by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 78,487 - 78,526 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Let my try to explain.
It's really very simple
IGNORANT REDNECK WHITE TRASH!
What's funny about Yasmin is that she was lying to cover up why she wasn't back home in time for her Curfew.
Because the Hijab and Islam is compatible with progressive feminism, with adult women having curfews.
It's painful to see how divided this nation is. Let me be clear....
-Trump is going bend the nation over and have his way with it.
-Hillary would have also screwed the nation.. maybe somewhat slower and with more PC'ness.
Google Mark Blyth...he explains how the establishment has been screwing over Americans for the last 30 years. This includes both the democrat and republican administrations.
Meanwhile everyone continues to bicker....
ALL 62+ MILLION Trump voters are racists..
Why post something that everyone knows?
Fucking racists. Hey, some of Trump racist voters are Black.
That's not true. States would lose representation because in your fantasy land, a few states would overrun the rest. Remember what I said about groupthink? You'd also lose the competition and diversity of ideas that all 50 states contribute to.
Question for all....Do we as a country need States? why not just have counties and cities? What real purpose do States serve?
Question for all....Do we as a country need States? why not just have counties and cities? What real purpose do States serve?
Good question. I think States exist to allow different ideas and laws to co-exist under one nation. Having all laws be applied to the entire national population would create too much national bitterness and divisiveness. Today, the federal gov't has way too much power IMO, which is why the country is so pissed and divided every time a President gets elected. If we drastically reduced power at the federal level and left more power to the states and municipalities (like it used to be), the country wouldn't be so pissed.
Boy, that doesn't look like a digital photograph.
What year was this?
When was the last act of fatal terrorism committed by a KKK group?
Who and when was the most fatalities of any terror attack in US history for what reason?
Who and when took part in the worst shooting in US History for what reason?
How long ago were they?
Thanks for your answers in advance. Just want to keep things in perspective.
#4. 90% of blacks voting Democrat, regardless of the candidate because they know their check comes from a white man. The same can be said about unions.
Grab them by the pussy Trump says
The subject bombings occurred in 1970 well before the lynching of Michael Donald in 1981.
So 35 years ago.
Grab them by the pussy Trump says
FYI The Klan is more popular today than ever.
Nope. Church of Satan has more members than KKK Groups. When was the last time you heard about the growth of Satanism?
Grab them by the pussy Trump says
The picture is from the 1915 mainstream hit movie classic
100 years ago. For fun triggering of the handful of actual White Supremacists, mention they took no Catholics and especially not Irish or Italians.
Grab them by the pussy Trump says
Look at North Carolina. The financial powers see no reason to allow any challenge to their supremecy. Look at South Dakota how police were brought in from several states all at your own expense for the single purpose of torturing protestors for the benefit of Koch-backed and GTBTP Trump-backed oil profit efficiencies.
Obama is the President. Where is he? You know that Hillary was a fanatical fracker, right? She pushed it in Poland, even, as SOS.
Any answers to my questions about who killed recently and for what reason?
You do know that in the US, that Islam is the main cause of terrorism fatalities, and all other causes combined - from pro-life to tax to ultraleftwing activism - is less than half of Islamic causes. Muslims make up no more than 2% of the population at best, whereas the US is at least 2/3 Christian of some kind.
That's not including the Beltway Snipers, who were Muslims, whose diaries were full of Koranic quotes, and who gave Islam as their reason - not classified by the FBI as Islamic Terror mostly to protect George W Bush's "legacy".
Yeah, it looks like it's Bush 2.
Wikileaks will probably leak something Trump related in the next few years, and will magically become a Freedom and Transparency Hero Outfit again, as opposed to the Evil Russian front they are today (whereas 10 years ago, they were Heroes).
Grab them by the pussy Trump says
sought support for the device in 2013 from a Ku Klux Klan grand wizard in North Carolina who was an FBI informant.
Key word: SOUGHT
Other key words: FBI Informant.
Of course, this is one Right Wing White from a pool of 2/3 of the population, compared to a far greater number of terrorists from the less than 2% Muslim population who have killed twice as many Americans since 9/11 than all other causes combined.
Grab them by the pussy Trump says
Investigators began tracking Crawford in 2012 after he approached two local Jewish groups with his idea for how they could defeat their enemies using a mobile X-ray weapon. Prosecutors said Crawford also sought support for the device in 2013 from a Ku Klux Klan grand wizard in North Carolina who was an FBI informant.
Don't know how much a white supremacist he is, then. A Mobile X-ray weapon?
How come when a Terrorist and gang of snipers pledges their life to ISIS/Al Qaeda, we get every excuse for why he was "really nuts" or "Struggling with being gay".
But when it's clearly a mentally ill man who thinks he can make an X-ray weapon, and approaches BOTH Jewish Groups and the KKK, it's only right wing extremism.
Grab them by the pussy Trump says
80 Americans were killed in terrorist attacks from 2004 to 2013
Nice Cherry Picked Dates!
What happened in December 2015 and in June 2016?
The New America Foundation is funded by George Soros
I did a long post on this using the FBI's official numbers (which don't count the Beltway snipers as Islamic Terror) a few months back, I think even before the Islamist Nightclub Shooting in Orlando, and there were more deaths from Islamists than Right Wingers.
Which is shocking when you consider the potential source material for White Conservatives is at least 65% of the country, whereas the source material for Islamic Attacks is less than 2% of the country. The Islamic body count is even more distorted when fatalities from Islamic Terror outnumber all fatalities from ALL other causes, not just Right Wing.
Again, as I noted in the introduction, this is not to dismiss the threat of right wing terrorism and its very deadly consequences for some, but only to add perspective to the claims being made. Right wing terrorism is more deadly for Americans only if you add a number of very limiting parameters (e.g. excluding the victims of 9/11, ignoring “lone wolf†attacks without solid connections to groups like al-Qaeda and their affiliates, etc…). But if you lift those limitations, and apply equal standards, then the raw and unfiltered numbers of deaths of Americans due to Islamic extremism in the United States over the last fifteen years dwarf the numbers attributable to right wing extremism by a ratio of over 62 to 1. Even if you leave out 9/11 victims and just focus on the ideological statements and goals of the attackers, then the deaths of Americans due to Islamic extremism still outnumber the deaths attributable to right wingers (which reveals an even greater disparity when compared with population groups). If we move beyond America’s borders, then the disparity becomes far greater, with somewhere around 90% of the world’s terrorism related deaths attributable to Islamic extremism, and only a fraction of 1% attributable to right wing extremism.
I don't hate you. I think you often make good points. I just think you're letting emotion get the better of you as a result of the election, versus looking at both positives and negatives related to a Trump presidency.
Here is the Thread:
https://patrick.net/Violent+Terror+Attacks+in+the+USA+since+911
The greatest terrorist act is Democrats & Republicans voting.
They are 'clearly mentally ill'.
He has the right to keep & bear arms. The 2nd Amendment does not restrict
the "arms" that one has the right to protect america with.
Why do you HATE THE CONSTITUTION & FREEDOM?
They came to take his FREEDOM.They will be coming for yours.
Is there a polite way to grab pussy, that is politically correct and that shows both decorum and manners?
Maybe after Trumpligula's reign, women will feel insulted if you DON'T grab them by the pussy.
That's what's so great about the fair sex. If you aren't committing a crime of commission, then you are guilty of a crime of omission. The greatest crime is the crime of emission without permission.
Yeah, cable TV being less popular has done zero to diminish demand for high speed internet. In fact you didn't really need great internet if you had cable TV, but if you're going to be streaming a lot of content as an alternative to cable TV, then you must have high speed internet, and cable companies are the major providers of high speed internet.
The problem with using the cable or phone companies as an example is that installation of infrastructure is needed and requires more regulation as to who can use it and for what. So, consolidation of these types of companies can make sense because of the infrastructure complexity issue, but that means we'd have to regulate them more like a utility so that price-gouging doesn't occur. With the advent of satellite TV and cellullar, this is changing because fiber/cable/phone lines to the neighborhood are no longer required, however, satellites and cell towers are now the focus of "who owns what rights to use it".
I think it's hard to apply the same principles from the cable/phone industry, which operates more like a utility, to the healthcare industry. Different animals that require different regulation (or lack thereof).
ONE NATION! under TRUMPLIGULA! with LIBERTY! & JUSTICE! for the 0.01%!
TRUMPLIGULA'S GREAT COMMANDMENT:
SOCIALISM for the 0.01%,CAPITALISM for the REST!
I don't have any links but I am inclined to believe that there are more rapes unreported in India than there are false accusations.
That's what I'd expect too.
Trump supporters are turning out to be the biggest hypocrites in history.
Yawn...
Who's the dumb motherfucker that honestly believes that any charity is actually a charity. With the sole purpose of being a charity?
Who's the stupid ass dipshit that honestly believes that?
Every Charity is a front for other stupid shit, Trump didn't invent that, but if it bothers you so bad. I'm sure that he can put a stop to it. And pass laws where every cent has to go to a Charity. A charity should be a charity. Everyone involved should be donating their time and money. You don't draw a salary from a damned charity. And Charities shouldn't have "Operating" costs. It's a damned sham. They partner with companies that charge them for the services they provide. The third party company gets to take a write off and look like they are philanthropist when in reality they are only opportunists.
I want to kick the shit out of everyone on the screen when I'm watching the 6 OClock news, and they do a report about a baby from Haiti born with a cleft pallet, or conjoined twins they'll die if we don't donate huge sums of money so those capable doctors in a capable facility that they are already at can perform those procedures.
The same when they do a news report at a veterinarian clinic where an animal was abused and they are pleading for public donations. Is that Vet not capable to save the dogs life? Get to work you opportunistic asshole.
Charity begins at home. If you can't must up any charitable spirit by doing your charity work for free, then don't expect me to donate to you.
I'm not going to start Prosecuting Trump over Charity now, not after watching the Liberals yawn over Hillary selling our country to the Saudis and Russia through her charity.
ALL! CHARITABLE! DOLLARS! ARE! BELONG! TO! TRUMPLIGULA!
Why should he spend the contributions on a bunch of losers when they could be used to eclipse the sun with his greatness.
Somehow our society shifted from "innocent until proven guilty" to "guilty until proven innocent". At least when it comes to a female accusing a male, that's how it seems culturally. There really should be a very significant punishment for false accusations, something liberals are against.
If men weren't fulsome, charming liars to gain access to zipless, shallow sex, then flinging the women off with abandon, they wouldn't be men. Disgusting dogs and pervs.
Women DEMAND that men lie, and then treat the lies as a binding contract. Uh, oh!
How come in the movies, the women disappear with the blessed seed, never bother the guy except for perpetual, dewy eyed gratitude that they were his temporary fuck-objects, unless to appear 25 years later with a fully grown and supported child who is a wonder of pride and joy, meets dad and never asks for a dime except for some tiny shred of acknowledgement?
« First « Previous Comments 78,487 - 78,526 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,534 comments by 14,886 users - ForcedTQ online now