Corona virus (more correctly, Wuhan virus)
invite response
2020 Jan 24, 12:33pm 192,147 views 3,372 comments
by Heraclitusstudent ➕follow (8) 💰tip ignore
Anyone wants to risk a bet on the eventual number of sick people? Dead people?
« First « Previous Comments 1,977 - 2,016 of 3,372 Next » Last » Search these comments
1977
Patrick
2021 Jan 9, 1:28pm
Patrick
2021 Jan 9, 1:28pm
Email from a mostly-reader:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/scottish-police-enter-home-arrest-family-after-neighbor-snitched-them-violating-covid
great how well COVID can justify police state measures
1978
Eric Holder
2021 Jan 10, 4:16pm
Eric Holder
2021 Jan 10, 4:16pm
Patrick says
If they know who ratted them out they need to SWAT them back. If they don't - they should SWAT all their fucking neighbors one by one.
Email from a mostly-reader:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/scottish-police-enter-home-arrest-family-after-neighbor-snitched-them-violating-covid
great how well COVID can justify police state measures
If they know who ratted them out they need to SWAT them back. If they don't - they should SWAT all their fucking neighbors one by one.
1979
Patrick
2021 Jan 16, 10:51am
Patrick
2021 Jan 16, 10:51am
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/01/many-scientists-citing-two-scandalous-covid-19-papers-ignore-their-retractions
So fraudulent "science" created for political reasons is still being cited as legitimate, to keep the whole virus scam going.
In June 2020, in the biggest research scandal of the pandemic so far, two of the most important medical journals each retracted a high-profile study of COVID-19 patients. Thousands of news articles, tweets, and scholarly commentaries highlighted the scandal, yet many researchers apparently failed to notice. In an examination of the most recent 200 academic articles published in 2020 that cite those papers, Science found that more than half—including many in leading journals—used the disgraced papers to support scientific findings and failed to note the retractions.
So fraudulent "science" created for political reasons is still being cited as legitimate, to keep the whole virus scam going.
1980
Onvacation
2021 Jan 17, 11:12am
Onvacation
2021 Jan 17, 11:12am
Dr. Simone Gold - The truth about the CV19 vaccine by Tony Heller
http://newtube.app/TonyHeller/OlBuCsk
#NewTube
http://newtube.app/TonyHeller/OlBuCsk
#NewTube
1982
MisdemeanorRebel
2021 Jan 17, 11:44am
MisdemeanorRebel
2021 Jan 17, 11:44am
Patrick says
Repeatable Research, and the withholding of Data behind Studies - esp. when Publicly Funded - is another crisis of legitimacy.
Schwartz killed himself to liberate taxpayer funded non-Defense research from the claws of EduAdmins.
So fraudulent "science" created for political reasons is still being cited as legitimate, to keep the whole virus scam going.
Repeatable Research, and the withholding of Data behind Studies - esp. when Publicly Funded - is another crisis of legitimacy.
Schwartz killed himself to liberate taxpayer funded non-Defense research from the claws of EduAdmins.
1984
Patrick
2021 Jan 17, 9:13pm
Patrick
2021 Jan 17, 9:13pm
You know, it would be helpful to have a list of businesses like the one that put up that sign, in order to patronize them.
1986
Onvacation
2021 Jan 18, 8:21am
Onvacation
2021 Jan 18, 8:21am
That would be funny if it might not be real, otherwise it is scary.
Using human Guinea pigs to test an experimental biologic agent has the advantage of getting all of the side effects. Animals can't tell us they are impotent after they take the shot, all we can tell is that they suffer an agonizing death when the experimental biological agent fails. With human test subjects we can get all the details.
Dr Mengele would approve! But he would have tested it on minorities first.
Using human Guinea pigs to test an experimental biologic agent has the advantage of getting all of the side effects. Animals can't tell us they are impotent after they take the shot, all we can tell is that they suffer an agonizing death when the experimental biological agent fails. With human test subjects we can get all the details.
Dr Mengele would approve! But he would have tested it on minorities first.
1987
Onvacation
2021 Jan 18, 8:31am
Onvacation
2021 Jan 18, 8:31am
Next step after second shot is exposure to live virus in the wild. You'll still get sick. The experimental biologic agent will be considered successful if you don't die.
1991
Patrick
2021 Jan 26, 8:49pm
Patrick
2021 Jan 26, 8:49pm
Onvacation says
I read some headline about how the supposed vaccine was offered to black people first, because, you know, BLM!
They rightly refused the honor.
Dr Mengele would approve! But he would have tested it on minorities first.
I read some headline about how the supposed vaccine was offered to black people first, because, you know, BLM!
They rightly refused the honor.
1992
Patrick
2021 Jan 26, 8:53pm
Patrick
2021 Jan 26, 8:53pm
zzyzzx says
This is not implausible.
They gained their political goal, the removal of Trump.
They also gained billions of dollars.
This is not implausible.
They gained their political goal, the removal of Trump.
They also gained billions of dollars.
1993
WookieMan
2021 Jan 26, 8:55pm
WookieMan
2021 Jan 26, 8:55pm
Onvacation says
Which was the case without the vaccine in 99.99% of people anyway. I guess saving 0.01% of unhealthy and old people is a noble goal. Has nothing to do with politics or big pharma getting a massive payday. Nope.
The experimental biologic agent will be considered successful if you don't die.
Which was the case without the vaccine in 99.99% of people anyway. I guess saving 0.01% of unhealthy and old people is a noble goal. Has nothing to do with politics or big pharma getting a massive payday. Nope.
1994
Onvacation
2021 Jan 27, 7:11am
Onvacation
2021 Jan 27, 7:11am
WookieMan says
99.95%
If you get the experimental biologic agent your chances of surviving the Wuhan increase to 99. 98%. So they say. However, this is negated by your chances of dying from the injection.
Where's Tiffany Dover?
Which was the case without the vaccine in 99.99%
99.95%
If you get the experimental biologic agent your chances of surviving the Wuhan increase to 99. 98%. So they say. However, this is negated by your chances of dying from the injection.
Where's Tiffany Dover?
2004
Patrick
2021 Jan 30, 11:57pm
Patrick
2021 Jan 30, 11:57pm
https://zenodo.org/record/4477081
A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived
Quay MD PhD, Steven Carl
2007
Onvacation
2021 Jan 31, 2:58pm
Onvacation
2021 Jan 31, 2:58pm
Maybe the Wuhan will go away if everyone locks down for two weeks.
2009
Eric Holder
2021 Jan 31, 6:52pm
Eric Holder
2021 Jan 31, 6:52pm
Onvacation says
It's the science, stupid! Believe and obey it, you fucking neandertals!
Maybe the Wuhan will go away if everyone locks down for two weeks.
It's the science, stupid! Believe and obey it, you fucking neandertals!
2010
mell
2021 Jan 31, 6:55pm
Just wear 20 diapers on yo face! And a butt plug to prevent !Covid!Farts! (a story actually run by the lamestream media a while ago).
2013
rocketjoe79
2021 Feb 2, 12:25pm
rocketjoe79
2021 Feb 2, 12:25pm
They're deep into believing their own misinformed science. They don't realize all "cases" were designated as COVID - until Biden got elected.
The WHO has changed their "case" designation to 1) must have 2 positive tests using different test methods AND 2) show clinical signs of infection.
Miraculously, cases are starting to drop!!
The WHO has changed their "case" designation to 1) must have 2 positive tests using different test methods AND 2) show clinical signs of infection.
Miraculously, cases are starting to drop!!
2014
Patrick
2021 Feb 2, 9:44pm
Patrick
2021 Feb 2, 9:44pm
The WHO did suggest that deaths via trauma not be counted as from Wuhan Virus.
Shows their honesty!
Shows their honesty!
« First « Previous Comments 1,977 - 2,016 of 3,372 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,258,907 comments by 15,020 users - Patrick online now