by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 107,063 - 107,102 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Who'd of thought Tulsi was a homophobe?
She has a 100% voting record on LGBT issues per the Human Rights Campaign (see HRC scorecard from the 115th Congress).
She won't be on the ballot for President.
Have the female candidates line up in sheer yoga pants and bend over. Who wins the camel toe contest? 'Nuff said.
Have the female candidates line up in sheer yoga pants and bend over. Who wins the camel toe contest? 'Nuff said.
KEEP! THE! CAMERAS! ROLLING!
SELL! MORE! TICKETS! ON NETFLEX! UNDER THE SHOW PROGRAM TITLE:
MICHELLE'S! IMMENSE! PREHENSILE! PENIS! VERSUS! MADISON SQUARE GARDEN!
He's not insulting the other users I think, so seems like this is what the ignore link is for.
Is there some better way?
BobD saysThe question is will the supreme Court take more power away from Congress? If not then California case is a moot point.
Huh?
But 7 comments on your own OP is excessive when there was only 11 total. The reason was likely to keep it at the top of the main fee
like Patrick said just hit ignore or dont read his posts Could it be the content is what has aroused the ire?
WookieMan saysYou can use the quote function in one comment and get back to a ton of people in just one comment.
You do you. I'll do me. Fair enough?
It was no different than making three comments saying fart, fart, fart.
just_dregalicious saysWhat do you call a guy floating in the water with no arms and no legs?
Answer: A Russian troll
Hmm, not a Ukrainian troll?
refusal to answer a questio
If I was trying to bump the thread when quoting TPB why would I do three posts within 1 minute of each other? Not really the best way to bump a thread, wouldn't you agree?
Actually, I was quoting what TPB said for 2 of them in case he edited what he said later. Although I don't think TPB would change what he said I quoted him anyway. I decided to add the # to point out that what he said will be disproven on December 9th. Thought it was obvious what I was doing but I guess It was not obvious for all.
Yeah we all have our own styles. I've done the string of posts so I'm not judgy.
CBOEtrader saysFlynn will be completely exonerated if he hasnt been already.
Didn't he plead guilty? Why did he plead guilty if he was innocent?, that is strange.
The Judge doesn't want to be forced to rule that the FBI and Government broke the Brady Rule, and worse, doctored evidence.
We have the Adulterers' chat plotting to have Lisa Page take them from somebody else's desk and edit the 302s.
The FBI has gotta be replaced entirely. They deliberately don't record interviews on purpose, so they can create "Lying to Federal Agent" traps. Not just Flynn, been going on for decades, a Hoover Tactic. It's your word against their subjectively written report.
And who got the scoop first? CNN that's who!
The FBI has gotta be replaced entirely. They deliberately don't record interviews on purpose, so they can create "Lying to Federal Agent" traps.
« First « Previous Comments 107,063 - 107,102 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,250,897 comments by 14,919 users - GreaterNYCDude, HeadSet, RayAmerica, socal2, zzyzzx online now