patrick.net

RC2006 says

Or this is a setup for some false ending that doesn't lead to the rich and powerful.

Most likely the guard is being set up. It will be some form of the guard's dereliction of duty that allowed Epstein to commit suicide. Something like the guard snuck off somewhere to watch a movie on the phone. Or even better, to have a tryst.

Ijazz_music says

HeadSet says

Most likely the guard is being set up.

That would be a standard practice

It's nice when both sides agree over Epstiens BS suicide.

The populace at large just couldn't let it go and stop paying attention to 'Epstein's Suicide', superficially glossed over by the usual cowed legacy press for the Politburo bosses.

So, now, they'll have to roll out the Patsys after all !sigh!?

Mass suicides and accidents of prison guards and emergency room personnel, and maybe a few sad deaths of pathologists, required? NO PROBLEMO! An inconvenient but vital next step carried out in the public interest by our friends at the CIA. Liberty comes at a cost.

Michelle Obama's IMMENSE! PREHENSILE! PENIS!

Too tame. We want to hear about IMMENSE, PREHENSILE, and HYDRA (multi headed) PENIS.

These smear campaigns are basically form letters at this point. Zero effort put into creating anything unique, it's always just the same old name calling, misrepresentation, context-cutting, and association tactics.

Karloff says

These smear campaigns are basically form letters at this point. Zero effort put into creating anything unique, it's always just the same old name calling, misrepresentation, context-cutting, and association tactics.

Yeah guilty by association a favorite of the modern leftoids since they can't think for themselves while associating with people with different opinions.

What are they going to do when Michelle's IPP, after strangling and consuming a whimpering, trembling, begging Trump, starts breaking chairs over the heads of the audience?

Have the female candidates line up in sheer yoga pants and bend over. Who wins the camel toe contest? 'Nuff said.

Taint is the proper word for the top officials. The noun, that is. Who cares about the fake news manipulation of the adjective.

I think he is sending them to CNN, which is a fate worse than death.

Onvacation says

Who'd of thought Tulsi was a homophobe?

She has a 100% voting record on LGBT issues per the Human Rights Campaign (see HRC scorecard from the 115th Congress).

Her dad is and that's good enough for dems.

EBGuy says

She has a 100% voting record on LGBT issues per the Human Rights Campaign (see HRC scorecard from the 115th Congress).

I'll still vote for her.

HEYYOU says

She won't be on the ballot for President.

True, Democrats insist on corrupt candidates only.

Ceffer says

Have the female candidates line up in sheer yoga pants and bend over. Who wins the camel toe contest? 'Nuff said.

You are a monster, Sir! Image of Warren in that position will make even the most tolerant people vomit.

Ceffer says

Have the female candidates line up in sheer yoga pants and bend over. Who wins the camel toe contest? 'Nuff said.

Good luck keeping Mayor Pete out of that contest.

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

KEEP! THE! CAMERAS! ROLLING!

SELL! MORE! TICKETS! ON NETFLEX! UNDER THE SHOW PROGRAM TITLE:

MICHELLE'S! IMMENSE! PREHENSILE! PENIS! VERSUS! MADISON SQUARE GARDEN!

There will be no contest. Michelle's Humongous, Prehensile Penis wins in 1st round by a knockout.
I wage 10000000/1 on Michelle.

Michelle needs to keep her cool and stop swinging from rafter to rafter with her IPP giving Tarzan yells.

IPP is already under contract to play the 'face hugger' in the next Alien movie sequel.

This topic often discussed on radio. No one knows the answer, and the conclusion is "forever"

That isn't going to fly in the Senate, and the source running around Washington spreading this story is Anonymous.

The Senator Kennedy told Chris Wallace today, that after the Strozk testimony and Comey's actions and testimony. This angle will not fly well in the Senate.
It will probably trigger an investigation of their own. It will ruin Horrowitz's career if he tries to say this was just an FBI staffing issue, and not a deeper corruption and abuse of power issue.

Don't forget Sullivan refuses to sentence General Flynn since December of last year, because he Knows damn well it will ruin his career. After everything settles and cooler heads prevail. Sulivan is trying to intemidate Flynn and his Lawyer to ask for the case to be thrown out. Because he can't bring himself to do what his oath demands he does. Which is throw the damn case out and call for an investigation into the what Horrowitz should have gotten to the bottom of in this investigation.

It will be a shit stain on Horrowitz and Sullivan if he tries to sell this as a disgruntled employee.
That narrative would say that the FISA judges and Senoir people at the FBI are incompetent and can allow any low grade cut rate Commie working solo in our greatest Law Department in the United States and use his Senior ranking officials as his personal little Patsy Fuck Bitch.

Is that what Horrowitz is going to sale? I don't thing so. You're going to be sorely disappointed if you believe that.

@Patrick - when is this considered spam? 7 of 11 comments from the OP? All for conversation and debate here, but this is annoying.....

He's not insulting the other users I think, so seems like this is what the ignore link is for.

Is there some better way?

Patrick says

He's not insulting the other users I think, so seems like this is what the ignore link is for.

Is there some better way?

He's not, you are correct. But 7 comments on your own OP is excessive when there was only 11 total. The reason was likely to keep it at the top of the main feed. The first 3 comments are his? Why not just do that in the OP or maybe do 1 comment for corrections? And you already have the edit function.

Just don't want to see a trend where someone just makes a bunch of one line comments on a topic to keep it at the top of the feed. TPB did 3 in a row here, but 2 were at least multiple sentence responses to the OP. Comments 7, 8 and 9 were also useless. Basically I'm pointing out that I could easily monopolize the "above the fold section" of the site with new threads and then comment on my own threads while no one else interacts.

This probably isn't the best explanation, but this thread just felt very spammy/trolly and with repeats with what was already in the OP, by the OP if that makes sense. Not sure there's a way to correct it. Maybe limit to 2 consecutive comments if there hasn't been another member reply? Or make a prompt (like delete or flag) that says you've done X number of posts, please edit a previous post to get your point across?

There's not a single reason to make more than one comment on a new thread I start before anyone else has responded. Or to make 3 comments in a row. You can use the quote function in one comment and get back to a ton of people in just one comment.

They must have Horowitz' Epstein Lolita vids.

What do you call a guy floating in the water with no arms and no legs?

Answer: A Russian troll

TrumpingTits says

BobD says

The question is will the supreme Court take more power away from Congress? If not then California case is a moot point.

Huh?

@BobD - Any response?

WookieMan says

But 7 comments on your own OP is excessive when there was only 11 total. The reason was likely to keep it at the top of the main fee

Oh so we have a p.net version of political correctness. If one's panties are in a bunch, like Patrick said just hit ignore or dont read his posts Could it be the content is what has aroused the ire?
This report is beginning to sound like its older brother, the famous Nunes report. A whisp of smoke and no fire. But not to worry Barr will concoct something to satiate the cult members.

Chiromancer says

like Patrick said just hit ignore or dont read his posts Could it be the content is what has aroused the ire?

You do know what spam is and what my point was, right? I also can't ignore for obvious reasons, or so I thought. There were 3 comments from the OP saying the exact same thing. Not about politics at all. It was no different than making three comments saying fart, fart, fart. The first fart was fine, the others? Completely spamming the site. I prefer exchanges of idea and thoughts even if they get testy. Not repetitive bull shit. Thought that was common sense, guess not?

BobD says

WookieMan says

You can use the quote function in one comment and get back to a ton of people in just one comment.

You do you. I'll do me. Fair enough?

Not what you did at all here. But whatever. You failed to ignore that I also mentioned I didn't appreciated TPB comments, or at least the barrage of them. Get the fucking thought out in one post/comment, MAYBE two in a row or take some tard meds. Otherwise it's just childish trolling and pushing topics to the top that someone wants there. That's a quick way to sink a site if allowed. (Check that out! Quoted two different users in one comment! My fucking hands hurt, but I did it. Patrick, where's my trophy?)

WookieMan says

It was no different than making three comments saying fart, fart, fart.

Yeah we all have our own styles. I've done the string of posts so I'm not judgy.

BobD says

just_dregalicious says

What do you call a guy floating in the water with no arms and no legs?

Answer: A Russian troll

Hmm, not a Ukrainian troll?

What does this mean? The D's have so far just mocked outrage, at which only the most blind leftists still go along with.

You obviously disagree, but how?

Where are the facts for russian collusion or ukraine QPQ? Looks all made up thus far. ...AND we're starting to see backlash from the lies.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-fisa-report-report-justice-department-fbi-conduct-fisa-warrants-2016-election-released-watchdog/

Flynn will be completely exonerated if he hasnt been already. The coup against Trump will have repercussions , albeit almost definitely less than the promised fox news bombshells as you point out above.

jazz_music says

Fake news

Hahahahaha... It's like rain in November.

BobD says

Hmm, not a Ukrainian troll?

конечно нет

BobD says

refusal to answer a questio

What question? If it's the question I'm thinking of, I did answer it and you just don't agree with the answer. That's not answering the question though.

BobD says

If I was trying to bump the thread when quoting TPB why would I do three posts within 1 minute of each other? Not really the best way to bump a thread, wouldn't you agree?

Ughh. Do people not understand forums?? I think you do and I'll explain what you did and you know it's what you were doing.

9:47am you make the OP.
10:55-10:56 you make 3 nonsensical comments

You saw no one had taken the bait on the OP yet. Why was that? Because people scroll through here and look for active posts. You had no comments and it was slipping down the page. Solution, just make 3 comments up. Gives it the look of an active post with 3 comments and yes, it does bring it back to the top. And BAM, post is more likely to be read and was.

You're now going to say this isn't what you were doing and I know that's not true. We'll have to just disagree on that before you come back and say I'm wrong, because I'm not. I (and most) would have never read this thread without seeing the high comment count and you know this to be true.

BobD says

Actually, I was quoting what TPB said for 2 of them in case he edited what he said later. Although I don't think TPB would change what he said I quoted him anyway. I decided to add the # to point out that what he said will be disproven on December 9th. Thought it was obvious what I was doing but I guess It was not obvious for all.

Nope. You readily admit TPB probably wouldn't change it. That's a silly excuse and you know it. Who cares if he changes it? Either way, TPB would have a lot of work on his hands to change all his posts/comments regarding recent events and you know that it wouldn't be realistic.

You were comment pumping the thread to make it look more active than it was to get people baited and still also bump it to the top. You could have quoted all 3 in one post unless you hit the character limit, which you wouldn't have. So 6 comments should have been 1. I think you knew what you were doing, but maybe you really didn't know. Now you do. It happens on every forum and it's annoying and keeps bad topics highlighted that never should have been.

CBOEtrader says

Yeah we all have our own styles. I've done the string of posts so I'm not judgy.

You do different content/comments though if you do a string. I'm okay with that, although it would be nice to have it wrapped up in one nice package admittedly. But it's not a big deal, like TPB did above.

You also don't make a new post, see it's flopped with other users and then make 3 comments before others users have said anything about the topic. Everything in the first 3 comments was already stated in the OP.

It's a tactic used by trolls in other forums and lessens the experience and conversation that can be good here at times. Hence why I tagged @Patrick in my previous comment here. It's the center of attention troll that tries to keep a bad topic relevant by building up the comment count. The edit button works just fine for up to a week I believe. Which negates the excuse made here as well about TPB changing comments.

Either consciously or subconsciously people will read posts/topic with higher comment counts. Forum 101.

BobD says

CBOEtrader says

Flynn will be completely exonerated if he hasnt been already.

Didn't he plead guilty? Why did he plead guilty if he was innocent?, that is strange.

Everyone pleads guilty when faced w financial and family collapse.

Flynn has since turned the tables on the prosecution, with his lawyer now suggesting she expects : https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/11/01/flynn_lawyer_sidney_powell_i_expect_judge_to_postpone_sentencing_hold_prosecutors_in_contempt.html

The Judge doesn't want to be forced to rule that the FBI and Government broke the Brady Rule, and worse, doctored evidence.

We have the Adulterers' chat plotting to have Lisa Page take them from somebody else's desk and edit the 302s.

The FBI has gotta be replaced entirely. They deliberately don't record interviews on purpose, so they can create "Lying to Federal Agent" traps. Not just Flynn, been going on for decades, a Hoover Tactic. It's your word against their subjectively written report.