patrick.net

Tenpoundbass says

Those fucksticks don't get to be the Hillary Clinton mouth peice for the last 3 years, now dare to weigh in on her crimes against America.

Fuck MSN, CNN, Huffingshitpost and the whole poopshoot of liberal bullshit.

It's an Associated Press report.

Sniper says

That's what Podesta, the Campaign Manager, gets for making his password on his Gmail account "Password". Duh... With idiots like that running a campaign, no wonder she lost!!

And, a report that foreign hackers were trying to get into US based servers. Let me show you my shocked face:

That's not how they got in. It was a phishing email.

If you have a conspiratorial mindset, might as well go with Putin killing Seth Rich and blaming Clinton to sow doubt in American's minds. That would have been brilliant considering how things have played out.

I’ve included a passage from the article which should be examined closely.
“The AP's reconstruction— based on a database of 19,000 malicious links recently shared by cybersecurity firm Secureworks — shows how the hackers worked their way around the Clinton campaign's top-of-the-line digital security to steal chairman John Podesta's emails in March 2016.”

So this is a “reconstruction,” not an investigation. That means they used this slew of phishing emails as a base for constructing a probable timeline for the probable act. The “data” didn’t come from the DNC server, but from another unaffiliated internet company called “Secureworks.”

Based on this careful analysis of the article, the entire thing is a fiction constructed in the same way a “making of a murderer” episode recreation scene is constructed: with actors and a lot of guesswork.

As such, it offers no new data, only renewed speculation.

Quigley says

So this is a “reconstruction,” not an investigation. That means they used this slew of phishing emails as a base for constructing a probable timeline for the probable act. The “data” didn’t come from the DNC server, but from another unaffiliated internet company called “Secureworks.”

Not really. They used the database to see when the phishing emails were sent out, who clicked on them, and subsequent emails that were sent out after the successful hacking. It was an investigation

Quigley says

“The AP's reconstruction— based on a database of 19,000 malicious links recently shared by cybersecurity firm Secureworks — shows how the hackers worked their way around the Clinton campaign's top-of-the-line digital security to steal chairman John Podesta's emails in March 2016.”

In other words, the DNC still hasn't had their server investigated by a Law Enforcement agency.

Why isn't the DNC pressing for an official investigation into this troubling possibility?

Maybe Congress should start on and demand the servers. That's when we'll find out they wiped it right away and kept no backups

Also, it's been over a year and no developments in the case, eh? Maybe the case should be federalized.

TwoScoopsMcGee says

In other words, the DNC still hasn't had their server investigated by a Law Enforcement agency.

Why would they?

They had an official investigation and it identified the Russians.

joeyjojojunior says

They had an official investigation and it identified the Russians.

Congress had an official investigation that involved the FBI directly inspecting the servers with physical access?

Or was it a paid contractor for the DNC putting the blame where the DNC wanted it?

joeyjojojunior says

They had an official investigation and it identified the Russians.

They did, who did the "official" investigation?

If it took "Fancy Bear" a week to crack such security as "Obama2008" and "P@assword", we can basically shut down the cyber warfare departments of the Federal Government.

Sniper says

They did, who did the "official" investigation?

Do you think official means "done by the government'"?

TwoScoopsMcGee says

If it took "Fancy Bear" a week to crack such security as "Obama2008" and "P@assword", we can basically shut down the cyber warfare departments of the Federal Government.

They didn't hack the passwords--they used a sophisticated phishing attack.

Sniper says

I DON'T think it means by a sub-contractor we hired.

Well, you're wrong as usual.

Brazile writes that she was haunted by the still-unsolved murder of DNC data staffer Seth Rich and feared for her own life, shutting the blinds to her office window so snipers could not see her and installing surveillance cameras at her home

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/brazile-i-considered-replacing-clinton-with-biden-as-2016-democratic-nominee/2017/11/04/f0b75418-bf4c-11e7-97d9-bdab5a0ab381_story.html?utm_term=.9d7639705891

Blurtman says

Brazile writes that she was haunted by the still-unsolved murder of DNC data staffer Seth Rich and feared for her own life, shutting the blinds to her office window so snipers could not see her and installing surveillance cameras at her home

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/brazile-i-considered-replacing-clinton-with-biden-as-2016-democratic-nominee/2017/11/04/f0b75418-bf4c-11e7-97d9-bdab5a0ab381_story.html?utm_term=.9d7639705891

Donna Brazile is a far Nazi troll. Duh

Sniper says

Sniper says

joeyjojojunior says

Sniper says

I DON'T think it means by a sub-contractor we hired.

Well, you're wrong as usual.

So tell us, Rachel Maddow, who was this "official" company that did the investigation. Please post their name.

Hey Joey the Troll, I'm still waiting....

Once it goes past innuendo and fake studies, joey runs away.

Every shred of actual hard evidence suggests an inside job.

Why would Donna Brazile be afraid for her life if Seth Rich's death was due to a random mugging in the middle of the night?

Booger says

Why would Donna Brazile be afraid for her life if Seth Rich's death was due to a random mugging in the middle of the night?

Yep, considering he was found with his wallet, cellphone and expensive watch still on his body. Strange mugging?

Sniper says

Hey Joey the Troll, I'm still waiting....

Yep, I'll get back with you as soon as you answer the questions that you ran from on all the other threads:

What does the Obama budget have to do with the trade deficit?
What am I wrong about with respect to running a business? Be specific
Which post of mine said that I didn't want kids from the wrong side of the tracks in school with mine?


anon_4480e says

Every shred of actual hard evidence suggests an inside job.

Can you detail this "hard" evidence?

anon_4480e says

Every shred of actual hard evidence suggests an inside job.

Which is why the DNC will never voluntarily allow LEOs to look at the server, if a copy still exists which is doubtful.

"Wiped, like with a rag?"

TwoScoopsMcGee says

Which is why the DNC will never voluntarily allow LEOs to look at the server, if a copy still exists which is doubtful.

Great--can you detail the "hard" evidence then?

Sniper says

The metadata on the transferred files, not that you'll understand what that is.

Sniper says

joeyjojojunior says

anon_4480e says

Every shred of actual hard evidence suggests an inside job.

Can you detail this "hard" evidence?

The metadata on the transferred files, not that you'll understand what that is.

ah great--please link to the hard evidence then

Sniper says

Google doesn't work on your TROLLING computer?

Google works fine on my computer. You mentioned "hard" evidence, but provided none.

I'm asking if anyone can show me this supposed "hard" evidence.

Sniper says

Try doing some work, for once in your life, instead of being the Socialist that you are, who wants EVERYTHING GIVEN to him.

Clearly I've done the work and haven't found the "hard" evidence to which you refer.

If you have something, please post it. Otherwise, I'll assume it's more BS from piggy.

Sniper says

..."What We Know

So far, all of the evidence pointing to Russia’s involvement in the Democratic hacks (DNC, DCCC, Podesta, et al.) comes from either private security firms (like CrowdStrike or FireEye) who sell cyber-defense services to other companies, or independent researchers, some with university affiliations and serious credentials, and some who are basically just Guys on Twitter."

https://theintercept.com/2016/12/14/heres-the-public-evidence-russia-hacked-the-dnc-its-not-enough/


Hey Joey the TROLL, ready to admit that these "officials" were HIRED sub-contractors yet?????

So, you gave up on providing the "hard" evidence then?

And yes, expert contractors are obvious candidates to perform "official" investigations.

Sniper says

Sure thing, Joey the TROLL, everyone knows you hire outside "official" contractors when doing a criminal investigation. Oh boy..

They weren't doing a criminal investigation, obviously. The DNC couldn't hire anyone to do a criminal investigation. That's not how criminal investigations work.

Still waiting on you to provide any "hard" evidence. (or McGee. or anon4480e.)

Sniper says

So hacking into an organization's or company's computers is legal now?

Nope. But the DNC can't perform a criminal investigation nor hire anyone to do so.

But, since you asked, the FBI DID investigate.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/fbi-dnc-226123
And their conclusion:

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/312132-fbi-dhs-release-report-on-russia-hacking
"The 13-page report provides technical details regarding tools and infrastructure used by Russian civilian and military intelligence services to “compromise and exploit networks and endpoints associated with the U.S. election, as well as a range of U.S. Government, political, and private sector entities.” (See the entire report below.)"

Sniper says

Ahhh, NO the FBI didn't, but if you read your links, you would have known that:

As the link said, both the FBI and crowdstrike investigated. So, yes, I'm right. Again.

Sniper says

Go post the sentence where it said the FBI examined the server for evidence.

Why? You obviously don't need to examine the server to do an investigation as multiple investigations have all agreed conclusively that it was the Russians.