patrick.net

What a fucking idiot article. Perfect for ten pound ass.

No one ever said Republicans owned slaves. The republican party has certainly have played the shit out of the race card in the last 30 years though. And it came back and bit them in the ass with trump.

The Republican Party enslaves young men in the Military Industrial Complex to die in Unfunded WMD LIE wars.
They also love flying the Confederate Flag.No better way to celebrate slavery.

They will get 100% of the black vote.

@bob

The democrat party has certainly have played the shit out of the race card in the last 60 years though. And it came back to bite them in the ass with BLM and promoting Islamic terrorist immigration.

Vaticanus says

Republicans are not racists and Republicans never owned slaves.

No, the ancestors of today's Republicans and Tea Party owned the slaves back. And these same ancestors also supported the KKK and segregation when they were Dixiecrats.

The ancestors of today's Democrats WERE slaves and abolitionists and the very Republicans back in the 19th century that today's Republicans praise. That's right, today's Republicans praise the ancestors of today's Democrats and the very same policies that are part of today's Democratic Party Platform.

You see, the constituents of the two parties swapped during the 1950s and 1960s due to Nixon's Southern Strategy. Praising the 19th century Republicans is praising today's Democrats. Condemning the 19th century Democrats is condemning their modern families, today's Republicans.

www.youtube.com/embed/QdR6c85fzog

Long video
www.youtube.com/embed/vjv4h8KoUqM

Let's get real. Let's be honest and frank. The problem with America has always been the American South, the Confederate states. The American South has ALWAYS been evil. It does not matter if the American South are Republican or Democrats; whichever party is the party of the American South is the party of evil. It has always been this way and it still is this way today.

Southerners are fucking evil. They are conservative and they are religious. Conservatism and religion are pure evil. It does not matter what you name the political party of evil. It's the people who make up the party that matter.

If there is ANY doubt anyone has that today's Republicans are the Dixiecrats Confederate TRAITORS of the 1860s, just look at the map. It's the same damn map every generation.

Lincoln was an R, but liberals can't accept it so they revise history and twist it around.

Dan8267 says

Southerners are fucking evil. They are conservative and they are religious. Conservatism and religion are pure evil.

Such a subtle and nuanced view!

rando says

Such a subtle and nuanced view!

Sometimes history isn't subtle or nuanced. There is not always two legitimate sides to a story. There is no balanced view of history that would provide reasonable justification for the Holocaust or American slavery or the genocides of Native Americans. Sometimes one side is just plain evil. And no matter how much you try, you cannot come up with some "subtle and nuanced" view that shows the Nazis or the slavers to be good, descent people who just had to deal with a bad situation as best as they could.

Middle Eastern Islam is evil. It's perfectly OK for us to say that despite brainwashed leftists opposing admitting that truth. The exact same thing goes for American South. A culture that has a very long and brutal history of evil and despicable acts should be condemned regardless of what kind of white headgear they wear.

Whitewashing the American South is no different than whitewashing Islam. In order to defeat evil, you must first acknowledge it.

Vaticanus says

@bob

The democrat party has certainly have played the shit out of the race card in the last 60 years though. And it came back to bite them in the ass with BLM and promoting Islamic terrorist immigration.

@vaticanus the relevance of this to what was in your OP is what exactly? This "logic" proves repugs aren't racists somehow?

@bob

Dems have successfully perpetuated the lie that they promote the interests of people of certain ethnic background more than the republicans, Which is what playing the race card is all about.

But in reality, the party of Lincoln is much more successful in judging people by the content of their character rather than their skin color. Republicans care more about what you do than how you look. which is why it never has been cool to be a republican and probably never will be.

Vaticanus says

But in reality, the party of Lincoln is much more successful in judging people by the content of their character rather than their skin color. Republicans care more about what you do than how you look.

All of American history contradicts your statement.

www.youtube.com/embed/YntAwZ0WMkY

www.youtube.com/embed/JTOylLjrfeY

www.youtube.com/embed/E48QqcTOXeY

www.youtube.com/embed/MnU3mOjkZ8s

www.youtube.com/embed/AT2fsv7xt4E

Vaticanus says

It was the Southern plantation owners that enslaved black people; most of these owners were Wiggs

Correct, as of 1860.

And then, starting in 1965, the Democratic Party lost almost all of its old-timey racists when Johnson pushed through The Civil Rights Act. And the Republican Party welcomed them all enthusiastically.

Amazing, isn't it? Party names actually apply to different people and principles over 100-year timespans. And yet many people find it inconvenient or unsettling to comprehend this?

Yep, looks like those old timey racists of the democrats still know how to run a campaign.

Vaticanus says

But in reality, the party of Lincoln is much more successful in judging people by the content of their character rather than their skin color. Republicans care more about what you do than how you look. which is why it never has been cool to be a republican and probably never will be.

Yes of course, that is why such a huge majority of black, hispanic, asian, and gay populations are republican voters, Republicans judge them by the content of their character. Denial isn't just a river in egypt.

@bayareaobserver

Thanks for the question. Most honest republican is easily Ron Paul. IMHO

Whose the most honest from the other side of the aisle?

@bob

The media and the democrat spin team has brainwashed the public to hide the fact they are using racial prejudice to consolidate their power. The real travesty is even LBJ was a racist who called people by the n word in the whitehouse. No body plays the race card better than the democrat racists.

HEY YOU says

The Republican Party enslaves young men in the Military Industrial Complex to die in Unfunded WMD LIE wars.

More so than Obama and Clinton but they are complicit too. Worst of the republicans are all the dishonorable chicken Hawks

As worse is all the southerner republicans who routinely vote against their own interests because of their racist prejudices

Dan8267 says

American history contradicts your statement

Muslims are to the right of rt wing republicans but democrats support unbridled immigration of Muslims to the United States

Vaticanus says

The media and the democrat spin team has brainwashed the public to hide the fact they are using racial prejudice to consolidate their power

Yep Jesse Jackson and al sharpton are the number one (1a and 1b) race-baiters in the political sphere

Vaticanus says

The media and the democrat spin team has brainwashed the public to hide the fact they are using racial prejudice to consolidate their power.

No one has brainwashed anyone, the democratic spin team has never hidden the fact that republicans are using racial prejudice to consolidate their power. Why would you think that? You do remember things like willie horton or john mccains "black baby" don't you? or the magic code words like welfare and food stamps (mostly collected by white's in the red states), illegal alien, law and order, cut taxes (for welfare), inner city (meaning irish south boston, or italian south philly, sure right) , etc. etc.

MMR says

democrats support unbridled immigration of Muslims to the United States

want to back this fairy tale up with any kind of fact. I didnt' think so. Right wingnuts don't do facts.

MMR says

Yep Jesse Jackson and al sharpton are the number one (1a and 1b) race-baiters in the political sphere

Jackson and sharpton haven't been relevant in the political sphere since reagan was president. We aren't talking ancient history.

Vaticanus says

Yep, looks like those old timey racists of the democrats still know how to run a campaign.

More dishonest revisionist history. There isn't a single honest bone in Vaticanus's body.

Here's reality. Source: https://www.britannica.com/event/United-States-presidential-election-of-1992

Vaticanus never lets the truth get in the way of a good lie.

However, I'm glad Vaticanus concedes that the American South is evil.

MMR says

Muslims are to the right of rt wing republicans but democrats support unbridled immigration of Muslims to the United States

That makes the massacre at the gay nightclub in Orlando very interesting. The current Democratic platform is simply hate for straight white Christian men, to the degree that men are any or all of those things. That's about it. Therefore Democrats get a large majority of the gay, black, secular, Jewish, and woman vote.

That hate for straight white Christian men leads Democrats to think that Muslims, as non-Christians and generally as non-whites, must be natural Democrats, and so Democrats support Muslim immigration as part of the grand plan to dilute the historical majority out of existence.

But uh oh! It turns out that Muslims are so far right, and so violent, that they make Republicans, even in the South, look pretty damn centrist and peaceful by comparison.

So when will Democrats catch on to the reality of Islamic teaching? What will it take if a Muslim massacre of gays won't do it?

Exleftie says

That hate for straight white Christian men leads Democrats to think that Muslims, as non-Christians and generally as non-whites, must be natural Democrats

No way. Afghanistan is a Republican utopia. I've said that millions of times. Conservatives want a theocracy just like Muslims.

What a propagandist self serving piece of tripe. There are no actual stats in the article that show the number of democrats versus republicans in slave holding states. Further Lincoln didn't give a rats ass about slavery, see myth 2:
http://www.simplefactsplainarguments.com/2013/02/5-myths-about-abraham-lincoln.html

The war for him was about denying the South their right to secede, he called it preserving the union. Fuck, revisionism has it's roots in the winners re-writing history. So the dumbass OP is actually advancing revisionism, or lying, with this thread.

bob2356 says

Jackson and sharpton haven't been relevant in the political sphere since reagan was president. We aren't talking ancient history.

They've been around for 3 decades, but yeah,, it's been taken over by black lives matter and others I suppose.

Dan8267 says

No way. Afghanistan is a Republican utopia. I've said that millions of times. Conservatives want a theocracy just like Muslims.

I agree that you have said it and repeatedly so...still, you're in the minority...majority here are apologists

bob2356 says

want to back this fairy tale up with any kind of fact. I didnt' think so. Right wingnuts don't do facts

1. I'm not "right wing". Don't listen to rush or hannity, watch Fox News or even vote for that matter, since it's a waste of time. Not generally being in favor of Muslim immigration qualifies as "right wing" in your world, then so be it.

I could argue that people who vote for Hillary are "right wing" since she is more right wing than republicans of the 70s-80s

Btw I don't dislike comments...someone , disliked your comment about democrats not supporting unbridled Muslim immigration because it's bullshit.......If anything, burden of proof is on you to show everyone all the instances of democratic politicians that are speaking in favor of curbing Muslim immigration in any way

NuttBoxer says

Further Lincoln didn't give a rats ass about slavery, see myth 2:

I always thought it was well-known that he wouldn't ever actually want to associate with slaves although he did fundamentally support their right to not be slaves. In other words, he wasn't a proponent of slavery, but was a racist and elitist

Exleftie says

That makes the massacre at the gay nightclub in Orlando very interesting

Anti-Islamic gays who support the second amendment...would they be wingnuts or libtards?

Tenpoundbass says

Parties, nations, and organization don't every do anything. Actions are only taken by people, not imaginary constructs. The Democratic Party did not found the KKK. The recent ancestors of modern day Republicans and American Southerners founded the KKK and filibustered the Civil Rights Act. These are also the descendants of slavers. Here's one example of them.

Strom Thurmond
Democrat from 1947 to 1964.
Republican from 1964 to 2003 when Hell finally claimed him.
This is the motherfucker who filibustered the Civil Rights Act. Yes, this is the actual guy.

So why did Strom Thurmond switch from the Democratic Party to the Republican Party in 1964? It was because of Nixon's Southern Strategy. The two political parties switched and so did all the politicians and voters.

This is how absolutely fucking disingenuous conservatives like Tenpoundbass are. They will outright lie about U.S. history to make the evil committed by their tribe appear to have been committed by the opposing tribe. Make no mistake about it, the American South is utterly fucking evil and it is precisely the American South that committed the evil that Tenpoundbass just referenced in his post.

The mere fact that conservatives have to go back to before the two parties switched under the Southern Strategy to make the Democrats falsely look bad demonstrates that they know conservatives, which is exactly what the Dixiecrats were, are completely fucking evil and it shows that conservatives are ashamed of their despicable history.

The Dixiecrats of yesteryear were conservatives and today the ones that are still alive, as well as their children and grandchildren, are today's conservatives and today's Republicans. But hey, can you blame conservatives for being so ashamed of their past?

By the way, when I say that the American South and conservatives should still not be forgiven for slavery, the KKK, segregation, and all the other abuses they inflicted throughout history, the justification for that is the continual lies about history spewed by modern conservatives like Tenpoundbass, FortWayne, and Vaticanus in which they try to pass the evil deeds of conservatives onto their opposition. This would be like a former Nazi today blaming the French Resistance in WWII for the Holocaust. It's despicable and offensive.

Any real American would be offended by this perversion of our history with contemptible lies. Such loathsome and detestable fabrications are the most unpatriotic things a person could say. Spreading such lies is the equivalent of wiping shit off your ass with the American flag. Anyone who partakes in such vile endeavors should be vilified as the execrable wretches they are.

Every day we get even more proof that the premise of this thread, today's Republicans are the party of Lincoln and are the protectors of civil rights of African Americans, is utter bullshit. Recently the Republican Party has been caught red handed committing election fraud against black voters having "target African Americans with almost surgical precision" based on heavy research regarding exactly how to disenfranchise legal voters who are black.

www.youtube.com/embed/FUomc6pEHnc

The American South is evil and conservatives have NEVER been the party of Lincoln regardless of which party they controlled. Furthermore, Republicans today are committing massive election fraud and getting caught.

Lincoln and Reagan would both be democrats today. the GOP would NEVER accept either one of them now!

moronic rationalization of the Piece of shit that is today's GOP will re-commence in 3,2,1...

MMR says

bob2356 says

want to back this fairy tale up with any kind of fact. I didnt' think so. Right wingnuts don't do facts

1. I'm not "right wing". Don't listen to rush or hannity, watch Fox News or even vote for that matter, since it's a waste of time. Not generally being in favor of Muslim immigration qualifies as "right wing" in your world, then so be it.

I could argue that people who vote for Hillary are "right wing" since she is more right wing than republicans of the 70s-80s

Btw I don't dislike comments...someone , disliked your comment about democrats not supporting unbridled Muslim immigration because it's bullshit.......If anything, burden of proof is on you to show everyone all the instances of democratic politicians that are speaking in favor of curbing Muslim immigration in any way

Spin, spin spin. You didn't say you were not in favor of muslim immigration. You said the democrats were in favor of "unbridled" (we are allowing immigration of muslim horses without bridles now?) immigration. So the burden of proof is on you to show where anyone of either party has EVER supported "unbridled" muslim immigration.

Asshole Dems.