by Patrick ➕follow (58) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 106,563 - 106,602 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Mainstream media outlets have largely ignored the Project Veritas bombshell that ABC News killed a story that would have exposed the now-deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein three years ago, with some having themselves been recently embarrassed by Project Veritas, and others still smarting from their own alleged #MeToo coverups.
Fox News found no coverage on CNN, MSNBC, CBS News, or NBC News from noon through midnight ET on Tuesday while the story was lighting up social media. During that same time frame, Fox News covered the scandal on five different programs, including its entire primetime lineup.
“That there has been so little coverage about ABC avoiding the Epstein story demonstrates again that mainstream media too often make news judgment based on sociocultural or political implications rather than journalistic values,” DePauw University professor and media critic Jeffrey McCall told Fox News.
But that outrage was tempered by self-interest. Lucrative arms deals were at stake. So too were strategic alliances and power plays in the volatile Middle East.
Trump was caught on the hop, condemning the killing one minute while trying to steer culpability away from the Crown Prince the next, despite the insistence of his own investigators at the CIA that MBS was in it up to his neck.
Added to that was (and is) the complication of son-in-law Kushner being a close friend of the Crown Prince and with his own agenda to pursue.
He (the father of Hatice) was right to be suspicious. It later turned out that — unknown to everyone else — a month after he met Hatice, he had secretly married an Egyptian air stewardess in an Islamic wedding ceremony near his Washington home. He was still in touch with her by telephone shortly before his death.
The only way Khashoggi could get the papers he needed to satisfy his prospective father-in-law was to go to the Saudi consulate.
Retrofit some of those water scooping planes that put out fires, so they can scoop up some space in the ionosphere.
Dump it back on the poles to cool things off.
Space is cold!
So why did the Obama's just buy a $15 million house on the beach? Were they ignoring 'science' of do they really know it is all bullshit too?
Gee! With all this Ice melting, you would think the worst of the sea level rise would be right now. How come's there ain't any?
Seeings how it's melting so much and all due to Climate Derange. It would seem NYC would be flooded like that Discovery Fearumentary used to show.
Remember by 2020 NYC was going to be flooded out? They had that 3D animation showing all of the streets in Manhattan getting swamped with rising water.
But Nah! Nothing, not an inch, Hollywood surf looks just like it did in 1985 when I first came to Broward.
You really want to fight “climate change?” Stop buying shit from and supporting the economies of China, India, and Korea. Then conquer both China and India and reduce their population density to what the average is in USA.
"To plan for future conflicts, the Pentagon says climate change must be considered as a factor. Anything less is irresponsible."
This is Rep/Cons military & Commander in Chief that allow such lies.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-surprising-ally-in-fighting-global-warming-the-pentagon
NoCoupForYou saysSo are we all gonna die from the Wet Bulb in 5 years or 10 years, yet again?
3 years.
I get so high on life I scare myself!
Yeah, I've long favored a thorough trial in the Senate. Maybe we can hear from some witnesses such as: Comey, Clapper, Brennen, Biden, Susan Rice (of "unmasking" fame), the tag team of Bruce and Nellie Ohr, and the tag team of Strzok and Page. Of course Adam Schiff would be called, as he was a direct witness to the current dog-and-pony show.
Onvacation saysNoCoupForYou saysSo are we all gonna die from the Wet Bulb in 5 years or 10 years, yet again?
3 years.
WE need iwog to save us.
I've been betting Trump won't be impeached in the House simply because the Senate trial would be such a disaster for the Democrats. I mean, who gives the opposing party the chance to bat last when an election is just around the corner?
Censuring would be unconstitutional.
Censure only applies to members of the group doing the censuring. So the House can not censure anyone else but a member of the House.
ties up any Democratic Party Senator that is running for the nomination (Warren and Biden for sure) for what will likely be months
What, no comments on something positive we have achieved over the years
Biden is no longer a senator, but Warren would be tied up. Sparticus would be tied up too, but he's pretty much already out of the race.
Would these senators either have to show up or resign from the senate?
« First « Previous Comments 106,563 - 106,602 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,267,396 comments by 15,159 users - HANrongli online now