patrick.net

They are going to take him to court to stop him next.

The 9th District asshole judges weighing in 3...2...1...

Liberals with they would make up their minds, separate kids in cages or lock them both in internment camps?

Sniper says

CovfefeButDeadly says

The leftists on this site mocked me when I suggested last year that leftists, the Democrats, and the msm move continually from one hysteria to the next.

I wasn’t incorrect.

So, what's next on their agenda?

"They are keeping innocent children in horrible jails along with rapists and murderers!"

Sniper says

CovfefeButDeadly says

The leftists on this site mocked me when I suggested last year that leftists, the Democrats, and the msm move continually from one hysteria to the next.

I wasn’t incorrect.

So, what's next on their agenda?

Jeff Sessions is a secret cross dresser? They are getting more and more bizarre.

HEYYOU says

now he thinks he can change the law.

What "law" are we talking about here?

Trump just shit all over the Democrats mid term hopes.

LOl liberals are now the part of free trade, globalism, the police state and separating children from parents!

Goran_K says

Trump just shit all over the Democrats mid term hopes.

I expected that move in one of my earlier posts yesterday or two days ago where I mentioned Trump needs to tread lightly and that I expect a concession/compromise here. He is outplaying the Dems at every turn. He wasn't wrong in the first place but the leftoid feelz were whipped into a frenzy shitting all over their fatherland and so he put the ball squarely back into their court. I mean, nobody wants to have any more trigglypuff sightings than absolutely necessary, really.

Goran_K says

#4DChess

Now magically, and I predict, we will now move on from Russia, Stormy Daniels, Where is Melania, Kids being separated at the border by Clinton policy, to some new made up outrage that CNN commands its sheep to be angry at.

Yes, please start the countdown to next faux outrage. 10, 9, 8, ...

Maybe the few remaining CNN watchers are getting tired of the lame attempts at whipping up hatred for The Donald:

Out of the big three cable news networks, CNN has lost a big chunk in viewership, with the latest almost reaching 30 percent, while Fox News continues to enjoy being the most watched channel. ...

For CNN, when compared to the same week last year, they experienced an almost 30 percent drop. In 2017, they averaged 1.2 million viewers. This year, they only had around 844,000 viewers during primetime.

https://ijr.com/2018/05/1095814-cnn-viewership-plummets-30-percent/

Note also that the lamestream media immediately reacts with the same pattern: "new order by the Donald => questions abound! => Donald must answer or is he hiding something?!" They don't even research they just automatically question everything and demand answers to make it look like it's incomplete or not a solution. Had this happened under Obummer the lamestream paper would have been deemed "rayscyst" for automatically questioning and scrutinizing the prez on every order. The fact they stayed silent when Obummer's camps where pretty much the same as those today speaks volumes of the leftoid hypocrisy and lamestream media bias. NPR was shitting over it all day today as well when in 8 years of Obummer there was no peep. Lame!

I am watching the Trump rally in MN. Trump tells the single protestor to go home to Mommy !!! I love this man. I was wrong, I wanted him to take care of jeff Sessions-if he did before the mid-terms it would have been non stop outrage. Now it is turning into an advantage and after the mid-terms he can deal with that old goat.

To the other protestor-was that a man or a woman, I couldn't tell-he needs a haircut -hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What the hell happened??

Total Liberal outrage by the usual suspects here yesterday regarding Trump ripping infants from their mothers and placing them in concentration camps. Now today, all we have is "crickets"..

Where did these Liberal pawns go?

Are they all waiting by their phones for the next Liberal narrative to be text to them to troll with?

lostand confused says

I am watching the Trump rally in MN. Trump tells the single protestor to go home to Mommy !!! I love this man. I was wrong, I wanted him to take care of jeff Sessions-if he did before the mid-terms it would have been non stop outrage. Now it is turning into an advantage and after the mid-terms he can deal with that old goat.

To the other protestor-was that a man or a woman, I couldn't tell-he needs a haircut -hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fuck he's on fire! #MAGA

What a stud. Liberal women are finally realizing that their hatred for Trump has really been lust for his alpha schlong, and they don't know how to deal with it. Liberal men are coping by fingering their manginas to cuckold porn.

Patrick says

Maybe the few remaining CNN watchers are getting tired of the lame attempts at whipping up hatred for The Donald:

You're a former Dem (I hope). What is is that still attracts them to such lies and bullshit night after night on CNN?

Are they really this clueless and just dumb, kool-aid drinking "sheep"?

Ha ha! Now their whole fucking family is in jail!

Hassan_Rouhani says

bob2356 says

Hassan_Rouhani says

But doesn't it bring the whole situation back to pre-1985 status quo?

Yep, screaming about illegals to fire up the base while making sure they don't really get deported just like always. Until so many employers go to jail that no one will hire an illegal it's all just a big smokescreen. Where are the executive arrests? Employing illegals is a crime.

I'm referring to the ACLU 1985 case re detention of minors. Not sure what your rant (comprised of 100% of canned talking points) has to do with this particular narrow legal matter.

I was referring to reagan pre amnesty. I forgot about flores. Which was about a policy of only releasing unauthorized unaccompanied children to their parent so I don't see how it is relevant to prosecuting families that cross together as a narrow legal point.

The truth of the total hypocrisy of the republican dealing with illegals is far from canned talking points. The conservatives have been flaming up outrage about illegals to fire up the base voters while very quietly blocking any reform to please corporate donors for many years.

Including trump. The wall is strictly meat for the base. Over 2/3's of illegals are visa overstayers who entered the US perfectly legally. How will the wall stop them? How will zero tolerance policy at the border stop them. Where are all the news events about tracking them down? How many employers have been criminally prosecuted to discourage hiring of illegals under trump? Where are all the big speeches from trump about the criminal employers? Just a big political show as always. The only difference is Trump is a much bigger showman.

socal2 says

bob2356 says

Until so many employers go to jail that no one will hire an illegal it's all just a big smokescreen. Where are the executive arrests? Employing illegals is a crime.

When will your party support E-Verify Bob?

Why does your party block any common sense immigration reform?

What party it that? i'm independent formerly republican. Republicans control both houses. How many mandatory usage of e verify bills have they introduced under Trump? Zero. The legal workforce act with mandatory e-verify has been introduced every session since 2011 and has gone nowhere every time. It has never made it out of committee. Republican chaired and majority committee. You do remember it's been a republican congress since 2010 don't you? Someone slipped mandatory e verify into the 2019 budget proposal. Want to bet some serious money it won't be there when congress finishes the budget? Which party is it that is blocking common sense immigration reform?

Don't let facts screw up good bit of nonsense partisan demagoguery though.

Hassan_Rouhani says

Sounds like you agree that these "asylum" cases are mostly bullshit and people are not "fleeing gang/domestic violence" but migrating for purely economic reasons. I mean, if somebody is really fleeing from a mortal danger, does he really-really care whether he'll have a job at the safe destination? And will a person who loses his job go back to where his life is in mortal danger? The answer for both questions is obviously "no".

Asylum seekers is just another bullshit political theatre straw man. Not that many people at the border are asylum seekers. The US only took in 85,000 asylum seekers in 2016 and only granted asylum to 26,000. That was for the entire world, not just the mexican border. The border patrol grabs over half a million people a year for christ sakes. Getting past the “credible fear” test has always been hard and sessions has made it much harder.

Trump's poop is stinky.

bob2356 says

What party it that? i'm independent formerly republican. Republicans control both houses. How many mandatory usage of e verify bills have they introduced under Trump? Zero.

Yet you never seem to have nary a bad word about Democrats when they oppose "common sense" immigration reform. This week we have Democrats like Kamala Harris saying that no illegal alien family should ever be detained if caught by ICE sneaking across the border. That is basically total open borders. All a human or drug smuggler needs is to carry a kid with them.

I've already conceded that some Republican Chamber of Commerce types are against E-Verify, but the majority of Republicans are for it. E-Verify doesn't get out of committee because they know they can't get enough Democrat votes in the House and Senate once out of committee.

socal2 says

Yet you never seem to have nary a bad word about Democrats when they oppose "common sense" immigration reform. This week we have Democrats like Kamala Harris saying that no illegal alien family should ever be detained if caught by ICE sneaking across the border. That is basically total open borders. All a human or drug smuggler needs is to carry a kid with them.

What "common sense" immigration reform are you talking about? Changing the policy from prioritizing going after proven criminals to simply making everyone a criminal case and creating total chaos. I agree with the dems that was just stupid. The debates on immigration reform on patnet are always right wingnuts throwing out outrageous bullshit bombs. Want to show the debates that have been had where the dem's were blocking common "common sense" immigration reform?

The only common sense immigation reform is eliminating jobs for illegals. Not a peep out about going after employers from trump or the republicans. I said the exact same thing when it was Obama in charge.

socal2 says

I've already conceded that some Republican Chamber of Commerce types are against E-Verify, but the majority of Republicans are for it. E-Verify doesn't get out of committee because they know they can't get enough Democrat votes in the House and Senate once out of committee.

Load of crap. R's have a majority in the house and don't need a single D vote. No way D's are going the philibuster E-Verify in the Senate going into mid term elections. Never going to happen. The republican comiittee chairman are deliberatly bottling it up so they can have their cake and eat it to. Appease the base with rhetoric about going after illegal immigrants and the corporatate donors by actually preventing anything from happening.

zzyzzx says

What this is really about.

What can you say about people who put their children at risk for a personal advantage? New Democrats?

These are the negligent, short sighted, brain dead, procreating ASSHOLES you DON'T want as citizens.

bob2356 says

What "common sense" immigration reform are you talking about?

Securing the border for starters. Eliminating sanctuary cities. Beefing up ICE enforcement. Ending chain migration.

Democrats are against all of that.

bob2356 says

Changing the policy from prioritizing going after proven criminals to simply making everyone a criminal case and creating total chaos.

Here's a hint, everyone who crosses the border illegally is a criminal. EVERY ONE. Which part of that law is difficult to understand?

This might help you:

Feux Follets says

socal2 says

Ending chain migration

Does this apply to Melania and her family ?

Ahhhhh...

So unique, isn't that cute!

socal2 says

Securing the border for starters. Eliminating sanctuary cities. Beefing up ICE enforcement. Ending chain migration.

And E-Verify!

I still just cannot understand any Left logic on the pro-illegal-immigration stance. It's as if their belief system isn't really their own, but simply whatever the opposite of the Right is.

Sniper says

Trump Signs E.O. that will keep migrant families together - What's the next Democrat Faux Outrage Du Jour?

Melania's jacket.

Feux Follets says

How about something concerning the Golden Golem's brilliant tariffs that may lead to a depression ?

If you mean an economic depression, that's impossible with the fed printing and the fake GDP numbers. If you mean a psychological depression, that's been going on since Nov. 2016

RafiMaas says

PrivilegedtobeWhite says

I still just cannot understand any Left logic on the pro-illegal-immigration stance.

It's called pro- human rights. Pro- not having my rights trampled

Rafi is illegal?

This video posted by Trump is actually pretty amusing:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1009536237881847808

RafiMaas says

If you don't want me to come after your second you sure as shit better not come after my 4th.

Cut the crap: you'll be coming after the 2nd no matter what until your last breath.

socal2 says

bob2356 says

What "common sense" immigration reform are you talking about?

Securing the border for starters. Eliminating sanctuary cities. Beefing up ICE enforcement. Ending chain migration.

Democrats are against all of that.

Which bills were those? What were the vote totals? Saying something is true doesn't make it true. Keeping E-verify in committee and refusing to allow it to a floor vote has zero to do with dems, even though you claim the dems are holding it up. Something you skipped over discussing while accusing me of political favouritism. .

So once we secure the borders what shall we do about the problem that 2/3's of illegals entered legally and overstayed? Will a gazillion dollar wall help with that? If the existing laws against employing illegals were enforced and no one would employ an illegal those illegals would leave also. When do you suppose trump will be issuing an executive order on that? When will we see executives doing perp walks? Until that day it's all self serving political theatre on both sides. But the R's are the hypocrites. The dems have wrong positions on some of the issues, but they aren't saying one thing and doing another.

PrivilegedtobeWhite says

I still just cannot understand any Left logic on the pro-illegal-immigration stance. It's as if their belief system isn't really their own, but simply whatever the opposite of the Right is.

It's just based on the Liberal kool-aid they drink and what Rachel Maddow tells them to think. Logic??? That horse left the barn a long time ago!

Voters Blame Parents, Not Feds, For Border Children Crisis

Most voters blame the parents of the separated children at the border for the latest illegal immigration crisis, not the federal government.

When families are arrested and separated after attempting to enter the United States illegally, 54% of Likely U.S. Voters say the parents are more to blame for breaking the law.

To help understand the current political debate over the children issue, a closer look shows that 82% of Republicans and 56% of voters not affiliated with either major political party feel the parents are more to blame for breaking the law. But 60% of Democrats say the government is more to blame for enforcing the law.

Seventy-five percent (75%) of Democrats think the Trump administration is too aggressive in trying to stop the flow of illegal immigrants into the United States, a view shared by only 23% of Republicans and a plurality (46%) of unaffiliated voters.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/immigration/june_2018/voters_blame_parents_not_feds_for_border_children_crisis

Feux Follets says

Speaking of crickets and pawns still not a peep from the base on this even after a week or more...

The Iran Business Ties Trump Didn’t Disclose. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-iran-business-ties-trump-didnt-disclose

Maybe because there's NOTHING to disclose. Did you miss this part of the article?

....."There is no reason to think that anyone in the Trump Organization was intentionally seeking to help the Iranians. Trump’s top lawyer at the time, Jason Greenblatt, oversaw the contract with the Mammadovs and is now at the White House, serving as an adviser on the Middle East. An Orthodox Jew, Greenblatt is known as a supporter of Israel and an antagonist of Iran."

Another Faux Liberal Outrage, foiled again.....

NEXT!!

bob2356 says

But the R's are the hypocrites. The dems have wrong positions on some of the issues, but they aren't saying one thing and doing another.

Good grief.
www.youtube.com/embed/Lps-As9djiw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=728SW65tlU0