9
0

Coronavirus toll could be up to 0.0003 of the US population!


 invite response                
2020 Mar 29, 9:38pm   17,569 views  376 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (58)   💰tip   ignore  

PANIC!

Wait, 3 percent of 1 percent?

Yes, 100 times smaller than 3 percent.

Say 100,000 die out of 300M people (actually, the population is even larger than that). That's 0.0003.

So, since 0.0086 of the US dies every year on average, this could bump up the US death rate by 3 / 86 = 3.5% this year.

Except not it wouldn't even be that much, because a large fraction of those who die weren't going to make it through a normal 2020 anyway.

It's still not at all clear that this was worth imploding the economy for. Remember that 81,000 died of the flu in 2018 and no one even blinked.

« First        Comments 72 - 111 of 376       Last »     Search these comments

72   mell   2020 Mar 30, 6:24pm  

astronut97 says
Booger says
Doesn't matter. All the antibiotics have probably been hoarded up already.


What part of "antibiotics are only effective against bacteria" did you not understand?


It's not that simple. Many antibiotics also have anti viral effects.

ThreeBays says
Patrick says
Actually, the weird thing about azithromycin is that it seems to have some anti-viral effects even though it was designed to work against bacteria.


I think it's just that viral respiratory infections also open the door to secondary bacterial pneumonia infection, so azithromycin as well as other broad spectrum antibiotics are indicated.


They actually do have first line anti viral effects unrelated to fighting secondary bacterial infections.

Plus they're easier to obtain than most anti virals.
73   Reality   2020 Mar 30, 6:36pm  

ThreeBays says
Your numbers are off by 10x. Flu has a fatality around 0.1% which would be 60k deaths a year assuming it got everybody ill which it doesn't.


The total number of death in Italy (60mil pop) is close to 600k per year because people's average life expectancy is less than 100 years. So on average, the daily death on average should be close to 2000 (because there are 300+ days in a year, in case that is not obvious), but Italy did see 3000+ deaths on many winter days in years past, thanks to the high toll of respiratory disease on the elderly in winter. How you classify those deaths is immaterial. If you wish, you could classify 919 of them on a particular day as dying of whatever disease you invent.
74   Reality   2020 Mar 30, 6:39pm  

ThreeBays says
Where are you getting that? The study published in TheLancet with sampling size of 190+ is indicating survival rate of 3-5%! for ventilators and intubation.

Oxygen therapy can be done at home, and likely done much safer at home when there is a contagious disease running rampant in the hospitals


Majority of Covid-19 get put on intubation from developing ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome). Studies put the mortality rate at 36% to 52%. Modelers like Imperial College used 50% as the figure for survival for those entering critical condition.


LOL! You are talking about a model, from the same idiots/alarmists who just revised their 600k UK death estimate to 20k. I was using real field data observed from hospitals during this Covid-19 epidemic!
75   mell   2020 Mar 30, 7:18pm  

You can see that men have over 50% more underlying illnesses - they tend to live less healthy, partially by choice and partially because they're heavily disadvantaged against womyn by the government. Their jobs are much more dangerous and unhealthy on average. Lastly, there's some evidence that womyn have a general sight genetic advantage towards longevity which is why the oldest people in the world are often womyn. So I expect the sex ratio to look similar for most infectious cold/flu-like diseases and pneumoniae. Another form of observation bias. Your general health and lung function determine your chances, likely neither race nor sex.
76   socal2   2020 Mar 30, 7:23pm  

ThreeBays says
Covid-19 seems to kill more in the old, and in men than women. Not great for Republicans.


Killing most of the people in big Progressive cities and states like New York and Washington. Not great for Democrats or their arguments of trying to convince people into cities, relying on mass transit and government.
77   mell   2020 Mar 30, 7:37pm  

ThreeBays says
socal2 says
Killing most of the people in big Progressive cities and states like New York and Washington. Not great for Democrats or their arguments of trying to convince people into cities, relying on mass transit and government.


So probably a good idea to keep this illness contained, ey?


In any densely populated areas such as metropoles like NY an outbreak like this will lead to many deaths and overcrowded hospitals, not (much) matter the federal administration (more so local). Again, Asians are much more disciplined with general hygiene and stock with masks and actually wearing them when sick, that's the only way to limit an outbreak in big and dense cities. The US and Europe have never learned this, so all the partisan bickery is BS. Trump did a good job overall, so did Newsom in CA, not so sure about Cuomo and De Blasio but everyone can form their own opinions. Actually even Mayor London Breed has done a decent job managing this crisis in SF so far.
78   Heraclitusstudent   2020 Mar 30, 7:39pm  

We passed 3000 dead in the US today. More than 9/11.
79   WookieMan   2020 Mar 30, 7:50pm  

Heraclitusstudent says
We passed 3000 dead in the US today. More than 9/11.

Oh my God!!! It's a fucking virus. Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton, etc. couldn't control it. What's your point? You're becoming Captain Obvious at this point. 4k will be dead by Wednesday. Who cares?
80   Shaman   2020 Mar 30, 9:08pm  

thomasdong1776 says
Uh, no. More people voted for her than voted for Trump. The Electoral College rejected her, not "the people".


All her extra votes came from California and one state can’t elect a President by itself no matter how many ballots it harvests!
Face it: your side lost fair and square and by the rules.
Loser!
81   Patrick   2020 Mar 30, 9:49pm  

ThreeBays says
The OP of this thread is very disingenuous.


Not at all.

Quite sincere.
82   Reality   2020 Mar 30, 10:39pm  

ThreeBays says
Reality says
Bergamo is a city of 120k, with likely only one burner topping out at 25 bodies to burn per day; the sampling size was way too small. Bergamo is way out in the far ex-burbs of Milan at the foothill and facing water, could be a retirement community.. The same thing is not happening in the nearest metro Milan, pop about 5mil.


Not sure why we should be comparing to the mortality of the entire population given that less than 0.0017 of the population is confirmed infected.


LOL! Because pandemic has to be highly contagious and very deadly to be a pandemic . . . i.e. capable of significantly increase total dead count.

If you think a contagious respiratory disease (which are usually prevalent only during less than half the year) is only infecting 0.0017 of the population after being around for 4 months, then it's not a pandemic at all.
83   Reality   2020 Mar 30, 10:44pm  

ThreeBays says
Now Birx is saying 100K to 200K is the best case scenario if people follow the orders, but could be worse because some douchebags aren't following them.

https://people.com/crime/fla-pastor-arrested-after-hundreds-congregate-for-church-during-coronavirus-outbreak/


Dr. Mengele Birx and Dr Mengele Fraudci are pulling their numbers out of their asses. The hospitals are spreading the disease and killing more people than all other institutions. Instead of shutting down churches, they should be shutting down the blind faith in hospitals, which are good for fixing mechanical trama injuries but simply not set up to deal with highly contagious diseases. When pandemics are declared, all hospitals and medical institutions treating more than 10 patients in a 24hr period should be shut down or at least stop taking new patients.

It makes zero sense to flatten the curve in order to fit more people into hospital capacities, when the hospitals are killing people! Especially when the shut-down of the rest of the society while not shutting down hospitals is effectively giving the most deadly strains of the virus a Darwinian advantage over the more mild strains.

The people who are advocating shutting-down the society/economy (while not shutting down the hospitals) are indeed bent on killing as many people as possible!
84   Patrick   2020 Mar 31, 7:23am  

What? Please quote the "few hundreds". You won't find that.

Also, where did you come up with "less than half of 2018 flu"?
85   Patrick   2020 Mar 31, 7:28am  

A friend from Northern Italy just wrote and said she doesn't know anyone who got sick from this. That's odd, given 11,000 deaths there, mostly in the north.
86   Patrick   2020 Mar 31, 7:33am  

astronut97 says
antibiotics are only effective against bacteria not viruses


@astronut97 Normally you'd be right, but it turns out that azithromycin happens to have anti-viral activity as well, though the mechanism is unclear.
87   Shaman   2020 Mar 31, 8:28am  

Patrick says
astronut97 says
antibiotics are only effective against bacteria not viruses


@astronut97 Normally you'd be right, but it turns out that azithromycin happens to have anti-viral activity as well, though the mechanism is unclear.


And also pneumonia is usually caused by opportunistic bacteria which absolutely are affected by antibiotics.
88   socal2   2020 Mar 31, 8:36am  

Tim Aurora says
Not sure why. If we were ready like Korea and Germany, we could have avoided a disaster in deaths and economy..


Good thing we weren't "ready" like virtually all of Western Europe with their nationalized healthcare systems that has 2 to 10 times the death rate as the US per capita.
89   Patrick   2020 Mar 31, 9:00am  

Shaman says
And also pneumonia is usually caused by opportunistic bacteria which absolutely are affected by antibiotics.


Right, that's another positive effect of azithromycin, probably the main one.
90   goofus   2020 Mar 31, 9:22am  

Tim Aurora says
At each point you and fellow Trump supporters have tried to minimize the death rate. COVID-19 has been a serious threat continuously downplayed by the entire right wing causing serious inaction. Not sure why. If we were ready like Korea and Germany, we could have avoided a disaster in deaths and economy..

See how the Ebola crisis was handled by Fox

https://patrick.net/post/1330788/2020-03-15-obama-and-trump-response-to-pandemics


It's wild to politicize the response, when the whole architecture of WHO, CDC, US media, and politicians (barring a few, like Trump) actively downplayed the dangers of COVID. This lasted all January and most of Feb. "Don't panic the plebs" was the order of the day -- by both parties. Trump, to his credit, shut down flights from China to widespread "xenophobic!" wails.
91   socal2   2020 Mar 31, 9:30am  

goofus says
It's wild to politicize the response, when the whole architecture of WHO, CDC, US media, and politicians (barring a few, like Trump) actively downplayed the dangers of COVID. This lasted all January and most of Feb. "Don't panic the plebs" was the order of the day -- by both parties. Trump, to his credit, shut down flights from China to widespread "xenophobic!" wails.


This X1000.

Are our Trump hating Democrat friends really this clueless about what all of the Democrats, National Media and international health agencies were saying about the virus just a few weeks ago?

Or are they just dishonest hacks?
92   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2020 Mar 31, 9:37am  

socal2 says
goofus says
It's wild to politicize the response, when the whole architecture of WHO, CDC, US media, and politicians (barring a few, like Trump) actively downplayed the dangers of COVID. This lasted all January and most of Feb. "Don't panic the plebs" was the order of the day -- by both parties. Trump, to his credit, shut down flights from China to widespread "xenophobic!" wails.


This X1000.

Are our Trump hating Democrat friends really this clueless about what all of the Democrats, National Media and international health agencies were saying about the virus just a few weeks ago?

Or are they just dishonest hacks?


Most aren’t. Hopefully this gets them to realize that CNN and MSNBC are strictly propaganda and not actual news and that the msms has its own left biased agenda. My biggest hope out of this(besides a quick and relatively innocuous recovery) is that people stop believing the lying deceitful msm.
93   goofus   2020 Mar 31, 9:43am  

Reality says
When pandemics are declared, all hospitals and medical institutions treating more than 10 patients in a 24hr period should be shut down or at least stop taking new patients.

It makes zero sense to flatten the curve in order to fit more people into hospital capacities, when the hospitals are killing people!


That's right, when people need intubation and oxygen because COVID destroys their lung capacity, close the hospitals! There's a rallying cry.
94   WookieMan   2020 Mar 31, 12:07pm  

ThreeBays says
You're mixing assumptions. The US models project 0.9% fatality, and you're using 0.1%. You've got to be consistent.

Who cares about the modeling? We've been keeping dead people alive too long because of big pharma and we're all now going to freak out over it? The same people here that have bitched about big pharma are now crying crocodile tears over them losing money? That's what this is. The sooner these people die, the quicker the numbers drop. Math isn't complicated.

CV-19 is killing people that 100 years ago would be lucky to be alive today. Most of their existence is miserable and self caused, but nah, morality is more important. These events are going to be more common as we keep dead people alive longer. Get over it.

I give this "self quarantine" BS another 2 weeks tops before we break out or riot. This isn't sustainable.
95   Patrick   2020 Mar 31, 12:39pm  

ThreeBays says
If we pass 10K deaths then your 0.1% assumption is too low.


What?

10K deaths would be a wonderfully mild flu season.

50K flu deaths is normal every year, 80K in a hard year.
96   Reality   2020 Mar 31, 12:43pm  

goofus says
Reality says
When pandemics are declared, all hospitals and medical institutions treating more than 10 patients in a 24hr period should be shut down or at least stop taking new patients.

It makes zero sense to flatten the curve in order to fit more people into hospital capacities, when the hospitals are killing people!


That's right, when people need intubation and oxygen because COVID destroys their lung capacity, close the hospitals! There's a rallying cry.


Hospitals as they are today are not set up to handle massively contagious diseases. They are literally killing people: according to CDC, 100,000 people die in the US from contagious disease that they pick up from hospitals every year in normal years (before this latest allegedly massively contagious and deadly disease). Hospitals are good at treating physical injuries and surgery, when there are not a lot of contagious disease patients hanging around to contaminate injury/surgery patients.

Your blind faith in hospitals today is about as silly as the doctors had in Asprin a century ago during the 1918-1919 Asprin-Flu: those who received Asprin were dying at 30x the rate of those who received traditional hydrotherapy, yet they kept handing out Asprin like (poisoned) candies . . . and about as silly as the doctors had in Blood-letting Therapy two centuries ago (Mozart, Washington, etc. all died from that) . . . and about as silly as the Iranian Mullahs had a few weeks ago in the faith that kissing the holy rock / temple in Qum would heal them from the viral disease.

Incidentally, also about as silly as in believing that bad economy would bring down a sitting president no matter what . . . not realizing that a national crisis would actually galvanize support for a sitting president: that's how FDR got his 3rd term even as the economy was turning down again: WWII (and French collapse under Nazi blitzkrieg in 1940 to be specific) elected FDR to the 3rd term (and a 4th term later during the war).
97   Rin   2020 Mar 31, 1:36pm  

Reality says
as silly as in believing that bad economy would bring down a sitting president no matter what . . . not realizing that a national crisis would actually galvanize support for a sitting president


Well Bush Sr, once the 1st Iraqi war was over, did cave to a recession.

The difference here is that Trump is entering election season as a war president and IMHO, his almost instinctive recommendation of hydroxycloroquine, has green lighted all the politically hamstrung physicians, who under their medical mafia guilds (NIH, FDA, etc), were too afraid of trying something experimental in nature.

If this stops ppl from getting on respirators, then Trump will be the FDR/Lincoln of the new century.
98   Reality   2020 Mar 31, 1:47pm  

Well said, Rin. If Bush Sr had launched Desert Storm in 1992 instead of early 1991, he would have been re-elected in 1992. Let's also not forget the Ross Perot factor: if not for Ross Perot, Bush Sr would have beaten Clinton (Bill). Trump has the overwhelming majority of Ross Perot votes, only more photogenic and has a better VP candidate, and now also having 4yrs of incumbent advantage . . . before the latest smart and heroic performance restraining the worst excesses of the bureaucracy. The left's linear thinking is destroying themselves.
99   Rin   2020 Mar 31, 2:50pm  

Reality says
The left's linear thinking is destroying themselves.


I'm not sure if the 'left' has any thinking at all.

In trading, we all understand the expression ... "priced into the market". That was the pivotal year of 2017, where for the most part, the left and its media wonks, slammed Trump of being a perma-trash talking douchebag.

So by mid-2018, much of society got used to the idea that yeah ... the commander in chief talks trash (think Imus but for politics, not sports) and at the same time, minimizes foreign wars, advocates border security, and tries to limit the phenomena of offshoring which has plagued the nation since the 1990s/2000s.

So in reality, the public has realized that this person is a sort of a political moderate, who despite having a loudmouth, isn't as bad as the left likes to portray him. This is the issue because by 2019, it's become somewhat clear that Trump's the classic anti-hero, who despite having a highly flawed personality, does the right thing, more often than not. This is akin to Kurt Russell in 'Escape from NY/LA', Vin Diesel in 'Pitch Black/Chronicles of Riddick', Jason Statham in 'Death Race', along with a slew of other "bad boy" movie anti-heroes whom everyone roots for.
100   WookieMan   2020 Mar 31, 4:31pm  

ThreeBays says
We don't usually lock most people at home for 2 months in flu seasons.

We don't usually test everyone with flu like symptoms either. So their death is much more likely to be attributed to an existing condition instead of the flu, or CV-19 in this case.

As more people are tested the death rate will drop. Especially as fatalities rise, killing off the weak and easy pickings. I wouldn't be surprised to find out this is substantially less deadly than the flu long term. It's just a new bug that those with weak immune systems can't handle. Not sure the reaction fits the probable outcome. The old and weak will continue to die from this for a while.
101   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2020 Mar 31, 4:46pm  

Rin says
Reality says
The left's linear thinking is destroying themselves.


I'm not sure if the 'left' has any thinking at all.

In trading, we all understand the expression ... "priced into the market". That was the pivotal year of 2017, where for the most part, the left and its media wonks, slammed Trump of being a perma-trash talking douchebag.

So by mid-2018, much of society got used to the idea that yeah ... the commander in chief talks trash (think Imus but for politics, not sports) and at the same time, minimizes foreign wars, advocates border security, and tries to limit the phenomena of offshoring which has plagued the nation since the 1990s/2000s.

So in reality, the public has realized that this person is a sort of a political moderate, who despite having a loudmouth, isn't as bad as the left likes to portray him. This is the issue because by 2019, it's become somewhat clea...


Take me now Rin!
102   EBGuy   2020 Mar 31, 4:49pm  

Now about those flu deaths...
The challenge of tracking deaths is not unique to COVID-19. Many of the world’s fatal illnesses are not counted individually. For example, U.S. influenza death tallies are drawn from mathematical models that rely on data taken at a network of hospitals.
103   Y   2020 Mar 31, 9:59pm  

Housing in the borough of Unknown should skyrocket...better buy in early!

ThreeBays says
Covid-19 seems to kill more in the old, and in men than women. Not great for Republicans.

104   Onvacation   2020 Apr 1, 10:11am  

CovfefeButDeadly says
Take me now Rin!

How big are your man boobs?
105   annoyed1   2020 Apr 1, 12:13pm  

We should treat corona like global warming. Do nothing and let future generations figure out how to create a magic fix for it.
107   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Apr 1, 1:17pm  

annoyed1 says
We should treat corona like global warming. Do nothing and let future generations figure out how to create a magic fix for it.


We should fix China Virus like Global Warming - insist on a China Virus offset market and levy huge taxes on medical equipment and quinine drugs.

108   annoyed1   2020 Apr 1, 3:28pm  

NoCoupForYou says
We should fix China Virus like Global Warming - insist on a China Virus offset market and levy huge taxes on medical equipment and quinine drugs.


Your analogy would work if medical equipment and quine drugs caused covid infection instead of fighting it.
109   Patrick   2020 Apr 1, 5:24pm  

Tim Aurora says
Patrick says
Also, where did you come up with "less than half of 2018 flu"?


It is one of your earlier posts which said something like this " I bet the number of deaths would be less than the 2017 or 2018 flu deaths"


Right, betting it will be under the 2018 flu deaths. Didn't mention 2017.

Where did you get "half"?

Please explain.
110   Patrick   2020 Apr 2, 12:02am  

For some perspective, there are about 330,149,796 people in the US.

0.0086 die each year.

That's 330,149,796 x 0.0086 = 2,839,288 deaths per year in the US.

Divide by 365 and you get a normal daily death rate in the US of 7,779 people,

More than 1,000 died of Wuhan virus on Wednesday. So that is pretty significant.

But will it hit the total death toll from the mostly-ignored flu season of 2018? Still doesn't look like it, if the US curve follows that of other countries.
111   MisdemeanorRebel   2020 Apr 2, 12:30am  

What's funny is that Berensen doesn't like Trump, but he's too much of a sane, skeptical type and is disgusted by the Resisthype around the disease.

« First        Comments 72 - 111 of 376       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions