patrick.net

YesYNot says

Maybe it's because their brains work differently than men's, and they prioritize housework over ejaculating their ideas into the ether. Maybe they just aren't as smart, so they have to spend more time working and less time bullshitting to get the same amount done. Maybe they have to accomplish more for the same reward, so they are stuck working. Maybe they'd just rather don a wedding dress and get pounded in the ass by a real man like Putin than read about it online. Nobody knew that interpreting comments could be so hard.

You're right. Most women are too practical to enjoy discussing abstract ideas online.
YesYNot, I still think you are a woman btw.

Heraclitusstudent says

I still think you are a woman btw.

Duly noted.

Rachel Dolezal will be rejected from entering grad school due to a claim of being "African American"
Meanwhile that same school will have allowed one or more students to state their non-birth gender and have no problem with it.

The left moves on to the next hysteria and Pat.net lefties go apeshit at whatever that is too.

This statement will come up again in 2020.

Tenpoundbass says

Yeah, cause China will tolerate the U.S. launching a nuclear missile to a location right next to them. I'm sure China and Russia won't mistake this for a first strike against them and launch all their nukes at us. You have heard of MAD, right?

jazz_music says

Rew says

really cool to shoot one of N Korea's missiles down, but I think if we do it, we might give too much of our current capabilities away to other adversaries.

Secrecy is unfortunately a primary motivation and the source of self-conflict that may end up costing millions of people their lives in the nations of our allies who we have managed to make dependent on the protection of the United States.

This kind of scenario worries me the most.

What use are the secret missiles if we don't use them when the time comes?
You two are anti America, aren't you? Shame on you.

Dan8267 says

Yeah, cause China will tolerate the U.S. launching a nuclear missile to a location right next to them. I'm sure China and Russia won't mistake this for a first strike against them and launch all their nukes at us. You have heard of MAD, right?

LOL. As if China and Russia will consider us as having launched a nuclear missile against them, if we launch it on NK.
Do you know what MAD is?
Dan, you are just another anti American. Aren't you?

It's so easy to identify the assholes who hate America when the time comes, isn't it?

Strategist says

Dan8267 says

Yeah, cause China will tolerate the U.S. launching a nuclear missile to a location right next to them. I'm sure China and Russia won't mistake this for a first strike against them and launch all their nukes at us. You have heard of MAD, right?

LOL. As if China and Russia will consider us as having launched a nuclear missile against them, if we launch it on NK.

Do you know what MAD is?

Dan, you are just another anti American. Aren't you?

That's the most retarded thing you've ever said.

China or Russia could easily mistake a nuclear weapon targeting North Korea for targeting them. You do realize that North Korea borders both Russia and China and that North Korea is a tiny target next to those two countries?

Thank god that you aren't in charge of the military. You'd do something damn stupid that would result in the other side mistaking it for a first strike and then it'd be nuclear war and the end of humanity.

www.youtube.com/embed/La4Dcd1aUcE

Strategist says

It's so easy to identify the assholes who hate America when the time comes, isn't it?

Yeah, it's the dumb asses who would start an accidental nuclear war that would completely destroy America.

Fucking White Male says

The left moves on to the next hysteria and Pat.net lefties go apeshit at whatever that is too.

Exactly.

Dan8267 says

China or Russia could easily mistake a nuclear weapon targeting North Korea for targeting them. You do realize that North Korea borders both Russia and China and that North Korea is a tiny target next to those two countries?

China and Russia aren't stupid. Everyone including Timbuctoo knows where our missiles are going if a war does break out.

Strategist says

Everyone including Timbuctoo knows where our missiles are going if a war does break out.

Bullshit. There have already been damn close calls of starting accidental nuclear war. If an ICBM is launched from America, there is no way to tell what its target is or if it will alter its course. Nor would anyone take the risk that America wouldn't use this opportunity to strike their country.

If the missile is launched from a submarine or aircraft carrier, it's even worse. Not knowing how many subs are hidden would require assuming a first strike and immediately retaliating.

You are the biggest fool in the world if you think using nukes isn't damn dangerous.

jazz_music says

Dan8267 says

That's the most retarded thing you've ever said.

Ha ha not by a long shot!

OK, maybe not, but it is the most dangerous thing he's said.

Dan8267 says

Strategist says

Everyone including Timbuctoo knows where our missiles are going if a war does break out.

Bullshit. There have already been damn close calls of starting accidental nuclear war. If an ICBM is launched from America, there is no way to tell what its target is or if it will alter its course. Nor would anyone take the risk that America wouldn't use this opportunity to strike their country.

If the missile is launched from a submarine or aircraft carrier, it's even worse. Not knowing how many subs are hidden would require assuming a first strike and immediately retaliating.

You are the biggest fool in the world if you think using nukes isn't damn dangerous.

So when NK launches an ICBM the world should go all out and destroy them, because no-one knows where their ICBM is going. It could be going to Moscow or Beijing.
Good thing no one follows your genius logic. Except Jazz.

Who had wake up Saturday to Nazi marches and have them plow a car into counter protesters?

Anyone?

Psst ... Right wingers, you are looking pretty Islamic terrorist there. ;)

Rew says

Who had wake up Saturday to Nazi marches and have them plow a car into counter protesters?

Anyone?

Psst ... Right wingers, you are looking pretty Islamic terrorist there. ;)

First find me even one right winger here who doesn't condemn both Nazi's and white supremacists.

Strategist says

So when NK launches an ICBM the world should go all out and destroy them, because no-one knows where their ICBM is going.

No one ever said that the U.S. shouldn't handle North Korea or even use wise military action. You are the only one proposing that launching nukes at them is the wise solution. That's idiotic.

You think like a cave man, that everything can be solved by clubbing your rival to death. That's damn dangerous thinking in the nuclear age.

Dan8267 says

No one ever said that the U.S. shouldn't handle North Korea or even use wise military action. You are the only one proposing that launching nukes at them is the wise solution. That's idiotic.

I think using tactical nukes on the NK armed forces will save a lot of of innocent lives. The lives of South Koreans in Seoul who are just a stones throw from the fat brat's artillery.
It would also end the war quickly and save American lives.

Strategist says

I think using tactical nukes on the NK armed forces will save a lot of of innocent lives.

You think a lot of things that are wrong. There's a reason we didn't nuke North Korea back in the 1950s.

And clearly you don't give a shit about all the innocent lives such nuclear explosions would kill. The North Korean population is almost entirely innocent victims.

Strategist says

I think using tactical nukes on the NK armed forces will save a lot of of innocent lives.

Nuclear fallout will kill quite many S. Koreans, Chinese, and Russians

I'm not sure if you guys know the difference between "tactical nukes" and strategic nukes"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_nuclear_weapon
A tactical nuclear weapon (TNW) or non-strategic nuclear weapon[1] is a nuclear weapon which is designed to be used on a battlefield in military situations, mostly with friendly forces in proximity and perhaps even on contested friendly territory. This is opposed to strategic nuclear weapons which are designed to be mostly targeted in the enemy interior away from the war front against military bases, cities, towns, arms industries, and other hardened or larger-area targets to damage the enemy's ability to wage war.

Crazy Times : Predict What Happens Next!

Tax reform is exactly as successful as Helathcare repeal was. Little of anything continues to be the order of the day. It moves farther away from Trump.

Stock market continues its upward trend, maybe at more modest gains.

Mueller and Russia, Russia, Russia:

totally foolish