by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 82,052 - 82,091 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Any consequence of Trump / EPA for ARLP?
Good question, I've been wondering why ARLP isn't making me any money lately.
I see mostly "buy" or "strong buy" ratings...yet, it keeps dropping...So far I have been buying on every $ down move. Although, yesterdays 4.5% down opening I missed.
I don't quite get whats not to like about a 50% surprise earnings company with a 8.3% (as of today) dividend.
We will not let a dictator come to power
He was kept pretty well in check this week. It's really just phony hysteria.
So you claim he's hitler and a dictator fascist threat to our civilization with his despotic ways. Aaaand then the next week you complain that he can't get anything done because he's following the constitution and people in other branches of government are opposing him.
If Trump is a dictator, he's the weakest one ever!
Ya'all need to get your "narrative" straight. The one you're running with doesn't make a lick of sense and is getting awful Neilson ratings.
That's fine but I wasn't referring to TPB in any way. He's a bit nuttier than I can deal with on most of his posts. That isn't to say that he's always wrong, but just unreliable and I wasn't referring to anything he's said. Just the OMG LITERALLY HITLER trash I've seen from Patnet's resident Leftists like you.
This seems to be true:
Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez has launched a major overhaul of the party's organization, which has been stung by recent crises — and the DNC has requested resignation letters from all current staffers.
But it doesn't matter. The DNC will continue to lose as long as its sole focus is identity politics.
Working class people are all equally in need of representation, but the DNC destroys their ability to get that representation by dividing them by race, gender, religion, and bizarre sexual preferences. And they do it over and over.
NPR is about nothing but division most of the time. It normally takes about 10 seconds from turning it on until they deliberately divide people by one of the above categories by praising anyone except straight white men.
May they lose, and lose, and lose again until they get back to their roots as representing the working class and not dividing it just because George Soros wants them to.
It's ambiguous. Does sounds like they were spying on Trump's team, but it's not completely clear.
Very interesting that there is no mention of Farkas in news.google.com, but there is in, say, news.bing.com
Google is clearly censoring things for partisan reasons, further destroying their credibility.
Trump just needs to wait his turn to use the same resources to spy on his future Democratic opponents. Fair is fair.
Whatever happened to dogpile.com?
I just looked at their ticker symbol BCOR, and it's been steaming of late. I kinda forgot it existed until Patrick comment on google vs bing
$143.8
https://finance.yahoo.com/m/07a9831c-1fdc-38e9-9f9d-1c7dd42a701d/apple%2C-inc.-likely-to.html
Ever since Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) initiated its dividend in March 2012, the tech giant has increased its dividend every year in March or April. With the company recently adopting the practice of announcing its annual dividend increase alongside its fiscal-second quarter results, Apple should announce its dividend increase for 2017 next month. Here's a close look at Apple's dividend, as well as an overview of what investors should expect from this year's increase. Consistent increases Apple's dividend increases have been very consistent and predictable.
Well, if he's active, informed, and smart, then Trump might as well suck his cock and do what he says, right?
All Farkas is saying is that she thinks that Trump will try to bury the intelligence we have gathered, and will try to cut off the source of intelligence. So, she told people in Congress to seek out the information before Trump had a chance to hide it. She didn't say how they got the intel, and didn't say that Obama had anything to do with it. She also said: I talked with my former colleagues and found that they were also trying to get information to the Hill. She then referred to this as leaking. If the order came from above, she wouldn't have had to talk to her colleagues to figure it out. She is saying that they are doing the leaking (whistle blowing) independently.
She certainly didn't say that Trump was spied on. She also didn't disparage Kislyak, so the compliment she gave him earlier doesn't contradict this and doesn't mean that he is going to be good to the US.
Any investing tips to play this range-bound (manipulated) market ?
Buy low, and sell high. Works every time!!!
Who was her boss, who did she work for?
Obama was in charge, but he wasn't responsible for every leak. If you blame Obama for every action in the government while he was in charge, you should likewise blame Trump for every leak since Jan 20. After all, he is in charge, right?
...." The Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff dealing with Russians, that they would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would not longer have access to that intelligence."
What does your crystal ball tell you about how they know what they know. Farkas doesn't tell you, so I want to know what you see through your tongue in Trump's ass glasses. My interpretation is that if Trump finds out their methods for producing information on the Russian operation that ended up crossing paths with Trump's associates, he will shut down those operations to sabotage the investigation. That is an opinion about Trump's behavior. It is not an admission of her own behavior.
You know there's another side to the whole Obama wiretapped Trump thing.
The fact they wiretapped him and didn't find anything to hang him with.
He was probably boasting to who ever he was talking to, how he killed them on CNN in every phone call he made.
intelligence between Trump and the Russians..
If you are saying that they heard conversations between Trump and Russians, no one has ever denied that. They were listening to the Russians. Trump kept calling the fucking Russians, so the feds heard him speak. What's so hard to understand about that.
Please let us know at what point in the video she admitted that they were spying on trump.
Try listening again around the 25 second mark
I did. Interesting that Ironman is now posting threads about intelligence that exists confiming Trumps people conspiring with Russians about the U.S. Presidential election. THank you sir, well done. Keep up the good work.
Did he actually do that? I thought he phoned it but in.
Imagine Rosie O'Donnell in yoga pants.
And we should cater to everyone's fears and imaginations. This poor victim seeks no financial reward for being the object of his spooj load.
This is getting scary-Obama the commie following soviet methods in America.
confiming Trumps people conspiring with Russians about the U.S. Presidential election.
Can you PROVE that is what they were talking about
Just to be clear, you do agree that if Trump was conspiring with Russians to rig the election the election in any way, that he should be impeached and imprisoned for treason.
confiming Trumps people conspiring with Russians about the U.S. Presidential election.
Can you PROVE that is what they were talking about
Just to be clear, you do agree that if Trump was conspiring with Russians to rig the election in any way, that he should be impeached and imprisoned for treason.
Are you idiots trying to split hairs on who actually dialed the phone??
This has been part of the story from the get go. People have tried to explain it to you multiple times. Why are you just figuring this out? It's not splitting hairs. It's the difference between bugging/'wire tapping'/spying on the Russians or bugging/'wire tapping'/spying on Trump. That's what Nunes walked back on his claims a day after his public leak to the press.
If there is a warrant to search my neighbors house for drugs, and I'm over there shooting up or just eating dinner, I can't say that the police are targeting me when they show up.
"Hey Romney Democrats, the 80s called. They want their foreign policy back."
Of course, back then half the Democrats were skeptics about the USSR=Evil Empire thing.
« First « Previous Comments 82,052 - 82,091 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,971 comments by 14,895 users - AmericanKulak, Ceffer, Misc online now