by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 102,232 - 102,271 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
He has been treated far worse than Obama ever was. By miles.
The network did once clash with the Obama administration, in what Mr. Lamb describes as “one of the strangest things I’ve ever seen.” During a taped 2010 interview, Mr. Lamb asked President Obama about redecorating the Oval Office. “Given that we are in the midst of some very difficult economic times,” Mr. Obama replied, “we decided to hold off last year in terms of making some changes.”
Weeks later, the White House unveiled fresh decor, including an Oval Office rug printed with quotations chosen specifically by Mr. Obama. This contradiction posed a small PR problem for the president. When C-Span immediately aired its unedited tape, the White House press shop was displeased.
“Out of that,” Mr. Lamb says, “came an attitude toward us, from Josh Earnest, that I still, to this day, do not understand.” From then on, C-Span received no cooperation from the Obama White House. “As a matter of fact, the next Christmas party, they made sure we had less tickets,” he says. “In their little world that they lived in down there, it was a way to retaliate.”
Just came across an example of the Obama Era, from an article about Brian Lamb retiring:
More like so much dirt, that no matter what he does, everyone is like, yeah, whatever, we already knew he was amoral and corrupt.
Trump did not break any laws. Therefore he is still our President.
Trump is actually doing a fantastic job, objectively speaking.
But over all Trump is a tremendous blow to this country's image,
Obama was far worse about retaliating against bad press than Trump has been
I yearn for the days when Tan suits were scandals. Now they would not even be a blimp on the news.
I yearn for the days when Tan suits were scandals. Now they would not even be a blimp on the news.
But by fact-checking, the paper really means judging various claims against liberal orthodoxies. Case in point: The claim in question was Trump’s protest that “Russia” is “fake news to try to make up for the loss of the Democrats.” The Washington Post judged that to be “false.” The Mueller report suggests otherwise.
komputodo says21 posts and 19 by the OP...Is that a new record?
Right? I was pushing for it in my cash thread. Fortunately the dip shit came through and the ratio changed because of that cunt. Oh well.
Trump is entitled to drop an A-bomb on Berkeley because it forgot to vote for him.
He won.
Libby cunts need to fucking die.
Exactly as the Founding Fathers demanded.
This is the story of Rockefeller's triumph of capitalism over democratic attempts to regulate and organize. The Rockefellers were allowed to paint themselves in a heroic and paternalistic light after murdering women and children along with tent camp workers.
The story shows the sacrifices that were made to establish organized labor in the United States only to backslide into new verisons of fascism and feudalism we currently endure.
You might modify that slogan to read "A corrupted government can only serve its donors"
Think the US States pre-Civil War
And India. Oh boy is India screwed. They say that they have other sources lined up. But that won't save them from the global oil price hikes when Iranian oil goes off the market.
Despite massive taxation norwegians saved what little they had and eventually could Fiord anything the local IKEA could ship out...
« First « Previous Comments 102,232 - 102,271 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,061 comments by 14,896 users - 6DOF, DemocratsAreTotallyFucked, goofus, Patrick, stereotomy, zzyzzx online now