« First « Previous Comments 35 - 74 of 160 Next » Last » Search these comments
I encourage you to keep "fighting". Bring out the ideas of the left and show them for their real value. If the value of leftism is so important, you should have no problem presenting and debating leftism on PatNet without resorting to personal insults.
Poobah Pat oppresses me all the time.
It is the price of FREE!dom.
Maybe it’s your own love of Republicans and disdain of Democrats that has you seeing this with such bias. Goran treats people who aren’t rabid right wingers way differently than he does those that he views as being on his team. It’s plain as day to anyone with a brain who doesn’t participate in the silly partisanship
Right wing think tank lol lol lol lol lmao lmao lol
Where they all whine and cry about how some 120lb dweeb at Berkeley is keeping them from sharing their ideas and restricting their free Speech, and then never ever present any unique ideas?
I encourage you to follow the rules and not take posts off topic. I am specifically referring to where you said
"To leftists ... I fucking hate these people."
What exactly did your comment have to do with China, the OP? Lead by example, Goran, or tell Patrick you resign because you are unfit for the job.
The performance being done is that the right is trying to drive away the left so that patnet can become a right wing think tank.
anon_13ce6 saysThe performance being done is that the right is trying to drive away the left so that patnet can become a right wing think tank.
BS. Your opinion is welcome.
There has never been a push to ban anyone but Ironman and TPB as far as I can remember.
So perhaps if you want a better community, one with the type of quality content you seek, maybe you should look in the mirror and figure out what you can do to personally improve the communities quality first. Just a suggestion!
I have and I'm doing it.
Actually, Ironman was number one liked
I wonder if @Patrick has just staged a piece of censorship Performance Art by instituting omnipotent censorship, under the guise of "moderation", and crowd-sourced mass-silencing (encouraging the use of the "uncivil" button) on patrick.net.
Yeah. We remember what happened to roberto, logan, and gary.
See the thing is, as a libertarian, I invite all trans-identities to come and enjoy PatNet.
Transgenderism, transracial, pretty much most trans anything is just misdiagnosed mental illness.
justme saysI wonder if @Patrick has just staged a piece of censorship Performance Art by instituting omnipotent censorship, under the guise of "moderation", and crowd-sourced mass-silencing (encouraging the use of the "uncivil" button) on patrick.net.
Yes, I posted a similar idea a while ago - an attempt by Patrick to show how easy it is to get people to acquiesce and even become partisan goons. Even if that was not the intent, it certainly has delivered the above.
Goran_K saysTransgenderism, transracial, pretty much most trans anything is just misdiagnosed mental illness.
So you want me to come back so you can make uncivil posts to my face rather than to me anonymously?
Working on all that today!
anon_13ce6 saysDepends on what you mean by safe and how old they are. I'm not a sick fuck like Roy Moore, I don't go to the local mall looking for 14 year olds.I don't like to fuck goats
Good to know.
Are my children safe around you?
I don't go to the local mall looking for 14 year olds.
Patrick saysWorking on all that today!
Your “moderator “ goron is lying again. He said everyone has a “mark as uncivil “ button. I don’t have one @Patrick
It seems uncivil and unhinged to call every anon by a pet name in reference to past members
errc saysPatrick saysWorking on all that today!
Your “moderator “ goron is lying again. He said everyone has a “mark as uncivil “ button. I don’t have one @Patrick
Goran did not lie. He was just unaware that I temporarily removed the uncivil link from some users because they were deliberately using it on perfectly valid comments.
Some of the anons are too obvious to not call out by name due to their posting pattern, obscure references only long term posters would have knowledge of, and finally, their pet phrases that slip through every now and then....
errc saysIt seems uncivil and unhinged to call every anon by a pet name in reference to past members
Some of the anons are too obvious to not call out by name due to their posting pattern, obscure references only long term posters would have knowledge of, and finally, their pet phrases that slip through every now and then....
errc saysIt seems uncivil and unhinged to call every anon by a pet name in reference to past members
Wouldn't it be possible for an anon to exhibit that trait or characteristic just to trough you off their true identity?
errc saysHe said everyone has a “mark as uncivil “ button. I don’t have one
That's because you wore yours out the other day. It was so used, Patrick has to build a new one for you.
errc saysFrom using it two or three times? I doubt it.
Maybe you should respect Patrick wishes and leave his site.
What happens to you on a Saturday? You become extremely uncivil. Is today a repeat of last Saturday?
errc saysI don’t find that in any way uncivil, it’s actually the pathway to a return to civility
So, you feel calling people liars all day today with ZERO evidence or proof is a "pathway to a return to civility"??
You really follow a strange pathway.
This thread is so much lulz.
Rin, can you secure some hookers? Half of Pat.net needs to get laid.
I saw him claim that ice would be gone in 5 years.
You should really learn how to spell his name correctly.
« First « Previous Comments 35 - 74 of 160 Next » Last » Search these comments
It is more than a little ironic (but should not be surprising to any serious student of human nature) that right-wingers appear to be every bit as eager to censor their opponents as they have recently been accusing the left-wingers of being. And by that I mean the last several years of talk about liberals and their desire for "safe spaces" on and off university campuses, calling them "special snowflakes", and so on.
Well, the right-wing has in recent days been out in force on Patnet, trying to enforce a "safe space" , free of "uncivility" and "NSFW" material, and acting like special snowflakes themselves. And boy, are these right-wing special snowflakes melting down Patnet in a volcanic eruption of censorship actions.
The famous 1960s psychological experiment known as the Stanford Prisoner Project comes to mind as an analogy of sorts. That experiment showed what happens when you give authority for random people to control other random people. What soon happened was not pretty. Read up on it if you want.
Finally, I will revisit and highlight a suggestion I have made several times this year:
What I would like to see is to have free speech, and at the same time avoid massive storms of low-quality comments. For a blog, I think that means to make threads and comments a limited commodity for all posters. Specifically, to limit the number of threads that a user can post on any given day to 1 or 2, and to limit how many comments every user can post on every thread to 10, or 10% of the total number of comments on the thread, whichever is larger.
The purpose of moderation should not be to censor certain forms of expression, but rather to make everyone's time (or space) on the proverbial soapbox a valuable commodity. That way, users are more likely to spend their posting currency wisely. Users who wastes their currency by posting low-quality drivel will lose esteem, or at the very least not be able to dominate the discussion based on volume posted only.
Think of it as rules of order, a very lightweight and blog-adapted version of Robert's rules of order. (By the way, a quite well-known now former pat-netter just mentioned Robert's rules just days ago, and is hereby recognized.)
PS: I very well understand the meta-question as to whether the impact of a blog, as measured by commercial value or informative value, or even political/propaganda value(!), is reduced when the number of threads or comments are somewhat limited. I think many people may think so, perhaps even Patrick himself. Personally, I will take quality over quantity any day.
#misc