patrick.net

LOL!

Indiana Jones says

deliberately hiring men with large johnsons to attract female staffers?

How would they know the size of the men's penises?

"How would they know the size of the men's penises?"

Because they are dickheads?

http://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/what-your-hand-says-about-your-penis

"Guys with shorter index fingers than ring fingers tend to have bigger penises than guys with the opposite digit scenario, finds a new study in the Asian Journal of Andrology. "

Ceffer says

"How would they know the size of the men's penises?"

Calculate the % of Asians.

Indiana Jones says

Are up-and-coming companies deliberately hiring men with large johnsons to attract female staffers?

Why go through the trouble. Just put out the help wanted sign and watch them line up for blocks. At least if its a biotech company.

Indiana Jones says

Alternately, could it be that men with a large phallus seeks out and find the up-and-coming companies?

Just the ones who stick a potato down there.

Indiana Jones says

Is there a correlation between future financial performance and objectively measured pecker size at the company now?

Possibly. Most tech companies are full of dicks.

You have to display wealth and suits, then a company will attract the most women (with the exception of angry feminists but they may not qualify for a proper gender role anyways). Physique also helps and I am sure dick size would help if its display or hints of it wouldn't be frowned upon by societal norms. Size does matter - no doubt about it.

To answer your question: the tech company I work for.

Indiana Jones says

Which SF tech companies have the men with the largest genitalia?

The ones which mainly employ niggers.

Indiana Jones says

1. Are up-and-coming companies deliberately hiring men with large johnsons to attract female staffers?

If your talking about a porn production company or a cuckold matching agency; than yes.

Indiana Jones says

Alternately, could it be that men with a large phallus seeks out and find the up-and-coming companies?

Niggers are always job-hopping lazy motherfucking parasites. So, yes.

Indiana Jones says

Is there a correlation between future financial performance and objectively measured pecker size at the company now?

Yes. A negative correlation. As the average penis gets larger, the greater the percent of niggers with the company. The more niggers in a company, the more financial issues a company is likely to incur in the near future according to countless studies.

Indiana Jones says

Which SF tech companies have the men with the largest genitalia?

Not Facebook.

Indiana Jones says

Yes, this will make masculinist heads explode in flames, but there is a distinct correlation between the upward momentum of a tech company and the size of the genitalia of the males who work there. Just open your eyes and look.

Unfortunately that's not true. A woman can use her sex appeal to climb the corporate ladder. A man cannot. If only it were true, I'd be CEO of America by now.

Dan8267 says

A man cannot. If only it were true, I'd be CEO of America by now.

Why do you think Bill Gate's company is called Microsoft?

thanks to @"Indiana Jones" for posting this!

it's a brilliant illustration of how men are not offended by "sexist" talk.

Rin says

Why do you think Bill Gate's company is called Microsoft?

Bwahahahahahaa

Robber Baron Elite Scum says

Indiana Jones says

Which SF tech companies have the men with the largest genitalia?

The ones which mainly employ niggers.

it's quite certain that some readers will completely miss the fact that Robber Baron Elite Scum is a parody of an archetype.

Are there are any African-American tech CEO?

If we are going to delve into this, we also need to find out which female CEO has the tightest vagina.

A more difficult metric to be sure.

Dan8267 says

A man cannot. If only it were true, I'd be CEO of America by now.

Learn to take a dick in your ass and find a gay boss and be willing to suck his cock and have your asshole stretched.

It's almost cute when CIC attempts humor. Maybe given a few hundred more years he'd get it right.

it's a brilliant illustration of how men are not offended by "sexist" talk.

Men would gladly use their sex appeal to further their finances and careers if they could. Pretty much all women who can do that will do that as well. The difference is that men will admit to using this tactic while women won't. We're all sluts and whores if we can be and ugly if we're not. But must we be hypocrites as well?

I think you're confusing fact with your homosexual fantasies about me. You seem to think a lot about my penis.

http://aboutmaleprivilege.tumblr.com/page/3

"Why can’t there be a male hooter’s equivalent where male servers are shirtless and highly sexualized for their bodies and looks

Male Strip clubs. You’re thinking of male strip clubs.

No. Not a male strip club. A strip club is a strip club. I want a place called Cahones where waiters wear Speedos and are forced to stuff if they don’t fill out their uniform well enough. I want them to giggle for my tips. I want it to be so normalised and engrained in our culture that women bring their daughters there for lunch (because whaaaaaat the wings are good! Geeze sensitive much?) where they’ll give playful little nudges like, “Wouldn’t mind if you dad had those. Heh heh heh.” that their daughters don’t even understand but will absorb and start to assume is just the normal way grown up women talk about grown up men. I want to playfully ask my waiter if I can have extra nuts on my salad and for him to swat my arm with an Oh, you because he knows if he doesn’t his manager will yell at him. I want other men to pretend to like going there so I think they’re cool. I want to go to Cahones during my lunch break at work and when I come back and tell the other women in the office where I went they chuckle slightly and the men around us suddenly feel self conscious and they don’t know why."

Indiana Jones says

I want a place called Cahones where waiters wear Speedos

How many women are wealthy today because they used their physics to marry well off men?
How many men have this possibility?

As much as you desperately want this to be fair and symmetric, well... it isn't.
Women (at least most) have the possibility to use their attractiveness, as well as their skills.

Stop blaming people who have nothing to do with this fact. It's not gonna change. Get over it.

Heraclitusstudent says

How many women are wealthy today because they used their physics to marry well off men?

How many men have this possibility?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/19/us/19marriage.html?_r=0

" “Men now are increasingly likely to marry wives with more education and income than they have, and the reverse is true for women,” said Paul Fucito, spokesman for the Pew Center. “In recent decades, with the rise of well-paid working wives, the economic gains of marriage have been a greater benefit for men.”

The analysis examines Americans 30 to 44 years old, the first generation in which more women than men have college degrees. Women’s earnings have been increasing faster than men’s since the 1970s.

“We’ve known for some time that men need marriage more than women from the standpoint of physical and mental well-being,” said Stephanie Coontz, a professor at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Wash., and research director for the Council on Contemporary Families, a research and advocacy group. “Now it is becoming increasingly important to their economic well-being as well.” "

Indiana Jones says

men need marriage more than women from the standpoint of physical and mental well-being

Huh? Many married men are miserable. Who came up with this idea?

The fact is that a successful man, only needs to see escort gals. And in 10 to 15 years, they'll be sex robots.

This article is irrelevant. First because 78% of men still make more money than their wives and second because men who marry richer women are not picked by women because of their physical attributes, at least not to the same extent as the opposite.
Anyone with half a brain understands the basic economics of life. Mothers need financial support. Men want beautiful women.

Rin says

Indiana Jones says

men need marriage more than women from the standpoint of physical and mental well-being

Huh? Many married men are miserable. Who came up with this idea?

Single men have too much fun. They abuse good stuff, drink too much, do crazy things, and generally die maybe happy but young.

Heraclitusstudent says

Anyone with half a brain understands the basic economics of life. Mothers need financial support. Men want beautiful women.

bingo.

but dangerous to say out loud in modern times

Heraclitusstudent says

Single men have too much fun.

You got that part right and in life is too short not to.

I'm wondering about men whose minds are focused on big dicks.

Rin says

The fact is that a successful man, only needs to see escort gals. And in 10 to 15 years, they'll be sex robots.

Rin, I get your schtick, and we can agree that the icon of the modern American woman is quite a fucked up thing to comprehend (as is that of the modern American "man"). But don't we make life even more meaningless when we have no continuity with other human beings? Just fucking a new escort/sexbot every different day for the remaining 40-60 years of our lives doesn't really add much to our human experience other than satisfying animal needs (like eating, shitting, and sleeping).

Or do you propose that men and women can't have meaningful, continuous relationships based on anything beyond sex? If so, where shall humanity be found--or this is just a construct and not even necessary, a la Neil Stephenson or Phillip Dick?

Philistine says

Rin says

The fact is that a successful man, only needs to see escort gals. And in 10 to 15 years, they'll be sex robots.

Rin, I get your schtick, and we can agree that the icon of the modern American woman is quite a fucked up thing to comprehend (as is that of the modern American "man"). But don't we make life even more meaningless when we have no continuity with other human beings? Just fucking a new escort/sexbot every different day for the remaining 40-60 years of our lives doesn't really add much to our human experience other than satisfying animal needs (like eating, shitting, and sleeping).

Or do you propose that men and women can't have meaningful, continuous relationships based on anything beyond sex? If so, where shall humanity be found--or this is just a construct and not even necessary, a la Neil Stephenson or Phillip Dick?

You're overthinking things. Many of us, have childhood friends, who we're close to, male or female. For the most part, in platonic situations, relationships can form. We've been doing this thing for ages now.

The problem, afterwards, are these cultural cul-de-sacs, known as romantic relationships. This is the arena of half-truths/lies, which draw men and women together.

Once we eliminate the biological instincts from our real friendships, then things can evolve. I'd much rather bone a robot and then, have associations with old friends, then to waste my time, chasing women in the old fashion way.

I'd much rather bone a chinook, and bbq over mesquite with a little bit of santa maria seasoning...

Rin says

I'd much rather bone a robot and then, have associations with old friends, then to waste my time, chasing women in the old fashion way.

Indiana Jones says

Why can’t there be a male hooter’s equivalent where male servers are shirtless and highly sexualized for their bodies and looks

There are. They are called gay bars.

A 20-year-old woman flashes men. The men are all grateful.

A 20-year-old man flashes women. The women call the police.

That is why there are no venues that celebrate exploit male sexuality. Men most certainly would be willing to be sex symbols objects of desire, but both men and women suppress male sexuality while glorifying female sexuality. Just look at T.V. It's ok to show scantly clad lesbians, but not two fully clothed gay men kissing. How many times have you seen men kiss other men on t.v. and how many times have you seen women kiss other women?

Our society says: female sexuality good, male sexuality bad. It's not the women who are oppressed. It's the men.

Now in other societies like Japan and the Middle East, it's the opposite, but in ours it's men who need the next sexual revolution.

From the Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 2008, Vol. 36, No. 2 (Winter): Page 178, women make up 16.4% of the military and men make up 83.6% despite that there are equal numbers of young men and women. Considering that most video games are military games, I'd say that women are over-represented.

Dan8267 says

That is why there are no venues that celebrate exploit male sexuality. Men most certainly would be willing to be sex symbols objects of desire, but both men and women suppress male sexuality while glorifying female sexuality. Just look at T.V. It's ok to show scantly clad lesbians, but not two fully clothed gay men kissing. How many times have you seen men kiss other men on t.v. and how many times have you seen women kiss other women?

Our society says: female sexuality good, male sexuality bad. It's not the women who are oppressed. It's the men.

That is certainly a twist in logic. Thank you for showing me how a person can completely miss the difference between glorification of female sexuality and sexual objectification by males. Women would love it if men/society actually glorified their sexuality. This means also honoring, respecting, celebrating a woman's sexuality. Instead in our society female sexuality is often used and degraded for the purposes of male gratification, a la Hooters, strip clubs, prostititutes, carl's jr. commercials, etc. Corporate America is excellent at using sex in general to sell, so yes, male sexuality is also exploited though less often, and often for the gratification of homosexual men. Count the male strip clubs and prostititutes vs. female.

Why are lesbians kissing on TV and not gay men? Because heterosexual men don't want to see a man kissing a man. But they are totally into two women kissing. And yes, men still run Hollywood.

Dan8267 says

A 20-year-old woman flashes men. The men are all grateful.

A 20-year-old man flashes women. The women call the police.

Women are not walking around exposing their gentalita to men and then getting off on the shock value. See these articles:

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/flashing-why-do-they-do-it-20120904-25bth.html

http://www.mykawartha.com/news-story/4252592-why-do-men-expose-themselves-to-get-a-reaction/

" "Why do men flash their genitals in public in the first place?

While there’s no definitive answer, Trent University psychology professor and sex researcher Terry Humphreys says attention seeking is at the core of this unsociable behaviour.

“Yes, they usually masturbate. Yes, they usually flash and they have an erection. But what they are getting off on is the shock or the disgust or that strong emotional reaction they get from others,” explains Dr. Humphreys. " "

Women do not flash for the above reasons. Women are flashing their boobs because they have learned they get something for it -- approval, adoration, sex, a stupid plastic necklace, whatever reward the man is offering. Our society teaches girls/women they are smart if they use their bodies to get what they want, and teaches men to objectify women -- they are merely a means to the gratification of men. When this continues in a society you get a person like Rin who doesn't care who or what sexually gratifies him -- it doesn't matter as long as his needs are taken care of and intimate personal connection is thrown out the window.

Indiana Jones says

Our society teaches girls/women they are smart if they use their bodies to get what they want, and teaches men to objectify women

BS.
It was like that long before "our society" came along.
It's called the "oldest profession" for a reason.

Considering women have something that men want and not the other way around, you should logically admit that this is to the advantage of women not men.

Only in your twisted logic is this translated into "women are oppressed".

Indiana Jones says

you get a person like Rin who doesn't care who or what sexually gratifies him -- it doesn't matter as long as his needs are taken care of and intimate personal connection is thrown out the window

And at the same time, I have a slew of friends and acquaintances, plus a successful career and hobbies, so it's not like I'm some isolated individual with zero social life.

You see, since women didn't put in a genuine effort into having a meaningful relationship with me, prior to that age of 29, when I finally saw the forest from the trees and realized it wasn't to my benefit, to waste time dating anymore. It'll be 4 years this spring, since I'd broken up with "Alanis Morrissette", the whack job Canadian, and I have no problems maintaining my dating-free lifestyle. Halleluiah!

Indiana Jones says

Thank you for showing me how a person can completely miss the difference between glorification of female sexuality and sexual objectification by males.

Instead of complaining that I missed what you wanted to convey, why don't you give specific details about what the hell you mean by "sexual objectification" and what specifically you want to say.

Indiana Jones says

Women would love it if men/society actually glorified their sexuality. This means also honoring, respecting, celebrating a woman's sexuality.

This is a perfect example of a meaningless statement. A man who looks at a woman and finds her attractive could be said to be honoring, respecting, and celebrating that woman's sexuality or he could be said to be a perverted, chauvinistic pig. The difference has nothing to do with what's going inside the man's head as you don't have access to that information. Instead, the difference is the arbitrary opinion of the person casting the judgement and it often has to do more with the man's perceived social status than his behavior.

Instead of talking in vague generalities like "honor" and "respect", you need to think about the subject matter more thoroughly so you can build up a detailed mental model of how you want men and women to behave and why. Then you need to write a specific, not vague, illustration of this and justify it to the rest of us.

Remember, it is you who are asking everyone else to change their behavior to conform to your standards. That means you must be able to outline the specific rules you want us to follow and you have to justify those rules to all of us. We are free to reject your rules if we find your reasons compelling.

Indiana Jones says

Instead in our society female sexuality is often used and degraded for the purposes of male gratification

First of all, is male gratification a bad thing? I take objection to that. Both male and female sexual gratification is a good thing. The complexities of sexual relations arise from how to achieve maximum gratification and the various trade-offs and dilemmas that occur in sexual relations, most of which revolve around intrasexual competition. I.e., the real secret of the battle of the sexes is that it's not a battle of men against women but rather a battle of men against men and women against women.

Second, you are implying, intentionally or not, that men being sexually aroused or gratified -- which by the way doesn't happen at Hooters -- is degrading to women. Perhaps you should start by specifying exactly what constitutes denigration. I sincerely doubt that all women have the same opinion on this. Some women think that showing their faces in public is degrading.

Sayeeda Warsi says women should be allowed to wear burkas at work

Wearing a burka does not prevent Muslim women ‘engaging in everyday life’ in Britain, the Conservative Party chairman Sayeeda Warsi claimed yesterday.

Now you and I might find the idea of a burka as oppressive, but who the hell are you and I to tell women who want to wear it -- and there are tens of millions of such women who strongly want that -- that they can't.

On the other end of the spectrum there are plenty of female nudists who have no problem with men seeing their bodies. There are also women making far more money than you or I are simply by modeling in a bikini for a beer billboard. These women do not find their work degrading. It's an easy way to make more money and live a better lifestyle than 95% of Americans while working a few hours a month. Hell, if that's degrading then sign me up.

What makes you think that the arbitrary lines you draw are representative of what all women in the world or even our country want? That's why you need to be damn specific and you need to be able to justify your opinion. And yes, this is all about your opinion not some fundamental, absolute, unchanging moral truth.

As for the reason there are Hooters and female models selling beer in bikinis and not the male equivalent, it's because female sexuality is valued by our species and our society while male sexuality is not. It's a biology thing. A male dies and no big deal because a single male can impregnate all the females in the tribe. A female dies and it's a tragedy because that's one less womb producing children. Like it or not, we still have the same brains, and thus the same values, as our Stone Age ancestors. If we valued people based on their contributions to our society, male engineers would be sexier than rock stars and athletes. But wishing evolution would catch up with technology isn't going to work. We'd have to change the human genome with genetic engineer.

Indiana Jones says

Women are not walking around exposing their gentalita to men and then getting off on the shock value.

They are getting off from the attention. Please see the documentaries listed here. There are hundreds of hours of young women demonstrating that they are thrilled to get attention by exposing themselves. They aren't receiving financial compensation for doing so. It's purely about the attention and revealing in the power they have because of their sexual appeal.

I happen to be an expert on this area having done ample research, but if you want I can do more.

But who are you to judge those women as being morally inferior, stupid, or wreckless? They are enjoying their youth. Now we can objectively discuss the various trade-offs their behavior constitutes, but applying a judgement to their behavior is entirely a matter of opinion.

Rin says

You see, since women didn't put in a genuine effort into having a meaningful relationship with me, prior to that age of 29,

This is very true. Women for the past 40 years have been following an almost exclusively short-term mating strategy during their peak sexual years only to scramble to get a long-term relationship once they reach their 30s and their bargaining power diminishes greatly.

Whether or not they are doing the right thing is an opinion. I prefer to understand the phenomenon first and only come to judgements later if at all.

Dan8267 says

Rin says

You see, since women didn't put in a genuine effort into having a meaningful relationship with me, prior to that age of 29,

This is very true. Women for the past 40 years have been following an almost exclusively short-term mating strategy during their peak sexual years only to scramble to get a long-term relationship once they reach their 30s and their bargaining power diminishes greatly.

Whether or not they are doing the right thing is an opinion. I prefer to understand the phenomenon first and only come to judgements later if at all.

Assuming that the above is accurate, I'd say that it's too late for them today. The idea is that ppl need to grow together. And thus, that partnership is that of growing together as a team, not as adversaries, during one's formative years.

And here, it's that one party (the females) who get to be a long term teenagers while the other party is told to 'man up'. Well, now that I'm long past my 20s, I see no need to hang out with aged teenagers in some charade-like ritual for spiritual and personal growth. That's New Age horseshit, not the reality we live in.