Thread for orphaned comments
invite response
2005 Apr 11, 5:00pm 183,829 views 117,730 comments
by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 78,291 - 78,330 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Personally I think it's disgusting that political hacks appointed by Obama would put such doubts on US Elections to help his Party's Candidate.
To help his party's candidate? How is this helping Clinton? She lost. And there is zero chance she will ever hold any other office in the future. She'd probably like this whole issue to go away.
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Dec 18, 4:28pm
What context? wtf are you talking about.
The context in that joint statement.
To help his party's candidate? How is this helping Clinton? She lost. And there is zero chance she will ever hold any other office in the future. She'd probably like this whole issue to go away.
The hacking allegations began long before the elections.
She lost, because she was a shitty candidate who called a huge portion of America "Deplorable", and whose henchmen and supporters who contributed to the great fuckup loss, don't want to blame themselves.
The hacking allegations began long before the elections.
Obviously--because the hacking began long before the elections.
She lost, because she was a shitty candidate who called a huge portion of America "Deplorable", and whose henchmen and supporters who contributed to the great fuckup loss, don't want to blame themselves.
Yep--that's clearly a large reason that she lost. Does that make it OK or a foreign State to hack private emails in an attempt to influence our elections?
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Dec 18, 4:31pm
Here's more context from the Obama appointees:
As you can see, it's utterly evidence free. Only "Confident" and "Suspect" and "Consistent with Motivations".
Do you think handing out cookies to anti-government protesters calling for unconstitutional elections by Ambassadors and State Department Officials is interference in an election?
Here's more context from the Obama appointees:
As you can see, it's utterly evidence free. Only "Confident" and "Suspect" and "Consistent with Motivations".
Yep--the point of that release wasn't to provide evidence or even convince anyone that the Russians were behind it. The point was to reassure people that the actual voting results are legit.
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Dec 18, 4:34pm
Yep--that's clearly a large reason that she lost. Does that make it OK or a foreign State to hack private emails in an attempt to influence our elections?
There's no evidence - only assertions about possible methods and motivations - that it happened.
If it did, Russia should get the Pulitzer Prize.
Personally, this kind of complicated of hacking into "Pa$$w0rd" protected systems could only done by one man, expert in Electronic Warfare and Love Rockets.
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Dec 18, 4:36pm
Yep--the point of that release wasn't to provide evidence or even convince anyone that the Russians were behind it. The point was to reassure people that the actual voting results are legit.
Yep, I'm glad the people had full context, and the minorities didn't trust Ms. Bring them to Heel, the co-inventor of private prisons and school-to-prison pipelines with her Husband, Bill.
www.youtube.com/embed/wQ4PYVATBac
I'm glad nuclear war was averted, because Hillary has a record of horrible judgement in politics generally, and especially in foreign affairs.
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Dec 18, 4:43pm
False dichotomy. Wikipedia articles have been controlled for over a decade by various well-funded government and private organizations as I have detailed above. There's a big difference between intentional, systematic deception and human error. If you cannot detect that you are being fooled, then you are simply even more foolish.
What ever happened to wikiscanner?
I think they caught a lot of IPs in Alexandria, VA editing "Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction" Articles. Because the CIA never lies.
Of course, since then they've gotten smart enough to use VPNs.
I'm glad nuclear war was averted, because Hillary has a record of horrible judgement in politics generally, and especially in foreign affairs.
Unfortunately, so does the Donald. Supporting the Iraq War, buying NJ casinos, refusing to rent apartments to blacks.
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Dec 18, 5:00pm
The first one is a PRATT. The second is proof that Trump isn't clairvoyant, and the third happened in the 70s.
Does Hillary personally support gay marriage yet?
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2631
Yeah right. Trump didn't rent some apartments to blacks in the 70s. Most of the virtue signaling armchair quarterbacks themselves would have probably run around in kkk robes back then. Or under the Nazi regime they would have been perfect blockwart snitches, but in their imagination they would have all been resistance fighters. Sure thing. But zomg! Trump didn't rent some apartments to people he didn't want to rent it to!! Next.
MisdemeanorRebel
2016 Dec 18, 5:09pm
@mell
What we are seeing is the transition between the 'bargaining' and 'acceptance' phase of Grief.
"If we can prove it was Russian Hackers..."
The acceptance phase is on the way.
Ceffer
2016 Dec 18, 5:17pm
That does it. We need to screen our civil servants to have a median IQ of 90 instead of 80.
Strategist
2016 Dec 18, 5:23pm
Among the data potentially accessed were names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, financial information and medical records
Here comes ID theft. Those Nigerians are smarter than i thought. Or should i say.......Americans are more stupid than i thought.
Patrick
2016 Dec 18, 5:34pm
The first one is a PRATT.
Previously Refuted A Thousand Times
Had to look it up.
Strategist
2016 Dec 18, 5:38pm
Unfortunately, so does the Donald. Supporting the Iraq War, buying NJ casinos, refusing to rent apartments to blacks.
What about....
Supporting the destruction of ISIS, selling NJ casino, renting to the rich?
Tenpoundbass
2016 Dec 18, 5:45pm
www.youtube.com/embed/TlqKFlU7YAs
At the first Presidential debate, Garrison speaks from the heart and tries to convince everyone to vote for his opponent.
DIE! Democratic voters. NOW!
LIVE FOUR YEARS REPUBLICAN VOTERS!
After the inauguration you will want to commit suicide.
All the attacks rightwingnuts have used on Dumbass Democrats will
look like a kindergarten party compared to what is about to happen to TRUMPNUTS
Need a little example?
Clinton at the $7.5 million Bennygazi committee said:What difference does it make?
And she took the heat as if she was a murderer.
Well,well what do we have here?
It doesn't matter if a global power interferes with america.
Destroying america is what trump voters want.
This is the the same party that allowed DEATH & DESTRUCTION ON 9/11.
There are just more retards coming out of the closet & exposing their STUPIDITY by voting for
their GOD tRUMP.
" Donald Trump's top aides on Sunday said the president-elect isn't ready to accept the finding by intelligence officials that Moscow hacked Democratic emails in a bid to elevate Trump."
How many of the same stupid fuck trump voters believed IRAQ HAS WMD?
We need to screen our civil servants to have a median IQ of 90 instead of 80.
There aren't any Trump voters in civil service. Their top IQ is -4 and
they would never accept any SOCIALIZED TAX DOLLARS for pay or pensions.
They would never join a private or public/govt. union.
SORRY SCUM!
PLENIPOTENTIARY!
BLASPHEMY! BLASPHEMY!
tRUMP IS GOD,ask his voters.
zzyzzx
2016 Dec 18, 7:08pm
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/hillary-clinton-lost-laptop-computer-emails-mail/
Hillary Clinton Lost a Laptop Computer with Her Emails on It in the Mail
zzyzzx
2016 Dec 18, 7:09pm
We need to screen our civil servants to have a median IQ of 90 instead of 80.
You will get complaints from Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton.
FortWayne
2016 Dec 18, 9:31pm
whatever... it's all Putins fault anyway...
Just don't remind Democrats that all their pretend "Putins fault" is happening on Obamas watch, him being a POTUS and all. DNC are so bad at fake news, they don't even see how bad their own crap makes them look. Blind fools they are.
Dan8267
2016 Dec 18, 9:38pm
Don't worry, Trump found another marching band he likes better anyway.
www.youtube.com/embed/aB86NY6CGiE
WTF was that ending?
Americans are more stupid than i thought.
You weren't aware trump was elected president?
"The first one is a PRATT. The second is proof that Trump isn't clairvoyant, and the third happened in the 70s."
I'd call it PRATTIYM. I like the clairvoyant one--that is a perfect example of Trump supporters. Clinton did something--Holy Shit!!!! Trump did something--eh, he's not clairvoyant, after all. Yep, his racist attitudes can be traced back to the 70s.
Tenpoundbass
2016 Dec 19, 5:28am
So much so that they practically hid their candidate while waiting for her pronouncement as president.
Aint that the Damned Truth!?
FuckTheMainstreamMedia
2016 Dec 19, 6:01am
It's very obvious...and super obvious that the Democrat shills here have bought into it hook line and sinker. There's about 5 MSNBC parrots that post here and it's like the don't even recognize they're spewing propaganda.
lostand confused
2016 Dec 19, 6:02am
I guess racist, sexist, misogynist did not work-so now blame the Russians. This gives an idea of the leftie mindset. heck last year, i think the Chinese hacked into our gubmnt and took allt he info of our intelligence officers, their addresses. I guess obama probably just told them to cut it out. Imbeciles-the lefties.
What did Obama do when the Cuban President refused to greet him or the Chinese refused to give him stairs from Air Force one and humiliated him??? Now suddenly he talks about Russia-the pig.
It looks like we have “fake†news mixed up with “real†news again.
Wow, "real" news from the investmentwatchdog (a major news powerhouse with a whopping 40k hits a month) that says that a "cia analyst" (any documentation strangely missing) told true pundit (the same true pundit who's exclusive inside FBI sources lead to a major breaking "real" news story by true pundit that there was a pedophile money laundering ring run by hillary out of a pizzia parlor in DC. Still waiting for the indictments on that one) the washington post was an outright lie.
Fuck CIC you really outdid yourself. This is the funniest shit you've come up with in years. You and ten pound are a constant source of LOL level amusement. Curiosity overwhelms me, are you two a couple or something? The patnet butt bros. Any progress on the ebola story? Any good animal sex fantasies lately? You've only been posting 19 hours a day, slowing down as you get older?
The first one is a PRATT.
Previously Refuted A Thousand Times
How can something be refuted when there is the stern interview of him saying he supported it? WTF? Is the steve jobs alternative reality field now the trump alternative reality field?
I know this won't constitute evidence in the Trumpkin's minds, but I'll post it anyway.
"But, Harvey said, the clearest evidence was the IP address that that malicious software used to phone home.
“It was an IP address that had been previously seen in other Russian-attributed attacks, including the German parliament, the Bundestag, they encountered a breach last year with the same malware, the same IP address, and then also attributed to the Russians,†he said."
I know, I know--the IP address is only relevant when it's the DHS hacking into Georgia's computers. In the case of Russia, it means nothing.
This person makes a good point,
The point was that cic believes that the WPO is liars because his much more reliable news sources investmentwathdog/truepundit say so.
The Democrats did that all by themselves.
Yes they did and the republicans did that all by themselves also. Even with all the negative hillary press trump barely took the election against the most widely despised candidate to ever run. Just because the dems put up just a shitty a candidate as the reps doesn't mean the election wasn't influenced. Of course it was. Did hillary deserve it? Absolutely. Her own ego and arrogance came back to bite her in the ass. Should it have come from a foreign hack? Absolutely not.
If the dirty laundry was going to be out there then we should have seen all of it including the RNC and trumps campaign then decided which was worse. Anyone that says seeing everything from the dems and nothing from the reps didn't affect the election is an idiot.
Come on, Bullshit Bobby, we really don't want to know what you're doing out in the barn.
Lone Ranger: Tonto look at all those indians attacking us, we are in trouble.
Tonto: Who be we white man?
There is no we. Only your fantasy of animal sex that seems to get into every post. Do you still subscribe to bovine monthly and drool over udder of the month?
« First « Previous Comments 78,291 - 78,330 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,459 comments by 14,886 users - Booger, Ceffer, Dholliday126, ElYorsh, Minime online now