patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,255,193 comments by 14,984 users - DOGEWontAmountToShit, mell, RWSGFY, socal2, zzyzzx online now
invite response« First « Previous Comments 10 - 33 of 33 Search these comments
Strategist
2014 Aug 31, 7:13am
Saying the same thing about Al Qaeda is just as silly.
I can't believe you question the Captain? WTF
No it is true, the CIA has a shitload of skeletons in their closet.
I'm sure they have lots of skeletons in their closet. They are a secret service set up to protect us. If they don't have skeletons, they aint doing their job.
The Captain has nothing to do with this claim.
indigenous
2014 Aug 31, 7:14am
Claiming we create people that take off the heads of children displaying them in parks for other kids to see, and who train their 7 year olds to take off a human head, is silly, stupid and part of the problem. As if that green book they read had nothing to do with it.
It is so outrageous that you just want to go to war, huh?
Your mistake is assuming these guys have scruples or fecks (is that a word? I mean you can be feckless)
Strategist
2014 Aug 31, 7:14am
Hey, they need a reason to test all the newly weaponry on somebody...
I thought they were going to start doing that domestically to save money?
Maybe they should have on the rioters, but they were too afraid of upsetting them.
indigenous
2014 Aug 31, 7:16am
The Captain has nothing to do with this claim.
Au Contrair, merely look at this post in this thread:
If it's a formidable force anywhere in the world, then chances are we not only trained their army, but played some role in their leader being where they are today.
Strategist
2014 Aug 31, 7:16am
Claiming we create people that take off the heads of children displaying them in parks for other kids to see, and who train their 7 year olds to take off a human head, is silly, stupid and part of the problem. As if that green book they read had nothing to do with it.
It is so outrageous that you just want to go to war, huh?
Who wants wars? It's such a waste. I want these barbarians exterminated once and for all so that we don't have any wars.
Strategist
2014 Aug 31, 7:17am
The Captain has nothing to do with this claim.
Au Contrair, merely look at this post in this thread:
If it's a formidable force anywhere in the world, then chances are we not only trained their army, but played some role in their leader being where they are today.
OK, so the Captain has an opinion. What's the big deal?
indigenous
2014 Aug 31, 7:36am
OK, so the Captain has an opinion. What's the big deal?
He is saying the same thing as me.
Strategist
2014 Aug 31, 9:02am
Who wants wars?
Defense contractors.
That I agree with.
OK, so the Captain has an opinion. What's the big deal?
He is saying the same thing as me.
I don't see the relevance.
indigenous
2014 Aug 31, 9:21am
I don't see the relevance.
The defense contractors need a reason to go to war. The past 100 years they have come up with one after another.
LBJ = Gulf of Tonkin
This was not true and passed along as true by McNamara to LBJ who then used it as an excuse to go into Vietnam in a big way
Wilson = the Lusitania
Wilson sent the Lusitania into enemy water knowing full well that it would get attacked IIRC the Germans warned him not to do that.
FDR = Pearl Harbor
Because he put sanctions on Japan they almost had no choice but to go to war
Bush (41) = misled Hussein in that the US would not attack if he went into Kuwait
Bush (43) = WMDs in Iraq
You know this story
Point is that EVERY war is provoked by the US in some way or fashion in order to give the military industrial complex something to due at a HUGE cost. That is NOT an investment in anyway fucking shape or form.
Eisenhower was dead on and extremely prescient. Give me more presidents just like him.
Almost all of the inflation can be tracked down to war, certainly hyperinflation anyway.
MisdemeanorRebel
2014 Aug 31, 9:25am
Indigenous, when you talk like this, you remind me of the good side of Libertarianism.
Strategist
2014 Aug 31, 9:29am
Indigenous, when you talk like this, you remind me of the good side of Libertarianism.
Ha ha ha.
It's called anti Americanism, not good side of Libertarianism.
I feel proud standing up for what is just and right. :)
RWSGFY
2014 Aug 31, 9:34am
The Syrian jihadist supported by .... for some baffling reason, Turkey....
"Baffling reason"? They've had Islamist PM (who has recently become their President) for the last 11 years. There is nothing "baffling" about his reasons.
indigenous
2014 Aug 31, 9:48am
"Baffling reason"? They've had Islamist PM (who has recently become their President) for the last 11 years. There is nothing "baffling" about his reasons.
The article is talking about Turkey supporting the Syrian jihadist?
indigenous
2014 Aug 31, 9:55am
And the invasion of Afghanistan because of the 9/11 conspiracy.
Just to keep the conspiracies straight, is this part of the trilateral thousand points of light type deal or something else?
They said the same thing about Al Qaeda.
Hillary admits it here:
Strategist
2014 Sep 1, 6:54am
It is fact that the Taliban went to Texas in 1997, and then rebuffed Cheney's pipeline. It was Unocal's pipeline but it would have gone to HW Bush and Cheney investments in energy in the Caspian Sea.
So because the Taliban refused a pipeline, we engineered the 911, so we could invade and take over Afghanistan. We got Afghanistan, where is the pipeline?
Strategist
2014 Sep 1, 6:59am
I want these barbarians exterminated once and for all so that we don't have any wars.
The CIA?
Be careful. The CIA spends every waking hour investigating Patnetters. If they offer me a job, I would accept.
Strategist
2014 Sep 1, 7:05am
I want these barbarians exterminated once and for all so that we don't have any wars.
The CIA?
Be careful. The CIA spends every waking hour investigating Patnetters. If they offer me a job, I would accept.
Too late, you're already on the hit list!
Who turned me in?
Strategist
2014 Sep 1, 10:25am
Well, oil shale is in the picture, making the pipeline less urgent.
Oil shale did not come into the picture until recently, and Cheney is getting old anyway.
Why do you think Israel wants Assad removed? It has its eye on the oil shale in the Golan Heights.
Israel already controls the Golan Heights. We want Assad removed because he is a mean dude.
Strategist
2014 Sep 1, 10:27am
Since Wikipedia has taken out the info about the Golan Heights, here is the scoop, Strategist: http://www.globalresearch.ca/israel-prepares-to-drill-for-oil-in-occupied-golan-new-jersey-based-genie-energy-granted-drilling-rights/5351602
Hope it's true. Drill baby drill.
The Syrian jihadist supported by the western powers and, for some baffling reason, Turkey, ran amok. A previously unknown band of gunmen known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant were trained and armed in Jordan by CIA, then turned lose on Syria.
What makes IS so effective is that the major portion of its leaders and soldiers are veterans of President Saddam Hussein’s army, notably the Republican Guard. With IS is the last surviving Saddam insider, Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/08/eric-margolis/the-mother-of-all-blowbacks/
#politics