patrick.net

Goran_K says

the lower half of the bell curve.

It's not called the racist 'bell curve' anymore. It's called the 'flat tire curve'.

ThreeBays says

High birthrate is associated with low IQ and poor economic stability, so it seems like education plus encouraging world prosperity will improve this - exactly the opposite of what rightists support.

One world government is a good idea?

It’s whats required to achieve what you propose.

d6rB says

Euthanize everyone but Japanese, Taiwanese, and Singaporeans. Seriously, though, IQ appears to track with inverse of fertility.

It used to be generally the opposite before the welfare state. High achievers, more kids.

porkchopexpress says

This is what happens when you eliminate Darwinism from the species. The weak, entitled and retarded keep having kids and perpetuating weakness.

We try to defy Darwinism, but it can only go so far before hitting a hard reset.

Wealth gap doesn’t tell the whole story.

In an expanding pie....which we had under Reagan, Clinton, Bush, and now Trump, if everyone is seeing increased incomes and standards of living, it matters little how much the wealthiest make

Democrats want to decrease the value of labor with importing massive numbers of immigrants and H1/2B visa holders. This works as a massive transfer of wealth from the middle class to the rich.

Then they have the fucking GALL to complain about inequality and the wealth gap that THEY FUCKING CREATED?
Oh, and they call us RACIST and other ad hominems for not wanting this policy of labor devaluement to continue.

RC2006 says

Subtle.
LOL

Lightweight for Democrats

To be elected Democrat this day you have to scream "fuck white people, fuck men, it's all about gender choices and feminism inclusivity". Otherwise you are dead end candidate.

There is still hope for the smartest reproducing:

The Hague (AFP) - A Dutch doctor at the centre of an IVF scandal fathered at least 49 children, an organisation representing parents and children born through his now-closed clinic said Friday.

Jan Karbaat, who died in 2017, is the father of 49 children born after women visited his Rotterdam clinic where he used his own sperm instead of sperm from a chosen donor to inseminate them, Defence for Children said.

Results of DNA tests conducted Friday at a hospital in the southeastern city of Nijmegen "showed that 49 children in the case are direct descendants of the late Karbaat," the organisation said in a statement.

"The results confirm serious suspicions that Karbaat used his own sperm at his clinic," Defence for Children added.

The controversial case became public after a Dutch court ruled in February that the results of Karbaat's DNA test should be made available to parents and children to conduct their own comparisons.

Before his death, aged 89, Karbaat reportedly admitted to having fathered about 60 children in his time at the discredited clinic which closed in 2009 amid reports of irregularities.
https://news.yahoo.com/dutch-doctor-fathered-49-children-ivf-scandal-150354296.html

FOR Once we agree, however, the article you linked to is lame.

Here's another one that doesn't center on he said/she said bullshit. The question is: was 911 an inside job or not? For that, turn to the 911 truth movement, because these are the people who care the most that the truth gets out there

SEE: http://911truth.org/americans-do-not-believe-official-911-story/

The media has NEVER EXAMINED the evidence or explained the analysis provided by scientists, architects, engineers, pilots, and the first responders who experienced the explosions of the World Trade Center twin towers. The media has never asked for the release of the multiple videos that recorded whatever struck the Pentagon. The media has never investigated whether cell phones worked in 2001 from the altitudes at which the official story claims calls were made.

THE TOP 40 REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001

FROM: http://911truth.org/top-40-reasons-doubt-offical-story/

one of the top reasons: What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives?

8) What did officials know? How did they know it?
a. Multiple allied foreign agencies informed the US government of a coming attack in detail, including the manner and likely targets of the attack, the name of the operation (the “Big Wedding”), and the names of certain men later identified as being among the perpetrators.

10) A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers

19) “No one could have imagined planes into buildings” – a transparent falsehood upheld repeatedly by Rice, Rumsfeld and Bush.

30) The Need for a “New Pearl Harbor”

And more. These articles only scratch the surface. This is a complicated issue that most people can't understand.

But you see, I am not a partisan hack. I care about the truth, whether the left lies or the right lies, what I care about are the lies, where ever they come from. That is my fight, a fight for the truth.

That's OK. As soon as he has his pecker sawed off and starts wearing a saffron, purple and green wig with secretary glasses, all will be forgiven.

Kakistocracy says

Only 11 comments to turn this political and get those high fives in the form of "likes" rolling in !

Nothing to say - make it political and try to turn it into a shit storm

Quigley says

because we have given the stupid people everything they need to reproduce

Ban abortion, birth control shunned by the Catholic Church - These brilliant thoughts are from the supposed "smart people" ...

What's next ? Forced sterilization except for the chosen few?

Here's a start:
- Stop illegal immigration.
- Stop racist and sexist Affirmative Action.
- Minimize welfare to be a safety net, not a lifestyle.
- Allow citizens to opt out of Social Security
- Make Medicaid access only to cheap, 1970s-level medicine.

I know there's more, but this will get the fire lit.

This is not even worth debating.

Anyone who has picked up women knows for a fact that they are extremely turned on by confidence and dominance, especially dominance over other men. I'm not talking cruelty, just other men showing you respect.

For women, it's like T&A is for men, reflexive. They just can't help looking and liking.

If you don't like alpha males, you can always hit them with your unisex handbag.

All breeds of dog have exactly the same temperament and intelligence.

Right?

Not right, and everyone who has been around dogs knows it to be a fact. So why wouldn't breeds of people also vary in temperament and intelligence?

Dogs have been domesticated for less than 30,000 years. People have been divergent for longer than that. There are people in the Andaman Islands who have been isolated for 50,000 years.

Money is a both a cause and effect of confidence and dominance.

Money makes you confident. Confidence helps get you money.

Kakistocracy says

When women fuck everything in sight - they are sluts

True.

The key that opens every lock is a very valuable key.
The lock that opens for every key is a very poor lock.

Another way to put it: women have something to protect, their limited eggs and 9 months of pregnancy. Women can have only a small number of children. They need to be choosy because they can't just move on once pregnant. Men have little to protect (in the biological sense, not legal sense). They do not need to be choosy because they can just move on and leave ever more offspring.

Alpha males are a myth, only to those who can never be.

Kakistocracy says

The Myth of the Alpha Male

It means the libbies suck at playing teacher...

Kakistocracy says

What does IQ 82 mean in practical terms?

Just because it can't be boiled down to something as simple as the way it's described (alpha dog), doesn't mean there's not something to it.


Kakistocracy says

When women fuck everything in sight - they are sluts, whores, easy and searching for that elusive "Alpha" male

Actually that's not quite the evolutionary story that the MGTOWs tell, to describe their difficulties they have with women. If anything women are generally and thankfully less likely than men to fuck everything in sight. And being more the "object of desire" in the human mating dance, women are often more selective about mating than men. The attraction of the most attractive women to the more powerful men seems to have a rather obvious evolutionary purpose. It is what it is.

I'm not a MGTOW. THat is I don't follow their stuff, and I'm not interested in abandoning women. But that doesn't mean that the RedPill MGTOW theories are anywhere close to being completely wrong.

Sharing a bunch of articles by beta male writers doesn’t equal an argument.

Kakistocracy says

Can you provide some data statistics from a somewhat reputable source to validate this allegation only the Democrats are responsible for the majority of these "foreign imports"

The legacy GOP is certainly culpable, but Trump is attempting to drag the party in a new direction. That’s the GOP I want to highlight: the one that promotes workers over immigrants.

Kakistocracy says

Patrick says

Money makes you confident. Confidence helps get you money.

Is that why drug cartels are so rich ?

Yes, of course.

Those Mexican cartel guys may be short, but they have balls that bulls would envy. And that's exactly what got them their money (along with a very short life expectancy).

And then flocks of women. All the poon they can handle and then some.

There are many "Kinds of Alpha Males"

Chris Hitchens was an alpha Male
Joe Girardi was an alpha Male
Oliver Cromwell was an Alpha Male

You don't have to look or act like The Hulk in a rage to be an alpha Male. Just thick skin, a drive to achieve something, confidence, all of which leads to respect from peers.

SJWs can never be alpha males to society generally, because who is an Alpha Male is actually decided by Men, not Women.

It's interesting that Trudeau and Macron are largely loathed by the Male population.

I wouldn't follow !Jeb! into battle.

Kakistocracy says

The top one per cent of fortunes holds two-fifths of the total wealth. Just one rich family, the six heirs of the brothers Sam and James Walton, founders of Walmart, are worth more than the bottom 40 per cent of the American population combined ($115 billion in 2012).

The 2nd sentence is extremely anti-human. It is morally wrong to equate people's financial net-worth with their worth.

As for money, would you rather park your money with the Walmart company, or with one of the bottom 40% who IIRC allegedly each can't put together $500 in an emergency? Of course the former. Why should that be a surprise? Would you trust people who have a track record of generating return on capital or would you trust people who have a record not only spending all their money but also going into debt for spending? That's all capital allocation is: where would people (including you) want to park their/your money. That preference has little to do with whether the bottom 40% should be respected and/or cared for for myriads of other qualities and individual rights. In fact, so many capitalists having invested in Walmart, a leader in retail efficiency, is the reason why many poor people can enjoy what they have despite relatively low income.

In fact, given that numerous people were willing to pay half a million dollars or more to become US citizens, the citizenship alone (with associated rights) has a market price of over half a million dollars over the citizenship rights of those countries where those wannabe-immigrants came from . . . and their starting point in their own country is not exactly zero. How much are they willing to pay to stay alive in their own countries as opposed to being executed? According to many cases where such a bargain was offered, the right to stay alive even in those countries were worth millions of dollars. Let's try some really low estimates: $1M for staying alive over being dead in those shitty countries, then half a million for difference for becoming US citizen . . . so that's $1.5M for the value of every US citizen. 40% of US population is 140million, times $1.5mil each, is 210,000,000,000,000; 210 Trillion dollars! That's assuming every one of those 40% (140 million people) is willing to die for $1.5 million. The number is obviously an under-estimate.

How much are you willing to die for? Most would demand more than $1.5 million price. $210 Trillion dollars is more than the entire sum total of all stocks traded in the US; i.e. the value of all public traded companies combined.

BTW, the primary reason why asset prices are so high is because the FED artificially kept the interest rate low. Low interest rates lead to high present value of future cash flows. In other words, the alleged high degree of inequality is largely due to government policies.

Patrick says

All breeds of dog have exactly the same temperament and intelligence.

Dogs are more genetically diverse than humans, and were bread for specific tasks. I do not think this is a good analogy.
Most of IQ differences could perhaps be explained away by upbringing, family access to food and education, etc. However, I have not seen a good investigation which takes all of that into account.
As sad as it is, it is so-called LIBRULS which have shouted down scientists so no one can touch this topic without being accused of RACISM! which just shows stupidity of academic left, as result of such study would probably support their ideas.

Nobody gives a shit when wealth is increasing for all.

People give a shit when wealth is increasing for a few, while wealth is declining for a good chunk of the population, while the wealthy institute programs to make themselves richer, like "Advanced Financial Instruments" and Wide Open Borders for Labor Arbitrage.

Patrick says

All breeds of dog have exactly the same temperament and intelligence.

d6rB says

Dogs are more genetically diverse than humans, and were bread for specific tasks. I do not think this is a good analogy.

Both points are correct. I think there is something to very distant populations, for example Sub-Saharan Africans vs. East Asians. Culture also plays a huge role. We can see from our inner cities where Matriarchy leads, for example. There's also a connection between Polygamy and Frequent Cousin Marriage in the Middle East and South Asia.

Herders and Fishermen seem to be the most intelligent, probably due to large amounts of abstract thought involved.

And one more thing-
genetically Sicilians are probably no that different from Libyans; South Spanish from Moroccans; Mongolians from Chinese; etc. Yet IQ"s appear to be different.

HonkpilledMaster says

Easy to explain -Culture where advancement and education is "acting white", a perpetual "chip on the shoulder" etc

d6rB says

Easy to explain -Culture where advancement and education is "acting white", a perpetual "chip on the shoulder" etc

And Matriarchy, when Criminal Bad Boys are celebrated; to get laid, boys are encouraged to become Criminal Bad Asses to win the pussy and resource sharing (due to welfare checks) of Matriarchs.

Not at all unusual for Ghetto Men to be homeless and flitter from Ho HUD apartment to Ho HUD apartment.

Get rid of welfare and HUD housing and Ghetto Culture would transform overnight.

If you are having problems with dominance, a twirling plywood pillory with shackles to bind your female guest and and nice collection of lashes is really helpful to get you in the mood.

Biden Was a NeoNazi Genocidist Who Plotted With Segregationists to Keep White American Schools White

So he is a classic Dem. Same beliefs today, different tactics. What is your point?

Ceffer says

If you are having problems with dominance, a twirling plywood pillory with shackles to bind your female guest and and nice collection of lashes is really helpful to get you in the mood.

You should leave that kind of humor to APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch.

When you try it, it's just creepy.

marcus says

You should leave that kind of humor to APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch.

When you try it, it's just creepy.

I know. When AF says it, it's so vibrant, lustrous and healthy. It's just that AF je ne sais quoi.

Quigley says

Democrats want to decrease the value of labor with importing massive numbers of immigrants and H1/2B visa holders. This works as a massive transfer of wealth from the middle class to the rich.

NO they don't.

Democrats have been very much in favor of strengthening the border. Obama increased border security massively. (do I need to show those graphs again?).

What did Trump do to prevent employers from hiring illegals or to prevent merchandisers from making goods offshore, when he had congress ?

NOTHING !!

AS for the visas for tech workers, yes, democrats may have succumbed to lobbying from the tech industry right along with republicans.

Putting immigration issues on democrats is total bullshit. What is it - just becasue they are less dishonest and won't even try to pin it on republicans ? Sure, they might be a bit more compassionate towards refugees. But otherwise it's been both parties.

marcus says

Democrats have been very much in favor of strengthening the border. Obama increased border security massively. (do I need to show those graphs again?).

Democrats oppose the Wall because Trump is for it and it was approaching actual reality. Look at it drop like a stone.

marcus says

NO they don't.

So, have I been hallucinating these past few years that Democrats are protecting illegal immigration at all costs? I don’t see how you could take this position given all the action the Dems have made towards enabling illegal immigration. I mean seriously, do you even news?