by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 76,891 - 76,930 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
massive infrastructure spending.
"Show me the money!"
Trick Question: From where does the money suddenly appear?
Maybe other programs?
T.Q #2 From where does the money in other programs suddenly appear?Borrowing.
I'm glad it didn't come from any american's tax burden. lol
Hey You is so damn slooooow.
We don't need any taxes.
We can borrow the money.
Trump will eliminate all taxes.
GREATEST! PRESIDENT!,EVER!
Make Ameirca Great Again. there's an App for that! Who knew?
Thunderlips Licks Shill Tears says
Let's just hope the liberals learn something. So far, they're hamstering their asses off, blaming whiteness, white women, etc. instead of tight relationship with Banks, Outsourcing and Uncontrolled Borders.
Leftists, not liberals. Remember, we liberals hated the Bush and Obama administration, and we hate both Trump and Hillary. And pretty much for all the same reasons, at least for three of those.
Liberals are the Bernie or Bust people and the Jill Stein people. And it looks like most of the Bernie or Bust people just stayed home, which is why voter turnout was so low and the Republicans took both chambers of Congress. They aren't the ones crying today.
Even you observe that Trump's electorate base are people who are celebrating mostly their emotional buttons getting pushed and others observed they all want to join hands to scream out a big "FUCK YOU" to their mostly miserable plights of lost homes, retirements, careers, etc. and "FUCK YOU" to the poor people who have been continually thrown in their faces to account for the big drain on their lives.
I don't think I said that. I see a tremendous number of people blaming Trump on idiots, racists, uneducated, etc... And you now "emotional buttons getting pushed".
All these people are stuck in their bubbles and refusing to recognize that there is indeed a real problem that is not due to people being emotional and idiots. The middle class is rapidly disappearing and leaving behind 60% poor, maybe only the top 20% actually ok, and the top 0.1% making up like bandits.
As far as what I said above, this is clear: Trump has shown himself a far more competent campaigner than most thought he would.
But now the campaign is over, this is a different bull game: actual policy, administration and DC politics sausage making.
If congress republicans think they will continue their game and change nothing - which they will almost certainly do - then we may well be going toward a national catastrophe.
If congress republicans think they will continue their game and change nothing - which they will almost certainly do - then we may well be going toward a national catastrophe
The sooner we pay the piper, the more likely we can actually afford the bill.
wait that only adds up to 80.1%
The remaining are struggling between poor and ok.
If congress republicans think they will continue their game and change nothing - which they will almost certainly do - then we may well be going toward a national catastrophe
The sooner we pay the piper, the more likely we can actually afford the bill.
We are never going to pay the bill.
Liberals are the Bernie or Bust people and the Jill Stein people. And it looks like most of the Bernie or Bust people just stayed home, which is why voter turnout was so low and the Republicans took both chambers of Congress. They aren't the ones crying today.
This in from Bernie :
Trump's first order of business is discipline for the Ryan-McConnell wing. He saved the GOP's bacon this year.
Very clear why education is now a major priority for Dems.
Then how come there are no economically disadvantaged kids going to school in your neighborhood?
Russia and Syria have publicly announced wanting peace with US. DOW is at record level. Canada announces they are willing to renegotiate NAFTA with the US. It's only been two days.WINNING!
Russia and Syria have publicly announced wanting peace with US. DOW is at record level. Canada announces they are willing to renegotiate NAFTA with the US. It's only been two days.WINNING!
Perhaps Trump is the first president who can hang a "Mission Accomplished" during his inauguration ceremony?
http://www.politico.eu/article/yes-president-marine-le-pen-is-now-more-possible-trump-clinton/
Yes, President Marine Le Pen is now more possible
The underlying trends that carried Trump to power are also present in France, and they are likely to fuel an inordinately strong performance by Le Pen next May — perhaps even her victory.
I gotta catch up with this thread, but Ima gonna leave this here:
Denial ain't a river in Egypt, "Centrist" Democrats:
http://www.politico.eu/article/yes-president-marine-le-pen-is-now-more-possible-trump-clinton/
Yes, President Marine Le Pen is now more possible
The underlying trends that carried Trump to power are also present in France, and they are likely to fuel an inordinately strong performance by Le Pen next May — perhaps even her victory.
So, the post-war powers will still have two women leaders in 2017.
Am I drunk or something? Marine Le Pen's current odds on PredictIt is BETTER than Trump's on Monday.
The French are leftists. They would never elect Trump. It's extremely unlikely that Le Pen could pass the 50% of votes in the runoff.
Le Pen is a leftist by US standard.
It's no surprise that Hillary lost and Bernie would have won. Pick the most hated senator instead of the most liked one? And pick the establishment candidate over the anti-establishment on during the biggest anti-establishment election in U.S. history? Stupid doesn't begin to cover this.
It's no surprise that Hillary lost and Bernie would have won. Pick the most hated senator instead of the most liked one? And pick the establishment candidate over the anti-establishment on during the biggest anti-establishment election in U.S. history? Stupid doesn't begin to cover this.
======================
They just wanted the next president to be a woman so bad that they were blind to everything else. The ends justified the means.
They just wanted the next president to be a woman so bad that they were blind to everything else. The ends justified the means
Ivanka 2024?
It's no surprise that Hillary lost and Bernie would have won.
woulda coulda shoulda. Get over it.
Ivanka 2024?
Vs Chelsea?
LOL! If Trump is still president in 2024 then it is going to be Mike Pence on the ticket.
WTF would you have us learn? That Ayn Rand rules? That trickle down is the greatest economic theory ever? That's a far cry from the guarantees we and even taxpayers abroad are subsidizing for the .1% who appoint themselves as winners via political donations.
How about "Don't take money from Wall Street and Banks for speeches and appearances moments before you announce your Presidential Campaign"
You beat me to it! Ivanka v. Chelsea... I want Dan to be happy, too. Maybe Taylor Swift can be the 3rd party candidate.
Even you observe that Trump's electorate base are people who are celebrating mostly their emotional buttons getting pushed and others observed they all want to join hands to scream out a big "FUCK YOU" to their mostly miserable plights of lost homes, retirements, careers, etc. and "FUCK YOU" to the poor people who have been continually thrown in their faces to account for the big drain on their lives.
Yeah, I totally see this right now with all the blue haired SJWs running around in the streets like chickens with their heads cut off.
You beat me to it! Ivanka v. Chelsea... I want Dan to be happy, too. Maybe Taylor Swift can be the 3rd party candidate.
I'm sure he prefers Scarlet Johanssen.
Ivanka the Beautiful, the exact opposite of Ivan the Terrible.
APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says
Margot Gerster, who ran into Hillary Clinton on a hike just a day after she conceded the race
Margot's lucky. I just ran into Anthony Weiner while on a hike. He took a selfie with me, which wouldn't have been bad if he had been wearing pants.
APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says
The photo was snapped by former President Bill Clinton, who was there as well.
After Bill took the photo he said, "OK, ladies, now one kissing.".
When they write about the causes of WW3 it will read: economic hardship, due to wealth disparity, ushered in scapegoating against others and nations became gripped by nationalism. In the guise of people's champions, populist figures rose to power on the fear and nationalism swaying the people. But, because no elected leaders removed the economic imbalances, reduced monied influence in government, and applied true progressive tax systems, the economic hardships continued into depression. Nationalism and depression lead to inevitable war, as the only thing leaders had to blame, to unify their populations and maintain power, was neighboring nation states that were once their strongest global trade partners.
Nationalism, Racisim, Islamaphobia, Anti-Intellectualism : these are merely the outward symptoms/manifestations of the economic woes, the disenfranchised voice, of the rural/non-market-competitive whites.
#notmypresident is wrong. He is your president and yes, there will be massive upticks in hate crimes. Yes, he is a bigoted bafoon. I understand that your "leader" spoke out against you directly.
But that's actually not really the fight. The problem is not going away by drum circles and tolerance training. The battle isn't against hate. Hate is a runny nose, a cough, a motivator.
The problem gets addressed when Sanders version 2.0 comes and removes Citizens United, ushers in massive campaign finance reform, and actually gets money into people's hands at the expense of the 1%.That may be a candidate to unify the nation.
"Pussy grabbing", and the like, is a complete sideshow issue, though I do understand the protests right now.
Do you understand the nationalism sweeping the world?
IMO, the major take-away for Democrats is that you cannot win an election by focusing on racism or sexism. If the majority just don't care about that even with a candidate like Donald, just forget about that play.
Maybe, they should have focused more on the environment. I also think that Hillary made a mistake refusing to defend what she likes about free trade. By failing to defend what she likes about the issue, she just looked like a duplicitous tool.
I wonder what the Green party is thinking today. Maybe they think Hillary would be just as bad, and also think about appointing a climate change denier to head the EPA. Maybe Stein will be comforted by Donald's lack of respect for science. They overlap a bit there.
They just wanted the next president to be a woman so bad that they were blind to everything else.
Maybe there was some of this, but imho mostly Hillary wanted Hillary to be president and the establishment complied.
IMO, the major take-away for Democrats is that you cannot win an election by focusing on racism or sexism. If the majority just don't care about that even with a candidate like Donald, just forget about that play.
Maybe, they should have focused more on the environment. I also think that Hillary made a mistake refusing to defend what she likes about free trade. By failing to defend what she likes about the issue, she just looked like a duplicitous tool.
The Democrats should have focused more on terrorism, and less on locker room talk.
« First « Previous Comments 76,891 - 76,930 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,117 comments by 14,896 users - Blue, Karloff, KgK one, The_Deplorable online now