patrick.net

CBOEtrader says

Try making a point and staying on a topic.

Nothing but personal attacks - maybe add in some name calling, see the mechanic from the IWLU for details. He may not be up yet since it is only 4:00 A.M. in California.

Nice to know I am so well thought of someone gets up so early to launch personal attacks.

Kakistocracy says

BOEtrader says

Try making a point and staying on a topic.

Kakistocracy says

Nice to know I am so well thought of someone gets up so early to launch personal attacks.

No, I'm criticizing your lack of an argument. You still have not made a single point, or even discussed the retarded article you dropped.

Try actually discussing something. It's why we're here (the rest of us at least)

personal

My colleague Quigley is a better man than myself. Quigley expects too much.

I just want ONE point. Choose ONE example of JP's bad data or pseudo science. If there is a valid critique, let's hear a small sliver of it at least.

CBOEtrader says

Lol, dude I've never seen more words used for less actual content. Try making a point and staying on a topic.

Whenever kak or heyyou post I mostly just scroll and scan for something, anything, useful or interesting. I'm usually disappointed.

personal

Onvacation says

Whenever kak or heyyou post I mostly just scroll and scan for something, anything, useful or interesting. I'm usually disappointed.

Ditto

@Onvacation - I am usually disappointed with the same from yourself and others but then we can't all be climate change deniers and play games with posts about the ideal temperature for human habitation.

Don't care what u think, otherwise I would have you off ignore wouldn't I ?

Patrick - as soon as I saw the title and knowing a bit about Peterson I just has this feeling this was the new "darling" of the right and I was not disappointed.

Milo's replacement until the next one comes along. An intellectual who has spent years without much of any attention or recognition is suddenly the new messiah.

It wasn't that long ago at all that Milo was the one being crucified by the evil liberal left, if Peterson turns out to have some sexual dalliances or other skeletons that are not in keeping with the expected image, will he be next to be tossed under the bus?

Controversy sells books. Not too excited or moved by the NYT times review either. Then again I suspect the majority of those books are bought by the "target audience"

Kind of ironic actually in that normally it is the professor types that are under the attack here until one takes a stance on gender identity and the
on air interview which everyone here is raving about because "he showed her"...

Actually his degree is normally under attack on here as well so I just don't get the hype other than that he embraces the right.

Quigley says

Ditto

Never seem to be lacking for something to attack though on my posts - why is that ?

Kakistocracy says

Actually his degree is normally under attack on here as well so I just don't get the hype other than that he embraces the right.

You clearly know nothing.
Peterson is not on the right, not religious, and not a fan of Donald Trump. He’s his own thing, something new under the sun. People who just want to crassly stereotype everyone into a pre-arranged category are stupid. Oddly, these people are the same ones who somehow believe themselves the champions of people who are routinely stereotyped. It’s kind of hilarious, and sad. But doesn’t humor come from a place of recognition that the human condition is sort of tragic?

Anyway, you should do your own research instead of just waiting for Maddow to tell you what you think.

Kakistocracy says

@Quigley - stop the personal attacks and I will stop flagging your comments

Quigley says

personal

Lolz!!!! So kak literally conflates criticisms of his lack of an argument as personal attacks while also literally doing nothing but personally attacking others... all while spamming articles and making exactly zero points, defending zero points.

Just amazing to watch this level of delusion.

These replies may be @Patrick 's new chatbot garage project. Would make more sense than a logical human writing these posts

personal

Quigley says

You clearly know nothing.
Peterson is not on the right, not religious, and not a fan of Donald Trump. He’s his own thing, something new under the sun. People who just want to crassly stereotype everyone into a pre-arranged category are stupid. Oddly, these people are the same ones who somehow believe themselves the champions of people who are routinely stereotyped. It’s kind of hilarious, and sad. But doesn’t humor come from a place of recognition that the human condition is sort of tragic?

Anyway, you should do your own research instead of just waiting for Maddow to tell you what you think.

He isn't on the right, then where is he ?

Never mentioned Trump.

People who just want to crassly stereotype everyone into a pre-arranged category are stupid - you mean like the ones categorizing the left, gays, SJWs etc. or is that smart categorizing not done crassly?

Never ever watched Maddow - what am I missing

personal

JP is awesome. He’s helping lots of young men and women get their life together.

Guaranteed left will always hate him, they hate responsibility and normal.

Ok kak, let's try again.

Please point out 1 example of JP's bad data or pseudo science that "riddles" his arguments.

Kakistocracy says

He isn't on the right, then where is he ?

He’s actually a liberal. But he’s garnered a lot of respect from conservatives because he has made the choice to speak the truth only, not dissembling, not hiding behind semantics to defend an indefensible point, but looking honestly at human behavior and social structures which attempt to regulate it. He’s the most honest man in psychology, and it’s the reason he’s garnered so much hate from the Leftists.

As you know, Leftists are left-leaning conservatives who hate the idea of someone holding different views than they do. They will commit any atrocity to silence free speech or free thought, and view promotion of their ideas or narratives as the highest virtue.

To such people, a free-thinking classical liberal like JP is complete anaethema. And to make things even worse, he’s promoting the heinous idea (especially to young directionless men) that they should take responsibility for their own lives and also take responsibility for other people in their power to assist.

Yes I read his book. A bit dense, but full of good ideas. And while the rules sometimes sound arbitrary, they’re underpinned by deep psychological truths, violated at your own peril.

CBOEtrader says

ease point out 1 example of JP's bad data or pseudo science that "riddles" his arguments.

In all fairness, when he goes off into Jungian dreamland, Peterson can be a bit wacky. Sometimes two snakes procreating is just two reptiles have sex.
That said, JBP is pretty solid with his science. If he's stating a conjecture or hypothesis, he'll usually be upfront about it.

Cambridge roofied Jordan, made him wear a woman's wig, and instilled by hypnotic suggestion that he didn't have a penis.

Fucking Commies!

CBOEtrader says

Please point out 1 example of JP's bad data or pseudo science that "riddles" his arguments.

JP is wrong "because I disagree with him"

CBOEtrader says

Ok kak, let's try again.

Let's not - gave u your 3 minutes of attention today. If I wanted to discuss anything with u, u would not be on ignore.

Patrick says

The Left really has just one tactic that they use over and over: "misrepresent and shame" as James Damore put it.

1. misrepresent the point you are making
2. shame you for it, even though it is a misrepresentation of what you're saying

That is the holy high ground of the right.

You are either with us or against - America right or wrong.

Disagree and you are a commie, un-American, anarchist, subversive

Twist it up and restate even though it is a misrepresentation of what was said - be sure to invoke a god and or the bible - both if possible and call anyone not on board an Islamic sympathizer in addition to all of the other things

d6rB says

JP is wrong "because I disagree with him"

JP is an polished up version of Milo and others - same old shit form the Milo was persecuted routines

Does this guy or doesn't he have a problem with the movie Frozen for being SJW material ?

He says he is not of the alt-right, but has said, “If men are pushed too hard to feminize, they will become more and more interested in harsh, fascist political ideology.”

Same old shit, not a new anything, just a more PC version of Milo and Richard Spencer

Moi is a commie subversive for not agreeing with Peterson and questioning him or anyone on this thread who supports and believes in him.

d6rB says

JP is wrong "because I disagree with him"

JP is one more in a long list of Milos and there will be more after him - and there will be another post about the shameful outrageous treatment they have recieved

Kakistocracy says

CBOEtrader says

Ok kak, let's try again.

Let's not -

That's what we expected.

Kakistocracy says

questioning him

Please question his ideas instead of producing blanket statements that

Kakistocracy says

JP is an polished up version of Milo and others - same old shit form the Milo was persecuted routines

personal

Anybody whose seen JP for a minute knows the Milo comparison is complete crap.

Aside from differences of worldview, their fundamental approach is 180.

personal

You would think Kakistocracy would be ecstatic that someone like Peterson is preaching the gospel of evo pysch to the students of Liberty University.

Quigley says

All ego, no substance.

From the person who told me not too long ago "I am probably the smartest person you know" that is really funny - stupid but funny.

EBGuy says

You would think Kakistocracy would be ecstatic that someone like Peterson is preaching the gospel of evo pysch to the students of Liberty University.

The Left hates Evo Psych as much as they hate Judeo-Christianity.

Both postulate actors on the state of humanity that make a "Blank Slate" to socially engineer infeasible, albeit from different angles.

I've been a big fan of JP since a good while before he blew up.

He's not comparable at all to the provocateur Milo. That's just silly.

You could watch Peterson's debates with Sam Harris if you wanted to learn more about him. Or many of his lectures that have been posted going way back. His big academic book was "Maps of Meaning."

He likes to talk about Dostoevsky, Nietzsche, Jung, archetypes, Myths, and value that stories have in our finding meaning in life.

He makes very solid arguments against Marxism and certain aspects of post modernism as it was twisted in the decades after marxism was a proven failure. . His thesis (which is only that) is that a lot of the craziness on the left can be traced to these.

I'm way oversimplifying, but the reason for his popularity is that his message fits with these crazy times. As for his being a darling of the right ? To the extent that that's true, its a very good thing, becasue he is a moderating influence. If wish the right worshiped JP, becasue he would point them in the right direction.

But also, the extent that a guy like him can be considered right wing, is purely a rather extreme example of how fucked up the left is these days. That is, any leftists that believe that are way too close minded, and not part of a left that I want to have anything to do with. . It underlines the departure of the left from what it meant 50 years ago.

The truth is, JP is a pragmatst and very middle of the road. The only time I've see him show a slight bit of what seemed like right wing bias was when answering a question about climate change. He didn't deny it, but he questioned how we can deal with it any faster than we are. And he questioned it in general. Sadly, I felt that one time, he was sucking up to the right a little bit, but maybe it was an off day, that he could manage a more balanced answer to an audience question.

Still I'm very impressed with the guy. Very quick on his toes, extremely intelligent, and he'll give you food for thought if you aren't closed minded. I agree with him 98% of the time. And I have a reputation of being a liberal around here. Go figure.

Maybe one of the main reasons I like him is the same reason Kak doesn't. That is, I like his view on religion. He makes the argument that I tried to make with Dan years ago, much better than I ever did. Very well constructed and totally consistent with my pov. Where as we know from recent posts that Kak is a hard core dogmatic atheist. JP's big debate with Sam Harris is centered on this subject. I'm guessing it's something Kak would never listen to, even though Harris is advocating very well for Kak's view.

If it's not that, then the other reason some leftists don't like him, is that he takes issue with the ugly fucked up part of the left. That is the over the top identity nonsense that prevents the left from being politically successful. That's my other favorite thing about JP. I want to see that part of the left (which is mostly on college campuses) squashed before it grows. Jp's insights and popularity are helping in that battle - especially as he gets main stream popularity.

Kakistocracy says

Why does the Trump support team embrace socialism when it benefits them directly but not so much when someone else benefits

You mean like illegal aliens who bring down wages and take some jobs away from American citizens?

WillPowers says

You mean like illegal aliens who bring down wages and take some jobs away from American citizens?

No - the socialism so near and dear to the hearts of the GOP voters like the farmers in fly over country who realize all of this flooding is putting a world of hurt on them, on top of the tariffs so now they want the government to come in and bail them out.

WillPowers says

You mean like illegal aliens who bring down wages

The same type of illegals that were employed by the Trump organization, the god king of so many commenters until the media spotlight caused a red face moment for the organization.

Be nice if someone were to lead by example instead of do what I say and not what I do

CBOEtrader says

Try actually discussing something. It's why we're here (the rest of us at least)

Really - Then it is not really this by CBOETrader ?

"Tired of picking on Marcus" - https://patrick.net/post/1323347/2019-03-23-tired-of-picking-on-marcus

Kind of leaning to the option I just cited. Both for CBOETrader and several others - quite a few others actually

CBOEtrader says

(You cant)

I did. https://patrick.net/post/1323785/2019-04-09-tales-from-the-right-aka-the-appeal-of-jordon-peterson-soon-to-be-labeled-a-hit-piece

and that concludes the attention you will get from me today.

Kakistocracy says

Don't care what u think, otherwise I would have you off ignore wouldn't I ?

So glad you're ignoring me. I would hate to be the victim of long cut and paste screeds.