0
0

Thread for orphaned comments


 invite response                
2005 Apr 11, 5:00pm   198,930 views  117,730 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (61)   💰tip   ignore  

Thread for comments whose parent thread has been deleted

« First        Comments 107,059 - 107,098 of 117,730       Last »     Search these comments

107059   Ceffer   2019 Nov 22, 6:49pm  

What are they going to do when Michelle's IPP, after strangling and consuming a whimpering, trembling, begging Trump, starts breaking chairs over the heads of the audience?
107060   Ceffer   2019 Nov 22, 6:50pm  

Have the female candidates line up in sheer yoga pants and bend over. Who wins the camel toe contest? 'Nuff said.
107061   Ceffer   2019 Nov 22, 6:53pm  

Taint is the proper word for the top officials. The noun, that is. Who cares about the fake news manipulation of the adjective.
107062   Ceffer   2019 Nov 22, 6:56pm  

I think he is sending them to CNN, which is a fate worse than death.
107063   EBGuy   2019 Nov 22, 7:56pm  

Onvacation says
Who'd of thought Tulsi was a homophobe?

She has a 100% voting record on LGBT issues per the Human Rights Campaign (see HRC scorecard from the 115th Congress).
107064   RC2006   2019 Nov 22, 8:10pm  

Her dad is and that's good enough for dems.
107065   Onvacation   2019 Nov 22, 8:12pm  

EBGuy says
She has a 100% voting record on LGBT issues per the Human Rights Campaign (see HRC scorecard from the 115th Congress).

I'll still vote for her.
107066   Patrick   2019 Nov 23, 9:59am  

HEYYOU says
She won't be on the ballot for President.


True, Democrats insist on corrupt candidates only.
107067   Bd6r   2019 Nov 23, 10:02am  

Ceffer says
Have the female candidates line up in sheer yoga pants and bend over. Who wins the camel toe contest? 'Nuff said.

You are a monster, Sir! Image of Warren in that position will make even the most tolerant people vomit.
107068   HeadSet   2019 Nov 23, 10:05am  

Ceffer says
Have the female candidates line up in sheer yoga pants and bend over. Who wins the camel toe contest? 'Nuff said.


Good luck keeping Mayor Pete out of that contest.
107069   Bd6r   2019 Nov 23, 10:26am  

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
KEEP! THE! CAMERAS! ROLLING!

SELL! MORE! TICKETS! ON NETFLEX! UNDER THE SHOW PROGRAM TITLE:

MICHELLE'S! IMMENSE! PREHENSILE! PENIS! VERSUS! MADISON SQUARE GARDEN!

There will be no contest. Michelle's Humongous, Prehensile Penis wins in 1st round by a knockout.
I wage 10000000/1 on Michelle.
107070   Ceffer   2019 Nov 23, 12:01pm  

Michelle needs to keep her cool and stop swinging from rafter to rafter with her IPP giving Tarzan yells.

IPP is already under contract to play the 'face hugger' in the next Alien movie sequel.
107071   Blue   2019 Nov 23, 11:03pm  

This topic often discussed on radio. No one knows the answer, and the conclusion is "forever"
107072   Tenpoundbass   2019 Nov 24, 9:01am  

That isn't going to fly in the Senate, and the source running around Washington spreading this story is Anonymous.

The Senator Kennedy told Chris Wallace today, that after the Strozk testimony and Comey's actions and testimony. This angle will not fly well in the Senate.
It will probably trigger an investigation of their own. It will ruin Horrowitz's career if he tries to say this was just an FBI staffing issue, and not a deeper corruption and abuse of power issue.
107073   Tenpoundbass   2019 Nov 24, 9:06am  

Don't forget Sullivan refuses to sentence General Flynn since December of last year, because he Knows damn well it will ruin his career. After everything settles and cooler heads prevail. Sulivan is trying to intemidate Flynn and his Lawyer to ask for the case to be thrown out. Because he can't bring himself to do what his oath demands he does. Which is throw the damn case out and call for an investigation into the what Horrowitz should have gotten to the bottom of in this investigation.

It will be a shit stain on Horrowitz and Sullivan if he tries to sell this as a disgruntled employee.
That narrative would say that the FISA judges and Senoir people at the FBI are incompetent and can allow any low grade cut rate Commie working solo in our greatest Law Department in the United States and use his Senior ranking officials as his personal little Patsy Fuck Bitch.

Is that what Horrowitz is going to sale? I don't thing so. You're going to be sorely disappointed if you believe that.
107075   WookieMan   2019 Nov 24, 10:18am  

@Patrick - when is this considered spam? 7 of 11 comments from the OP? All for conversation and debate here, but this is annoying.....
107076   Patrick   2019 Nov 24, 11:16am  

He's not insulting the other users I think, so seems like this is what the ignore link is for.

Is there some better way?
107077   WookieMan   2019 Nov 24, 11:45am  

Patrick says
He's not insulting the other users I think, so seems like this is what the ignore link is for.

Is there some better way?

He's not, you are correct. But 7 comments on your own OP is excessive when there was only 11 total. The reason was likely to keep it at the top of the main feed. The first 3 comments are his? Why not just do that in the OP or maybe do 1 comment for corrections? And you already have the edit function.

Just don't want to see a trend where someone just makes a bunch of one line comments on a topic to keep it at the top of the feed. TPB did 3 in a row here, but 2 were at least multiple sentence responses to the OP. Comments 7, 8 and 9 were also useless. Basically I'm pointing out that I could easily monopolize the "above the fold section" of the site with new threads and then comment on my own threads while no one else interacts.

This probably isn't the best explanation, but this thread just felt very spammy/trolly and with repeats with what was already in the OP, by the OP if that makes sense. Not sure there's a way to correct it. Maybe limit to 2 consecutive comments if there hasn't been another member reply? Or make a prompt (like delete or flag) that says you've done X number of posts, please edit a previous post to get your point across?

There's not a single reason to make more than one comment on a new thread I start before anyone else has responded. Or to make 3 comments in a row. You can use the quote function in one comment and get back to a ton of people in just one comment.
107078   Ceffer   2019 Nov 24, 11:49am  

They must have Horowitz' Epstein Lolita vids.
107079   SoTex   2019 Nov 24, 12:16pm  

What do you call a guy floating in the water with no arms and no legs?

Answer: A Russian troll
107080   WookieMan   2019 Nov 24, 12:59pm  

TrumpingTits says
BobD says
The question is will the supreme Court take more power away from Congress? If not then California case is a moot point.


Huh?

@BobD - Any response?
107081   Chiromancer   2019 Nov 24, 2:56pm  

WookieMan says
But 7 comments on your own OP is excessive when there was only 11 total. The reason was likely to keep it at the top of the main fee


Oh so we have a p.net version of political correctness. If one's panties are in a bunch, like Patrick said just hit ignore or dont read his posts Could it be the content is what has aroused the ire?
This report is beginning to sound like its older brother, the famous Nunes report. A whisp of smoke and no fire. But not to worry Barr will concoct something to satiate the cult members.
107082   Booger   2019 Nov 24, 5:53pm  

107083   WookieMan   2019 Nov 24, 5:53pm  

Chiromancer says
like Patrick said just hit ignore or dont read his posts Could it be the content is what has aroused the ire?

You do know what spam is and what my point was, right? I also can't ignore for obvious reasons, or so I thought. There were 3 comments from the OP saying the exact same thing. Not about politics at all. It was no different than making three comments saying fart, fart, fart. The first fart was fine, the others? Completely spamming the site. I prefer exchanges of idea and thoughts even if they get testy. Not repetitive bull shit. Thought that was common sense, guess not?

BobD says
WookieMan says
You can use the quote function in one comment and get back to a ton of people in just one comment.

You do you. I'll do me. Fair enough?

Not what you did at all here. But whatever. You failed to ignore that I also mentioned I didn't appreciated TPB comments, or at least the barrage of them. Get the fucking thought out in one post/comment, MAYBE two in a row or take some tard meds. Otherwise it's just childish trolling and pushing topics to the top that someone wants there. That's a quick way to sink a site if allowed. (Check that out! Quoted two different users in one comment! My fucking hands hurt, but I did it. Patrick, where's my trophy?)
107084   CBOEtrader   2019 Nov 24, 6:31pm  

WookieMan says
It was no different than making three comments saying fart, fart, fart.


Yeah we all have our own styles. I've done the string of posts so I'm not judgy.

BobD says
just_dregalicious says
What do you call a guy floating in the water with no arms and no legs?

Answer: A Russian troll


Hmm, not a Ukrainian troll?


What does this mean? The D's have so far just mocked outrage, at which only the most blind leftists still go along with.

You obviously disagree, but how?

Where are the facts for russian collusion or ukraine QPQ? Looks all made up thus far. ...AND we're starting to see backlash from the lies.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-fisa-report-report-justice-department-fbi-conduct-fisa-warrants-2016-election-released-watchdog/

Flynn will be completely exonerated if he hasnt been already. The coup against Trump will have repercussions , albeit almost definitely less than the promised fox news bombshells as you point out above.
107085   SoTex   2019 Nov 24, 9:56pm  

jazz_music says
Fake news


Hahahahaha... It's like rain in November.
107086   SoTex   2019 Nov 24, 10:02pm  

BobD says
Hmm, not a Ukrainian troll?


конечно нет
107087   WookieMan   2019 Nov 25, 4:02am  

BobD says
refusal to answer a questio

What question? If it's the question I'm thinking of, I did answer it and you just don't agree with the answer. That's not answering the question though.
107088   WookieMan   2019 Nov 25, 4:51am  

BobD says
If I was trying to bump the thread when quoting TPB why would I do three posts within 1 minute of each other? Not really the best way to bump a thread, wouldn't you agree?

Ughh. Do people not understand forums?? I think you do and I'll explain what you did and you know it's what you were doing.

9:47am you make the OP.
10:55-10:56 you make 3 nonsensical comments

You saw no one had taken the bait on the OP yet. Why was that? Because people scroll through here and look for active posts. You had no comments and it was slipping down the page. Solution, just make 3 comments up. Gives it the look of an active post with 3 comments and yes, it does bring it back to the top. And BAM, post is more likely to be read and was.

You're now going to say this isn't what you were doing and I know that's not true. We'll have to just disagree on that before you come back and say I'm wrong, because I'm not. I (and most) would have never read this thread without seeing the high comment count and you know this to be true.

BobD says
Actually, I was quoting what TPB said for 2 of them in case he edited what he said later. Although I don't think TPB would change what he said I quoted him anyway. I decided to add the # to point out that what he said will be disproven on December 9th. Thought it was obvious what I was doing but I guess It was not obvious for all.

Nope. You readily admit TPB probably wouldn't change it. That's a silly excuse and you know it. Who cares if he changes it? Either way, TPB would have a lot of work on his hands to change all his posts/comments regarding recent events and you know that it wouldn't be realistic.

You were comment pumping the thread to make it look more active than it was to get people baited and still also bump it to the top. You could have quoted all 3 in one post unless you hit the character limit, which you wouldn't have. So 6 comments should have been 1. I think you knew what you were doing, but maybe you really didn't know. Now you do. It happens on every forum and it's annoying and keeps bad topics highlighted that never should have been.
107089   WookieMan   2019 Nov 25, 5:05am  

CBOEtrader says
Yeah we all have our own styles. I've done the string of posts so I'm not judgy.

You do different content/comments though if you do a string. I'm okay with that, although it would be nice to have it wrapped up in one nice package admittedly. But it's not a big deal, like TPB did above.

You also don't make a new post, see it's flopped with other users and then make 3 comments before others users have said anything about the topic. Everything in the first 3 comments was already stated in the OP.

It's a tactic used by trolls in other forums and lessens the experience and conversation that can be good here at times. Hence why I tagged @Patrick in my previous comment here. It's the center of attention troll that tries to keep a bad topic relevant by building up the comment count. The edit button works just fine for up to a week I believe. Which negates the excuse made here as well about TPB changing comments.

Either consciously or subconsciously people will read posts/topic with higher comment counts. Forum 101.
107090   CBOEtrader   2019 Nov 25, 5:26am  

BobD says
CBOEtrader says
Flynn will be completely exonerated if he hasnt been already.

Didn't he plead guilty? Why did he plead guilty if he was innocent?, that is strange.


Everyone pleads guilty when faced w financial and family collapse.

Flynn has since turned the tables on the prosecution, with his lawyer now suggesting she expects : https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/11/01/flynn_lawyer_sidney_powell_i_expect_judge_to_postpone_sentencing_hold_prosecutors_in_contempt.html
107091   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Nov 25, 5:50am  

The Judge doesn't want to be forced to rule that the FBI and Government broke the Brady Rule, and worse, doctored evidence.

We have the Adulterers' chat plotting to have Lisa Page take them from somebody else's desk and edit the 302s.

The FBI has gotta be replaced entirely. They deliberately don't record interviews on purpose, so they can create "Lying to Federal Agent" traps. Not just Flynn, been going on for decades, a Hoover Tactic. It's your word against their subjectively written report.
107092   CBOEtrader   2019 Nov 25, 6:27am  

NoCoupForYou says
The Judge doesn't want to be forced to rule that the FBI and Government broke the Brady Rule, and worse, doctored evidence.

We have the Adulterers' chat plotting to have Lisa Page take them from somebody else's desk and edit the 302s.

The FBI has gotta be replaced entirely. They deliberately don't record interviews on purpose, so they can create "Lying to Federal Agent" traps. Not just Flynn, been going on for decades, a Hoover Tactic. It's your word against their subjectively written report.


...and they used the entire force of this system to attempt a coup w Trump.

I dont doubt CNN will keep saying everything is NBG.

Rational people who turn CNN off will see the treason on display, and hopefully tear the FBI down brick by brick
107093   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Nov 25, 7:21am  

BobD says
And who got the scoop first? CNN that's who!


Who got the fake leaks first? CNN!

Remember the misdated emails to Don Jr. about wikileaks from December 2017? We still never got an explanation.
107094   Chiromancer   2019 Nov 25, 8:38am  

NoCoupForYou says
The FBI has gotta be replaced entirely. They deliberately don't record interviews on purpose, so they can create "Lying to Federal Agent" traps.


My understanding is that the Flynn interview was recorded. He is a friggin General not some smuck that doesn't know his ass from his elbow when dealing with the Feds. But on the other hand he probably thought he was smarter then they were, oh well.

Dont count on that judge to "free him".After seeing the evidence, which has not been made public he mentioned the word treason (wrongly I might add). Flynn is guilty, he already plead so. Its clear he is going for a pardon by ginning up the fox news conspiracy bullshit to get Trump's attention after ratting out others to Muller's crew. Doubt it will work but maybe if he starts chanting lock Bidden up Donnie will forgive him.
107095   Tenpoundbass   2019 Nov 25, 8:58am  

John Huber is investigating Hillary Clinton & her Uranium One Scandal.
(Pg 294 of OIG Report)

John Durham is investigating the origins of the Russia Witch Hunt.

And Michael Horowitz is releasing the FISA Report in 14 days.

Things are happening.
May God bring some real justice.

« First        Comments 107,059 - 107,098 of 117,730       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste