patrick.net

The guy is pretty good, he says very reasonable things.
Left absolutely hates him, because he does call out their lies.

Today left is not about truth, it's about propaganda. And if you disagree, they try to beat you down Nazi style, suppression, exclusion, oppression, etc...

spam

Dropping ratings over a few days is indicative of nothing more than the vagarities of weekly viewership. Tucker is the most popular pundit on tv. But hey, maybe you like the mannish MadCow? Idk, whatever floats your boat .

Just remember, executive orders can only apply to the executive branch of government. They cannot transgress down to the people. They can only apply during time of war, oh, that's probably why we have been in a continual state of "war" since 1933....

What about being unconstitutional too??? Oh yeah, there is that too.

This is designed to keep businessmen like Starbucks Schultz out of running, not just Trump.

100 bucks a month, sounds steep your smart phone should already have 4G hotspot, and you're need a phone still.

That's what I was thinking unless it's a satphone of some sort I don't get it or how its cheaper than a smart phone on an unlimited plan.

That thing looks cool for traveling where the hotels may have crummy wifi.

Cell I have in the USA: Republic wireless=$23/month ; the phone defaults to wifi calling so it's ultra cheap service and outside of any wifi it is Sprint. The cool thing is that wherever I have it connected to wifi, the phone works as if I were in the USA; the phone doesn't care since it's VOIP by default. I would use it for calling the USA from my hotel in Baja MX last June.

Internet service=Xfinity $29/month +$11/month modem&router rent; 65 mps download.

Since when has that pesky piece of paper actually mattered, been enforced?

Trump...he... he was just tipsy on joo joo cum! Nothing to see here. In fact, listen here, cucks, if Trump needs to censor free speech to MAGA, then by golly we are gonna MAGA! If Trump needs to flood our skilled labor market to appease the masters at your expense, it is OK to replace you legally for MAGA! And, if we need to take out a trillion dollar loan on your children's head to MAGA the MIC and fat lazy nigllegals! Well then, we just need to MAGA! Do. Not. Question. Goy!

The sad part is the uniparty has this shit on lockdown now. It's now framed as Trump or batshit-racist-crazy-self-guilting-piece-of-shit. Still think Trump is better, but honestly he had better redeem bigtime.

There is probably misinformation and fake news. They aren't going to censor internet or anything of that sort. It falls under free speech.

I wonder if that figure would be more in favor of "workers" if the US legal and illegal immigration system weren't bring in so much competition at the "worker" level?

Imagine if a president attempt to reduce immigration (especially of the unskilled kind) and simultaneously discourage offshoring? That could really help the bottom 90% of US citizens.

Start a business.
Stop taxing working class.
Remove illegals and offshores from labor market.

Liberals are funny, tax the life out of the poor and complain about successful people.

HEYYOU says

"CEOs rake in 940% more than 40 years ago, while average workers earn 12% more"

Because of unchecked illegal immigration and outsourcing to Chindia. Why does the Left HATE! AMERICAN! WORKERS! and are not doing anything about this??? (I understand why Koch Industries are for illegal immigration).

Looks cool, but I suspect the "Fair use data policy" will throttle speeds heavily in some areas / times.

https://support.skyroam.com/hc/en-us/articles/360033217174-Fair-Use-Policy

Did he have a GoFundMe betting pool on his hits and misses?

Because obviously one armed guy and a squadron of incompetent, armed, vested police is not a fair fight. Maybe they should put more money into police training.

Donut fat is NOT bullet proof.

I know. This is one of Trump's major failings. Here he is surrounded by all these Deep State black bag and disinformation artists, ready and willing with itchy piano wire fingers, and he doesn't deploy them for a Clintonesque reign of terror on these idiot Congress people.

Nut up, Trumpligula, nut UP!

Why doesn't he use BiBi and Mossad? Have you no imagination? All Trump need do is "leak" that Omar and Tlaib have incriminating evidence on the Clintons. Both Omar and Tlaib would then be "Seth Riched."

HEYYOU says

take SS & Medicare from all Republicans

That's pretty much what will happen if SS and Medicare become needs tested. All my close friends are assuming they will get $0 from SS after having paid in the maximum amount every year for a few decades.

"Putin has Siberia. We MUST have Greenland! It's an image thing."

Senior Moments by Commander in Chief!

We should just Annex it. Denmark can kiss our Red White and Blue Ass.

Danes have an abundance of blond bush. They don't need Greenland.

Good idea! I like.

jazz_music says

he other part is 100 percent clean energy by 2030.

In short, poor people will be fucked because some scientifically incompetent utopians will make energy 5x more expensive, while not decreasing carbon emissions. One special interest - fossil fuels - will be replaced by another, so called "green" or "sustainable" or "clean" energy, whatever it means.
Hollywood rich and Al Gore will be able to survive this in their 1000000000 sq ft mansions, while working poor will see their life quality plummet

Reparations for listening to Trump!

jazz_music says

That's major fear in the face of extinction.

I do not get this? Let's pretend that scientifically incompetent utopians will save us from extinction? They will not, they (due to their incompetence and stupidity) will make extincion faster. Their solutions will (1) make power rates go up, and (2) will not decrease carbon emissions or even pollution. Please see what happened when Germany went with so-called Green energy. https://www.electricitymap.org/?page=map&solar=false&remote=true&wind=false

jazz_music says

crushing corporate power and establishing a socialist system.

And this part seems quite suspicious as well. Usually crushing corporate power ends up with establishing Power of State Socialism, which is much worse than what was crushed. I get that corporate power is bad - I just do not know how to remove it without system degenerating into Mao or Stalin socialism. Perhaps devolving 99% of power to communities would do the trick, but neither the collective Right nor left would go for it, as they seem more concerned with imposing their visions on everyone.

Ceffer says

Reparations for listening to Trump!

I switch off my TV when Trump is on. Did the same when Obama was on TV as bleating of politicians is highly annoying.
Should my wages be garnished?

jazz_music says

Good, because we have to do something.

Best solution would be to allow individuals to make their own choices, unless their choices harm others. Sadly, people quoted in the OP appear to be ready to make choices for others.
I make my choice by living in a 1200 sq ft house and consuming 20% of electricity that an average household consumes. I do not want to be told that my electricity price has to go up by 500% to support Mr. Hedges carbon dioxide-spewing travels to London, or to support Al Gore investments, or Ms. Ocasio-Cortez reelection by scientifically illiterate millenial hipsters.

Professional liberal victims writing articles again. Nothing new.

Democrats the party that supports illegal migration, open racism, and pedophilia. And now crying victim while yelling insults at whites, women, conservatives and blacks for 10 ducking years.

jazz_music says

By focusing on the choices in less overblown terms we can get closer to some practical solutions.

The problem is that "solutions" are proposed by people who are scientifically illiterate AND have self-interest in solutions they are peddling. Not different from "solutions" proposed by Big Oil. Just saying that solar or cellulosic ethanol is "green" does not make it green or practical in any way.

The only practical solution that involves cutting CO2 emissions to nearly 0 and does not decrease life quality of "deplorables" of all races and nationalities is nuclear power, which none of the "green whatever" people like. A rational solution thus would be to advance and research Th reactors, to re-burn nuclear waste a few times so that it gets really radioactive with short half-life, to build new, modern and safe nuclear reactors, and so on. Unfortunately, the trend-setting Hollywood celebrities, who are individuals we are supposed to turn to for "wise guidance" think that "green" involves things that are mostly not green in reality. Neither side of politicians discussing this shows any brain waves as well. Ms. Cortez is beyond any criticism in her lack of education and stupidity, to the point that it is not even worth discussing. This is conveniently combined with her self-righteousness and lack of ability to process new information on scale not seen before. Other side of discourse is in pocket of oil companies and Saudi Barbaria (which may be the same pocket).

I get that Step 1 with any problem is to admit that we have one. I am not 100% sure that we have a problem; having said that, even if chance of having that problem is 20%, we should do something as not doing anything has possible catastrophic results; furthermore, screwing over dictatorships such as Russia and Saudi barbaria is a worthwhile goal by itself. Step 2 is however even more important - what we do should mitigate the issue and not kill life quality of billions to make few select new oligarchs very rich. The Green new Deals I have heard about will not work and will benefit select few politically connected rich people to the detriment of everyone else.

Diversity has crippled the US ability to reach consensus on anything. Gone are the days that we could plan out grand projects to help future generations. Globalists have used diversity to divide our once great western civilization into tribalism that is easily manipulated.

'The Art Of The Deal'. Maybe Trump can fool Denmark into giving us Greenland by telling them they can have Germany in exchange.

jazz_music says

There are other choices, windmills don't really cause cancer, hydro not just from rivers but from ocean waves, tidal power, solar may fit into the picture too, perhaps the best is a blending of choices.

We need to look seriously at what the Europeans are doing that is working for them, instead of letting the rest of the world leave us behind so our rich pricks can keep their rate of returns optimal.

Wind kills bats in millions, other than that it may be OK - but it does not run all the time. Solar works in desert climates and covers up too much land - again, it may be a niche solution in some places. Hydro in rivers is the only currently realistic carbon neutral source besides nuclear, but it screws up eco-systems of rivers and can not work everywhere. Tidal I do not know much about.

The most successful Europeans are Icelanders with geothermal (not applicable everywhere, again a good niche solution), French with nucular, and Norwegians with hydro which is not applicable everywhere as well. Germans are doing worse WRT to emissions since they started their own Green deal.

If you look at link in #4 you will see that only countries with nuclear or hydro are extremely low-CO2 emitters.

Windmills dude, how many you gonna build? That’s a lot of fields to cover, and they don’t always work. How do you connect it all? How do you manage VAR? You can’t!

That’s fantasy land thinking with windmills, only nuclear can solve this problem.

jazz_music says

6rdB says

The only practical solution that involves cutting CO2 emissions to nearly 0 and does not decrease life quality of "deplorables" of all races and nationalities is nuclear power,

There are other choices, windmills don't really cause cancer, hydro not just from rivers but from ocean waves, tidal power, solar may fit into the picture too, perhaps the best is a blending of choices.

We need to look seriously at what the Europeans are doing that is working for them, instead of letting the rest of the world leave us behind so our rich pricks can keep their rate of returns optimal.

6rdB says

In short, poor people will be fucked because some scientifically incompetent utopians will make energy 5x more expensive, while not decreasing carbon emissions. One special interest - fossil fuels - will be replaced by another, so called "green" or "sustainable" or "clean" energy, whatever it means.

The Energiewende!

Fortwaynemobile says

Windmills dude, how many you gonna build? That’s a lot of fields to cover, and they don’t always work. How do you connect it all? How do you manage VAR? You can’t!

Most of the renewables under the Glorious Energiewende came from highly subsidized ethanol. Half of all of Germany's "Renewable" power. Of course, ethanol is grown with fertilizer using diesel powered tractors... plus the smoke belching diesel trucks hauling the fertilizer and the oil.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2019/05/06/the-reason-renewables-cant-power-modern-civilization-is-because-they-were-never-meant-to/#39129823ea2b

6rdB says

If you look at link in #4 you will see that only countries with nuclear or hydro are extremely low-CO2 emitters.

One of the tricks the Greenies play is to look at German Domestic Gross Capacity, rather than Gross Consumption. So it looks good they built so much Wind and Solar, until one realizes they've been importing electric from France and Poland to make up for the unreliability of wind and solar - those countries are running on Nuclear and Coal Plants.

Germany's share of renewables isn't impressive at all, in fact it's below the EU average. And that's counting biogas as "renewable".

To get there they doubled the average Residential/Commerical (but not Industrial, exempt) electric bill in Real Euros over the past decade or so, just to get a teeny increase in renewables.