patrick.net

justme,

I believe that the biggest reason for MSFT's decline is because they have lost their best talents around 2000. I know a few old-timers who joined prior to IPO or Windows 3.0 who helped build the company came down to the Bay Area, and ironically, MOST of the ex-MSFTies in the Bay Area ended up in Google. Those who stayed in Seattle started their own business or VC. The team that trashed Netscape have almost completely left.

The internal system worked for MSFT for many years, and it is a part of its unique culture. But when the growth phase is over, the real talents moved on to better opportunities, MSFT is stuck with many employees who are either leeches or political animals who only know how to do performance reviews.

I have met quite a few members on their OS team, and let me put it this way, I am not surprised that they churn out shitty product. And if these few were to come down and apply for a job at a company known for being difficult to get in, e.g. google, they won't stand a chance.

And if these few were to come down and apply for a job at a company known for being difficult to get in, e.g. google, they won’t stand a chance.

I thought Google is more growth-dependent than Microsoft. Perhaps they see this and choose to stay with the largest software company in the world?

>> I thought Google is more growth-dependent than Microsoft

I have been approached by Google recruiters several times. We never hit off since they could not explain career path in Google. I have been manager/principal engineer at telecom and internet space.

Microsoft is actually on a dying path.

A friend of mine is in their office applications group, and he said the corporates are completely getting off the upgrade path, and once they get off, they never come back for upgrades. About 1/3 of those who bought the latest Office license didn't even get around to install the last version (not sure if this number is still current, but I can only imagine it getting worse), so when Microsoft is trying to upsell the next version, the CTOs will have plenty of reasons to say no, not to mention that open-source office has become a real threat. Applications is a VERY major source of MSFT revenue.

Microsoft online is a mess, search is a joke, and when applications revenue dwindles there is nothing that can take up the void.

Most people who are still with Microsoft just don't have a choice to go elsewhere. 10, 15 years ago, you would meet really smart asses from MSFT, but thank god they are all gone. Why do the left-overs still stay with MSFT? Well, like my friend said, if you are comfortable with Seattle because you bought a house, your family and friends are there, where else can you find a stable job apart from MSFT? AMZN's development team is way smaller than MSFT. It is quite difficult for Bay Area people to understand, but I got offer at MSFT a few years ago, and after researching around Seattle to see the next opportunity after MSFT, I decided that Seattle was an one-trick pony. MSFT, or nothing else.

Today I played Monopoly with the wife on the Playstation. I remembered as a boy growing up, my brothers and I would rob the bank and split the cash evenly anytime one of us got into trouble.

This board game has become the new reality.

All those once a year upgrades seemed like the software version of the Evil Pair of Twins, the hardware phenomenon so many treated like god's gospel, Moore's Law. Some kind of positive feedback loop between the need for hardware upgrades and the software upgrades, to a piece of people's discretionary money for things like games or other leisure. Now people don't have the discretionary money for frivolous stuff like that and so the jig is up.

You could replace "MSFT" in OO's entries with the symbol for hardware companies, and the overall paragraph would be just as accurate.

I don't know... I have Vista Ultimate on my laptop and I am extremely happy with it.

I just cannot imagine using open source office programs because they do not function like Microsoft Office. You know, once you are used to a particular software personality it is hard to switch away.

After a few years of using Firefox, I am now back with IE.

Jan. 2 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. regulators working to untangle Bernard Madoff’s alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme are probing other money managers suspected of using similar tactics, two people with knowledge of the inquiries said.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is pursuing at least one case in which investors may have been cheated out of as much as $1 billion, according to a person, who declined to name the manager and asked not to be identified because the probe isn’t public.

Regulators may discover additional Ponzi arrangements as declining stock markets prompt investors to withdraw their cash and they question how their money is being managed. This week, the SEC said it halted what the agency described as a $23 million scam targeting Haitian-Americans, and said the Florida- based operators as recently as last month sought more investors.

The new cases “signal it’s become an enforcement priority,” said University of Rochester President Joel Seligman, who wrote a history book on the SEC. After Madoff’s alleged fraud “you’ve got to check hard and see if there is more like it in the marketplace.”

Herhold: Girlfriend at center of storm testifies in Achilli murder hearing
By Scott Herhold, Mercury News

It was the moment everyone had waited for in the Mark Achilli murder case, the testimony of the woman at the center of the storm. "Your honor," Deputy District Attorney Jeff Rosen said Wednesday, "the people call Tessa Donnelly."

In strode a tall woman in her 20s, wearing a charcoal overcoat and a lavender scarf, with her long hair done up in a bun. As she settled in, she looked very much like a parochial schoolgirl called before the dean to explain herself.

This was the first time the public had heard from Donnelly, the woman that both defendant and victim strove to win. She offered no direct testimony on the killing. Instead, she unveiled some of the messy details of a love triangle that police say led to Achilli's death.

Donnelly's testimony was as bundled as her attire. Where other witnesses in the 3-day-old preliminary hearing have been eager to wander off on tangents, she kept her answers terse. Only an occasional Mona Lisa-style smile gave something of her personality away.

The crowded courtroom of Superior Court Judge Rodney Stafford still leaned on every stubborn syllable as her private life, now painfully public after the killing of Achilli, spilled out.

Donnelly acknowledged that she had been the girlfriend of both Achilli, a 53-year-old Los Gatos businessman who was shot to death March 14, and of Esequiel "Paul" Garcia, 30, the restaurant and bar owner alleged to have paid for Achilli's murder.

The devil was in the details — or perhaps in the text messages. Under Rosen's questioning, Donnelly told her story: She had been Achilli's girlfriend for about four years before September 2007, when she broke up with him because he was seeing another woman.

Later that month, she testified, she began dating Garcia, who had just purchased Mountain Charley's bar and the 180 Restaurant and Lounge from Achilli. Donnelly worked at both establishments as a bar manager. In effect, one boss supplanted the other as her boyfriend.

While the relationship with Garcia went well at first, Donnelly said, it quickly deteriorated, and she broke off having sex with Garcia in November. She went back to Achilli the next month but continued to spend nights with Garcia and take trips with him in early 2008 to Las Vegas, Portland and Carmel.

The dark-haired woman told the court that her physical relationship with Garcia over this period was largely limited to kissing and fondling, and that she had lied when she told him an ovarian cyst made intercourse painful. Asked whether she had sex with Garcia over Valentine's Day in Carmel, she said, "I'm not positive."

Asked prosecutor Rosen. "Did you really love Mark, or did you really love Paul?"

"I really loved Mark," she responded.

The numbers told part of that story. In the first 21/2 months of 2008, Donnelly and Achilli exchanged 632 phone calls, a little less than nine a day. Over the same period, she exchanged 425 calls with Garcia. But it veered toward the one-sided: Garcia called her 271 times. She called him 154 times.

Rosen also took Donnelly through a barrage of text messages that an exasperated Garcia had sent to her in the two weeks before Achilli was brought down in a hail of bullets outside his Overlook Road condominium.

"I guess I was wrong about u," said one Garcia message dated March 1, the day after Achilli barged into Donnelly's apartment and found her with Garcia. "The ball is in your court." Another, dated four days later, said, "U playing games with me? Thought we r going out?" (And yes, for the record, this is the way text messages are really written: It drives the grammatical experts among my readers crazy.)

On cross-examination, Garcia's attorney, Harry Robertson, managed to inflict some damage on Donnelly's story. She admitted that she was a heavy user of marijuana and alcohol, occasionally blacking out from drinking too much.

Robertson also made a plausible case that her memory was selective: After viewing a prosecution printout, Donnelly said she remembered the text messages Garcia sent her. But she testified she didn't remember any that she had sent him — even when it was obvious he was responding to her.

It was also clear that Donnelly took a cold-eyed realist's view of her relationship with Garcia. Although she acknowledged that he was interested in marrying her, she said she had continued going out with him in part because he was her boss, and in part because her real love, Achilli, was still seeing another woman.

"You misled both Mark Achilli and Paul Garcia,'' Robertson said. "Did you see anything wrong with that?'' Donnelly was saved from answering by a quick objection from prosecutor Rosen. The defense had still scored a point: Just how important it is in terms of an alleged contract killing isn't very clear.

The hearing on the charges against Garcia and two other men — Miguel Chaidez, 22, who is accused of arranging logistics for the killing, and Lucio Estrada, 25, the suspected triggerman — will continue today. The key witness is expected to be a bouncer at Mountain Charley's, Daniel Chaidez, one of the original defendants who has agreed to cooperate with the prosecution.

Open Office works just like Office, in fact, it is better, because the new Office changes the location of menu just for the sake of it - or else people don't know why they are upgrading.

I don't know enough about Google to compare it to Microsoft. But here is something that I observe among my friends at both companies. The Microsoft friends (from at least 3 different groups at Redmond) are very open about the issues within Microsoft, politics among internal orgs, and their product plans etc. it seems to me that they do not really care about Microsoft, because if I care about my employer, I would shut the hell up and only do the official line even in front of friends. There is no pride of employment.

My Google friends, however, are very hush hush about what they do, what the internal org is like, and revert to official lines for all my product plan questions. It seems to me that they care about their employer, and their own employment. There is plenty of pride of employment.

OO,

The differences is mainly attributable to the relative ages of the companies.

Leon Panetta for CIA Director !! Damn, Obama is smart.

PermaRenter,

There was a photo of Tessa Donnelly in the paper, and the worst part of the whole story is she was NOT worth fighting over by any stretch of the imagination.

And what kind of freak couple talks on the average of 9 times a day over several months. And the rival was not far behind -- at the same time! Some people....

You beat 12%-24% on your investments last year (1%-2% per month)?

I only made one investment over the last two years, the double-inverse financials ETF, SKF.

Once I doubled my money I cashed out.

My investment philosophy is to stay all in cash and then take short positions against collapsing speculative bubbles. It's worked well for me so far!