patrick.net

What a bitch.

FP says

Yes, very concern abut this one girl, while at the same time condemning thousands of other girls to sexual slavery and poverty.

I miss the made-up "facts" about Obamacare and Ebola which wingnuts used to trot forward.

Today's "facts" about Hillary are not nearly so creatively written. Can you think up some better facts about Hillary?

Yemen, a Clinton Foundation contributor. What did Hillary sell for the money?

Wow, new feature, I posted just a link and it automatically included a bit of text from the linked article.

This should make posts by tovarichpeter and tvgnus more valuable ;-)

HydroCabron says

Young girls are for dating - not for handouts and government programs. Showing them charity just hurts them.

Lol, Hydro, very astute satire.

So forget Benghazi, forget the aiding and abetting of a serial rapist, forget the insecure email server, and just focus on this one email.

Happy days are here again!

NuttBoxer says

So forget Benghazi, forget the aiding and abetting of a serial rapist, forget the insecure email server, and just focus on this one email.

Happy days are here again!

You are talking about Bill and Epstein? Well, at least Clinton didn't rape the girls. Trump, and a witness employed by Epstein said, he has raped a 13 year old according to the witness.

FP says

while at the same time condemning thousands of other girls to sexual slavery and poverty.

That bitch didn't save them all. If you cannot save them all, then by God, you'd better not save just one. That would be unfair. Clinton is always rigging the system.

Gary Anderson says

Trump, and a witness employed by Epstein said, he has raped a 13 year old according to the witness.

Can you provide references to the allegations?

>

I doubt if someone would risk her life to give this testimony without a sense of moral duty to do so.

Hey, you guys are aligned with Gary Anderson, so you're on the right track

Gary Anderson says

I doubt if someone would risk her life to give this testimony without a sense of moral duty.

That is not proof. Evidence might include photos of the alleged rape, e-mails from Epstein and Trump, etc. Try again.

We are not trying Trump. We are voting for president, Blurtman. Hillary sucks, but Trump is, well, beyond the pale.

Gary Anderson says

We are not trying Trump. We are voting for president, Blurtman. Hillary sucks, but Trump is well, beyond the pale.

Nonsense will sway no one, but instead discredit the person and also cast doubt on his views and motives for spreading nonsense.

errc says

Hey, you guys are aligned with Gary Anderson, so you're on the right track

You are aligned with David Duke, so you're....

YesYNot says

errc says

Hey, you guys are aligned with Gary Anderson, so you're on the right track

You are aligned with David Duke, so you're....

How do you figure?

David Duke is with Bernie?

Because you are hoping that Trump beats Hillary. Duke is hoping for the same thing. Now, you might be hoping for some other miracle, but that's not really relevant.

HydroCabron says

FP says

Yes, very concern abut this one girl, while at the same time condemning thousands of other girls to sexual slavery and poverty.

I miss the made-up "facts" about Obamacare and Ebola which wingnuts used to trot forward.

Today's "facts" about Hillary are not nearly so creatively written. Can you think up some better facts about Hillary?

Blurtman says

Yemen, a Clinton Foundation contributor. What did Hillary sell for the money?

Yemen paid for Clinton's executive orders that required thousands, 312,000 to be exact, girls to become sexual slaves. Breitbart has covered this. Clinton was indicted and convicted; this is a matter of record which Breitbart has also exhaustively covered.

NuttBoxer says

So forget Benghazi, forget the aiding and abetting of a serial rapist, forget the insecure email server, and just focus on this one email.

Hard to forget the Benghazi indictment and conviction. Hard to forget Bill's rape conviction and the sentence he's still serving. Breitbart has covered all of this. You're just asking too much.

Blurtman says

That is not proof. Evidence might include photos of the alleged rape, e-mails from Epstein and Trump, etc. Try again.

The photos of Bill Clinton raping all those women set a precedent the Trump apologists rightly demand!. Just because Trump was smart enough to destroy so many emails over the years doesn't make him guilty of anything. Losers!

I'm thinking of voting for Hillary too.
I hear she pets her dog!

BTW. It's not like she'd be philanthropic towards Noori and then NOT... mention her on the campaign?... in a debate? ... in the State Of The Union address?

If anything, the story proves focusing in to close on a systemic problem isn't the answer. Neither is the almighty dollar (when dad spends it).

I'm sure if I rummage around the "Made by" labels your house I'd find some "Made In China" ones.
What do Chinese do regularly to babies when they discover they are girls?
Have you posted anything about Chinese attitude to baby girls?
But you buy their stuff no problem!

Who's the hypocrite now?

neplusultra57 says

The photos of Bill Clinton raping that women

Just FYI Patrick, edit button is appearing on everyone's post. Glitch no doubt.

But seriously, Bill is not running, and you are not seriously equating the rape of a woman to the rape of 12 and 13 year olds are you? There are degrees of evil, and Trump is extending evil beyond what is embarrassing to even mention.

And according to the testimony the 12 year old disappeared under disturbing circumstances.

neplusultra57 says

. Breitbart has covered this.

Breitbart wants a race war. You can't take that website seriously. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/08/27/breitbart-news-posts-factual-headline-about-race-war-execution-internet-melts-down/

And, of course, Breitbart failed to post this second picture of a woman supposedly shot point blank by a glock, running away and before that being interested in crisis makeup: Oh, and the video of the event shows the glock not ejecting cartridges, which would have jammed the gun, only they were blanks.

neplusultra57 says

The photos of Bill Clinton raping all those women set a precedent the Trump apologists rightly demand!. Just because Trump was smart enough to destroy so many emails over the years doesn't make him guilty of anything.

You are shooting at the wrong target. Bill raping women is really not the issue and therefore proof of Bill's alleged rapes is irrelevant. Hillary's own words discrediting and attacking Bill's accusers and the hypocrisy of her statement that rape victims must be believed is quite relevant. It seems to be a lesson that the unethical constantly miss. Here is an analogy that might make this more understandable:

Doubts about a rape is to discrediting and attacking the rape victims as doubts about an actual crime is to thwarting an investigation.

NuttBoxer says

So forget Benghazi

We don't expect you to forget your programming.

We also don't expect you to think about the fact that dozens of attacks of embassies, or the huge lebanon barracks that was attacked in 1983, or even 9/11 which Bush had many explicit warnings about, are ever blamed on politicians. Oh, but Hillary was involved in possibly incorrect speculation about who did the Benghazi attacks for two days afterward ? Wtf ? Somehow Benghazi is Hillary's fault. But none of these other events have ever been publicly blamed on a politician or a general. How does this make sense to you ?

If you guys were capable of seeing the big picture objectively, you would see what utter fools you make of yourself. You're a bunch of children in a bubble.

Damn america!
People have the right to vote for one of the equal EVILS!
And Dumbasses will.
Those that aren't,what's your excuse?

HydroCabron says

Can you think up some better facts about Hillary

You make no sense.

YesYNot says

That bitch didn't save them all. If you cannot save them all, then by God, you'd better not save just one.

Just don't start wars.

No warmongering would do

FP says

HydroCabron says

Can you think up some better facts about Hillary

You make no sense.

I got it. He was referring to this "fact:"

FP says

at the same time condemning thousands of other girls to sexual slavery and poverty. How come?

I think this goes with Hillary and Obama creating ISIS. Which comes from the same people that would have said we need to get out of Iraq a few years earlier. You people are such simpletons.

Gary Anderson says

You are talking about Bill and Epstein? Well, at least Clinton didn't rape the girls. Trump, and a witness employed by Epstein said, he has raped a 13 year old according to the witness.

The classic "lesser evil" argument. How about no evil, ever thought of that?

NuttBoxer says

The classic "lesser evil" argument. How about no evil, ever thought of that?

It's call Jill Stein. But we're too stupid to vote for her.

FP says

Just don't start wars.

Trumps wants to bomb the fuck out of them. He wanted to go to war in Iraq. He wanted to intervene in Libya.

marcus is NOT deplorable says

We don't expect you to forget your programming.

Anything that's not left/right causes you to throw 500's, might want to debug that...

marcus is NOT deplorable says

But none of these other events have ever been publicly blamed on a politician or a general.

Let's blame them all. All Clintons, Obama, All Bush's, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, LBJ, FDR, Teddy, Hoover, Wilson. All morons, all contributed to making this country worse.

Feel better now? Guess not since I don't play your false paradigm game and try to justify Bush or some other evil asshole. Maybe you should think about doing the same. You know, not justifying evil assholes...

"The classic "lesser evil" argument. How about no evil, ever thought of that?"

Unfortunately, that candidate isn't running.

marcus is NOT deplorable says

I think this goes with Hillary and Obama creating ISIS. Which comes from the same people that would have said we need to get out of Iraq a few years earlier. You people are such simpletons.

Not only ISIS, pussy liberal

YesYNot says

Trumps wants to bomb the fuck out of them. He wanted to go to war in Iraq. He wanted to intervene in Libya

How big is your head?

From http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/
>>
Epstein likes to tell people that he's a loner, a man who's never touched alcohol or drugs, and one whose nightlife is far from energetic. And yet if you talk to Donald Trump, a different Epstein emerges. "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,'' Trump booms from a speakerphone. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life."

Tampajoe says

Unfortunately, that candidate isn't running.

Yes they are, you just don't have the sack to write them in.

Gary Anderson says

I doubt if someone would risk her life to give this testimony without a sense of moral duty to do so.

How is she risking a damn thing? Signing a fake name to a manufactured document is hardly an act of bravery. For all we know, the plaintiff is Podesta of the HRC campaign.

Blurtman says

You are shooting at the wrong target.

As if anyone is stupid enough to let you set the target.

Blurtman says

It seems to be a lesson that the unethical constantly miss.

Unethical? That’s rich coming from you. You willfully substitute “rape” for “accusation” for Bill but not for the #DoucheBag. You willfully substitute “rape victims” for Bill’s accusers but not for the DoucheBag’s. You willfully substitute “actual” for “alleged” in Bill’s case but not for the #DoucheBag.

Needs to be cleaned up to be both “more understandable” and less full of bullshit: “Doubts about a rape an accusation is to discrediting and attacking the rape victims accuser as doubts about an actual crime allegation is to thwarting an investigation.”

Now you get this nugget of nothingness, typical of your fictive “journalism”: “Doubts about an accusation is to discrediting and attacking the accuser as doubts about an allegation is to thwarting an investigation?”

I don’t blame you for still nurturing your Bernie Butthurt. Just don’t presume it passes for an objective criticism of the remaining candidates.

Blurtman says

Bill raping women is really not the issue

Correct. But it's your issue because it underlies and underpins your bullshit analogy. If it ain't Bill it ain't Hill and there's no "thwarting", and you're left with your head up your ass. So by saying it's not the issue makes you the fool. What's your target Blurty, fool or head-up-the-ass?