patrick.net

So who are the "super delegates" that are actively trying to thwart democracy and sabotage the election? Well, most of them are the Establishment LOSERS!!

Democrat Governers 21
Democrat Senators 46
Democrat Reps 193

Their pledged break down is

Governors
Clinton 16
Sanders 0
uncommitted 5

Senators
Clinton 39
Sanders 1 (himself)
uncommitted 6

Representatives
Clinton 166
Sanders 7
uncommitted 20

There you have it, folks. The Democrat party is the big bunch of phony's we always knew they were. Spineless, gutless, hacks, supporting the LOSER and failed candidate IHLary Clinton and all her special interests. Most dangerously, her deep ties with Saudi Arabia and all the money she receives from the funders of 9/11 and the bank-rollers of ISIS.

saroya says

That is true with pure socialism, but it is equally true that the problem with capitalism is eventually only a very few people end up with all of the money.

It's why we do not allow monopolies, to the best of our abilities. But all the socialist countries out there, they are all completely failures, cuba, russia, china...

Bernie is not advocating Socialism. He's pushing good ole fashioned American Democratic Socialism. Kinda like how we are nowhere near a Capitalist country even though some people confuse our brand of Lemon Socialism for Capitalism.

In the DonkeyDen, everyone participating is awarded enough delegates to be the president.
No tears here!

justme says

ALSO PLEASE KEEP IN MIND: Nobody is "winning states" in the Democratic primary

errc says

Spineless, gutless, hacks,

It is called cronyism.

Here in 'Murica we have the best socialism! You'll be cushioned from your bad bets and awful decisions, given money to keep doing what you're doing, and guaranteed immunity from prosecution — IF you're a huge bank!

curious2 says

Does any website track the total number of delegates and votes for each candidate?

First off, it's pretty sad that some loser felt the need to dislike the post referenced above. Really? You really dislike someone asking a non-partisan, completely non-controversial, mundane, and useful question like that? You must really have no life.

Second, yes, Google. delegates democrats republicans and you get both the counts for both parties including the superdelegate pledges.

Oh no, it looks like I upset the official cry-baby of PatNet. It's nice to know he's so obsessed with me he can't even let me answer cursios2's unanswered question without whining like the little bitch he is.

The only time CIC isn't whining is when his mouth is busy servicing glory holes along the New Jersey turnpike. Luckily that accounts for 80% of his day.

I had to put Ironman on Ignore so he doesn't ruin another good thread with his petty personal attacks.

So now I don't see his posts in this thread, and as I understand it, he won't see mine either.

Question is, do those of you who don't have him on ignore, still see his comments in this thread that I posted?

errc says

As the skin color lightens and the income of the voting base increases, so does his support.

And the stupidty goes off the charts.

They are the rowdy angry violent rabble. Show a White Bernie supporter a Trump sign they'll get all Keeper of the faith on you and call you a racist.
But as soon as you walk away, they admit there's not a black face among the crowd of Bernie supporters, and then they'll take to calling them Bible thumping Uncle Toms and Hillary supporters.
The only support they get from blacks is the BLM movement. I hope Bernie brings them all the way to the convention, then hijack the nomination right out from under Bernie and Hillary. With some radical Black Panter's White Transgender Woman that self identifies as a black Transgender Man.

Right. I mean, I understand that is how things are playing out under your roof with the missus and her daughters and their boyfriends. But in the real world, non-white support for Bernie is going parabolic. It's not like non-white folk ever had any reastnot to support Bernie, moreso that they are just now hearing about the guy.

What with your boy oompa loompa with gigantauritis clogging up the airwaves with his meely mouth rabble rousing

errc says

Question is, do those of you who don't have him on ignore, still see his comments in this thread that I posted?

Yes, they do. Even for those of us with the petty boy-child on ignore still see his constant whining on the home page of PatNet.

The only good ignore does is preventing him from posting on the author's thread, but many more regular contributors need to put that boy-child on ignore for it to do any good.

errc says

I had to put Ironman on Ignore so he doesn't ruin another good thread with his petty personal attacks.

So now I don't see his posts in this thread, and as I understand it, he won't see mine either.

Question is, do those of you who don't have him on ignore, still see his comments in this thread that I posted?

Yes we do. On the other hand, I've somehow pissed of Dan again and he put me on ignore ... sigh.

Well Patrick, your whole ignore feature sucks then.

It's a free speech forum. The way ignore works now is a good compromise. Personal choice - yes. Censorship - no.

Whats the value add of allowing people to yell fire in a crowded theater?

errc says

.....Canada, Germany, France, Australia, Japan........

It would be nice if you grew up and stopped lying.

With the exception of 3 or 4 authoritarian patriarchal oil producing countries in the Middle East, the top 20 countries with the highest standards of living and highest median income in the developed world are much more "socialist" than the US is. Turn off Faux Noise and Rush!

What if Bernie gets burned by Hillaries super secret delegates, even though he is slated to take the majority of the known delegates?
And the GOP steals the primary from Trump and gives it to the Ryan/Romney ticket?

Then both Trump and Sanders runs as independents. To shave Hillary's number preception down. The RR ticket would be dead in the water.
It would really turn into a tight three way race, that I believe ultimately Trump would win.

Tenpoundbass says

Then both Trump and Sanders runs as independents.

Under that scenario where we have 4 candidates, can any one get enough electoral college votes to become president? And if not, then what?

We need to force the 1 peron one vote rule. And do away with all party politics.
January 1st any candidate on the official Federalized standard ballot, will have 11 months to campaign. The one with the most vote, yes just one vote would be enough, wins.
Skip the primaries totally and just do away with the roles that the GOP, RNC, the DNC and the myriad of Super PACs have.

Thats just your vision going bad from pre-diabetes. A junk food diet will do that to you

He looks like that podium is holding him up.

Those lil' Munchkins has Grandpa all tuckered out.

Look at Ironman Feeling the Bern!

Keep watching the YouTube! #FeeltheBern

Ironman says

Ya think so... go to about the 16:00 minute mark in this video and watch and listen:

I see a passionate guy who is making salient points, although he is losing his voice.

Meanwhile, today, people close to Trump were on TV excusing his gaffes last week due to his being tired from campaigning too hard.

http://polichart.com/interactives/bern-path

Well every poll going into todays NY primary shows hillary with a DD lead. In about twelve hours we will see how accurate they were. Hoping Bernie pulls the upset

errc says

Says everything you need to know about which one should be president.

Hillary also campaigned in 2008 as a 'skeptic' of the Columbia Free Trade deal, then as Sec of State she sent countless emails trying to get the same exact bill passed.

And of course she ran against Obama on the grounds he was a gun grabber, now she runs against Bernie saying he's too pro-gun.

#CrookedHillary

The only thing worse than a Clinton, is a freedom hating low info Clinton voter. They must suffer from Stockholm Syndrome.

Suggestion: ban the goat-fucker formally known as Call It Crazy so he can't post his dribble on your threads.

We know what you're thinking about doing today, and yesterday, and the day before, and before that....

1,299 -1,105

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/clintons-delegate-lead-do_b_9711160.html

errc says

Question is, do those of you who don't have him on ignore, still see his comments in this thread that I posted?

errc says

Well Patrick, your whole ignore feature sucks then.

Ignore must be broken then, because I think a while back, Patrick made it so that an ignored person can not see your thread and if they try to post to it they get a message denying their post. So yeah, I think it's broke, or else Patrick changed it again after that.

Maybe some of the highly ignored people won out, in their request that Patrick not do it that way (which was awesome but ignored people don't like it).

Patrick had a thread recently that he fixed a bug (where dan was exploiting the hydro cabron loophole) to hyperlink misleading text, or even images, 'tricking' people to unknowingly ignore users. So he said he reset some of the ignores.

But i see you willingly decided to unignore me all on your own. Congrats

marcus says

Ignore must be broken then, because I think a while back, Patrick made it so that an ignored person can not see your thread and if they try to post to it they get a message denying their post. So yeah, I think it's broke, or else Patrick changed it again after that.

if you are ignoring someone, they should not be able to comment on any of your threads.

so if errc is ignoring ironman, then ironman should not be able to comment here.

let me test that...

rando says

so if errc is ignoring ironman, then ironman should not be able to comment here.

let me test that...

the answer is that errc did not actually have ironman on ignore anymore, probably as a result of my rolling back lots of ignores after dan was playing with them.

i put ironman on ignore for errc. @errc you can unignore ironman at the bottom of your profile if you like.

so i think there is no bug. please correct me if you think there actually is a bug.