Comments 1 - 9 of 9 Search these comments
Lowering the legal age a few Cents is one thing. But his was just a blanket "Who are we to Judge" blind eye.
Deviant Freaks! I think they like the raping that's why they keep it silent and don't move.
You do know there's a radio show game called "Germany or Florida" don't you?
The radio host describes a kinky or perverted sex act that made news headlines and the contestant has to guess if it happened in Germany or Florida.
It was an act of mercy by the German courts, so that the girl didn't have to remain shackled to the radiator until she turned 16.
Usen zie sapfe word, und alle ist gut.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BDSM_and_the_law#Germany
... a 14 year old is not a child bride in their Culture.
What was the alternative? The court deny the marriage? Then what happens to the 14-year-old girl? In her community, she's considered already married. She would be ruined, otherwise. So, let's play this out. If they were to overturn the marriage then who would be her legal guardian, as she is still a child under German law? She would be turned over to social services. She would be placed with a foster family (God only knows what they might do to her - it's not exactly a guarantee of safety). The courts "goal" should be NOT to do harm to children. What does less harm to the child? Foster care or leaving things be, keeping in mind the parts that are already a done deal (e.g., some of these girls already have children)?
So, you have a girl who is either left in her marriage that she says she's okay with, she's isn't in immediate danger from, and is, in fact, a reflection of the law in her native country. Or you place them all into foster care, which may or may not be a safer environment and, from the vantage point of the girl, would be akin to ripping her away from her family and "ruining" her in her own community; the only community she knows or understands.... Not to mention a huge strain on the welfare system.
It's a complicated issue, for sure. I have no doubt the decision kept the judge up at night as he/she performed countless mental exercises between rocks and hard places.
I'm not saying the mariage was wrong. I'm saying the Germans should be smart enough, to draw the line NOW. On what is acceptable and just how young would be considered "TOO Young" and pedophilia regardless how Holly they were married.
Muhammad married a 6 year old. The Germans via a 14 year old girl married off to a 20 year old. Just gave the "Child Bride" permission, and there is no unlawful age of a "Child bride" the Germans just decided.
That 14 year olds. And btw I think we can most certainly say that 14 year olds aren't 14 year olds of 15 to 20 years ago. But that's another debate on over sexed teens. They could have said no to Child brides but would consider teen brides. I don't know, the whole thing sounds like cockamamie cave.
You need to read something else besides Breitbart, so you can see the world as something more complicated than a bunch of hand-picked horror stories.
That's as far as you'll go? That's it?
No... "Yeah they should draw a line somewhere so they don't end up with a repeat of those horror storries that Breitbart will latch hold of then beat everyone to death with as they stoke fear into every one. We better be prudent now. "
I bet you buy a rubber after you gay sex don't you?
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/06/11/child-bride-legally-married-sharia-law-german-judge-rules/