by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 108,422 - 108,461 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
But the AGW crowd does not want solutions other than everyone has the "original sin" of being a polluter and must fund big government as contrition
Trump can just order a tactical nuke strike on the court and have the judge's relatives raped to death and fed to lions at the National Zoo.
One phone call.
MAGA.
Two examples of many Dem retard posts.
If we still had nut house mental institutions around the country,they would be full of Democrats.
Ok, I am dumb here. What is meant by "adjustments." I would expect to see something like "Actual Predicted Temps" compared to "Actual Measured Temps." Also, what is the scale on PPP CO2? And how do you measure "atmospheric CO2? CO2 is heavier than air and would vary with altitude and proximity to sources.
When we get the House of Representatives back maybe we can do something about this.
Where are the teabaggers?
All of a sudden the Democrats became Deficit Hawks, who woulda thunk it?
Actually, going back to at least Clinton, democrats have been clearly way more fiscally responsible than republicans.
Back then, a disapproving Krugman called the deficit "comparable to the worst we've ever seen in this country. ... The only time postwar that the United States has had anything like these deficits is the middle Reagan years, and that was with unemployment close to 10 percent." Take away the Social Security surplus spent by the government, he said, and "we're running at a deficit of more than 6 percent of GDP, and that is unprecedented."
We must guard against "deficit hysteria." In "Fiscal Scare Tactics," his recent column, Krugman writes: "These days it's hard to pick up a newspaper or turn on a news program without encountering stern warnings about the federal budget deficit. The deficit threatens economic recovery, we're told; it puts American economic stability at risk; it will undermine our influence in the world. These claims generally aren't stated as opinions, as views held by some analysts but disputed by others. Instead, they're reported as if they were facts, plain and simple."
This is in spite of Trump, not becasue of him. I think the economy would have been similar with Clinton, but with way less new debt. . Because of the lower deficit spending, we might have had a recession by now, but that has to happen sooner or later anyway.
ain't gonna work, R's had house for 2 yrs after tRUMP election and ZILCH!
I think at this point no one gives a shit anymore. Everyone sees it as someone else’s credit card.
NoCoupForYou saysAll of a sudden the Democrats became Deficit Hawks, who woulda thunk it?
Actually, going back to at least Clinton, democrats have been clearly way more fiscally responsible than republicans.
You're right. The economy has been decent (only), with gdp growth to the obama years. What is it now ?
This is in spite of Trump, not becasue of him. I think the economy would have been similar with Clinton, but with way less new debt. . Because of the lower deficit spending, we might have had a recession by now, but that has to happen sooner or later anyway.
Interest is SATAN!'s paycheck!
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/one-year-after-trumps-election-revisiting-autocracy-rules-for-survival
All of a sudden the Democrats became Deficit Hawks, who woulda thunk it?
« First « Previous Comments 108,422 - 108,461 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,240 comments by 14,901 users - 6DOF, Blue online now