patrick.net

Tarantula says

There seems to be tacit approval of the mass shooter around these parts.

Bullshit.

Hugolas_Madurez says

Bullshit.

Yes, it is bullshit that there is tacit approval and no one has a set to come out in public to voice their approval but historical rhetoric on this forum
proves this to be true as well as the identities of the approvers.

Failure to denounce the attacks = tacit approval.

Logic courtesy of the "Attack Gang" - names not provided since everyone knows who they are and they aren't from the left side of the political spectrum.

The biggest supporter of the NZ shooting terrorist(s) so far is the NZ government: the shooter was stopped at the 2nd Mosque by a private individual who had a gun. The NZ government's response is banning private gun ownership! so the next time a shooter (regardless whether 6 months earlier having been in Pakistan on record loving and praising Muslims while on likely government paid assignment or not before going to NZ to launch mass shooting of Muslims allegedly due to hatred of Muslims worldwide killing of Christians in previous decades), there wouldn't be someone getting in the way and stopping the mass murder!

Elgatouno says

ALEXANDRIA! OCASIO!-CORTEZ!

This comes from the playbook of Saul-Patron Saint of Losers-Alinsky. And she does have those crazy, starring eyes.

Liberals will try anything to take down a free speech website.

Tarantula says

My taxes increased.

That's because you made MORE money under Trump.

Duh.

If she wasn't so fucking stupid, she wouldn't be such a lightning rod for negative attention.

That means you have expensive real estate. Salt was the only increase. So you also lied about your Property taxes.

Tarantula says

FortWayneIndiana says

I’m not rich, got tax cut.

My taxes increased.

More distressingly, Trump is on pace to HUGELY increase the national debt. He makes Obama look like a fiscal conservative.

Tarantula says

Lots of stupid people out there, Booger. She's particularly triggering to Alt-Right white males suffering from OCDS ;)

How many were working as a bartender with a college degree, and won a seat in congress with only 10% of the voters in the district actually voting for them?

Little boy went from trolling to harassing Patrick. Liberals don’t believe in free speech.

This is why no one likes liberals. It’s that circle of SJW that someone posted, where first they get in, then they kick you out with empty threats.

Tarantula says

Are YOU suffering from Ocasio-Cortez Derangement Syndrome (OCDS)?

No not at all...I happen to like her and even admire someone that as a first term rookie congress person that can stir up the shit and have the old guard in her party in a panic...What's not to like?

Only a person that watches TV propaganda would actually believe that the Green New deal has even a remote chance of being applied.

I guess I’ll never work for CNN or some feminist group. What a loss..... not.

As founding fathers intended.

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

Hey, guys!

Clue: Trump doesn't remember what he promised and he wouldn't care if he could.

Everything he emits is all a variation on DONNIE! MAKE! MOO!, the warm gooey joy of releasing MOO! wild and smelly into the world to announce his being and his potency.

https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/03/13/ocasio-cortez-blames-pipeline-that-hasnt-been-built-yet-for-an-oil-spill

I'm the only out and open vocal Trump supporter at my job.
3 of the 5 people that has anything to do with tech, were either fired or quit.
As a result now not only do have to code my day to day functions I now have to play report bitch and data gate keeper.

I even get the feeling the family that owns this company, don't even like me. But I could go in their office tomorrow and tell them I need a $20K raise or I'm leaving and I'm 90% certain they would give it to me.

We have to wait 3 months for trading partners to catch up with me, when I integrate our systems with the outside world. And most of the times I'm going by their specs, and get it implemented months before they are even ready. I've had to share my code and processes with about 2 or 3 of their partners, and some are industry leaders in what they do.

Stay relevant my friends.

Just how sophisticated are you? You don't really follow the real news enough to pick up on nuances and political innuendos do you?
Besides you know it's illegal to be on welfare and White. Can't have the Honkeys taking away the Illegal Alien welcome wagon money.

Tarantula says

That's all the right wing welfare queens can afford anyway. Welfare recipients who pretend to be Conservatives are the absolute WORST.

It's OK to talk about wanting to retire in Caligulan splendor. Other than that, I would not quote this website at work.

Your seeing in this thread why dems are loosing it. Sara Palin, Bushes, McCain, all of the republicans running for 2016 can be called out and disliked by republicans even Trump. Dems on the other hand just keep defending the Clintons, their own people that should be in nursing homes, and now all of these communist/socialists that are becoming the new stars of the party. Dems need to stop worrying about Trump and clean their own house why they still can. I don't think most people want to see either party pushed to an extreme and both parties have their pros and cons when working correctly.

Tarantula says

In a word, YES.

In fact, Patrick has shared an instance where the HR people turned down his application based on his hosting this very site. So it can happen if the company you apply to is run by DICKS!
From what he reports, however, Patrick is very gainfully employed at the time.

Thanks for your “concern.” I expect now you’ll be trying to get either the site shutdown or Pat fired for SJW reasons.

Some people just suck.

RC2006 says

I don't think most people want to see either party pushed to an extreme and both parties have their pros and cons when working correctly.

That's why before 2016, I always registered as NPA No Party Affiliated.

And always said a perfectly split congress was ideal. So neither party could inflict their will with impunity.

And unless the Tom Fitton's, Devin Nunez's, Mark Meadows, and the Steve Scalise's inherit the Republican party post Trump.
I'll be back as an NPA voter.

Tarantula says

It seems as if folks around these parts are singularly obsessed with a particular first (and likely only) term congresswoman, to the point that I"m concerned for their mental well being.

She gets a LOL. We kind of love her for how many stupid things she says and how she drives people out of her own party and drives the party bosses to distraction with her Marxist ideas.

Your post, however, gets only a “meh.”

Yes, Elagtouno/ERRC.

We are terrified of AOC. Everytime she appears and opens her mouth, MAGA takes a deadly blow.

Keep rolling her out, repeatedly. And Beta, too.

He looks crazed.

Often his crazy noise is intended to get the media and us to move on from the last embarrassing ridiculous thing he said. It's a ploy he's been using since the 2016 campaign.

He's going to be working overtime for the next week to take our minds of the interview where he basically threatened violence against the media and democrats if they "go too far."

Tim Aurora says

First of all, I am not big on grades. Some people. however dedicated cannot score high and others who are good at taking exam.

So, then you're admitting grades really don't serve any point in the big picture.


Tim Aurora says

That said, before he mocks others grades and other failed enterprises, I would like Trump to show his taxes and his grades,

You just admitted grades won't tell you much. What do you think you can determine from Trump's tax return that the IRS hasn't figured out? Do you know more than the IRS?




What's your expertise in reading all those pages?

www.youtube.com/embed/UDz718_HhQI

www.youtube.com/embed/XgXwIIHAmaw

www.youtube.com/embed/I3oO6I56Guc

www.youtube.com/embed/fhbrjGUM2jw

HEYYOU says

How many Republicans will never be anything but takers?

A small amount compared to the number of Democrats

See, if the government hadn't gotten involved in funding education, they never would have been defrauded, and she never would have had to go through that. And tuition likely wouldn't be so unaffordable.

Once Again: The GOP Tax Cuts Are Not Paying for Themselves

A handful of supply-side enthusiasts are sticking to their claim that the Republican tax cuts are paying for themselves, with Art Laffer making that argument on CNBC just last week, but the overwhelming consensus is that the tax overhaul has pushed the federal government deeper into the red. William Gale and Aaron Krupkin of the Tax Policy Center revisited the topic Wednesday, and concluded once again that the tax cuts are neither increasing revenues nor paying for themselves:

“While some [Tax Cuts and Jobs Act] supporters are touting that nominal revenues were higher in fiscal year (FY) 2018 than in FY2017, that comparison does not address the question of TCJA’s effects. Nominal revenues rise because of inflation and economic growth. Adjusted for inflation, total revenues fell from FY2017 to FY2018. Adjusted for the size of the economy, they fell even more.”

As the table below indicates, federal revenues were lower in every category in fiscal year 2018 compared to the projected revenues without the tax cuts. And the revenue declines for the calendar year are even greater, since the fiscal year includes three months (October to December 2017) before the tax cuts took place.



“None of these findings should be surprising,” Gale and Krupkin write, since just about every major analysis – including those by the Congressional Budget Office, the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Tax Policy Center, the Penn-Wharton Budget Model and academic researchers Robert Barro and Jason Furman – concluded that the tax cuts would significantly reduce revenues. And there’s no reason to believe that economic growth will make up the loss, the authors say, since those same analyses concluded that higher economic growth sparked by the tax cuts would cover an average of just 20 percent of the overall cost.

http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2019/03/13/Once-Again-GOP-Tax-Cuts-Are-Not-Paying-Themselves

@TrumpingTits
"Who claimed the tax cuts would pay for themselves?"
Er, I can't tell if this is sarcasm, ignorance or fake news? Is this just an attempt by a Trumpturd to rewrite history to suit your delusions? If you really are asking this question, then I suggest either getting a high school diploma or a vasectomy. Either you are undereducated and that might help or you are too far gone and your genes should be removed from the gene pool.
You might look up Mnuchin, Trump, and dozens of other Republicans cunts who claimed the cuts would pay for themselves. And that they benefited the middle class. LOL.

@FortWayne
Keep spinning until you hit a lie that is irrefutable. That's the spirit!
Unemployment is not at a record low and employment rates are still extremely low. Real wages are stagnated. No one mentioned Obama. Why not bring up Hillary and Hitler while you are whining? Next thing you will tell us that the Democrats are to blame because they are secretly controlling America and stopping companies from hiring. Or it's the Muslims or Jews or some other minority.