« First « Previous Comments 91 - 130 of 177 Next » Last » Search these comments
Yet despite all this talk of automation replacing human workers you can still walk into just about any pharmacy in America and have your prescription filled by a human staff. The technology to replace these workers already exists, the human workers command high salaries, the need for 24/7/365 mistake free, high security performance high, yet still there are very few robot pharmacists out there.
WTF?
The large mail order pharmacies probably work this way. your neighborhood pharmacy can't be setup to to huge volume like that
Why not? A robot pharmacy would likely have a breakeven point measured in at most couple years at most over a human run one. Probably less.
Sales
That's exactly where I'm at today.
When I'd started in this hedge fund work, I was in the quant/IT support side for our prop trading algos, developing point-in-time risk analysis tracking with taxable audit trails. You might say that that was a "real" job in a BS sort of way, as it's far removed from industrial R&D.
Then, as funds flowed in and auditing protocols were finalized, I was spending more and more time, yakking with clients, to help sustain and grow the business.
Today, that's nearly 100% of the my job.
So yeah, Sales! Sales! Sales! I'm not the Wolf but perhaps, a Bobcat of Wall Street :-)
I know what multi variable regression and calculus is, because I did the shit. Like you said, not once, ever, did I have a need for it.
But wasn't it cool to learn/finally know that you actually COULD divide by zero?
I never learnt that part. Must have been sleeping in math class as usual.
No point is staying awake for those university classes as that theoretical convergence of the denominator towards zero, is based upon continuous function where dx - > 0 and then, you have an analytical solution for a derivative.
Real world data is discretized, in the 1/2, 1, 5, 15 min demarcations and thus, the denominator has to convergence upon a low noise threshold, for the result to be applicable, otherwise, it's just a random blip.
And that's all I can say, the rest is all voodoo.
But wasn't it cool to learn/finally know that you actually COULD divide by zero?
Is that what you learned ? You're wrong. It's also still true that multiplying by zero always gives you zero. This is why dividing something other than zero by zero is absurd. (but 0/0 is undefined too - possibly only by human agreement since anything close to zero divided by itself is 1).
I'm guessing you made some strange inference about a false deeper meaning of a removable discontinuity or something along those lines.
Sales
That's exactly where I'm at today.
When I'd started in this hedge fund work, I was in the quant/IT support side for our prop trading algos, developing point-in-time risk analysis tracking with taxable audit trails. You might say that that was a "real" job in a BS sort of way, as it's far removed from industrial R&D.
Then, as funds flowed in and auditing protocols were finalized, I was spending more and more time, yakking with clients, to help sustain and grow the business.
Today, that's nearly 100% of the my job.
So yeah, Sales! Sales! Sales! I'm not the Wolf but perhaps, a Bobcat of Wall Street :-)
There you go - working in "hedge fund work" will completely remove any sense of reality. You won't even have to drink.
I never learnt that part. Must have been sleeping in math class as usual.
No point is staying awake for those university classes as that theoretical convergence of the denominator towards zero, is based upon continuous function where dx - > 0 and then, you have an analytical solution for a derivative.
Real world data is discretized, in the 1/2, 1, 5, 15 min demarcations and thus, the denominator has to convergence upon a low noise threshold, for the result to be applicable, otherwise, it's just a random blip.
And that's all I can say, the rest is all voodoo.
You are worse then my professor. Have mercy, please.
There you go - working in "hedge fund work" will completely remove any sense of reality. You won't even have to drink.
"For the love of Money! Money! Money! And the fever getting higher
Desire, desire, desire, desire"
-Bono U2
Most people cannot even add.
Sure they can ... just let me get my calculator out here. Wait, the calculator has been replaced by this app on my phone so ... what was the question? Oh yeah, so now I have the app loaded up, what math problem did you have again?
It's harder to use the apps then to add. Most people can't read either.
Seattle will be the first to have a massive robot invasion. They are doomed.
Seattle will be the first to have a massive robot invasion. They are doomed.
California is next.
Move over MMMARVEL, I'm coming to Texas.
Seattle will be the first to have a massive robot invasion. They are doomed.
Psyche'd, as minimum wage laws are enacted, the rise of robots will accelerate. Soon, they'll be no more jobs and we'll have every man, woman, and child on welfare.
Seattle will be the first to have a massive robot invasion. They are doomed.
Psyche'd, as minimum wage laws are enacted, the rise of robots will accelerate. Soon, they'll be no more jobs and we'll have every man, woman, and child on welfare.
The teenagers will have a different minimum wage. I was more concerned about that. The school drop out rate is too high, and teenagers getting a job is too difficult. We don't need the crime.
The teenagers will have a different minimum wage. I was more concerned about that. The school drop out rate is too high, and teenagers getting a job is too difficult. We don't need the crime.
I think we're doomed, as a society. There's lots of unemployment in the 16 to 25 year old age bracket. Thus, gangs will grow and there will a lot of petty crime, as time goes by.
Here is Our Top 20 of the Most Hilarious Spelling Mistakes on Resumes and Cover Letters:
20. “I have a known track record and excellent experience with accurancy and fixing erorsâ€
19. “Strong Work Ethic, Attention to Detail, Team Player, Attention to Detailâ€
18. “My experience include filing, billing, printing and copingâ€
17. “Demonstrated ability in multi-tasting.â€
16. “My work ethics are impeachable.â€
15. “I have nervous of steel.â€
14. “I consistently tanked as top sales producer for new accounts.â€
13. “I am a perfectionist and rarely if if ever forget details.â€
12. “Dear Sir or Madman,â€
11. “I can type without looking at thekeyboard.â€
10. “Instrumental in ruining entire operation for a Midwest chain store.â€
9. “I am anxious to use my exiting skillsâ€
8. “Speak English and Spinachâ€
7. “I am a Notary Republicâ€
6. “I attended collage courses for minor public relationsâ€
5. “Following is a grief overview of my skills.â€
4. “I’m attacking my resume for you to review.â€
3. “I am experienced in all faucets of accounting.â€
2. “Hope to hear from you, shorty.â€
And the most embarrassing one to finish off our list:
1. “Directed $25 million anal shipping and receiving operations.â€
So yeah, Sales! Sales! Sales! I'm not the Wolf but perhaps, a Bobcat of Wall Street :-)
Remember the Turing Test?
Again it's a 10 to 1 compression ratio of former human jobs to future human jobs.
Is no one worried? Or has everyone accepted my prognostication?
The compression ratio in agriculture has been 40:1, from 80% of the population to 2%. The result was new industries, like movies and professional sports; i.e. leisure industries.
Nope, no worries.
By the time it happens, I will be with Pamela Anderson, Britney Spears and Madonna.
Exactly! New jobs for fine-tuning conversation skills of robots that mimic the bimbo bombshells. Wouldn't you want to have a personal hottie that looks just like PA, BS or M, yet can blow you like a fat chick, and pass the Turing Test? BTW, did the originals ever pass the Turing Test?
The compression ratio in agriculture has been 40:1, from 80% of the population to 2%. The result was new industries, like movies and professional sports; i.e. leisure industries.
The next wave is no more human labor. Everyone will be living in a VR simulation and be b*ning models, like Raquel Welch & Sophia Lorens, living in their fantasies.
The next wave is no more human labor. Everyone will be living in a VR simulation and be b*ning models, like Raquel Welch & Sophia Lorens, living in their fantasies.
What makes you think we are not already in one? What makes you think you are so lucky as to be born exactly to experience the change-over? What if the real change over already took place long long time ago, and everything you know is mere simulation? and why? Did something go wrong?
The next wave is no more human labor. Everyone will be living in a VR simulation and be b*ning models, like Raquel Welch & Sophia Lorens, living in their fantasies.
What makes you think we are not already in one? What makes you think you are so lucky as to be born exactly to experience the change-over? What if the real change over already took place long long time ago, and everything you know is mere simulation? and why? Did something go wrong?
Very simple, as I lay back on my coach, I should be feeling Raquel's b**bs, smothering my face. Well, it doesn't seem to be happening quite so automatically.
So, until that happens, I know that I'm living in the precursor era, before all of us, get what we want in a VR matrix.
The next wave is no more human labor. Everyone will be living in a VR simulation and be b*ning models, like Raquel Welch & Sophia Lorens, living in their fantasies.
What makes you think we are not already in one? What makes you think you are so lucky as to be born exactly to experience the change-over? What if the real change over already took place long long time ago, and everything you know is mere simulation? and why? Did something go wrong?
Interesting, calling this phenomenon " compression ratio"
The compression ratio is dynamic and tends towards a limit of zero.
All industries and all occupations would have the same limit - zero.
Remember the Turing Test?
Why do we need a Turing test? If something, which looks like let's say Marilyn Monroe, goes up to me and says, "I want, your c*ck, inside me", she'd flunk the Turing test, as it's clear that no such phenomena would ever occur with a real human, however, it would definitely pass my test :-)!
Remember the Turing Test?
Why do we need a Turing test? If something, which looks like let's say Marilyn Monroe, goes up to me and says, "I want, your c*ck, inside me", she'd flunk the Turing test, as it's clear that no such phenomena would ever occur with a real human, however, it would definitely pass my test :-)!
Dude, it's clear you wanna hump something with circuits. Just build yourself a love robot and be done with it!
Move over MMMARVEL, I'm coming to Texas.
Sorry, no room. However, Illinois or Michigan look like they might have room (or houses) to spare. Sorry, borders here are closed.
The next wave is no more human labor. Everyone will be living in a VR
simulation and be b*ning models, like Raquel Welch & Sophia Lorens, living
in their fantasies.
And somehow, deep down, I get flashbacks of how humans were portraited in the movie Wall-E. Sitting in comfie chairs, sipping on big gulps, watching everything via virtual; meanwhile they are fat as pigs and pretty much unable to accomplish even menial tasks that require any kind of physical effort.
All industries and all occupations would have the same limit - zero.
Which you can then divide by. And you thought calculus was a waste of time.
Move over MMMARVEL, I'm coming to Texas.
Sorry, no room. However, Illinois or Michigan look like they might have room (or houses) to spare. Sorry, borders here are closed.
Never stopped the Mexicans.
Maybe the "border closed" sign should be in Spanish.
Grocery stores tried these kiosks. They work pretty well except that every 10 minutes or so, an idiot comes by and shows the system isn't, er, idiot-proof. The idiot doesn't know how to use a bar code, or won't click on the screen after they use their credit card, etc. So many stores yanked them out and went back to old fashioned checkout clerks.
Then there's the cost of maintaining the machines and keeping them up to date. As the IT sector discovered, those guys cost money. So they sought to import a million from India. And then we get healthcare.gov or as it's also known as: Error 404.
There's ALWAYS a need for labor. Don't let anyone fool you. The problem is that the oligarchs want CHEAP but also SKILLED labor (or at least labor that pretends to be skilled.) Democrats need new voters as working and middle class whites flee the genocidal policies of the left.
There's ALWAYS a need for labor.
That's cause software is still in the prior paradigm of the 80s/90s. Understand this, many Fortune 1000 firms still use Oracle Forms, the biggest joke for a front end GUI, where the default validation is still the tab function. So wherever you go, you'll find that an entire form is rejected, if ppl don't tab around between their entries. The lazy developers seldom change Oracle's default behavior. This is basically the world of the old MVS mainframe type of stupidity. So if that's corporate America, I wouldn't expect anything more from a checkout kiosk.
But fast forward to a time where robots pick up the groceries for you. Then, no more kiosks, no more checkout counters. It's then either a curbside pick or a home delivery.
many Fortune 1000 firms still use Oracle Forms, the biggest joke for a front end GUI
Oracle APEX is much better.
many Fortune 1000 firms still use Oracle Forms, the biggest joke for a front end GUI
Oracle APEX is much better.
Good to know, as something's got to replace that legacy garbage.
Is no one worried? Or has everyone accepted my prognostication?
Just because accountants and possibly actuaries (although I question the latter more) are somewhat superfluous in certain contexts (which really seems to be your chief example) doesn't mean that every job is. Carl Frey and Michael Osborne at Oxford who studies this suggest that accountants are indeed at very high risk, but other high paying jobs such as chemical engineers or dentists are not -- they created an index that evaluates various jobs for automation, and towards the top are telemarketers and Patnet's favorite, realtors:
In addition, the article points out that previous technological innovations has usually resulted in higher employment and higher wages after a period of adjustment.
People are made for work. If a job becomes so easy that one person can do it instead of ten, that frees up labor for different jobs that can tackle problems that were heretofore out of reach because of technical or workforce requirements. All that's really required for this to continue is a functioning system of economic rewards for productive labor, security, and resources.
As far as accountants go: I think they are a long long way from being obsolete. Auditors will always be needed to go over company and government finances. A good auditor will justify many, many times their salary in cost savings. A poor auditor will save at least ten times their wage. Why would you not hire someone with a productivity so high?
high paying jobs such as chemical engineers
I've actually studied applied chemistry/chemical engineering and a lot of that training is based upon designing unit operations, primarily distillation towers. Aside from the day-to-day maintenance & retrofitting of such facilities, a lot of that design work has been computerized. That's reduced the actual need for ChemEs, dramatically since the 80s. Today, with the resurgence of the energy sector, they are primarily hired to help support fracking operations and transport but many alternate engineers: mechanical, civil, petroleum, geologist, etc are also involved there. The US has not build a new refinery since the late 70s. I'm hearing that there are plans on the drawing board but that's from a design firm, which had shed up to 80% of their headcount since the mid-80s. If these go through, great, some jobs for a decade but then what?
As for dentistry, that's heathcare and much of ancillary healthcare is about having ppl around. I think no one wants to enter a clinic and not see a PA or nurse but a machine. And lower paid dental hygienist are actually eating away at dentist's business over time, performing the routine fillings and cleanings, as not everyone needs a root canal or bridge, every quarter.
Auditors will always be needed to go over company and government finances. A good auditor will justify many, many times their salary in cost savings
Yes, but we already have these CPAs, bonded and licensed with the big three or independent. The field, however, currently has many more auditors than actually needed, once AI can churn through all the receipts and GL, within an 1/2 hour's worth of time. Then, the auditor's job is to put a human face at the end of the day and declare that the client's books are kosher.
Auditors will always be needed to go over company and government finances. A good auditor will justify many, many times their salary in cost savings
Yes, but we already have these CPAs, bonded and licensed with the big three or independent. The field, however, currently has many more auditors than actually needed, once AI can churn through all the receipts and GL, within an 1/2 hour's worth of time. Then, the auditor's job is to put a human face at the end of the day and declare that the client's books are kosher.
I've dealt with auditors. A "good" auditor is a matter of definition. By the terms of the big auditing companies, a "good" auditor generates tons of work for the company being audited to justify their audits. Efficiency experts also seek to justify layoffs whether it makes the company more efficient or not. Lawyers sue companies not to make the companies more responsible and save consumers money, but rather to make a lot of money in legal fees.
There's ALWAYS a need for labor.
That's cause software is still in the prior paradigm of the 80s/90s. Understand this, many Fortune 1000 firms still use Oracle Forms, the biggest joke for a front end GUI, where the default validation is still the tab function. So wherever you go, you'll find that an entire form is rejected, if ppl don't tab around between their entries. The lazy developers seldom change Oracle's default behavior. This is basically the world of the old MVS mainframe type of stupidity. So if that's corporate America, I wouldn't expect anything more from a checkout kiosk.
But fast forward to a time where robots pick up the groceries for you. Then, no more kiosks, no more checkout counters. It's then either a curbside pick or a home delivery.
Again, I've seen this attempted with home delivery here where I live. It's a great idea for seniors and such who can't drive but for most people, they like the idea of picking out their own fruits and vegetables and going though the milk counter to make sure they get the freshest milk (You know, take out the older milk in the front to get to the back.)
Walking through a supermarket, I can browse what's available more easily than on a web browser. I can look at the bread and make sure it's fresh. Or smells the way I like. I'm sure a virtual reality will eventually fix this, but for now, I think most people prefer old fashioned shopping when it comes to groceries and even clothes.
many Fortune 1000 firms still use Oracle Forms, the biggest joke for a front end GUI
Oracle APEX is much better.
Good to know, as something's got to replace that legacy garbage.
The same system that healthcare.gov was built on?
Sure, newer systems are great when they work and are built by qualified programmers and engineers who perform actual quality control on the work.
Yes, I've seen actual 33.3K modems used to transmit real estate orders to GSE enterprises. Most companies now communicate with those mainframes with the packets encapsulated over TCP/IP. Taxpayer money (30 million) was spent to port the tasks over to Java. After the money was sent to India, the port didn't work so they remained with the mainframe and outsourced it to CGI.
Sigh, that was 5 years ago. I remember back when 30 million was a lot of money...
es, I've seen actual 33.3K modems
That would be impressive. I've only ever seen 33.6K ones.
I've dealt with auditors. A "good" auditor is a matter of definition. By the terms of the big auditing companies, a "good" auditor generates tons of work for the company being audited to justify their audits. Efficiency experts also seek to justify layoffs whether it makes the company more efficient or not. Lawyers sue companies not to make the companies more responsible and save consumers money, but rather to make a lot of money in legal fees.
If that's your take on this, it sounds like you've only dealt with shitty CFOs who can't manage their auditors and shitty auditors, and also shitty General Counsels who can't manage outside law firms and shitty lawyers.
Today, that's nearly 100% of the my job.
So yeah, Sales! Sales! Sales! I'm not the Wolf but perhaps, a Bobcat of Wall Street :-)
So if you're so awesome because you only deal with sales now, what's going to happen when there's no one to consume things, which seems to be the case according to your vision?
Today, with the resurgence of the energy sector, they are primarily hired to help support fracking operations and transport but many alternate engineers: mechanical, civil, petroleum, geologist, etc are also involved there. The US has not build a new refinery since the late 70s. I'm hearing that there are plans on the drawing board but that's from a design firm, which had shed up to 80% of their headcount since the mid-80s. If these go through, great, some jobs for a decade but then what?
I think you misunderstood the use of the index. These are jobs that are less susceptible to automation. It doesn't dictate what depend for these jobs may or may not be in the future. However, the increasing pay of ChemE and petroleum engineers suggests that they're doing okay so far.
« First « Previous Comments 91 - 130 of 177 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-robots-are-coming-and-they-are-replacing-warehouse-workers-and-fast-food-employees