patrick.net

RC2006 says

After digging around it looks to good to be true.

Darn.

NoCoupForYou says

Some good news is the East Asians aren't into wokey dokey, including feminism.

Yup, Asians are too smart to be woke.

?? I do not see the resemblance at all between the ape in the pic and that Black guy. No sloping forehead, no protruding brow, no flat nose, lips completely different, eyes nothing alike.

HeadSet says

?? I do not see the resemblance at all between the ape in the pic and that Black guy. No sloping forehead, no protruding brow, no flat nose, lips completely different, eyes nothing alike.

It's the thought that counts!

Booger says

Notice the chin sticks out further than the teef? That's the tell-tale sign of homo sapiens.

Patrick says

Kepi says

Nothing new nor surprising but good to keep in mind.

I found this statistic hard to believe at first, but it is actually true.

Show me the statistics so I can also know it is true. A meme isn't enough. How did you verify it to be correct? I know the link is https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf - what page?

Not calling you a liar, but trust then verify - but always verify. It's a common tactic to bury a needle in a haystack or simply claim that there's a needle there when there isn't. That's a 135 page document. Where's the needle - what page?

It was the FBI reports. I posted it at some point.

richwicks says

Show me the statistics so I can also know it is true. A meme isn't enough. How did you verify it to be correct? I know the link is https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf - what page?

Not calling you a liar, but trust then verify - but always verify. It's a common tactic to bury a needle in a haystack or simply claim that there's a needle there when there isn't. That's a 135 page document. Where's the needle - what page?

here ya go: Table 42 here: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf
Says less than 10 cases

richwicks says

Show me the statistics so I can also know it is true. A meme isn't enough. How did you verify it to be correct? I know the link is https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf - what page?

This is part of Table 42 from page 55 of the report. I have circled the White on Black rape data in red. The asterisk indicates the estimate is based on 10 or fewer sample cases.

Brd6 says

richwicks says

Show me the statistics so I can also know it is true. A meme isn't enough. How did you verify it to be correct? I know the link is https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf - what page?

Not calling you a liar, but trust then verify - but always verify. It's a common tactic to bury a needle in a haystack or simply claim that there's a needle there when there isn't. That's a 135 page document. Where's the needle - what page?

here ya go: Table 42 here: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf
Says less than 10 cases

Page 52, 4th column down.

Well, I'll be - but sample case is only 10 or less so I wouldn't take too much stock in it but then again it would have to be less than 10 sample cases because if it doesn't happen, you have 0 for a sample case.

Try it. As of about 1PM today...

NoCoupForYou says

Try it. As of about 1PM today...

Yeah, it works.

And The French, of course, were famous for being very chaste for centuries before les Juifs showed up with cameras



The Italians would never collect money from horny guys to watch a chick strip, either.

https://themobmuseum.org/blog/mafia-ruled-times-square/

www.youtube.com/embed/kvXXRWdQqok

www.youtube.com/embed/griMGY-JLvo

TrumpingTits says

No way. Before 1850 having homosexual sex was just about equivalent to bestiality in 95% of the country. Sure, people who had homosexual sex existed, but they certainly didn't advertise it outside the group that was involved with it. Oscar Wilde was convicted of gross indecency for consensual homosexual sex and did 2 years hard labor labor for it in England which was far more socially liberal than the United States was at the time.

There's no historical precedence, that I know of anyhow, where people ever wore their pants waistband below their waist. It's just a stupid fashion among morons. Like wearing sneakers with the shoelaces completely untied.

Booger says

Probably a good idea for personal safety, statistically speaking.

Most black people won't assault you, but you do in fact have a 10x risk of being assaulted simply by being near a young black man rather than a young white man.

And if the black guy has his pants low, it's probably 100x.

Conversely, if the black guy is wearing a suit and looks very clean cut, there's probably not much risk at all.

TrumpingTits says

Patrick says

The "buck breaking" meme is no doubt constructed to get the low-pants morons to wonder if they are acting gay, or subservient.

Yeah. That is why I posted it. :)

I heard that the low pants stems from prison culture - partly because of no belts allowed and the other as subservience. I also heard that whoever has his pants the lowest is the "girl" of the group.

Oh lol, took me a moment.

"Where's Homer?"

Patrick says

"Where's Homer?"

You mean the three absent daddies?

LOL

Ceffer says

Patrick says

"Where's Homer?"

You mean the three absent daddies?

Wow, just keeps getting better.

And yet it is based in reality. Would be interesting to see actual stats of number of fathers per woman by race.

It may well be true that black people are genetically inclined to a mother + maternal grandmother system of raising children. To even suggest that is "racist" but race is very real.

It may well be true that black people are genetically inclined to a mother + maternal grandmother system of raising children. To even suggest that is "racist" but race is very real.

Historical evidence does not support the absent dad as genetic. Before the welfare system emasculated low income dads, Black illegitimacy was rather low. Also, rural Whites have gone down the path of collecting welfare in lieu of a husband. Add to that England. which also has a very generous dole system that caters to young knocked up women, who are overwhelmingly White.

HeadSet says

It may well be true that black people are genetically inclined to a mother + maternal grandmother system of raising children. To even suggest that is "racist" but race is very real.

Historical evidence does not support the absent dad as genetic. Before the welfare system emasculated low income dads, Black illegitimacy was rather low. Also, rural Whites have gone down the path of collecting welfare in lieu of a husband. Add to that England. which also has a very generous dole system that caters to young knocked up women, who are overwhelmingly White.

I'm sure there are huge differences over time and across regions, but there always seems to have been a racial difference as well:



The largest difference seems to correspond with the rise of feminism in the 1960's and 70's.

I honestly think that Sweden got bored with peace and prosperity and decided the completely fuck it up with violent Muslim immigration just to have something interesting going on.