by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 31 - 70 of 169 Next » Last » Search these comments
He would go for the ones that swallow:
always pushing the bottom to new lows... you are one sick fuck
Clearly CIC is a homophobe which probably means he's fighting latent homosexual desires and failing. Now if only he could date within his species and outside of his family.
Ok I thought rail guns worked on principle of magnetic acceleration? Aluminum is NOT a magnet-affected metal. So how can what you say be true? Source link would be good!
Good Point this thread gets more and more non seqitur.
First, the explosions started at the top, just as in no controlled demolition ever - whoo, whoo, wooo!
Then the buildings fell faster than freefall due to special thrusters installed in the upper floors to accelerate them downward - whoo, whoo, wooo!
Then WTC 7 fell several hours later, in a controlled demolition - whoo, whoo, wooo - which does absolutely nothing to make the "faked" attack more realistic or terrifying - whoo, whoo, wooo!
Glowing, not molten, steel was found in the rubble - whoo, whoo, wooo!
What kind of people would believe in these bizarre conspiracy theories?
The kind of people that don't automatically discount the opinions of people like John Lear and many others just because they don't coincide with the stories told by Brian Williams and Katie Kouric.
The kind of people that don't believe that the people in power are necessarily concerned about the best interests of us common folk.
The kind of people that can open up their minds a bit and don't feel the need to shout people down when they are presented with an alternative idea.
You get the idea.
The kind of people that don't believe that the people in power are necessarily concerned about the best interests of us common folk
They people in power don't give a shit about us. And that includes John Lear.
But none of this means we have to rely on stupid evidence for a conspiracy and live in a fantasy world.
They people in power don't give a shit about us. And that includes John Lear.
But none of this means we have to rely on stupid evidence for a conspiracy and live in a fantasy world.
I never thought of John Lear as being a person in power.
I didn't know that evidence could be stupid.
Most americans live in an fantasy world. i.e. "the terrorists hate us for our freedoms" hah...they hate us because we kill their families.
Anytime you have 2 or more people planning an event, it could be considered a conspiracy.
I didn't know that evidence could be stupid.
Most americans live in an fantasy world. i.e. "the terrorists hate us for our freedoms" hah...they hate us because we kill their families.
Anytime you have 2 or more people planning an event, it could be considered a conspiracy.
Do you have any idea how weak this sounds?
If we follow the money we can see that military contractors made a fortune from 911 and the average American citizen is both poorer and less safe.
This is the typical conspiracy theory basis--someone had a motive. But the problem is that motive, in itself, is not evidence of anything. I've yet to see an 9/11 alternate theory that actually details what they think happened. It's always just trying to poke holes in the official version. If and when I ever see a version that details exactly what really happened on 9/11, then I'll pay attention.
If we follow the money we can see that military contractors made a fortune from 911
Emergency room nurses and physicians make a living from car accidents.
Cars: conspiracy by the medical profession? Cui bono?
If we follow the money we can see that military contractors made a fortune from 911
Emergency room nurses and physicians make a living from car accidents.
Nurses don't run over people. The U.S. military industrial complex does start wars. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are prime examples.
Don't you believe the official story? All that high test jet fuel really made a mess in Manhattan. It took months to put the fires out; remember?
Like I said--let me know when you have a plausible theory.
He believes that the planes were holograms.
Can you offer one documented demonstration of a believable hologram which can convince witnesses (including video cameras) filming from 80 different angles? Or is this secret, black-ops technology which still hasn't seen the light of public viewing (other than on 9/11) for 13 years and counting?
By the way: Isn't it cheaper, and less risky, to simply hijack the planes as-is and fly them into the buildings? Why employ all manner of Buck Rogers non-existent technology if just flying real planes into the buildings will do the trick for less money? Are you a moron?
I usually know better than to argue with twoofers, since they will never, ever change their minds - except to change to a different conspiracy.
All that high test jet fuel really made a mess in Manhattan
News flash: Jet fuel is combustible.
Do you have any idea how weak this sounds?
Obviously I don't or I wouldn't have posted it.
This is the typical conspiracy theory basis--someone had a motive.
Isn't that how detectives normally solve crimes? By looking for the motive? Do the police call crimes "conspiracy theories"?
If and when I ever see a version that details exactly what really happened on 9/11, then I'll pay attention.
Have you ever been informed of the "exact details" of any crime? One would have to actually commit it to know.
Obviously I don't or I wouldn't have posted it.
What amazes me most is that the buildings shook and crud (real debris, not holograms) shot away from the buildings and landed in the streets below, just as the holograms hit the buildings, and holes appeared in the shape of the holograms. Think about the coordination required to pull that one off.
Don't know why the Illuminati/Jews/NWO/Bush/CIA/military-industrial went to the trouble of holograms, when actual jets would have sufficed, but these are deep, dark waters!
So did they off the airline passengers somewhere else, or were they just fake humans played by Zionist-hired actors, like Barbara Olson, who faked a marriage to Ted Olson just to get fake-killed at the Pentagon?
What about Sandy Hook? Is it tied to 9/11?
Isn't that how detectives normally solve crimes? By looking for the motive? Do the police call crimes "conspiracy theories"?
No, police look for evidence. They like to have a motive so it's easier to convict.
Have you ever been informed of the "exact details" of any crime? One would have to actually commit it to know.
I didn't say I wanted the exact details--I'd be happy to see any theory that isn't just telling me why the official version is wrong. Tell me what did happen, not what didn't.
Check out Dali's holographic sculpture of Alice Cooper in St. Petersburg. Way cool and unbelievable
Yes, very cool.
And on a medium - a plastic or glass cylinder. Not projected onto thin air.
Everyone knows that the jet fuel weakened the steel causing the building to collapse and taking out WTC7 on the way down.
Everyone knows that?
I'm aware that everyone was told that on the news but my problem is that I tend to believe science rather than Nancy Grace.
taking out WTC7 on the way down
Yes, and they made WTC7 collapse hours later to make it look more realistic, because even though they could synchronize explosions and debris with non-existent hologram technology, they could not make WTC7 go down immediately.
Holograms??? The planes were real!
I sense some sarcasm here. But the planes were real--they were controlled remotely from outer space. You don't deny the alien connection, do you?
Still can't shoot down 100 Kingfish Missiles launched from 270 degrees around the compass.
Following President Biden's recently signed executive order for the declassification of many of the remaining documents relating to the Saudi role in the 9/11 attacks, the Justice Dept. on Saturday night released its first one - a heavily redacted 16-page report from April 2016.
While not yet considered a smoking gun in terms of proving high level Saudi foreknowledge and complicity, it does contain new information on a Saudi student in California at the time, Omar al-Bayoumi, who is shown to have aided two of the 9/11 hijackers while enjoying close ties with Saudi diplomats. The memo ultimately shines more light on what appears Saudi intelligence continuing contact with some of the hijackers leading up to the 9/11 attacks.
But none of this means we have to rely on stupid evidence for a conspiracy and live in a fantasy world.
People are actually saying September 11 WASN'T AS BAD as the January 6 Capitol riot. Seriously.
Joe Biden's Submissive -- and Highly Revealing -- Embrace of Saudi Despots
Biden's immediate abandonment of his 2020 vow to turn the Saudis into "pariahs," and his increasing support for the regime, shows the core deceit of U.S. propaganda.
When news broke that President Biden was planning a trip to Saudi Arabia to visit the crown prince Mohammed bin Salman (known as MbS), members of his party were horrified. Representative Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, was especially disturbed and recommended the White House cancel it outright. “I wouldn’t go. I wouldn’t shake his hand,” Schiff told CBS on June 5. “This is someone who butchered an American resident, cut him up into pieces in the most terrible and pre-meditated way.”
That resident was Jamal Khashoggi, a former Saudi royal family insider who used his perch as a columnist at the Washington Post to raise awareness about the crown prince’s ruthless ways. Khashoggi would be caught in a Saudi government ruse, tricked into coming to the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to sign marriage papers, only to be summarily killed and dismembered by hitmen close to MbS’s inner circle. President Biden, who promised to avenge the murder during his campaign, declassified the US intelligence community’s assessment of the killing a month after he was sworn in, laying responsibility on the kingdom’s de facto ruler.
Now, nearly a year and a half later, Biden is apparently forgetting about the whole “I’m going to turn Saudi Arabia into a pariah” thing. The official announcement of the president’s trip to the kingdom could come this week. Needless to say, the trip will be Biden’s most controversial. This is the same president who, after all, claims to be putting human rights at the center of US foreign policy. Opponents of the visit argue that a face-to-face with one of the world’s most notorious murderers is the very essence of hypocrisy. How can the world take Washington’s rhetoric about human rights seriously when US officials will jettison their own principles at the first opportunity?
A Case Study of Congressional Concealment
Reviewing the 29 redacted pages of the Joint Inquiry of 9/11 attacks.
On December of 2002, Congress published a report on its Inquiry. At first glance, this seemed an admirable example of our legislative branch doing its job for the American people. However, concerned citizens who read it—especially the relatives of Americans who died in the attacks—noticed that 29 pages of the report had been redacted because they contained “certain sensitive national security matters.”
Sensible readers will note that the whole point of the Inquiry was to ascertain WHY our intelligence and law enforcement had so catastrophically failed to protect our national security, so redacting 29 pages because they pertained “to sensitive national security matters” struck me as ridiculous. I immediately suspected that Congress was simply protecting influential “friends” and “allies” from embarrassment.
Relatives of 9/11 victims filed a FOIA request for the redacted pages, and after a 14-year legal contest, Congress was finally ordered to publish the document, which it did on Friday, July 15, 2016.
For years the redacted section had been referenced as “the 28 pages,” but the total number turned out to be 29. The key FINDING of the redacted section is as follows:
While in the United States, some of these September 11 hijackers were in contact with, and received support or assistance from individuals who may be connected to the Saudi government. There is information, primarily from FBI sources, that at least two of those individuals were alleged by some to be Saudi intelligence officers.
One of the suspected intelligence officers was Osama Bassnan, who lived across the street from two of the hijackers when they resided in San Diego and was in close contact with many of their associates. According to the report:
Bassnan has many ties to the Saudi government, including past employment by the Saudi Arabian education mission. The FBI also received reports from individuals in the Muslim community alleging that Bessan might be a Saudi intelligence officer According to a CIA memo, Bassnan has reportedly received funding, and possibly a fake passport, from Saudi government officials, he and his wife have received financial support from the Saudi ambassador to the United States and his wife.
On at least one occasion, Bassnan received a check directly from Prince Bandar‘s account. According to the FBI, on May 14, 1998, Bassnan cashed the check from Bandar in the amount of $15,000. Bassnan’s wife also received at least one check directly from Bandar. She also received one additional check from Bandar’s wife which she cashed on January 8, 1998 for $10,000.
While such statements might pique someone’s curiosity to learn more about this connection between President Bush’s friend, Prince Bandar, and a suspected Saudi intelligence agent providing support for hijackers in San Diego, Congress wasn’t interested. As the Committees stated in their report:
It should be clear that this joint inquiry has made no final determinations as to the reliability or sufficiency of the information regarding these issues that we found contained in FBI and CIA documents.
U.S. mainstream media coverage of the release was minimal and it downplayed the significance of what was contained in the document. CNN’s report quoted Senators Richard Burr and Dianne Feinstein:
Sens. Richard Burr and Dianne Feinstein, the chair and top Democrat of the Senate Intelligence Committee, issued a statement that they agreed with the decision to declassify the report. But they cautioned, “These pages include unconfirmed allegations and raw reporting and have been the subject of conspiracy theories for years.”
Ain’t it funny how you will never discover the truth of a matter if you don’t investigate it? Not investigating also enables you to brand anyone who raises questions about the matter a “conspiracy theorist.”
The United States has repatriated a Saudi national to Saudi Arabia after keeping him behind bars in Guantanamo prison for 21 years over suspected involvement in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
In a statement on Wednesday, the Pentagon announced that it had released 48-year-old Saudi national Ghassan al-Sharbi and returned him to Saudi Arabia "subject to the implementation of a comprehensive set of security measures including monitoring, travel restrictions and continued information sharing."
Yes, Saudi's did it, but at this point I think it was with the active cooperation of the CIA.
He believes that the planes were holograms.
Can you offer one documented demonstration of a believable hologram which can convince witnesses (including video cameras) filming from 80 different angles? Or is this secret, black-ops technology which still hasn't seen the light of public viewing (other than on 9/11) for 13 years and counting?
By the way: Isn't it cheaper, and less risky, to simply hijack the planes as-is and fly them into the buildings? Why employ all manner of Buck Rogers non-existent technology if just flying real planes into the buildings will do the trick for less money? Are you a moron?
I usually know better than to argue with twoofers, since they will never, ever change their minds - except to change to a different conspiracy.
This hologram you can see from any angle.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/906292397041636?mibextid=6AJuK9&s=chYV2B&fs=e
inject a bunch of obvious bullshit into it,
What the heck guys.
The captain of a United Airlines flight that was supposed to depart on the morning of September 11, 2001, believes his plane might have been meant to be part of the terrorist attacks that day. Yeah, a fifth plane.
This is an airline captain saying this – not some basement-dwelling blogger or Dollar Store conspiracy theorist or something.
In a TMZ special called "9/11: The Fifth Plane," Captain Tom Mannello shares his suspicions about his Flight 23, a Boeing 767 scheduled to depart JFK Airport for L.A. at 9 a.m.
« First « Previous Comments 31 - 70 of 169 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,261,396 comments by 15,062 users - Booger, clambo, HeadSet, mell, Misc, Tenpoundbass, WookieMan online now