by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 114,603 - 114,642 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
I don't think you should hate anyone except Fauci and Collins.
As for gays, there are a number of problems:
- gays molest children at far higher rates than straight people
- at least half of gays were created by this molestation of children, others were "converted" eg in prison or in San Francisco
- no one was born gay. there is no evidence of a "gay gene" and no way for it to persist evolutionarily
- there was no concept of innate or exclusive gayness in the ancient world, only endemic Greek pedophilia
- gays spread disease very effectively, particularly AIDS and anal cancers
- the gay "lifestyle" killed about 700,000 Americans with AIDS
- gays typically die decades earlier than others as a result of their lifestyle. it's literally worse for health than smoking
My issue with homos is threefold:
there was no concept of innate or exclusive gayness in the ancient world, only endemic Greek pedophilia
It's not natural. Yes it happens in nature. But as with humans, it's actually pretty rare. It's a mental illness. We no longer procreate if we're a fucking the same sex and layer on the logical fact if we're not procreating, there are less people to fuck. There are also health issues.
I personally don't care if anyone is gay, but I do look at you differently. We could eliminate AIDS tomorrow if gay guys stopped fucking each other. They're at a higher percentage of suicide. A friends brother did that at 35 about a year ago. It's a toxic lifestyle. Even if 50% of straight marriages fail, it's a better outcome than sticking a dick in some other dudes ass. If you're gay, you should love the straight people. They up the crop of little boys to diddle.
I also don't care about history either. The images presented are Asian. There's a reason China with all the manpower in the world only has 2 aircraft carriers bought from the Russians, they're gay. Probably to...
Why are these allegedly Chinese paintings both showing a black guy f**king a white guy with extremely feminine faces/legs
Historically and currently, (upper-class) gays are better at wealth accumulation as they don't have to deal with the burden of women (the primary resource wasters in human society) . . . which makes them good targets for harvesting by banksters, especially since gays have a higher probability of not having heirs when they die (the money is already in the bank, as is for most people, so the death of the claimant makes it instant free money for the banksters). So, yes, I can see why banksters would like to stir up cycles of promoting homosexuality and then killing gay men.
Gender is fluid
BoomAndBustCycle saysGender is fluid
XX
XY
not fluid at all according to SCIENCE! which seems to be ignored these days.
About OP, I don't CARE about gays UNLESS I am shoved their lifestyle propaganda from media 24/7. I don't want to hear about pride parades, about same-sex couples, about personal lives of any politicians including gay ones, I don't want to see Rayethon employees parading around in rainbow outfits after droning Afghan children, etc. Unfortunately, media plays this 24/7, so my solution is to not consume MSM. Most gay persons I know are reasonable individuals, and some of best journalists around, such as Greenwald and Rubin, are gay but they don't go around proclaiming that all the time.
People should be allowed to do whatever the hell they want if that does not hurt others, or if this hurt is mutually acceptable. I don't care if someone fucks men, women, wasp nests...
Gender is fluid like most things in life and you fall on a scale. You might be 99.9% into the opposite sex or as low as .001%. Then societal norms, consistent behavior to endorse attraction to one sex or another or abuse comes in a pushes that percentage up or down somewhat. Like everything in life… rarely is anything black and white.
BoomAndBustCycle saysGender is fluid
XX
XY
not fluid at all according to SCIENCE! which seems to be ignored these days.
Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.
But genders definition is evolving to be more about social constructs and norms of a sex. Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.
BoomAndBustCycle saysBut genders definition is evolving to be more about social constructs and norms of a sex. Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.
Nope. Genders aren't about roles. If women hunted and I cooked it, give me that life. Women can in fact do it, at least the good ones. Gets problematic when they're prego. That's why the traditional roles exist. 3-6 months during pregnancy women are useless. This is fact. Then there's caring for the kid. If you have 2, they're literally taking care of them for 2-4 years before they can back off.
Women have children. It's not a "construct." It's reality. Women cannot hunt and gather a solid portion of their life. It's not abo...
Gender is fluid like most things in life and you fall on a scale. You might be 99.9% into the opposite sex or as low as .001%. Then societal norms, consistent behavior to endorse attraction to one sex or another or abuse comes in a pushes that percentage up or down somewhat. Like everything in life… rarely is anything black and white.
Bd6r saysBoomAndBustCycle saysGender is fluid
XX
XY
not fluid at all according to SCIENCE! which seems to be ignored these days.
I guess it depends on your definition of gender. If you don’t consider SEX and GENDER to be exact synonyms. When you refer to chromosomes it’s XX and XY. But genders definition is evolving to be more about social constructs and norms of a sex. Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.
« First « Previous Comments 114,603 - 114,642 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,725 comments by 14,891 users - FuckTheMainstreamMedia, goofus, Misc, Tenpoundbass, The_Deplorable online now