6
0

Patrick.net's name should be changed to TenPoundBass's Airing of Grievances Forum since 98% of threads are started by him & his chronic, incessant whining..


 invite response                
2017 Jul 31, 8:56pm   32,643 views  99 comments

by AllTruth   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Also, who wants to bet that TendPoundBass has at least 3 other aliases, including 2scoopsMcgee, and may even be Ironman/CIC also?

Also, Trump's approval ratings are at an-all time low for a President 6 months into office (as in, way worse than even the 2nd worst, so... He wins something?).

Also, the crises regarding North Korea-SouthKorea-Japan, the new housing bubble, the equity market bubble (which Trump has claimed credit for, so that when it crashes, it'll blow up directly in his face), the bond market bubble (possibly the biggest bubble of all time), Russia-Ukraine-Estonia, Poland-Turkey-EU, China's massive debt-fueled bubble, the Mueller probe into Trump family-Kushner family-Manafort loan shark loans and thinly disguised payoffs from the Russians, etc., are all'coming to a head soon - and any one of these, let alone multiple ones popping at the same time, will overwhelm Trump in ways very brutal.

*Also, to borrow Faux New's "fair & balanced" bullshit, the Democrats are LITERALLY as bad as the GOP in fucking over the middle class - who here knew that Dianne Feinstein' husband was Sidney Blum of Blum Capital, a private equity firm that buys weak companies, like Gymboree or Burger King or Payless Shoes, loads them up with leveraged debt the size of the milky way, and then sinks them like a harpooned whale, intentionally, for fun and profit?

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2017/07/private-equity-firms-sued-retailer-distress-bankruptcies.html

Does anyone here REALLY believe that democrats are in tune with average Americans any more than Republicans are? Hint: Democrats are as or more beholden to Wall Street and PE as Republicans, once a task thought implausible.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/10/democrats-working-class-americans-us-election

« First        Comments 50 - 89 of 99       Last »     Search these comments

50   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 8, 7:13pm  

Dan8267 says

The Senate still funds these undeclared wars.

Both Repukes and Demoncrats.

51   Dan8267   2017 Aug 8, 7:40pm  

PeopleUnited says

Dan8267 says

The Senate still funds these undeclared wars.

Both Repukes and Demoncrats.

But obviously not equally, so it's not a wash. That's a lie. One party is half full of despicable people. The other party is completely full of despicable people. There is no equivalency.

Let me put this in terms that you will understand. Some Christians commit murder in the name of their religion. A far greater percentage of Muslims commit murder in the name of their religion. Are Christianity and Islam equal?

Cut your hypocrisy.

52   MisdemeanorRebel   2017 Aug 8, 7:47pm  

In the next Constitution, all Congressional authorizations and declarations have to have an expiration date. Congress can renew with a simple majority vote, but it can't make any law or authorization permanent until specifically repealed.

I think we'd have some very interesting debates if all Congressional Activity had a 10 year maximum.

For example, Obama would have faced vetoing or not vetoing the Bush AUF vis-a-vis Afghanistan.

53   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 8, 7:47pm  

Dan8267 says

PeopleUnited says

Dan8267 says

The Senate still funds these undeclared wars.

Both Repukes and Demoncrats.

But obviously not equally, so it's not a wash. That's a lie. One party is half full of despicable people. The other party is completely full of despicable people. There is no equivalency.

Let me put this in terms that you will understand. Some Christians commit murder in the name of their religion. A far greater percentage of Muslims commit murder in the name of their religion. Are Christianity and Islam equal?

Cut your hypocrisy.

The democrats tolerate and even promote those who voted for the war to the top of their party. The ones who didn't support the war are complicit. Just as the muslims who tolerate the terrorists and support the Imams who preach violence are complicit.

54   Dan8267   2017 Aug 8, 7:49pm  

PeopleUnited says

The democrats tolerate and even promote those who voted for the war to the top of their party. The ones who didn't support the war are complicit. Just as the muslims who tolerate the terrorists and support the Imams who preach violence are complicit.

Again, you are attempting to rewrite history. Half on one party is evil. All of the other party is evil. It's not hard to tell which is the lesser of the two evils by far.

55   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 8, 8:03pm  

Dan8267 says

PeopleUnited says

The democrats tolerate and even promote those who voted for the war to the top of their party. The ones who didn't support the war are complicit. Just as the muslims who tolerate the terrorists and support the Imams who preach violence are complicit.

Again, you are attempting to rewrite history. Half on one party is evil. All of the other party is evil. It's not hard to tell which is the lesser of the two evils by far.

Chuck Schumer

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry

Joe Lieberman

Chris Dodd

Joe Biden

Diane Feinstien

Harry Reid

These people are the leaders of your party. You are deceptive, self deceived and in denial.

56   Dan8267   2017 Aug 8, 8:24pm  

PeopleUnited says

You are deceptive, self deceived and in denial.

You're projecting. You are also the only one using deception.

I've called for the DNC establishment to be overthrown. See my new classic thread The path to victory in the seventh party system.

Nonetheless, half of the Democratic senators and representatives are evil. ALL of the Republican senators and representatives are evil. A quarter to a tenth of the Democratic voters are evil. 80% or more of the Republican voters are evil.

Arguing that the other team is not flawless does not excuse the atrocities of your team. The two teams are not on the same level, not by far. Team blue has some evil players. Team red is pure evil and exists solely for evil. Team blue is corrupt and needs to be cleansed by the blue fans. Team red will destroy the world at the becking of the red fans.

57   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 10, 4:32am  

Chuck Schumer

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry

Joe Lieberman

Chris Dodd

Joe Biden

Diane Feinstien

Harry Reid

These people are the democrat party. Arguing that the Republicans are evil while ignoring that the other party is dominated by evil people is pointless. They are both evil and selling the American people a bag a lies. You are promoting one party. I acknowledge that both are to blame. It is disingenuous to blame on party when the other party is complicit. Any one of the above could have stood up and made a national argument against the war. NONE OF THEM DID. instead they voted for it, just as their puppetmasters told them to. And you support them, just as you are told to do.

58   Y   2017 Aug 10, 5:23am  

Threads that have to be declared 'classic' by the author because nobody else will, usually aren't...

Dan8267 says

See my new classic thread

59   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 10, 5:27am  

BlueSardine says

See my new classic thread The path to victory in the seventh party system.

Exactly. And I don't visit threads where the author censors.

60   bob2356   2017 Aug 10, 5:39am  

BlueSardine says

Threads that have to be declared 'classic' by the author because nobody else will, usually aren't...

Dan8267 says

See my new classic thread

Aren't new and classic opposites? Just saying.

61   anonymous   2017 Aug 10, 6:55am  

bob2356 says

BlueSardine says

Threads that have to be declared 'classic' by the author because nobody else will, usually aren't...

Dan8267 says

See my new classic thread

Aren't new and classic opposites? Just saying.

This is a ban able offense!

62   Dan8267   2017 Aug 10, 8:17am  

BlueSardine says

Threads that have to be declared 'classic' by the author because nobody else will, usually aren't...

If you had any real arguments to make, you would have done that instead of whining.

PeopleUnited says

Exactly. And I don't visit threads where the author censors.

1. You weren't the one invited.
2. I don't give a shit.
3. There is no censorship. You are just whining.

bob2356 says

Aren't new and classic opposites? Just saying.

It's called an oxymoron. It's a common literary mechanic. In this case implying that although a thread is recent, it's an instant classic. And yes, that's self-promotion, but guess what, you are exposed to such promotions hundreds of times a day.

errc says

This is a ban able offense!

Straw man argument. I've only banned people for being trolls (like you) or for constant repeating of debunked lies.

I've also always followed the policy of allowing such people to be unbanned if they choose to change their ways. You have to choose to continue acting like a child to be kept on the ban. But of course, few such immature people are even capable of changing.

63   Dan8267   2017 Aug 10, 8:22am  

PeopleUnited says

These people are the democrat party. Arguing that the Republicans are evil while ignoring that the other party is dominated by evil people is pointless.

None of the Democrats you sited are nearly as evil as ANY of the current leaders of the Republican Party, the leaders of the GOP from 10 or 20 years ago, or the Trump administration. Not even Hillary Clinton.

Furthermore, the policies of the Republican Party are far more evil than anything that has come out of the Democratic Party since the two parties switched roles.

Finally, the overall vileness of Republican voters is far greater than the overall vileness of Democratic voters. Anyone who is for torture and raping prisoners, many of which are innocent, is almost certainly a Republican. Your party is the party of evil, plain and simple. And if Christianity didn't make you so morally bankrupted, you'd admit this.

64   bob2356   2017 Aug 10, 9:08am  

Dan8267 says

bob2356 says

Aren't new and classic opposites? Just saying.

It's called an oxymoron. It's a common literary mechanic

Really? It's called an oxymoron? Well bless my soul the things you learn on patnet every day from such really smart people. If I hadn't learned about oxymoron in 1967 or so I would be super impressed.

Websters says oxymoron is :a combination of words that have opposite or very different meanings

Just like I said.

Dan8267 says

And yes, that's self-promotion, but guess what, you are exposed to such promotions hundreds of times a day.

Since you are the undisputed champion of self promotion I defer to your far superior personal knowledge of the subject.

Instant classic. That's just too funny. You are certainly a legend in your own mind.

65   Dan8267   2017 Aug 10, 10:34am  

bob2356 says

Instant classic. That's just too funny. You are certainly a legend in your own mind.

Yes, we get it. You hate me. Nobody gives a shit, so get over it.

66   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 10, 7:56pm  

Dan8267 says

PeopleUnited says

These people are the democrat party. Arguing that the Republicans are evil while ignoring that the other party is dominated by evil people is pointless.

None of the Democrats you sited are nearly as evil as ANY of the current leaders of the Republican Party, the leaders of the GOP from 10 or 20 years ago, or the Trump administration. Not even Hillary Clinton.

Furthermore, the policies of the Republican Party are far more evil than anything that has come out of the Democratic Party since the two parties switched roles.

Finally, the overall vileness of Republican voters is far greater than the overall vileness of Democratic voters. Anyone who is for torture and raping prisoners, many of which are innocent, is almost certainly a Republican. Your party is the party of evil, plain and simple. And if Christianity didn't make you so morally bankrupted, you'd admit this.

That is like saying Stalin is not as evil as Hitler because of your own person bias. It is absurd. Both parties are full of lying, sold out, warmongering cronies. Stalin is just as evil as Hitler, and Democrats are just as evil as republicans.

67   Dan8267   2017 Aug 11, 7:50am  

PeopleUnited says

That is like saying Stalin is not as evil as Hitler because of your own person bias.

Another lie. It's saying that Stalin was evil because he was power hungry. Sure Hitler was power hungry as well, but the Holocaust was absolutely religiously motivated just like 9/11 was. Stalin killing his political rivals was not motivated by atheism.

You are whitewashing history and making straw man arguments. You are a pathological liar.

68   Dan8267   2017 Aug 11, 7:52am  

PeopleUnited says

Democrats are just as evil as republicans.

Voting for the act that made torture U.S. policy.

Party Yea Nay Abstain
Republican 211 3 5
Democratic 145 62 4
Independent 1 1
TOTALS 357 66 9

Not even close.

69   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 12, 11:55am  

Democrats are just as evil as republicans.
Voting for the act that made torture U.S. policy.

Party Yea Nay Abstain
Republican 211 3 5
Democratic 145 62 4
Independent 1 1
TOTALS 357 66 9

This is just more proof of the FACT that democrats are just as evil if not more so than republicans. The Democrats are bought and paid for just like the republicans. So they take turns voting for the policies that their overlords tell them to. In the end EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT might as well have voted for it because enough of them did that it iNSURED PASSAGE of this law you demonize. You don't like it? THANK THE DEMOCRATS GENIUS!!! It wouldn't have passed without them. Eat that for supper.

Dan8267 says

PeopleUnited says

That is like saying Stalin is not as evil as Hitler because of your own person bias.

Another lie. It's saying that Stalin was evil because he was power hungry. Sure Hitler was power hungry as well, but the Holocaust was absolutely religiously motivated just like 9/11 was. Stalin killing his political rivals was not motivated by atheism.

You are whitewashing history and making straw man arguments. You are a pathological liar.

No Dan, you are lying by claiming that Hitler is worse that Stalin. That is simply your flawed opinion.

Stalin is responsible for the murder of at least twice as many people as Hitler. His motivation for killing them by defining them as political rivals is the EXACT same thing Hitler did. Hitler knew the Jews would never join his ranks, and therefore he saw them as enemies. The are both murderous dictators and equally foul stains on humanity. Your attempts to portray one as worse than the other is your whitewashing of history. You are the most prodigious pathological liar on this site. The most amazing part is that you believe your lies.

70   Dan8267   2017 Aug 12, 12:13pm  

PeopleUnited says

No Dan, you are lying by claiming that Hitler is worse that Stalin.

I never made such claim. Are you incapable of being truthful?

You are lying by claiming that religion was not the prime factor in the Holocaust of the Jews. This is a grotesque lie that whitewashes history.

PeopleUnited says

You are the most prodigious pathological liar on this site. The most amazing part is that you believe your lies.

Oh, I get it. Whenever I point out and debunk your lies, you take whatever I say about you and without evidence accuse me of it. I think that's the "I'm rubber and your glue" defense. Didn't O.J. use that defense? I didn't murder my wife. You did. I'm out of order? This whole court is out of order!

Talking to you is like talking to a petulant child.

71   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 12, 1:35pm  

Dan8267 says

You are lying by claiming that religion was not the prime factor in the Holocaust of the Jews. This is a grotesque lie that whitewashes history

You would have to define what you mean in order the have a rational conversation about this.
Hitler killed people because of his religion? or Jews were killed because of their religion? What are you saying?

72   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 12, 1:36pm  

Also: So we are clear, Hitler is just as evil as Stalin in Dan's world?

73   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 12, 1:41pm  

Dan8267 says

Arguing that the other team is not flawless does not excuse the atrocities of your team.

Arguing that in your opinion the other team has more supporters of atrocity does not change the fact that the atrocity could not have occurred without the EXPRESS COOPERATION of your team.

74   Dan8267   2017 Aug 12, 2:25pm  

PeopleUnited says

Also: So we are clear, Hitler is just as evil as Stalin in Dan's world?

I don't have precise measurements of the evilness of individuals, nor is there even any unit to measure it by.

What I can say is that both have done great evils, but only one was motivated by religion and the other was motivated solely by political power. That's the difference. Stalin did not kill people because of atheist beliefs. Hitler did kill Jews because of his religious beliefs just like ISIS members kills people because of their religious beliefs. To deny this is a lie.

PeopleUnited says

Arguing that in your opinion the other team has more supporters of atrocity does not change the fact that the atrocity could not have occurred without the EXPRESS COOPERATION of your team.

That's not what I'm arguing. I'm arguing that in a two party system where everyone in one party is in favor of committing atrocities and half the members of the other party oppose those atrocities, the second party is the wiser and more moral choice. If forced between choosing between two evils, always choose the lesser of the two evils.

Also, the team did not cooperate. Half the team cooperates, and that half are cowards, but the other half opposed. Meanwhile, your team orchestrated the entire atrocity. So, no, you don't get to claim any moral high ground or that it's a wash.

75   Dan8267   2017 Aug 12, 2:39pm  

jazz_music says

Especially when one party advertises that evil is going to be your salvation.

Evil infiltrated the Democratic Party. Evil is the Republican Party platform.

76   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 12, 3:56pm  

jazz_music says

They both put work into their responses and conscientiously restrain themselves from gratuitous urges to be VINDICTIVE, PETTY, CONDESCENDING AND DISHONEST.

bullshit. They are the most uncivil posters on Patnet. My guess is that between them they have more uncivil flags than you and I TPB combined. And they routinely engage in all of the above uncivil behaviors. Just ask Dan why he loves to call people honey. Your comment is a lie. Your compliment is meaningless.

77   bob2356   2017 Aug 13, 4:26am  

Dan8267 says

What I can say is that both have done great evils, but only one was motivated by religion and the other was motivated solely by political power. That's the difference. Stalin did not kill people because of atheist beliefs. Hitler did kill Jews because of his religious beliefs just like ISIS members kills people because of their religious beliefs. To deny this is a lie.

To deny this is to know history. You haven't read much about Hitler have you? Hitler is the man that said Christianity is a harmful superstition and Christianity is a religion only fit for slaves. I've got both Kershaw's and Bullock's biographies. Try either one, they both have extensive examples of Hitler's private writings. Any support Hitler gave to Christianity was political posturing to accomplish his goals.

Hitler persecuted Jews because they were a handy scapegoat for his followers feelings of frustration and inadequacy at their reduced economic situation as well as loss of national prestige. He played on the historical enmity of European Christians toward Jews to both reinforce and exacerbate pre existing prejudice with the goal of leading the people to unquestioning nationalism.

Does scapegoatig and playing on pre existing prejudice for people who feel they have lost ground economically sound like anyone we know currently in high office?

78   bob2356   2017 Aug 13, 4:29am  

errc says

You misspelled delusional

I was trying to give the benefit of the doubt in keeping with the new more civil patnet.

79   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 13, 7:13am  

bob2356 says

Hitler did kill Jews because of his religious beliefs just like ISIS members kills people because of their religious beliefs. To deny this is a lie.

To deny this is to know history. You haven't read much about Hitler have you? Hitler is the man that said Christianity is a harmful superstition and Christianity is a religion only fit for slaves. I've got both Kershaw's and Bullock's biographies. Try either one, they both have extensive examples of Hitler's private writings. Any support Hitler gave to Christianity was political posturing to accomplish his goals.

Hitler persecuted Jews because they were a handy scapegoat for his followers feelings of frustration and inadequacy at their reduced economic situation as well as loss of national prestige. He played on the historical enmity of European Christians toward Jews to both reinforce and exacerbate pre existing prejudice with the goal of leading the people to unquestioning nationalism.

Thanks for being a voice of reason Bob. Surely you are correct and history is all the evidence needed to show Hitlers true beliefs.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/non-jewish-victims-of-the-holocaust

"Priests and Pastors Died for Their Beliefs

Hitler wanted not only to conquer all of Europe, but Hitler also wanted to create a new religion and to replace Jesus Christ as a person to be worshipped. Hitler expected his followers to worship the Nazi ideology. Since Catholic priests and Christian pastors were often influential leaders in their community, they were sought out by the Nazis very early. Thousands of Catholic priests and Christian pastors were forced into concentration camps. A special barracks was set up at Dachau, the camp near Munich, Germany, for clergymen. A few survived; some were executed, but most were allowed to die slowly of starvation or disease. "

Any objective observer can see that Hitler's "christianity" was a facade he used to get votes.

80   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 13, 7:20am  

Dan8267 says

jazz_music says

Especially when one party advertises that evil is going to be your salvation.

Evil infiltrated the Democratic Party. Evil is the Republican Party platform.

When exactly Dan in your bizarro world did the democrats get infiltrated by evil?

Must have happened before LBJ

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lyndon-johnson-civil-rights-racism

Johnson was a man of his time, and bore those flaws as surely as he sought to lead the country past them. For two decades in Congress he was a reliable member of the Southern bloc, helping to stonewall civil rights legislation. As Caro recalls, Johnson spent the late 1940s railing against the “hordes of barbaric yellow dwarves” in East Asia. Buying into the stereotype that blacks were afraid of snakes (who isn’t afraid of snakes?) he’d drive to gas stations with one in his trunk and try to trick black attendants into opening it. Once, Caro writes, the stunt nearly ended with him being beaten with a tire iron.
Nor was it the kind of immature, frat-boy racism that Johnson eventually jettisoned. Even as president, Johnson’s interpersonal relationships with blacks were marred by his prejudice. As longtime Jet correspondent Simeon Booker wrote in his memoirShocks the Conscience, early in his presidency, Johnson once lectured Booker after he authored a critical article for Jet Magazine, telling Booker he should “thank” Johnson for all he’d done for black people. In Flawed Giant, Johnson biographer Robert Dallek writes that Johnson explained his decision to nominate Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court rather than a less famous black judge by saying, “when I appoint a nigger to the bench, I want everybody to know he’s a nigger.”

According to Caro, Robert Parker, Johnson’s sometime chauffer, described in his memoir Capitol Hill in Black and White a moment when Johnson asked Parker whether he’d prefer to be referred to by his name rather than “boy,” “nigger” or “chief.” When Parker said he would, Johnson grew angry and said, “As long as you are black, and you’re gonna be black till the day you die, no one’s gonna call you by your goddamn name. So no matter what you are called, nigger, you just let it roll off your back like water, and you’ll make it. Just pretend you’re a goddamn piece of furniture.”

LBJ was a racist just like most if not all the southern Democrats.

81   Dan8267   2017 Aug 13, 11:19am  

bob2356 says

You haven't read much about Hitler have you? Hitler is the man that said Christianity is a harmful superstition and Christianity is a religion only fit for slaves.

For someone who complains about other people's knowledge of history, you sure don't seem knowledgeable yourself. I'll take historical evidence over the assertions of a random guy on the Internet any day.

Antisemitism in Germany spanned from the Middle Ages to the mid-20th century. To deny this is to just lie about history.

82   Dan8267   2017 Aug 13, 11:23am  

PeopleUnited says

LBJ was a racist just like most if not all the southern Democrats.

Yes, because the American South is racist. And that's why the Republican Party is the party of racism today. It's the same damn racist southerners. They just switched parties. We went over this. You are just trying to white wash history again. The labels changed, not the people.

The Democrats before the Southern Strategy are today's Republicans.

83   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 13, 12:49pm  

PeopleUnited says

When exactly Dan in your bizarro world did the democrats get infiltrated by evil?

So LBJ was a racist,

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lyndon-johnson-civil-rights-racism

These guys/gals voted for Iraq War

Chuck Schumer

Hillary Clinton

John Kerry

Joe Lieberman

Chris Dodd

Joe Biden

Diane Feinstien

Harry Reid

Dan8267 says

Voting for the act that made torture U.S. policy.

98 Senators voted Yes on this bill including what percentage of Democrats Dan?

a few years later 88 Senators voted to reauthorize it. You are whitewashing history by dismissing the fact that DEMOCRATS MADE TORTURE THE LAW OF THE LAND. it could not have been done without the cooperation of the democrats. In fact the first time around it was nearly unanimous, and only a few were brave enough to stand up to their overlords the second time around. The Democrats own the patriot act, as the minority party they didn't even put a defense against it. They overwhelmingly approved it in the Senate. Just more lies from the biggest propagandist on the site.

The democrat party was not infiltrated by evil as Dan claims. It was evil, and still is evil today. Anyone who would defend the party that made the Patriot Act and the Iraq war authorization possible is clearly ignorant of the role these evil people played in making America less safe and less free.

84   bob2356   2017 Aug 13, 12:58pm  

Dan8267 says

For someone who complains about other people's knowledge of history, you sure don't seem knowledgeable yourself. I'll take historical evidence over the assertions of a random guy on the Internet any day.

You don't accept Hitlers own words in his writings? Not that you have read them. There are more authoritative sources that wiki you should check out some time.

Dan8267 says

Antisemitism in Germany spanned from the Middle Ages to the mid-20th century. To deny this is to just lie about history.

I know the history very well. You like to believe you do. Jews were persecuted in Europe starting with the first Gentiles converting to Christianity. Last time I checked the region of Germany (there being no German nation until 1871) was part of Europe. Somehow you were unable to comprehend when I said quite plainly:

bob2356 says

historical enmity of European Christians toward Jews

Where exactly is my denial of antisemitism in that sentence? You didn't say Germany’s antisemitism. You said:

Dan8267 says

Hitler did kill Jews because of his religious beliefs

Nice strawman and tap dance though. Keep shucking and jiving you got it wrong. Deal.

85   Dan8267   2017 Aug 13, 1:54pm  

PeopleUnited says

98 Senators voted Yes on this bill including what percentage of Democrats Dan?

Yep, the Democrats went evil on that one. Republicans went evil on EVERY issue since 1960.

Again, vote for the lesser of the two evils, and by far that's Democrats today because Republicans were taken over by Jesus freaks.

PeopleUnited says

Anyone who would defend the party that made the Patriot Act and the Iraq war authorization possible is clearly ignorant of the role these evil people played in making America less safe and less free.

I don't defend the politicians who voted for the Patriot Act. Have you read anything I've written on Hillary Clinton or Obama?

However, the vast majority of Republican voters support that evil act, whereas the vast majority of Democrat voters do not. Your party is evil to the core of its voters.

bob2356 says

Nice strawman

Go visit a holocaust site. Tell the families of the survivors that the Holocaust had nothing to do with religion. Go on.

86   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 13, 3:10pm  

Dan8267 says

because Republicans were taken over by Jesus freaks.

And there is Dan's true feelings, I knew we would live to see him declare it.

Anti-Christian bigotry. How conservative of you.

Dan8267 says

Your party is evil to the core of its voters.

And this is EXACTLY why there will be no resolution of the matter. Dan literally believes that people who don't think like him are evil to the core. This is the kind of thinking that causes a man to mow down protestors with a car, or mow down congressmen on a baseball field with a rifle. Dan you are part of the problem. When are you going to wise up and quit this conservative tribalism of yours? Are you blind to your own bigotry?

87   Dan8267   2017 Aug 13, 4:24pm  

PeopleUnited says

Dan literally believes that people who don't think like him are evil to the core.

Bullshit. I think those who rape and torture are evil. That's not a stretch. And rape and torture are exactly what happen with the Patriot Act and Bush's illegal war.

In contrast, your despicable religion says that all people who don't mindlessly accept Jesus as divine will burn in hell. That's fucking evil.

88   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 14, 6:38pm  

Dan8267 says

your despicable religion says that all people who don't mindlessly accept Jesus as divine

More lies, God does not want anyone to "mindlessly accept" He wants you to choose, to carefully consider...

Isaiah Chapter 1

16 Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil;

17 Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow.

18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.

Proverbs Chapter 8

33 Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it not.

34 Blessed is the man that heareth me, watching daily at my gates, waiting at the posts of my doors.

35 For whoso findeth me findeth life, and shall obtain favour of the Lord.

89   Dan8267   2017 Aug 14, 6:39pm  

PeopleUnited says

More lies, God does not want anyone to "mindlessly accept" He wants you to choose, to carefully consider...

Well, I have, and I have found the case for his existence to be severely wanting.

« First        Comments 50 - 89 of 99       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste