patrick.net

ThreeBays says

It's quite a shame for a 25 year old doctor to perjure herself.

Are you saying they did complete animal (the non human kind) testing on the experimental biologic agent?

What is the perjury?

32-YEAR-OLD WOMAN DEA*D 12 DAYS AFTER VAC*CINE

How many more will die before we stop?

I've heard reference to this before:

In 2005 an animal study was done with SARS-CoV-1 mRNA vaccines on ferrets. Two doses were administered in the same manner as the SARS-CoV-2, aka, COVID19 mRNA Vaccines. The ferrets showed no adverse reaction and seemed to be completely healthy. After some time, the ferrets were exposed to the SARS-CoV-1 coronavirus in the wild. The ferrets died. The mRNA Vaccine had caused a cytokine storm, a fatal cascade of exaggerated immune responses.

https://factcheckedorg.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/covid-vaccines.r5.1.pdf

ThreeBays says

Two vaccine doses provide strong protection against Indian Variant B.1.617.2

https://www.ft.com/content/a70d423a-7d7c-4736-8828-0a485d7c3a8e

So does Ivermectin

Ivermectin may well work much better than the vaccine.

The problem is that anyone who interferes with the vaccine profit machine will be shouted down as a RACIST!

(Doesn't matter that racism is utterly irrelevant, it's the all-purpose insult to stop conversations from happening.)

Huh, looks like anyone who was infected has "robust" immunity against variants as well:

Andrew Bostom, MD, MS
@andrewbostom
3h
Review of 25 studies of Tcell immunity, w/focus on C19 convalescent patients, by preeminent US Immunology/Virology Lab, highlights robust natural Tcell immunity, making it “unlikely SARS CoV2 variants might escape T cell recognition at population level" cell.com/action/showPdf?pii=…
10:49 PM · May 22, 2021

https://www.cell.com/action/showPdf?pii=S1931-3128%2821%2900238-9

Another good reason not to let oneself be an guinea pig for the experimental agent.

FRom March 24 ..pretty good! I'm horrible at math


1…This graph from Worldometer shows you that of all the people in the world presently with a “confirmed” PCR positive , .4% ( 4 out of 1000 ) have severe symptoms and are presumably Hospitalized

So Our immune systems are running at 99.6% success rate with absolutely NO vaccine assistance already.

That’s pretty freaking amazing is it not ? But Apparently for the WHO et al…that’s NOT good enough !

2…The Vaccines are said to provide 95% protection to you …So you will be 95% less likely to become Hospitalized should you get a positive test.

3…Taken at face value…lets do the math…

a…IF You get a positive test you already are 99.6% NOT going to be hospitalized.

b…Of the .4% you will virtually Not become one of them If the Vaccines are 95% guaranteed to keep you out of the hospital.

So IF you get Covid The reduction in you chances of being hospitalized are NOT 95% ( 950 out of 1000)…they are at best .4%

This means that out of 1000 people injected with an experimental drug only 4 “might” be prevented from being hospitalized.

So in that case the real Risk reduction is .4% Not 95 %

AND…as we now know NOT everyone will get Covid ( cross immunity etc) and 10% of the world population has already had it and recovered…so we need to move that decimal one place to the right to account for all this…ie…your risk from becoming positive is much less than 100%

Now …..04 % is your risk without the vaccine ( 4 in 10,000)

And the most one can benefit from the vaccine is 4 in 10,000

That is to say 9,996 people vaccinated out of 10,000 will get zero benefit anD take ALL the risks which include everything from a sore arm to instant death.

Lastly if you are Healthy and Young…the number is even much smaller than this

Still think It’s a good deal ?

Krispy Creme anyone ?

PS….The Fact that these are 95% successful in preventing hospitalization is pure BS !

The studies were boiled down to 170 Patients ( out of 30,000 ) ( Moderna)

95% of those FIRST 170 PATIENTS with Any Covid Symptoms were in the control group BUT NONE of them were hospitalized .

So NO study has shown reduced Hospitalizations…just reduced Symptoms..ie sniffles aches and pains headaches loss of taste etc.

The Hype for this thing is based on a LIE ! A Big Assed Lie !

99.6% of all people with positive tests have mild symptoms and recover

What else in your life works that well ?

It Boggles the mind that people are willing to play with their immune systems like this.

Also that the Trust The Gov’t and vaccine manufacturers .

Luckily, the cases are down since they changed the PCR test cycles. Way down.

Onvacation says

Luckily, the cases are down since they changed the PCR test cycles. Way down.

Noooooooo!

Watch the video of Dr. Pierre Kory (one of the FLCCC physicians) present at a Senate hearing in Dec 2020 on Ivermectin and the mountains of data proving how safe and effective it is.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/

I really recommend everyone watch this video. The way bureaucrats and media are silencing front-line docs regarding Ivermectin is a crime against humanity.
These Brave Doctors are Upholding Their Hippocratic Oath & Putting Patients—Not Profits—First
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QciiFYJJiJk&t=263s

I'm currently on the FLCCC protocol with Ivermectin. Now why would the US be suppressing Ivermectin in favor of experimental "vaccines"? That should be a MAJOR red flag for anyone.

Sample letter to send to your employer if they start pushing or mandating vaccines:
https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/post/689810/vaccine-mandate-employee-letter-example

original link
/

Does Ivermectin work against regular flus and colds?

WineHorror1 says

Does Ivermectin work against regular flus and colds?

That’s a great question. Dr Kory believes it may but more studies need to be conducted. We’ll certainly find out this Fall/Winter with cold and flu season.

By the way, I’ve discovered that the “wonder drug” that Trump took when he got Covid was indeed Ivermectin.

Kentucky senator Rand Paul says "until he sees evidence suggesting immunity from the vaccine is better than natural immunity, he’s not going to get vaccinated" during an interview with John Catsimatidis on his radio show on WABC 770 AM.

original link
/

WineHorror1 says

Does Ivermectin work against regular flus and colds?

There are plenty of antivirals studied that inhibit the flu and probably also colds (colds are of lesser severity so there is not much incentive to research). You can get Tamiflu which is like ivermectin but for the flu (best bet and fda approved), or Interferons (prob not fda approved but can be obtained overseas) or andrographis tea (very bitter).

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11010-021-04084-7

mich says

FRom March 24 ..pretty good! I'm horrible at math


1…This graph from Worldometer shows you that of all the people in the world presently with a “confirmed” PCR positive , .4% ( 4 out of 1000 ) have severe symptoms and are presumably Hospitalized

So Our immune systems are running at 99.6% success rate with absolutely NO vaccine assistance already.

That’s pretty freaking amazing is it not ? But Apparently for the WHO et al…that’s NOT good enough !

2…The Vaccines are said to provide 95% protection to you …So you will be 95% less likely to become Hospitalized should you get a positive test.

3…Taken at face value…lets do the math…

a…IF You get a positive test you already are 99.6% NOT going to be hospitalized.

b…Of the .4% you will virtually Not become one of them If the Vaccines are 95% guaranteed to keep you out of the hospital.

So IF you get Covid The reduct...

Hyperbolic commentary like this doesn’t at all help the argument that the vaccinations are bad.

So NO study has shown reduced Hospitalizations…just reduced Symptoms..ie sniffles aches and pains headaches loss of taste etc.

Seriously? Just using basic logic this statement is ridiculous.

That is to say 9,996 people vaccinated out of 10,000 will get zero benefit anD take ALL the risks which include everything from a sore arm to instant death.

Sore arm as a risk? Why are you even bothering? Instant death?

Over 273 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through May 17, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 4,647 reports of death (0.0017%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA physicians review each case report of death as soon as notified and CDC requests medical records to further assess reports. A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines. However, recent reports indicate a plausible causal relationship between the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and a rare and serious adverse event—blood clots with low platelets—which has caused deaths. Get the latest safety information on the J&J/Janssen vaccine. CDC and FDA will continue to investigate reports of adverse events, including deaths, reported to VAERS.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html

Now we do certainly agree that there are many reasons not to get the vaccine and the biggest of those is that Covid 19 isn’t actually a threat. Certainly no person under 30 should get it short of underlying health conditions and neither should anyone who has had Covid already. And anyone in the 30-50 year old range should strongly consider not getting it unless they have underlying health conditions. The two people I personally know who got very sick are both in their 50’s and have bad health issues.

But to go bombastic and make silly claims about what the vaccination might do, just undermines any efforts to persuade people who are rah rah vaccine.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_breakingnews/cdc-investigating-heart-inflammation-in-covid-19-vaccinated-teens-young-adults_3826981.html?utm_source=patrick.net&utm_medium=patrick.net&utm_campaign=patrick.net

CDC Investigating Heart Inflammation in COVID-19 Vaccinated Teens, Young Adults
BY JACK PHILLIPS May 23, 2021

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said it is investigating reports of heart inflammation in teenagers and young adults who have received the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus vaccine.

Of course you won't see any of this published in MSM.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/early-treatment-for-covid-is-key-to-better-outcomes-155397/

TEXAS SENATE HEARING; COVID VACCINES DID HAVE ANIMAL TRIALS, ALL WERE HALTED BECAUSE THEY KEPT DYING

Humans keep dying too but PETA don't give a fuck.

Onvacation says

Humans keep dying too but PETA don't give a fuck.

peta is asshoe!

porkchopexpress says

Of course you won't see any of this published in MSM.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/early-treatment-for-covid-is-key-to-better-outcomes-155397/

If you have not yet been vaccinated, taking 0.2mg/kg of ivermectin once a week has been shown to reduce the risk of getting a Covid infection by an average of 85%. It is advisable to take two doses of 0.2mg/kg spread 2 days apart in the first week. ...

The combination of ivermectin and fluvoxamine is extremely effective when used ASAP. Two of the most effective drugs to treat Covid early are ivermectin and fluvoxamine. Both drugs should be started together at the same time. If you are treated within 48 hours of first symptoms, research shows that ivermectin should be given at a dose of 0.4mg/kg for a minimum of 5 days or until symptoms resolve, whichever is later. Fluvoxamine should be given as 50 mg twice a day for 14 days. The website www.c19early.com shows that these are the two approved drugs which individually have shown to be the most effective against Covid in two or more studies. Used together, these drugs have no common adverse interactions and have complementary mechanisms of action. ...

There are many drugs and supplements that have varying levels of positive effectiveness against the virus including inhaled budesonide, bromhexine, vitamin D, and HCQ. All of these have the greatest value when started as early as possible. There is no benefit to waiting. In general, these drugs (and supplements) are safe with very low side-effect profiles. Your doctor may recommend adding one or more of these drugs at the start of treatment in addition to ivermectin and fluvoxamine. ...

is Executive Director of the Covid-19 Early Treatment Fund which funded the clinical trials in the US of fluvoxamine. He has been a medical philanthropist for over 20 years and was recently featured on 60 Minutes for his work on Covid early treatment.

Maybe that guy has some conflict of interest with fluvoxamine, which I've never heard of before. Also, being featured on 60 Minutes is kind of the opposite of credibility these days. 60 Minutes is quite corrupt now.

Patrick says

porkchopexpress says

Of course you won't see any of this published in MSM.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/early-treatment-for-covid-is-key-to-better-outcomes-155397/

If you have not yet been vaccinated, taking 0.2mg/kg of ivermectin once a week has been shown to reduce the risk of getting a Covid infection by an average of 85%. It is advisable to take two doses of 0.2mg/kg spread 2 days apart in the first week.

Keep in mind this is for acute large outbreaks. The US has hardly any covid cases right now, so even taking prophylactic Ivermectin is overkill, you can still do so once there is a confirmed outbreak within friends and/or family.

Patrick says

Maybe that guy has some conflict of interest with fluvoxamine, which I've never heard of before. Also, being featured on 60 Minutes is kind of the opposite of credibility these days. 60 Minutes is quite corrupt now.

Actually, the FLCCC has endorsed fluvoxamine as well for when you have neuro-inflammatory symptoms because it can cross the blood-brain barrier to squash the inflammation. Dr. Drew also swears by fluvoxamine for what it did to help his long-haul neuro symptoms.

mell says

Keep in mind this is for acute large outbreaks. The US has hardly any covid cases right now, so even taking prophylactic Ivermectin is overkill, you can still do so once there is a confirmed outbreak within friends and/or family.

You're probably right. Ivermectin is such a safe drug that one could still take it weekly to be sure. Now that I've done my first two doses of Ivermectin, I actually feel better than I did before not thinking I felt bad at all. If you've had Covid, there's a likelihood that you can still have lingering bits of the virus in your system, and Ivermectin will kill it all off. Perhaps its placebo, but I could've just rid myself of the last of it.

If any of you know people suffering from long-Covid, please have them try Ivermectin because there are numerous stories now about how it solves many symptoms. Also, tell them to try fluvoxamine if they have brain fog or any other neurological issues.

porkchopexpress says

FLCCC

Thanks, I didn't know this FLCCC site:

https://covid19criticalcare.com/

Patrick says

Thanks, I didn't know this FLCCC site:

https://covid19criticalcare.com/

I highly recommend everyone watch the video on their home page of Dr. Kory testifying before the Senate.

COMPANIES ARE BACKPEDALING SINCE OSHA WARNED THEM ABOUT THEIR LIABILITY FOR MANDATORY VACCINES

And they should be sued into oblivion for all harm that their mandatory vaccines do.

Lawsuits are the answer.

More personal surveillance: two more deaths in Santa Cruz hood. Lady four doors down died, AND her son in law, within two weeks of each other. My wife says they were 'liberals', so likely they got the vaccine. The lady was quite elderly, but her son in law was nominally healthy and in his late 60's ( heart attack???). The daughter is alive, but bereft that both her husband and her mother died together more or less.

So, that's suspicious deaths increasing out of proportion already, first one was the guy around the corner, neighbors starting to drop. If any more die, it is truly disproportionate. Guy right across the street died a few months ago, but don't know if he had the vaccine, he had a stroke and was in nursing home, so probably he did have the vax, but who knows.

First lady who had a terrible reaction and got very sick from the vaccine, who walks with my wife, but got 'better' but not really ever 'the same'. She stopped drinking because my wife noticed post jab that she was turning yellow (jaundice), so she has had liver involvement, too. She got mad at my wife for pointing out that her eyes and skin looked strange, but her own daughter confirmed, so she apologized.

Of course, another friend's sister got really ill from the jab, and another lady in our complex was hospitalized after the jab. i saw her the other day, so she's at least still vertical.

https://news.yahoo.com/wuhan-lab-staff-sought-hospital-215837238.html

So three researchers from Wuhan lab sought hospital treatment in November 2019. Pretty sus!

https://youtu.be/UZniDsuCX5g

The balance of evidence now strongly points to the Wuhan lab leak.

At this point what difference does it make?

We all know who all of the traitors are. They built a wall around their place of power and manned it with the woke guard. We know what they did. We know who they are. The same people that brought you 9/11, weapons of mass destruction, anthrax, and myriad unknown maladies are now pushing a dangerous biologic agent to make your symptoms less if you get the manmade cold.

Surprised? Yes! I did not think they could be this evil.

We know who these people are. What can we do?

Lol, I also have relatives who cannot believe that that little elf Fauci could be so satanically evil, but it's obvious that Fauci created the virus for power and profit.

It does make a difference whether or not Fauci gets convicted for his crime against humanity.

What can we do? We need a union of people who want the truth, to pool resources to:

1. sue the bastards
2. run our own journalism
3. understand how the mental disease of wokeness spreads among the weak

Easier said that done, I know.

Fauci has been on the fraud bandwagon for a long time. Once a criminal 'succeeds' the criminal behavior becomes embedded with further successes and there are no other options in behavior.

Also, sociopaths don't consider consequences and believe they can just continue to synthesize new lies to cover the old, and try a charm offensive to get away with it. Fauci is a case in point, spinning new whoppers all the time. He's about as credible as Michael Avenatti, another Everready Bunny Sociopath. His vestments of authority are what allow him to get away with it. Human useful idiots are idolators of the vestments.

Here's a picture of Bill Gates. Look at his expression. The nasty, angry psycho shows through:

Ceffer says

Here's a picture of Bill Gates. Look at his expression. The nasty, angry psycho shows through:

He looks more like a constipated and angry librarian.

I believe that the following is a more an angry psycho ...

Rin says

He looks more like a constipated and angry librarian.

Do you know any librarians?

They can be petty vindictive bitches.

Onvacation says

Rin says

He looks more like a constipated and angry librarian.

Do you know any librarians?

They can be petty vindictive bitches.

Yes, but those are sporadic killing sprees.

Gates is more in the line of the Khmer Rouge, you know, culling herds of people, followed by a mass genocide or two.