« First « Previous Comments 164 - 203 of 461 Next » Last » Search these comments
some child molester
Jesus supported slavery. It's in the New Testament. Slavery in the ancient world, just like in American history, included sex slavery of children. Pot meet kettle.
Red herring. Are you accusing Jesus of being a child molester? Seriously, that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. Are you done talking about God (and making shit up about God yet)?
If you changed your name back to Vaticanus your arguments would carry more weight.
Images of luxurious palaces and gold chinaware come to mind.
PeopleUnited sounds like a british soccer team...
You and
Once again, you don't get to rewrite history. Muslims are worshiping the same god as you. Clearly your false god doesn't mind or he would make his real wishes abundantly clear.
Neither do you get to rewrite history. The Bible is what God says about Himself. Anything else that anyone else says about Him is subject to verification. Including what you and I say. But just because some idiot wrote another book whether it be the Book of Mormon or any other religious book claiming to be about God or Jesus, doesn't mean jack shit regarding Jesus Himself. Let Jesus speak for Himself, and you can find his words in the Bible.
If you changed your name back to Vaticanus your arguments would carry more weight.
Images of luxurious palaces and gold chinaware come to mind.
PeopleUnited sounds like a british soccer team...You and
Vaticanus was kind of a joke name. But I agree it does sound pretty badass.
We can stop talking about Him anytime you decide to quit talking about Him and His followers.
I am not going to be silent in the face of evil. Christian brainwash children every day. It's the worst and most prevalence form of child abuse in our society. How about you Christians leave children alone. If you cannot convince a rational adult of your false religion, you should not be allowed to brainwash children.
If anyone causes one of these little ones--those who believe in me--to stumble, it would be better for them if a large millstone were hung around their neck and they were thrown into the sea.
If anyone causes one of these little ones--those who believe in me--to stumble, it would be better for them if a large millstone were hung around their neck and they were thrown into the sea
Yeah, that says all we need to know about Christianity being "harmless".
@Patrick, still think there's no major downsides to tolerating Christianity or that Christians could not be radicalized? How different, fundamentally, does PeopleUnited sound from a Muslim?
If anyone causes one of these little ones--those who believe in me--to stumble, it would be better for them if a large millstone were hung around their neck and they were thrown into the sea
Yeah, that says all we need to know about Christianity being "harmless".
@Patrick, still think there's no major downsides to tolerating Christianity or that Christians could not be radicalized? How different, fundamentally, does PeopleUnited sound from a Muslim?
I didn't say it genius, Jesus did. And it is a warning and promise from God. I suggest you heed it. God follows through with His promises.
"Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell"
And it is a warning and promise from God. I suggest you heed it.
Spoken like a true Muslim, er, Christian. Same diff.
And it is a warning and promise from God. I suggest you heed it.
Spoken like a true Muslim, er, Christian. Same diff.
Nope the difference is that a Muslim will kill you for insulting his prophet, I will just gently remind you that my God keeps His promises.
The difference is a mere century of devolution. Left uncheck, you'd Christians would rival Muslims in cruelty just like you did for 80% of your history.
The difference is a mere century of devolution. Left uncheck, you'd Christians would rival Muslims in cruelty just like you did for 80% of your history.
More making shit up. Moreover, since Christianity predates Islam, your devolution claim doesn't even make sense. Clearly no intelligence here. You must be a bot.
More making shit up. Moreover, since Christianity predates Islam, your devolution claim doesn't even make sense. Clearly no intelligence here. You must be a bot.
It is a historical fact that Christianity became oppressive and violent after the Romans legalized it. Your statement is empirically false.
More making shit up. Moreover, since Christianity predates Islam, your devolution claim doesn't even make sense. Clearly no intelligence here. You must be a bot.
It is a historical fact that Christianity became oppressive and violent after the Romans legalized it. Your statement is empirically false.
The RCC is Christian in name only. The RCC was torturing Christians for centuries. http://amazingdiscoveries.org/R-Reformation_Rome_crusade_slaughter
Just because someone claims to be a Christian, doesn't make them a Christian. There may be some people in the RCC that are Christians, but their leaders never were.
Martin Luther discovered this with the help of God and many others have as well.
Just because someone claims to be a Christian, doesn't make them a Christian.
What makes a person a Christian is the belief in the divinity and resurrection of Christ. Many such people have committed genocide, rape, torture, and infanticide over the past 2000 years. The Roman Catholic Church is certainly Christian. Again, you don't get to rewrite history.
Dan, your hatred for Christianity blinds you. You are a blind man.
Dan, your hatred for Christianity blinds you.
I hate evil. Christianity is simply a specific example of evil. Any good person would have Christianity for the exact same reasons he hates Nazism. Both movements have committed genocide, rape, torture, infanticide, and brainwashing.
I have backed up all my claims with historic evidence. You have nothing more than a baseless assertion.
It is a historical fact that Christianity became oppressive and violent after the Romans legalized it. Your statement is empirically false.
Actually the biggest reason Constantine recognized (which means christians got state support like the pagan religions, it was very profitable to be a state recognized religion in those days) Christianity is he thought it would stop the brutal fighting between the various christen factions which was actually destabilizing his empire. Didn't work out. Christianity started out violent and oppressive well before Constantine. .
The root cause of any extremism is the "success" that laundry room operators have in brainwashing the young. The communist knew it and islamists know it. The way to stop it is to prevent certain imams from speaking.....by any means necessary.
Never fails.
After every Islamic inspired terrorist attack, the usual monkeys are criticizing Christianity.
ISIS loves the free PR.
All those Christians murdered in Egypt yesterday for having the temerity to peacefully celebrate Palm Sunday - not so much.
Christianity started out violent and oppressive well before Constantine. .
But it got worse thus demonstrating that Christianity can become more radicalized with time.
Well, I am. There is plenty in the history of Christianity that merits criticism.
In history - sure.
If you think you are making some sort of cogent point to comparing human activity from 2,000 years ago to contemporary Islam, I am failing to see it.
I'm sure you would take issue with me criticizing atheists for the hundreds of millions killed 50 short years ago under the banner of Communism where post-religious fanatical "enlightened Man" had no moral constraints trying to create heaven on earth.
In history - sure.
History matters. The present is an arbitrary point in time, and history repeats itself. Just because you live in a time where Christianity is contained does not mean that will be the case in the future. The price of freedom and safety is eternal vigilance.
I'm sure you would take issue with me criticizing atheists for the hundreds of millions killed 50 short years ago
Yes, because atheism had no more to do with that than mustaches and you know that because we've gone over that a hundred times.
In contrast, the Spanish Inquisition and Crusades are intrinsic to Christianity.
Now if you want to argue that the mass murder by Stalin and Mao were examples of authoritarianism being evil, go right ahead.
Dan - where is your picture of the skateboarder punk getting a BJ by the Jesus statue?
Surely that ranks up there with the 50 Coptic Christians killed by Islamists yesterday in Egypt. Let alone the genocide and ethnic cleansing of the tens of thousands of Christians in the Middle East over the last few years or the massive persecution Christians face in China.
Christianity is literally the most persecuted ideological group in the world today - and Florida Dan is on the case taking a big giant dump on them.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kelly-james-clark/christianity-most-persecuted-religion_b_2402644.html
Bravo Dan! So edgy and brave!
Yes, because atheism had no more to do with that than mustaches and you know that because we've gone over that a hundred times.
Atheism is a central tenet of Communism practiced in the Soviet Union and China. There is no white-washing away the fanatical zealotry atheism had in the spread of Communism and all that human suffering.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist%E2%80%93Leninist_atheism
Surely that ranks up there with the 50 Coptic Christians killed by Islamists yesterday in Egypt.
It doesn't, and that's a straw man argument. Rape isn't as bad as murder, but why would one make rape legal? There's not connection.
The arrest and prosecution of the boy for blasphemy -- and that's what they were really prosecuting no matter what they call it -- is utterly unacceptable. And allowing Christianity in our society does not in any way help defeat Islam. In fact, tolerance for Christianity helps Islam by letting an irrational playing field exist.
Christianity is literally the most persecuted ideological group in the world today
Well, that's just bullshit. But the disregard for the truth is yet another reason that no religion, including Christianity, should be tolerated.
The arrest and prosecution of the boy for blasphemy
Can you send a link to this arrest? Was he really arrested for "blasphemy" or was he arrested for trespassing?
Well, that's just bullshit. But the disregard for the truth is yet another reason that no religion, including Christianity, should be tolerated.
You really dispute that Christianity is the most persecuted ideological group on the planet today?
Name another ethnicity or ideological group that has faced more persecution in the last 20 years in terms of being driving from their homes, forced to convert, or jailed by thousands like they are in China simply because of their religious identification.
Trespassing was code for blasphemy. One can walk onto church's lot. He was arrested solely because he posted a blasphemous picture on Facebook. Had he taken a picture of himself standing next to the statue, he would not have been arrested, plain and simple. So yes, this was prosecution of a religious crime.
If I did the same thing on PRIVATE PROPERTY to a statue of MLK, Rosa Parks or Harvey Milk - I would be arrested for trespassing and probably charged with a "hate crime" to boot.
All and all, your skate boarding martyr is pretty weak sauce to support your paranoia that America is at risk of becoming like the Taliban.
If I did the same thing on PRIVATE PROPERTY to a statue of MLK, Rosa Parks or Harvey Milk - I would be arrested for trespassing and probably charged with a "hate crime" to boot.
Bullshit. If this guy took a picture of himself just standing next to the statue, he would not have been arrested and the church would not have pressed charges. He was arrested for blasphemy, plain and simple. To say otherwise is a lie. The fact that people can and do visit church grounds without explicit permission is proof positive that it is not trespassing. Furthermore, selecting enforcing one law to in effect enforce an illegal act that cannot be made into law is still enforcing an illegal act.
Just because someone claims to be a Christian, doesn't make them a Christian.
What makes a person a Christian is the belief in the divinity and resurrection of Christ. Many such people have committed genocide, rape, torture, and infanticide over the past 2000 years. The Roman Catholic Church is certainly Christian. Again, you don't get to rewrite history.
Actually it is you who are now speaking for God and trying to tell everyone who is a real Christian. Only God knows who the real Christians are.
Actually it is you who are now speaking for God and trying to tell everyone who is a real Christian. Only God knows who the real Christians are.
Sorry, you don't get to define Christian. A Christian is, by definition, one who believes in the divinity and resurrection of Christ. Plain and simple. If such people do bad things then Christianity is a bad thing.
Why would we even target innocent people? There is no benefit.
There are no innocent people in war.
Actually it is you who are now speaking for God and trying to tell everyone who is a real Christian. Only God knows who the real Christians are.
Sorry, you don't get to define Christian. A Christian is, by definition, one who believes in the divinity and resurrection of Christ. Plain and simple. If such people do bad things then Christianity is a bad thing.
Sorry YOU don't get to define Christian either. For manifold reasons, not the least of which is that you don't even know who Christ is. But a better definition of a Christian is someone who is Christ like, someone who emulates Christ. Simply believing is not evidence of Christianity. See James 2:9 even demons believe yet they are not Christians.
Sorry YOU don't get to define Christian either.
I didn't. This is what Christian has always meant. It's a self-identifying term. The Christ in Christian stands for Jesus Christ. Once more, you demonstrate how dangerous Christian brainwashing is.
For manifold reasons, not the least of which is that you don't even know who Christ is. But a better definition of a Christian is someone who is Christ like, someone who emulates Christ.
By that definition, no person is a Christian, especially not you.
Simply believing is not evidence of Christianity.
You need to read that dumb ass Bible you proclaim to follow. It clearly states that no amount of good deeds will save you from eternal damnation and the only way to be saved and go to heaven is with faith in Jesus Christ.
101 Verses that Teach: Salvation is NOT by Works!
Eph. 2:8-9 - "For BY GRACE are ye SAVED THROUGH FAITH; and that NOT OF
YOURSELVES: it is the GIFT of God: NOT OF WORKS, lest any man should boast."Acts 16:30-31 - When the Philippian jailer asked, "What must I do to be saved?" Paul didn't say,
keep the Ten Commandments, but rather, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved."Luke 7:49-50 - Christ told the woman: "Thy faith hath saved thee," not thy works! (See #1)
Eph. 1:7 - "Redemption through HIS BLOOD, the forgiveness of sins," not through our works.
1 Pet. 1:3-5 - "According to his abundant MERCY," not according to our good deeds. (See #12)
Christianity has a 2000 year history of dogma stating that only through faith in Jesus can you prevent your soul from being tortured in hell for all eternity. So no, you don't get to change 2000 years of history to support your lying ass agenda.
Turns out that religious people really like to write down their dogma, so it's damn easy to verify what it is.
I'm okay with the Christians...this is a free country and we have the freedom of religion. However, all their powerful figures who speak the gospel, sexually assaulting and molesting all those young boys, doesn't sit well with me. Why do so many of the most devout Christians molest young boys? Did God tell them to do it?
That's bullshit
You don't win wars by sparing the enemy. If you want to win, you have to fight like we did in WW2, so doing things like firebombing cities is absolutely necessary.
« First « Previous Comments 164 - 203 of 461 Next » Last » Search these comments
Sensible people are discouraged from thinking about the root causes of Islamic terrorism by mainstream media and academia. (AKA SJW's)
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/414113/actual-root-causes-islamic-terrorism-ira-straus
Osama Bin Laden was a well to do man from a well to do family who was radicalized.
http://markhumphrys.com/root.cause.html
Former Islamic Radical shares his solutions.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/261829/former-islamic-radical-unveils-root-causes-islamic-joseph-puder