Political Humor Thread
invite response
2019 Feb 17, 4:30pm 3,075,826 views 41,380 comments
by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 4,527 - 4,566 of 41,380 Next » Last » Search these comments
4544
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 18, 9:41am
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 18, 9:41am
Wasnt Ken the first transgender doll?
Why do you think american women want a neutered man?
Why do you think american women want a neutered man?
4546
Tenpoundbass
2020 Jan 18, 11:01am
Tenpoundbass
2020 Jan 18, 11:01am
marcus says
Damn those FBI traitors went to great lengths to really frame up their Insurance policy. I would bet anything that most of these photos were in the original mueller investigation. But since the collusion canard didn't stick. The photos were a complete waste of time. This is why Humpty Dumpty and Pencil Neck, wanted the Mueller grand jury material made public. If you notice in every photo Lev is in with Trump. Trump isn't even aware that Lev is photo bombing him. One would think the photog would have made Trump the subject. Lev was nobody back then. Why is Lev an aware photo subject, where Trump is a backdrop or even a prop?
Lev looks the same in every photo regardless how relaxed and casual the Trump family may be. Just because Lev got access to every where Trump was, with a FBI out to get Trump like they are. And to have so many photos that make Lev the subject of the pictures over the President. Is highly suspect if you ask me.
Damn those FBI traitors went to great lengths to really frame up their Insurance policy. I would bet anything that most of these photos were in the original mueller investigation. But since the collusion canard didn't stick. The photos were a complete waste of time. This is why Humpty Dumpty and Pencil Neck, wanted the Mueller grand jury material made public. If you notice in every photo Lev is in with Trump. Trump isn't even aware that Lev is photo bombing him. One would think the photog would have made Trump the subject. Lev was nobody back then. Why is Lev an aware photo subject, where Trump is a backdrop or even a prop?
Lev looks the same in every photo regardless how relaxed and casual the Trump family may be. Just because Lev got access to every where Trump was, with a FBI out to get Trump like they are. And to have so many photos that make Lev the subject of the pictures over the President. Is highly suspect if you ask me.
4555
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 19, 8:45am
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 19, 8:45am
marcus says
Whatre you talking about? He DID both those things already.
He released the transcript AND the only people who were witness to the conversation affirmed Trumps innocence.
So, what extra transcript do you want? Whose opinion on this do you think is relevant? I'd suggest we need to show the US public details of the treasonous crimes they were discussing so perhaps you understand why investigating and prosecuting this treason is important.
Do you care about the Truth, marcus?
How about due process? Is that also not important?
If your answer to both is no, then your memes represent you perfectly.
Whatre you talking about? He DID both those things already.
He released the transcript AND the only people who were witness to the conversation affirmed Trumps innocence.
So, what extra transcript do you want? Whose opinion on this do you think is relevant? I'd suggest we need to show the US public details of the treasonous crimes they were discussing so perhaps you understand why investigating and prosecuting this treason is important.
Do you care about the Truth, marcus?
How about due process? Is that also not important?
If your answer to both is no, then your memes represent you perfectly.
4557
Onvacation
2020 Jan 19, 9:53am
Onvacation
2020 Jan 19, 9:53am
CBOEtrader says
The one Schiff made up.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/GN4CJ8MYLTY?start=234
So, what extra transcript
The one Schiff made up.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/GN4CJ8MYLTY?start=234
4559
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 19, 12:22pm
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 19, 12:22pm
Onvacation says
Lol, yeah that was hilarious.
I dont think Marcus is fully aware of where his opinions come from. He repeats what MSNBC says. So, when msnbc mistates that "we still need a transcript and eyewitnesses that Trump is withholding" despite the actual FACT that Trump immediately made both available, marcus repeats it.
^^this is why I press to see even the smallest shred of evidence to prove these statements. Or perhaps an explanation? Or anything. Who knows, maybe I'm missing something. Since he wont support his statements, noone will learn or grow from the exchange. Sad.
The one Schiff made up.
Lol, yeah that was hilarious.
I dont think Marcus is fully aware of where his opinions come from. He repeats what MSNBC says. So, when msnbc mistates that "we still need a transcript and eyewitnesses that Trump is withholding" despite the actual FACT that Trump immediately made both available, marcus repeats it.
^^this is why I press to see even the smallest shred of evidence to prove these statements. Or perhaps an explanation? Or anything. Who knows, maybe I'm missing something. Since he wont support his statements, noone will learn or grow from the exchange. Sad.
4564
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 19, 5:29pm
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 19, 5:29pm
marcus says
This is called executive privilege. Rights are an important part of due process. Disagreements go to a judge. Simple...but democrats disnt want to be bothered w process and judges did they?
marcus says
Yup, and I think we just identified why that article is laughable.
marcus says
Offering facts for why you believe something is too much for, then why are you here? Notice how I just explained myself above? It's not that hard if you have supporting facts and logical reasoning.
Marcus, do you have any supporting facts or logical reasoning? Please share
Trump did not allow
This is called executive privilege. Rights are an important part of due process. Disagreements go to a judge. Simple...but democrats disnt want to be bothered w process and judges did they?
marcus says
This is why obstruction of congress is one of the primary reasons he is being impeached.
Yup, and I think we just identified why that article is laughable.
marcus says
Why should I argue
Offering facts for why you believe something is too much for, then why are you here? Notice how I just explained myself above? It's not that hard if you have supporting facts and logical reasoning.
Marcus, do you have any supporting facts or logical reasoning? Please share
4565
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 19, 5:32pm
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 19, 5:32pm
What transcript havent we read? And what witnesses did Trump no allow?
You do realize trump wasnt a lawyer, or any witnesses right? Is that also part of due process in your world, or does that go against due process?
I hope you can see why the world is laughing at this fraud of an impeachment. By all means, if I'm missing something relevant, please share.
You do realize trump wasnt a lawyer, or any witnesses right? Is that also part of due process in your world, or does that go against due process?
I hope you can see why the world is laughing at this fraud of an impeachment. By all means, if I'm missing something relevant, please share.
4566
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 19, 7:38pm
CBOEtrader
2020 Jan 19, 7:38pm
marcus says
You have been fed innuendo and half truths as facts. i dont think you can support your statements without exposing the weakness of your assumptions. This is why you wont try.
We dont read minds here like the democrats. You have to actually support your statements with something beyond mind reading assumptions of guilt. "Its not what Trump actually said or did, it's what he really meant that's the problem."
Good luck w that in the Senate where trump is allowed to speak up and fight back. This is gonna be a slaughter
Offering facts for why you believe something is too much for, then why are you here?
Not to convince people of facts that are common knowledge in the real world.
You have been fed innuendo and half truths as facts. i dont think you can support your statements without exposing the weakness of your assumptions. This is why you wont try.
We dont read minds here like the democrats. You have to actually support your statements with something beyond mind reading assumptions of guilt. "Its not what Trump actually said or did, it's what he really meant that's the problem."
Good luck w that in the Senate where trump is allowed to speak up and fight back. This is gonna be a slaughter
« First « Previous Comments 4,527 - 4,566 of 41,380 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,931 comments by 14,891 users - askmeaboutthesaltporkcure, ElYorsh, The_Deplorable online now