« First « Previous Comments 13 - 52 of 102 Next » Last » Search these comments
Personal much ? ;-)
Exactly no-one is defining the 500 murders per year in Chicago as terrorism.
brand violence by Muslim or brown people as terrorism, while ignoring the same acts if perpetrated by a white person
CBOEtrader saysYour desire to call him a white terrorist is 100% about politicizing tragedy. It's a deplorable move
Personal much ? ;-)
Is it terrorism? Is it WHITE TERROR?
Justme is racist who hates white people. His posts are Leftwing Terror.
Ah, your first mistake.
Thinking you could come to a relevant (never correct) conclusion based on nothing but your powers of reasoning!
Everything after that was just mental masturbation.
We can turn it around rather simply...
Justme is racist who hates white people. His posts are Leftwing Terror.
What exactly is the Administration's definition of terrorism then?
Quigley saysAh, your first mistake.
Thinking you could come to a relevant (never correct) conclusion based on nothing but your powers of reasoning!
Everything after that was just mental masturbation.
Moderators let this one go?
FortWayne saysWe can turn it around rather simply...
Justme is racist who hates white people. His posts are Leftwing Terror.
And this one?
What difference would that make? Criminals don't follow laws.
Quigley saysThanks for making the NRA’s point!
(it's called sarcasm)
deepcgi saysbombs should be illegal.
What difference would that make? Criminals don't follow laws.
The funny part was Sarah Sanders claiming this wasn't terrorism.
What exactly is the Administration's definition of terrorism then?
Hahaha pwned by his own fingers! An unnamed happy person loses!
Would that be like denying the Ft Hood shooting that killed 13 and wounded 30 was terrorism, even though done by an Islamic extremist yelling "Allah u Akbar?" The Obama administration and their allies were explicitly against labeling that this Ft Hood massacre as terrorism, but instead called it "work place violence."
Yeah so it was likely was (domestic) terrorism, no problem with the assessment if you leave skin color out of it cause it has nothing to do with it, still dwarfs imported terrorism so much that the thread becomes insignificant.
Ah...sarcasm. I think you’ll find that bombs are already illegal. Apparently didn’t matter did it?
mell saysYeah so it was likely was (domestic) terrorism, no problem with the assessment if you leave skin color out of it cause it has nothing to do with it, still dwarfs imported terrorism so much that the thread becomes insignificant.
Yes, let's call it Christian terrorism.
No that would be a clear lie since there are no Christian motives at all.
mell says
No that would be a clear lie since there are no Christian motives at all.
Source? I've seen nothing saying there was no Christian motive. I have seen sources stating he was Christian.
Pretty sure most here would assume it was Islamic terrorism if he was Muslim.
I doubt it. Link?
what the rationale could be when declaring that someone planting bombs designed to kill people isn't terrorism?
No that would be a clear lie since there are no Christian motives at all.
This isnt complicated, just seems like the left cant skip a chance to shit on white men. Quite pathetic
just seems like the left cant skip a chance to shit on white men
deepcgi saysAh...sarcasm. I think you’ll find that bombs are already illegal. Apparently didn’t matter did it?
Again--so the solution is to get rid of all laws then?
Last I checked, people are still getting raped, so rape laws don't matter
If this is the deceased suspect, it's a refutation of the Media/DNC (but I repeat myself) line about it being "White Terror"
Pretty sure most here would assume it was Islamic terrorism if he was Muslim.
No, it's just a chance to, once again, show the hypocrisy of the Trump supporters.
What's been pointed out with the delusional Libbies is that laws already exist on the books that make these acts illegal, but the Libbies think adding NEW laws will stop future attacks.
« First « Previous Comments 13 - 52 of 102 Next » Last » Search these comments
I think it is time to resurrect an old term that originated during the French Revolution, and has since been reused several times through the centuries:
WHITE TERROR
So from now one, if there is an act that could be viewed as possible terrorism, the public should always ask: Is it terrorism? Is it WHITE TERROR? Then the public should relentlessly hound rightist politicians and blog jockeys why why WHY have they not denounced the violence as a cowardly act of terrorism. That would only be fair, given that the rightists always want to brand violence by Muslim or brown people as terrorism, while ignoring the same acts if perpetrated by a white person.