patrick.net

In 2019, the Demmedia claimed:

Trump would resign
Mueller would find collusion
The stock market would crash
Jussie Smollett was honest
Trump’s base would leave him
A recession would happen
War would break out
Avenatti was a serious candidate

None of that shit happened.

Please Update your Meme Servers:

Hahaha! It's funny because Liberals are Fags!

Booger says

www.youtube.com/embed/hyomP-XTYY8

marcus says

:

Fake news. Trump is more popular than Obama.

Even Leftist Rag Newsweek forced to admit:
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-approval-rating-higher-obama-1460076

marcus says

As for the rest of the "people of Earth," you can be sure that his popularity is much lower in much of the rest of the world, compared to other PResiedents.

Duh, foreigners want a weak President that gives them money, helps enact THEIR policies, and doesn't stand in their way.

Germany, for example, doesn't want to stop trading tech and machines to Iran, and doesn't want to be reminded that while they spend luxuriously on migrants, they are shorting their NATO commitments.

LOL How Deranged can one get? The artist of this sketch needs a safety check.

marcus says

Actually all of the last 9 Presidents, even Jimmy Carter were more popular at this point in their Presidency, than Trump

Did you unsourced and unsupported chart come from CNN? Lolz, dude admit you are being lied to and like it

The most accurate meme on the internet

NoCoupForYou says

Why isn't the incredible wealth politicians and their cronies amass front page news? Rhetorical question; they own the newspapers.

tovarichpeter says

Only the left would draw a comparison between temporarily jailing children vs permanently killing fetuses yet believe they "made a funny" by pointing out hypocrisy.

Utter meme failure.

marcus says

:

:

What you talkin bout, Willis?

The economy is booming, wages rising, stocks rising.

marcus says

Actually all of the last 9 Presidents, even Jimmy Carter were more popular at this point in their Presidency, than Trump. But hey, do what the others do, say that it's the
media's fault. It couldn't be that the media actually reflects the collective observations and average opinions of a lot of intelligent citizens.

You believe polls after they were so incredibly wrong about the last presidential election?

The only poll that actually matters is the voting booth.

It couldn't be that the election of Trump actually reflects the collective observations and average opinions of a lot of intelligent citizens. Or could it be?

You missed the obvious message:

Krugman before 2016 Election: "Ignore the Debt Scolds"
Krugman after 2016 Election: "Muh Deficits"

The analogy between human races and breeds of dog is in fact quite accurate. It's even an understatement of the reality.

The different breeds of dogs definitely have different physical and mental characteristics. No one would seriously deny this.

Yet to call attention to the fact that humans also come in different breeds is met with outrage and denial.

Dog breeds have been separate for less than 50,000 years. But the differences are considerable.

Human races have been separate for 100,000 years at least, but we are supposed to pretend that the differences do not exist.

There are people in the Andaman Islands who have been isolated from the rest of humanity for 50,000 years themselves. And this is just one small example.

It is the left which denies science, not the right.

Racism would be the denial of rights on the basis of race. I would never advocate that. But race does exist. It is real.

But race does exist. It is real.

True, but we are all individuals and race is but one attribute of any distinct human. A person still has unique features (IQ, sex, interests), regardless of which extended family that person shares skin color and bone structure with.

What makes racism wrong? Philosophical question.

marcus says

Patrick says

The analogy between human races and breeds of dog is in fact quite accurate. It's even an understatement of the reality.

The different breeds of dogs definitely have different physical and mental characteristics. No one would seriously deny this.

Yet to call attention to the fact that humans also come in different breeds is met with outrage and denial.

Dog breeds have been separate for less than 50,000 years. But the differences are considerable.

Human races have been separate for 100,000 years at least, but we are supposed to pretend that the differences do not exist.

Forgetting about arguing this for now (although you're wrong), what I would like to know is this.

So you don't think that this assertion on it's own is not racist ?

How do you define racism ?

If you're goal is to help people, cultural vs genetic is core to the discussion.

Todays PC cult of diversity would NEVER allow scientific, helpful research on such a topic and you know it.

The big problem, is that the left today ALSO wants every to accept that differences of outcomes in life are signs of racism from white people. This is itself racist as fuck, but the left seems cool with it.

Studies which identify the racial and cultural differences in aptitude would be called tools of white supremacy or something equally as cartoonish.

Therefore memes like Patrick's are important to remind people that the PC cult of diversity is tyrannical, wrong, and standing in the way of societal progress.

You are talking about supremacy of “one better than other”. I’m not talking about that. I see that every time economy downturns people get into groups of like looking. Blacks only hang with blacks, Mexican with Mexican, etc... basic racism is survival instinct. And all the inclusivity and presence that everyone is sane is unnatural. You still haven’t answered what makes racism morally wrong.

marcus says

:
Another thing you might want to realize is that accepting race as a mostly a social and cultural construct, but that differences in intelligence , character, ethics, empathy and many other attributes vary within each race FAR FAR more than they might between races on avg, if they even do, is good for white people as they become a minority.

Perpetuating the idea that some races are better than others is not in anyone's best interest. The reasons for this should be obvious, even if you can not imagine yourself as a member of the oppressed group.

Meritocracy should be supported independent of race so that they are not ever conflated as being interdependent.

Fortwaynemobile says

What makes racism wrong? Philosophical question.

marcus says

What if differences in outcome are partially the result of racism ? That's not racist to believe that. Racial oppression is natural - we know that.

Its racist if you think the world power system is a vast male white supremacist conspiracy. This is repackaged anti-semitism. Replace Jewry w straight white males and you wouldnt know the difference.

I've only ever witnessed race being an asset to the underachieving races. You are free to believe whatever you want, but I doubt you will find real world evidence to suggest racism, especially white racism against blacks. It's not a thing here

marcus says

Better for us all to take race out of it. This is why I said this:

marcus says

Meritocracy should be supported independent of race so that they are not conflated as being interdependent.

This is exactly what every trump supporter wants. The mainstream left would label you a nazi for suggesting to "take race out of it"