patrick.net

Logan Mohtashami says

just any guy says

I dare you...you're all hiding behind your Levis and plastic pants.

On a side note.. My wife is a writer and she loved that entire post ( Just Any Guy) kudos on creativity

See you all on December

Tell her thanks. My contributions are usually lame, so at least I can try to be semi-entertaining.

just any guy says

My wife is a writer and she loved that entire post ( Just Any Guy) kudos on creativity

where is this at?

Hmm, before I saw the picture, I had assumed they dropped off Trump.

You need to think this through a little bit. Comey realizes that when he gets called out by the rank and file at the FBI he's gonna be responsible for allowing Hillary to get elected. Like many people he was bullied into coming up with the statement by some very senior operatives probably within the current aministration. He's had some time to think this through and realize the ramifications of what he's done.He is protecting his rear end. Any lawyer is going to be able to prove that Comey was wrong about his statement that she was not guilty of crimes. She's absolutely guilty under the rules of the national security. So therefore he is in a quandary he is giving himself and out for the quandary that he is in.

Strategic false flag, perchance? Where are the resident conspiracy paranoids?

I guess the pudding proof will be if Comey winds up being rewarded rather than punished. IHLlary can proclaim righteous indignation the week before the election.

Would've been loved to have been a fly on the wall for the meeting between the Attorney General and Bill Clinton on the tarmac

Seems like s strange interpretation of the law that doesn't pass the common sense test. People get arrested for incidental findings all the time. If you had to have a warrant listing exactly everything you're looking for, how would anything ever be admissible? Police aren't psychic.

If you know that a person was killed, hit in the head with something. And you have a search warrant for the home. You don't then have to get another search warrant for the candlestick holder when you figure out that's what probably was the weapon. And if in the search, you find a printing press for cash, you can arrest them for counterfeiting in addition to murder. I've never heard of incidental findings being thrown out because they didn't expect to find something else in the search. Because they didn't list the printer specifically.

@CDon @freespeechforever

Aren't you guys lawyers? Why do the emails require a special warrant? Could they be thrown out as evidence because the emails were found by accident, and therefore without a warrant.

Hillary Clinton disgusts me to no end.

But could it be as simple as people being sick of this topic and not caring as much anymore? Does that seem as or more feasible than social media blackouts in ALL four sites you cited?

BayArea says

But could it be as simple as people being sick of this topic and not caring as much anymore?

Ding ding ding. That and this no information letter doesn't really change minds.

. I don't know why the hillary heater circles wouldn't be circulating it with all sorts of misinterpretations like they are doing here. Why don't you post some and ask a friend to do the same iron man. See what shows up.

www.youtube.com/embed/C9CqwMPfsms

BayArea says

But could it be as simple as people being sick of this topic and not caring as much anymore?

Or it could be that people are interested in and click on what ever Facebook and Twitter puts infront of them.
We now know that the Facebook trend is more like Facebook impose.

November 9th is national Facebook and Twitter uninstall day for this very reason.

Looks like a false flag redwood bark dump...
No watering eyes due to absence of fumes.

Does yahoo cache email when used through a browser? Does outlook cache emails from IMAP? Do people use it as a pop server and download email? Or did they just find Huma's yahoo password stored in the browser? No one here knows what the FBI found and whether or not it was covered.

Facebook is infested with SJW's, totally unusable for the unwashed masses...

What is the policy for serendipitous airport meetings - revealed only by Chance - between an Attorney General and the Husband of a politico under investigation on the eve of the report that will charge her or not?

This issue doesn't absolve Clinton of anything, but it does highlight something else: Trump constantly misinterprets things, lies about things, and generally talks nonsense about things he knows nothing about. So, this brings up people's doubts about Clinton, but at the same time, it reminds people what an ignoramus her opponent is.

The Oligarch Media, especially Bezo's Blog, needs to stop Second Guessing the FBI. It was wrong in July, and it's wrong just weeks later in October.

I know Oligarchs like things their way, but this is dangerous for the rule of law.

This issue doesn't absolve Clinton of anything, but it does highlight something else: The MSM constantly misinterprets things, lies about things, and generally talks nonsense about things they know nothing about.

turtledove says

r

Aren't you guys lawyers? Why do the emails require a special warrant? Could th

Because that's a warrant that could be denied by a corrupt attorney general.

I see we're back to the unevidenced assertion that all/most of the data the NYPD gleaned from Weiner's computer is duplicate information. Let's have the FBI look at it and verify if that's the case.

Quigley is deplorable says

Because that's a warrant that could be denied by a corrupt attorney general.

An AG who just "Happened" to meet with the spouse of a major figure being investigated during a "chance meeting" on an airport tarmac that we would have never known about on the eve of the Investigation Report. Only a sharp journalist/plane ID Fanatic discovered this. They discussed Grandkids and Retirement or whatever, of course.

Pure Serendipity!

The Rule of law is at stake here.

It's long past time there was an independent counsel. Lynch's "Coinky Dinky" meeting with Bill was the final straw. Late is better than Never.

Clinton's Extreme Carelessness as Secretary of State makes her unqualified to be POTUS, criminal charges aside.

This is a Yale trained Lawyer, former Law Professor.

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

Clinton's Extreme Carelessness as Secretary of State

She is just about 70 years old.

What if individuals at the FBI looked at all of Weiner's wife's emails through homeland Security anti-terrorism connections and found something, and then the most recent pursuit of Weiner's emails was only a pretext for the FBI to be able to say, well you know, we thought that while we were in his laptop, we should read his wife's emails, you know, just in case.

Privacy sure ain't what it once was.

I think there is room at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for Comey.

because answering your question takes more time. now don't interrupt me

That's because we've been at 3 the whole time Liberals were stuck in 0.

Even king Liberal Idiot himself Bill Mahr has said he doesn't care if Jon Benet's body is buried in Hillary's closet he says Trump is more dangerous.

Well that's not how it works fucksticks, this isn't LaLa land this is the United States of America and in this Country! The United States of Ameirca!
You need a tickey... No tickey! No laundry!

Comey has a fucking Tickey now so step aside Assholes!

Hot Tickey coming through!

At this point everyone that planned on voting for Hillary, knows about her email server. They also know that there may be a lot of emails she erased rather than have congress go through them with a fine tooth comb.

So what does this story do, besides totally dominating the last (or at least second to last) media/news cycle before the election ?

Makes a person wonder.

FP says

I know for sure that if a regular Joe had done the same, he would have been fired and most likely criminally charged. You dismiss this calling it "fake email scandal."

PRevious Secretarys used their own email accounts rather than State Dept email accounts. Did everyone want to go through all of their emails to see whether any had referred to anything classified ? Why not ?

jazz music says

That's a fair assessment considering this damning evidence

That's utter bs. Trump doesn't do drugs he doesn't even drink that has been documented his whole life, for many it is an appeal if somebody who is not a career-politician enters the stage (not just in the US, but increasingly so everywhere), and the housing crisis was fueled by the same people who lost their homes later on after pricing out everybody else by any means necessary. This victimization of people who overstated (sometimes criminally), overpaid and contributed to the bs run up in housing is utter shite and a slap in the face of those who actually handled responsibly and decided they are not going to buy a million dollar crap-shack on falsified credit info just to please their SO or outdo their neighbors.

marcus is NOT deplorable says

PRevious Secretarys used their own email accounts rather than State Dept email accounts. Did everyone want to go through all of their emails to see whether any had referred to anything classified ? Why not ?

marcus, don't talk about things you know little about. There are very strict regulations about dealing with classified and sensitive information, and when it is mishandled it is a serious violation. If there's doubt that that the protocol has been broken, it must be investigated.

We all know she's guilty as hell. That doesn't mean we're all Trump supporters.

Halloween, World Series, Weekend, Golf, Football, and the fact that people have pretty much made up their minds.

Wo, this real-time posting shit is cool.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=231599

I remind you, if it happened is a felony.) Huma is married to (but now estranged from) Weiner. The laptop belonged to Weiner.

Let's try a non-partisan information source:
https://www.factcheck.org/2016/09/the-fbi-files-on-clintons-emails/

Highlights:
-The Clinton campaign previously had indicated that her personal emails were deleted before Clinton received a congressional subpoena on March 4, 2015. But the FBI said her emails were deleted “between March 25-31, 2015″ — three weeks after the subpoena.
-Clinton’s office disclosed on March 10, 2015, that she gave the State Department 30,490 work-related emails on Dec. 5, 2014, and “chose not to keep” 31,830 emails she deemed “personal.” (Note - over 30K work-related emails on her private server??? This isn't a "senior moment"...sorry. SHE HAD MORE WORK EMAILS THAN PERSONAL ON HER "PRIVATE" SERVER)
-It appears that Clinton, who has admitted to not being tech savvy, assumed that her email address — hdr22@clintonemail.com — was displayed in the “from” field when she sent emails. But the FBI says that that was not the case. The FBI said “e-mails from Clinton only contained the letter ‘H’ in the sender field and did not display her e-mail address.” Only 13 people emailed her directly, and the “majority” of State employees interviewed by the FBI did not know she had a private server, the FBI said.

No offense, but if it walks like a duck, ...