patrick.net

There's a difference in cases in the real world with evidence that can convict. Vs the Liberal pure made up fantasies like this pisspoor meme.

marcus says

marcus says

He's the most calm eloquent guy in Congress. He chews people up with their own shit. He doesn't pull the race card like all of the Libcom Slicksters like to do.
how come there aint no Black Caucus members on this committee accusing the Ukraine ambassadors of being racists? Where in the Fuck is Ted Lieu?
There's a Cock Sucker for ya!

Booger says

Is this real? Went to UM, just curious.

marcus says

God Marcus. This meme is terrible. Please stop.

marcus says

:
Filed under "Facts"

How is this even humor? God you suck at memes. Go ahead and flag this as personal. I’ll probably do it myself. But you are truly dumb and not funny.

marcus says

:
Filed under "Facts"

Absolutely wrong. He never said he acted under Trumps orders. He repeated spoke how he "assumed" that is what Trump wanted. When asked point blank if anyone told him to withhold aid for a favor, he said no. He also said Trump specifically said "no quid pro quo." Of course the anti-Trumpers are saying the "no quid pro quo" statement came out because Trump was anticipating being investigated.

marcus says

Jezus... you are the worst

marcus says

What was the quid pro quo TODAY? Arms for Investigation? Announcement for meeting? Bribery? Extortion? OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE!

Nunes asked for the whistleblower AND Hunter Biden to testify in closed door hearings. The news reports it as "Nunes wants to expose the whistleblower to bodily harm or even murder".

It's all political theatre.

Meanwhile in Hong Kong...

marcus says

:


This guy was never an enemy of Trumps. He was Trumps guy.

Either he has the integrity and or he realizes it would catch up with him if he doesn't tell the truth, or perhaps some combination of both.

Why don’t you post the rest of it? You know, the part where he says it was his supposition?

CovfefeButDeadly says

Why don’t you post the rest of it? You know, the part where he says it was his supposition?

Because he's a pond scum sucking news feeder.

Alright listen up Pissheads!
There is no such thing as "Fake News" there is only "Reputable News".
Well how do I know if my news source is reputable or not?
Great question!
Ask yourself would your news source print a story you read somewhere else, that you know to be true, and actual news because the actual source Tweeted it, so there's no dispute on the accuracy. Now ask yourself. Would CNN, MSNBC, FOX, Huffington Post, WaPo, The New York Times, print, publish or broadcast that given story.
If you answered no, then you personally labeled your news source as "Fake News".

See! Trump nor his supporters had to do it for you. Is your news source reputable?
The answer is probably NO!

marcus says

Challenge number two for the Fucksticks playing along at home.

Give me just one story that your source reported this year, and I'll show you where OUR news sources covered that story, even if it wasn't flattering or it was damning to Trump.
We still get those stories. I'm the most trusted name in News to every Democrat I know.
They know better than to challenge me or the authenticity, because I beat them over the head with reality every single time. I am the one that breaks every news story that is damning to a Democrat to my Democrat family, friends and colleagues.


We get ALL of the news, you idiots get a tunnel vision biased view.

I challenge to you to prove me wrong with one news item I can't find in my News sources.

Tenpoundbass says

I challenge to you to prove me wrong with one news item I can't find in my News sources.

Trump is a Russian spy who likes to get peed on by prostitutes. You know it's true.

Onvacation says

Trump is a Russian spy who likes to get peed on by prostitutes. You know it's true.

LO(Fucking)L Not only do I know about that canard, I knew about at least 3 years before the bottom feeding liberals did.
Hillary's operatives threw that out there in less than 24 hours after the Clinton Cash movie was released during the 2016 elections.
CNN didn't even report it yet, but Pro Trump people in the Intel leaked it to the Trump Patriots.

Along with the report that the Liberals were working on the Steele Dossier to support it.

TDS is a form of autism

Tenpoundbass says

Perfect - nothing explains the juxtaposition and logical fallacy better than this.

Dem Congressman's #FartGate coverage spreads across the Atlantic.

www.youtube.com/embed/F0YLJ4youbw

Why do you so desperately want to protect obviously corrupt politicians like Joe and Hillary?

It's like we are watching 2 separate movies.

BobD says

if they are guilty I say lock all 3 up

Agreed. Lock them up if they are guilty. BobD says

how does it help America to have a foreign leader announce investigations on TV?

If you're talking about the Ukrainian's, it would be nice if their president would root out corruption and announce it on tv.

Why would you not want to get to the bottom of the Biden Burisma and the Clinton foundation scandals?

The corrupt Ukrainian's are (were) the biggest foreign donors to the Clinton foundation before Hillary lost and all the donations dried up. Why do you suppose that is?

BobD says

Tell us, how does it help America to have a foreign leader announce investigations on TV?

Did he (Ukrainian President) announce investigations? All witnesses have testified that they were not TOLD there was quid pro quo, it just LOOKED improper. Words matter. Was Biden not the sitting VP at the time Trump was discussing his son being on a board of a corrupt company, with no skills that would benefit said company? Is and was Biden a private citizen at the time of the phone call? In theory, couldn't every single citizen of our country be considered a political rival of Trump? If Trump is directing people not to testify, are they legally required to testify regardless?

You know the answers to these questions. I didn't watch this week, but to make a point I probably will. All 30 hours or whatever we're at now. Already 12 or so hours deep anyway from last week. If you're not watching the whole thing and going to ANY website or publication or news station, you are being fed bull shit.

Just watch the damn things and you'll be singing a different tune. The problem is most people are looking at this like a football score. You check a website and your team only lost by 3 points, so it looks close. If you watched the actual game you'd see it was a fucking blowout. That's my point. Any objective observer can see is a shockingly piss poor game plan by the Dem's and the game is out of control. They're just trying to make the loss seem better by using a massive media arm that is fully in their court.

BobD says

WookieMan says

Just watch the damn thing

I've been listening and when there is something I hear that I want to see I go back and watch, like Jim Jordan filibustering then accusing the witness of filibustering. Classic Republican hypocrisy.

Said in this thread or some other. HUGE difference between listening and watching even certain sections. Watch the whole thing. This isn't what you think it is. You're hung up on a Jordan clip which is a dead give away for how you're getting your information. DON'T go to any news site or tv/cable station. Ever. Just watch the feed where there's zero commentary ever.