deserved every bit of his tirade. Even Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) commented,
“Generally around here we measure who the winners and losers are, and we have seen over the period of the last year, year and a half, how the drug companies come out [winners] time and time again, but never, never, ever, ever like they have with this sweetheart deal.”
Senator Frist handed the drug companies more immunity than any bill ever passed by Congress. He has been awarded well for his performance...
What They Won
In case you missed the link above, you can read Division E here.
The PREP Act provided at least four sweeping provisions:
Immunity from liability for ALL drugs, vaccines, and biological products deemed as a “covered countermeasure” in the event of an outbreak of any kind. The proposal is not limited to only new drugs or vaccines developed under the umbrella of “bioterrorism” or “pandemic” protection. The proposal is so broad that it could include drugs like Tylenol, Advil . . . and would have applied to Vioxx, an anti-inflammatory drug that lead to an estimated 88,000 heart attacks in Americans alone, with 38,000 deaths before it was pulled from the market in 2007.
Immunity for Any and ALL products used for any public health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). As explained below, the authority to declare an emergency now rests completely in the hands of the Secretary of HHS—an appointed, often non-medical person who has no accountability to the general public. The president’s person, hand-picked to be part of his inner circle, will have the power to mandate vaccines and other medications be given to the American people. In the event of a declared medical emergency, the Secretary of HHS is the most powerful person in America.
Who is that person today?
The current head of HHS is Xavier Beccera. Going into a pandemic, did he have decades of medical or even public health experience? Not at all. ...
Immunity from accountability, no matter what a drug company did wrong. Even if the company’s dirty facility created a batch of contaminated vaccines that resulted in death or injury to thousands of people, the drug company will not be held accountable.
Immunity from lawsuits. A person who suffers any type of loss will be legally prohibited from suing the drug companies; they now had immunity from almost everything, perhaps even murder. The bill’s provisions provided a mechanism for filing a lawsuit, but the language explicitly protects against frivolous suits by setting a standard for liability, so high that lawsuits would essentially be impossible.
Even the American Trial Lawyers Association stated the bill contained language never before seen in any proposal. In simple terms, if a claim is filed by an injured party, it can only go forward if the injured party can prove that the manufacturer, hospital, or medical professional performed an act of willful misconduct that resulted in injury or death. In other words, the injured party would have to prove the drug company or the doctor/nurse had administered the product with the intent to cause harm.
Unbelievably, even then, the defendant would be immune from accountability UNLESS the plaintiff could convince the U.S. Attorney General (AG) that the person or the drug manufacturer had intentionally harmed them AND, being convinced, the AG takes action against the drug company.
This means the U.S. government would have to go to bat for the plaintiff against the drug company for the lawsuit to move forward…..
Keep in mind that the person who rammed this bill through - Senator Bill Frist - was a medical doctor who at one time in his life took an oath to “do no harm.”
Medical Countermeasures
At about the same time that BARDA was created and massive expansion within the government for bioterrorism events, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) was greatly expanded within the Public Health Service. The agency has various roles and responsibilities dating back to at least 1955.
In 2002, ASPR was promoted to be an independent office, headed by an Assistant Secretary of HHS. In 2006, it was expanded and renamed the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. In July 2022, the scope of duties was again expanded and renamed the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response. ASPR has a $40 billion budget and today is managed by Dawn Myers O'Connell, an attorney who worked as a health advisor within the Obama Administration.
Ever heard of her? She’s one of the most important and powerful unelected persons in our government.
In 2017, O'Connell joined the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), where she served as director of its U.S. office. As the director, she was responsible for managing CEPI's U.S. and North American interests. CEPI was formally launched in 2017 at Davos, Switzerland by the World Economic Forum with initial funding of US$460 million from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, The Welcome Trust, and several governments. In January 2022, an additional $300M was pledged by The Wellcome Trust and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to help CEPI fast-track vaccines within 100 days - or less.
BARDA works directly with the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE). Housed within HHS, decisions are made by the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Dr. Robert Kadlec, another unelected official who is one of the most powerful people in all of government. PHEMCE decides what countermeasures are needed and then BARDA procures the funds through public-private partnerships. ...
Since that time…
That was a recap from 2005.
The concept of mandatory vaccination has only recently gone from a worrisome possibility to a reality. ...
And, 20 years later, here we are.
If we look back and connect the dots, we see that Project BioShield, the PREP Act, the creation of BARDA, ASPR, PHEMCE, and most recently CEPI, have all been part of the long-term plan that the WEF, UN, WHO, BIS, and our own government put together for the current global takedown, including the decimation of America: One Nation, under God, with Liberty and Justice for all.’ ...
The planedmic was it now appears a biodefense drill that was a trial run for responding to a biological attack.
wired magazine, 1996
Wake-up call! Some of the world's farthest-out, cutting-edge, and high-technodazzle biotech thinking is now being done not by scientists and academics, but by the military.
And then, suddenly, I could see the whole picture: the conference, titled Biotechnology Workshop 2020, would focus on battles to be fought in the future. These battles would not be limited to the hand grenades, assault rifles, and land mines of the 20th century - they would feature entirely new categories of weapons, munitions based on the biotech advances that would occur in the interim. The army, I concluded, was looking to produce fleets of attack microbes - maybe even a race of supersoldiers - by tinkering with DNA, the molecular basis of all life. And they wanted my far-seeing, penetrating, and all-knowing advice and counsel.
https://www.wired.com/1996/11/es-biowar/
The 2006 Origins of the Lockdown Idea
https://www.aier.org/article/the-2006-origins-of-the-lockdown-idea/
It required the key proponents — Dr. Mecher, a Department of Veterans Affairs physician, and Dr. Hatchett, an oncologist turned White House adviser — to overcome intense initial opposition. It brought their work together with that of a Defense Department team assigned to a similar task.
Was the Pandemic Orchestrated as a Trial Run for Responding to a Biological Attack?
https://brownstone.org/articles/was-the-pandemic-orchestrated/
US Plans to Lockdown and Wait for a Vaccine Date from 2007
https://brownstone.org/articles/us-plans-lockdown-vaccine-2007/
The Early Career of Covid Czar Robert Kadlec
biodefense connections of covid czar Kadlec
https://brownstone.org/articles/early-career-covid-czar-robert-kadlec/
A Manhattan Project for the Biomedical Security State
Gates is the promoter, facilitator and profiteer-in-chief of the great vaccine Manhattan Project but he certainly isn’t the originator of it. The call for a biosecurity Manhattan Project dates back to the George W Bush administration. On July 11, 2019, a think tank called the Biodefence Commission held a panel discussion entitled A Manhattan Project for Biodefence: Taking Biological Threats off the Table. The objective was to ‘create a national, public-private research and development undertaking to defend the United States against biological threats.’
https://brownstone.org/articles/manhattan-project-biomedical-security-state-part-1/
Birx hired by DoD
https://brownstone.org/articles/how-did-deborah-birx-get-the-job/
Lockdowns Were Counterterrorism, Not Public Health
The national security pandemic response plans, devised under the rubric of biodefense, are aimed at countering bioterrorism attacks.
https://brownstone.org/articles/lockdowns-counterterrorism-not-public-health/
Government’s National Security Arm Took Charge During the Covid Response
https://brownstone.org/articles/governments-national-security-arm-led-the-covid-response/
The Pandemic Crisis Action Plan – Adapted (PanCAP-A) dated March 13, 2020. In this plan, the National Security Council is designated as solely responsible for Covid response policy. The document states in a footnote that the “Strategic Objectives” of the response plan “were directed by the NSC Resilience DRG PCC on February 24, 2020.” ... Could this be because they were responding to a potential bioweapon – a genetically engineered virus that they themselves might have been involved in developing?
https://brownstone.org/articles/was-there-a-covid-response-plan-if-so-where-is-it/
Was the Pandemic Orchestrated as a Trial Run for Responding to a Biological Attack?
https://brownstone.org/articles/was-the-pandemic-orchestrated/
US Plans to Lockdown and Wait for a Vaccine Date from 2007
https://brownstone.org/articles/us-plans-lockdown-vaccine-2007/
At this point, Pfizer was not part of BioNTech’s C-19 vaccine project. As narrated in The Vaccine, the small German company, which had never had any product on the market, only succeeded in recruiting the American multinational as partner three months later (p. 156).
Rep. Waxman question to FDA Commissioner McClellan: "...the BioShield proposal would allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to waive virtually all of the consumer protections in the Federal Food and Drug Cosmetic Act in case of an emergency. Moreover, the proposal would then severely curtail judicial review of the Secretary’s decision...What is the rationale for severely limiting oversight of these extraordinary powers?"
Emerging research is showing that the entire thing was run by the DoD and the outbreak, lockdowns, and vaccines were all parts of the overall plan. Purpose was apparently a drill, to test the biowarfare response capability. There may be more to it than that as we learn more.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-defense-dept-s-covid-vax-operation-pushed-unregulated-shots-deceived-public-researcher/
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-defense-dept-secretly-controls-covid-vaccine-production-process-that-cannot-be-traced-researcher/
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/toxic-by-design-researcher-explains-why-us-defense-depts-covid-vax-operation-shows-intent-to-harm/
https://www.lifesitenews.com/analysis/how-the-us-govt-built-a-shadow-structure-that-enabled-covid-vax-bioterrorism/
Moderna CEO Admits Company Produced Covid Vaccine BEFORE The Pandemic
In 2019 Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel knew that " there is gonna be a pandemic".
Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel Admits Company Produced 100,000 COVID-19 Vaccine Doses In 2019 Before The Pandemic Started. Stéphane Bancel also admitted that in 2019 he knew that “there is gonna be a pandemic".
https://rumble.com/v28obuy-moderna-ceo-admits-company-produced-vax-before-the-pandemic.html
original link
Moderna strategic alliances: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
US Department of Defence has been running the “covid vaccine” fraud worldwide
“[Pfizer] did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered.” Sasha Latypova used these words to describe the basis on which Pfizer has requested the dismissal of a False Claims Act case brought against them for their covid “vaccines.”
The US Department of Defence ordered “demonstrations” from pharmaceutical companies using the same secretive framework they use to order weapons. While telling us they were pharmaceutical products, for legal reasons they described them as emergency use authorised “countermeasures.” No pharmaceutical regulation applies to countermeasures.
“They were claiming that they’re producing pharmaceutical products to the good manufacturing standards when they perfectly well knew, I assure you, they were all aware of this. They perfectly well knew that no pharmaceutical regulations apply to these things, countermeasures … They’re just lying to you that these are pharmaceuticals. They’re actually not,” Latypova explained. ...
Below is a slide from the presentation where the organisational structure of Operation Warp Speed was discussed. “The chief operating officer is the Department of Defence. We were told, ‘oh, they’re just doing logistics’. No, they’re not just doing logistics. They’re running the whole thing,” Latypova said.
As proof of this, Latypova cited the case where Pfizer or the FDA was refusing to release clinical trial data in less than 75 years.
“Who was arguing in court on behalf of Pfizer? Pfizer lawyers were not even in the room. It was the Department of Justice. So why is the US government defending presumably a private commercial interest of a pharmaceutical company?
“[In the slide above] you can see that the pharmaceutical companies are a third level down. They are not in charge, but they’re getting tremendous amounts of money to shut up and follow the orders and do as they’re told. [ ] The whole operation is run by the Department of Defence and the US government. I’m not absolving Pharma … of any responsibility. They are criminals in this cartel, and they’re collaborating, and they’re co-conspirators, and should be prosecuted together.” ...
They spent $47 billion on research and development contracts – $33 billion was spent on “vaccines.” All the contracts are publicly available HERE. All of them say the Department of Defence contracted these companies. And they’re managed through Advanced Technologies International, a long-standing contracts manager for the Department of Defence.
They exempt everyone who participates in this, regardless of where they’re working, as long as they’re following the orders, they’re exempt from liability under the Prep Act clause. That same Prep Act clause states that this is a dual-use civil and military application product. How they exempted themselves internationally is by Pfizer forcing countries to sign predatory contract clauses where the national governments had to lift good manufacturing practice requirements or any drug importation requirements and look the other way. Clauses that if, for example, Swedish citizens get injured and sue Pfizer, then the Swedish government has to indemnify Pfizer and put state assets such as military bases, embassies, and other state assets as collateral. “That’s because it’s the US government who wants that base, not the private commercial manufacturer,” Latypova explained.
Legal structures were created in the European Union echoing the US structures as evidence of the global pre-planned "plandemic" event.
Who Manufactured Your Vaccine?
Robert Kennedy Jr - Pfizer and Moderna don't really own those vaccines. They slap their labels on them, but it was a Pentagon project. ...
The Vigilant Fox
@VigilantFox
@RobertKennedyJr: The Pentagon and the National Security Agency Ran the Entire Pandemic Response
There were 138 companies that were involved in manufacturing and distributing the vaccine. They’re all military contractors. The Pentagon and the National Security Agency ran the entire pandemic response. Pfizer and Moderna don’t really own those vaccines. They slap their labels on them, but it was a Pentagon project.
He might be right…
The Congressional Research Service confirms Operation Warp Speed involved the Department of Health, Department of Human Services, Department of Defense to “accelerate the development, acquisition, and distribution of COVID-19 medical countermeasures.”
... The official reason they did it this way is to produce enough vaccines to vaccinate the entire population in the least time. It makes more sense when you consider the fact they knew what was in the Wuhan lab well before it was ‘released’. ...
MyCovidBubble
Writes MyCovidBubble’s Newsletter
2 hr ago
In the beginning I thought that maybe the virus was accidentally released. I no longer believe that. Everything was so expertly rolled out and coordinated worldwide, a near impossible feat and a certain impossible feat if trying to pull it off at the last minute. Then there was event 201.
SimulationCommander
Writes Screaming into the Void
2 hr ago
I'm pretty sure it was bad cat himself who convinced me with the paperwork showing how quickly the OG 'vax' was ready -- yet it took like two years to nail down an Omi variant...
1. DOD incompetence.
Available DOD contracts for covid countermeasures. Sorted alphabetically by manufacturer name.
https://www.keionline.org/covid-contracts
While I believe Trump is responsible for what occurred on his watch, I don’t think he is to blame for the design and development of these biowarfare agents, despite his bombastic claims to the contrary. They had been designed and developed by many parties including DARPA, NIH, other gov agencies, academia and private companies long before he was elected, as pre-planning and practice runs for “the pandemic” had gone on for years.
I agree that pharmas are very bad, corrupt, and are in the criminal cartel that’s committing worldwide murder. The head of the cartel is not the pharma, however, and I believe that a proper investigation and prosecution strategy must take this view. Note that I also do not think that the US DOD is the ultimate head of the operation - they are the executor, the global military enforcement structure. They are the Chief Operating Officer and the CEO is someplace else. The head of the snake is located somewhere towards the global banking area.
I knew it! Janssen was removed from the market, because it was the safest, not most dangerous.
richwicks says
I knew it! Janssen was removed from the market, because it was the safest, not most dangerous.
But does it cure the cold?
The DoD doesn't really care if half a million Americans die from the mRNA. It's just a way of working out the kinks in their technology!
No. Nothing does.
I suspect that ivermectin may cure colds.
I suspect that ivermectin may cure colds. It would be good if someone tested this.
Thanks sterotomy where did you buy it?
richwicks says
No. Nothing does.
I suspect that ivermectin may cure colds. It would be good if someone tested this.
Patrick says
Thanks sterotomy where did you buy it?
You can get it on Amazon for veterinarian purposes, but you must recalculate dosage for your weight. Easy and relatively cheap.
You can get it on Amazon for veterinarian purposes, but you must recalculate dosage for your weight. Easy and relatively cheap.
Thanks sterotomy where did you buy it?
Thanks sterotomy where did you buy it?
A new eye-popping FOIA disclosure was making the rounds this week. The FDA three emails evidenced a perfect storm of government bungling and corruption. The short version is that right while federal jab mandates were lifting off in the fall of 2021, top government officials already knew that the jabs “waned,” meaning they didn’t protect anybody.
But that’s not all. Not even close.
Here’s the first email in the thread. It’s a doozy. It was sent from a Department of Defense contractor to FDA top official Marion Gruber in advance of the September 2021 vaccine committee meeting. Marion Gruber was the Director of the Office of Vaccines Research and Review at the FDA.
First of all, notice the email explained that the Department of Defense hired Humetrix in March 2020 to analyze Medicare claims data related to covid:
This study has been conducted by my company under contract with the DoD JAIC (Joint Artificial Intelligence Center) since March 2020, when we were tasked to analyze Medicare claim data to monitor, map and conduct Covid-19 predictive analytics for the military.
“For the military.” Why was DoD involved right from March 2020? Was covid a military operation or a health emergency? What do they know that they aren’t saying?
"Salus" was the name of a pagan Roman goddess associated with health, well-being, and prosperity. Hopefully someone will follow up and FOIA everything related to “Project Salus.”
And … the JAIC? A DoD joint artificial intelligence center? What is that? How and why did the JAIC get involved in covid from day one? Why haven’t we ever heard of its role in the pandemic? Unanswerable questions.
At least, unanswerable so far. We’re getting there, drop by painful drop.
Thanks sterotomy where did you buy it?
Americans were misled about all Covid-19 “countermeasures,” including those products marketed as “vaccines.” Covid policy was managed by the National Security Council (NSC) acting on war footing and countermeasures were contracted for by the Department of Defense (DoD) and Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) without any effective regulatory oversight at any stage along the process.
The activities passing as “regulatory processes” appear to have been fraudulent attempts to create color of law and avoid liability for what were clearly criminal acts. These multiple overlapping and mutually reinforcing violations of federal law have imposed serious harms on the American people, including severe injury and death.
Fact pattern background:
Under Stafford Act authority, President Trump declared a Public Health Emergency (PHE) on March 13, 2020 (Stafford Act, P.L. 93-288 as amended).
Under a PHE, medical “countermeasures” are not regulated or safeguarded as normal pharmaceutical products (21 USC 360bbb-3(k).[1]
According to Operation Warp Speed / Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) reports, the United States Department of Defense (DoD) directed, oversaw and managed the development, manufacture and distribution of nearly all Covid countermeasures,[2] largely utilizing DoD’s previously established network of military contractors and consortia.[3]
DoD, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) contracted for Covid countermeasures, including “vaccines,” as “prototype demonstrations” of “large-scale manufacturing.”[4]
These agencies avoided nearly all relevant legal and transparency requirements by using Other Transaction Authority (OTA) contracts.[5]
Although the DoD/BARDA contracts refer to “safety and efficacy requirements” and mention cGMP compliance, these items are explicitly carved out as not being paid for or ordered by the U.S. Government.
The contracts for countermeasures include a liability shield for manufacturers and contractors along the supply and distribution chains, under the PREP Act.
As prototypes under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) during a PHE, Covid countermeasures need not comply with laws governing clinical trials, manufacturing quality, safety or labeling (21 USC 360bbb-3(k)). The result: we have a chaotic mess of everything from sham injections that may be mostly just saline all the way to extremely dangerous/deadly shots, all of which are being distributed under the same product brands and labels.[6]
The underlying FDA authorizations and approvals under EUA statutory authority and Investigational New Drug regulatory frameworks all violated drug safety laws governing clinical trials, product labeling, product serialization, importation, product distribution, product quality control testing, dispensing and other parts of the national drug supply oversight system.[7]
The implications of the above can not be overstated. Senior Executive Service officials within the U.S. Government authorized and funded the deployment of noncompliant biological materials on Americans and others without clarifying their “prototype” and “large scale demonstration” legal status, making the materials not subject to normal regulatory oversight, all while knowingly and willfully maintaining a fraudulent pseudo-“regulatory” presentation to the public.
These materials have harmed and killed and continue to harm and kill Americans and other people around the world. ...
« First « Previous Comments 32 - 71 of 134 Next » Last » Search these comments
Trump was at least nominally in charge of the DOD. Trump continues to push the toxxine and brag about operation "Warp Speed" which was actually years in the making.
Trump knew. That's why he has to keep pretending that the toxxine is safe when it is really very dangerous. He doesn't want to get blamed for the mass death that the toxxine is causing.
The DOD had been wanting to try out the toxxine even before Trump got into office, which means mean that Obama knew about it too.
https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/article/2440556/dod-announces-covid-19-vaccine-distribution-plan/
https://www.conejoguardian.org/2023/01/24/on-the-front-lines-whats-in-that-vial-you-will-never-know/