patrick.net

Same for China, Ancient texts/pictures show it.

It's not natural. Yes it happens in nature. But as with humans, it's actually pretty rare. It's a mental illness. We no longer procreate if we're a fucking the same sex and layer on the logical fact if we're not procreating, there are less people to fuck. There are also health issues.

I personally don't care if anyone is gay, but I do look at you differently. We could eliminate AIDS tomorrow if gay guys stopped fucking each other. They're at a higher percentage of suicide. A friends brother did that at 35 about a year ago. It's a toxic lifestyle. Even if 50% of straight marriages fail, it's a better outcome than sticking a dick in some other dudes ass. If you're gay, you should love the straight people. They up the crop of little boys to diddle.

I also don't care about history either. The images presented are Asian. There's a reason China with all the manpower in the world only has 2 aircraft carriers bought from the Russians, they're gay. Probably too busy eating bats with a dick in the poop shooter of another man.

Because being gay is gay

Why are these allegedly Chinese paintings both showing a black guy f**king a white guy with extremely feminine faces/legs? Did someone just paint penises onto some original erotica/porn showing hetero action? Or was that a weird caricature of the outside world in their own rather xenophobic minds? Before the age of photography, it was normal to draw foreigners with facial features and settings that were familiar to artists' own (e.g. most early European drawings in the 16-18th century of the Tartar rule over China, and Shogunate Japan, had European faces instead of Asiatic faces).

I'm not against gays at all, or even the act of male homosexuality between consenting adults. In fact, I wish all other men (excepting my sons and their offspring) were gay! Then I'd have all the girls to myself.

Historically and currently, (upper-class) gays are better at wealth accumulation as they don't have to deal with the burden of women (the primary resource wasters in human society) . . . which makes them good targets for harvesting by banksters, especially since gays have a higher probability of not having heirs when they die (the money is already in the bank, as is for most people, so the death of the claimant makes it instant free money for the banksters). So, yes, I can see why banksters would like to stir up cycles of promoting homosexuality and then killing gay men.

WookieMan says

It's not natural. Yes it happens in nature. But as with humans, it's actually pretty rare. It's a mental illness. We no longer procreate if we're a fucking the same sex and layer on the logical fact if we're not procreating, there are less people to fuck. There are also health issues.

I personally don't care if anyone is gay, but I do look at you differently. We could eliminate AIDS tomorrow if gay guys stopped fucking each other. They're at a higher percentage of suicide. A friends brother did that at 35 about a year ago. It's a toxic lifestyle. Even if 50% of straight marriages fail, it's a better outcome than sticking a dick in some other dudes ass. If you're gay, you should love the straight people. They up the crop of little boys to diddle.

I also don't care about history either. The images presented are Asian. There's a reason China with all the manpower in the world only has 2 aircraft carriers bought from the Russians, they're gay. Probably to...

1) This can be said of many diseases,If fat people stop eating red meat or sugary drinks.. or kids stop playing video games instead spend time outside etc. AIDS in gays is not the only killer.
2) Gay lifestyle by itself is not toxic .. promiscuous with drugs is real reason for AIDS. You are right that anal sex has higher chance of spreading AIDS. But many gays live long productive lifestyles as long as they are not promiscuous and drug users.
3) If you're gay, you should love the straight people. They up the crop of little boys to diddle.
>>> Pedophilia is biggest crime irrespective of homo or hetero. I would recommend capital punishment for this crime.
4) China/Bharat were biggest economy and highest population. I am amused when you contradict by saying gays reduce population and give example of china/Bharat. The failure of these two nations have many reasons not being gay or lack of offsprings, the main one is acceptance of "treason".. which is also happening in west and their decline will start.
5) It's not natural. Yes it happens in nature
>> If it does happen in nature, Why would anyone force someone to do things not natural to person... I would oppose homo trying top force his lifestyle on hetero kid.

Reality says

Why are these allegedly Chinese paintings both showing a black guy f**king a white guy with extremely feminine faces/legs

I just searched net after @patrick mentioned "gay" lifestyle was only greek. Hard to know authenticity.
The examples from Bharat are authentic. Bharti people before spread of islamic cult of Hindooo were very tolerant.

porkchopexpress says

Because being gay is gay

Being not gay is gayless.

porkchopexpress says

Historically and currently, (upper-class) gays are better at wealth accumulation as they don't have to deal with the burden of women (the primary resource wasters in human society) . . . which makes them good targets for harvesting by banksters, especially since gays have a higher probability of not having heirs when they die (the money is already in the bank, as is for most people, so the death of the claimant makes it instant free money for the banksters). So, yes, I can see why banksters would like to stir up cycles of promoting homosexuality and then killing gay men.

this looks like a far fetched theory.. But who knows.. Banking elites are very manipulative and have no regard for life.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/art-and-culture/na-koi-hindu-na-koi-musalman-guru-nanak-dev-ji-belongs-to-all/story-QhC0WreEYCbYmfCPc1TlCJ.html

Guru Nanak Dev Ji, the founder of Sikhism, brought down the arrogant walls of caste, creed and religion with love, compassion and humility. In his eyes, all were equal. Sarbat da bhala, (welfare of all) is one of the core principles of Sikhism that can lead us to a humane world.

https://www.thequint.com/lifestyle/books/guru-nanak-the-sikhs-book-excerpt-khushwant-singh-sikhism-hindu-muslim-unity
Guru Nanak’s 550 Years: ‘There’s No Hindu, There’s No Muslim’

The following Nanak created in his lifetime could be described as a group dissenting from both Hinduism & Islam.


He started with the simple statement: ‘There is no Hindu, there is no Mussulman.’ He took as his companions a ‘low-caste’ Hindu and a Muslim musician, and the three went preaching from hamlet to hamlet. The Guru composed his sermons in verse, which his Muslim colleague set to music and sang with the lute.

Gender is fluid like most things in life and you fall on a scale. You might be 99.9% into the opposite sex or as low as .001%. Then societal norms, consistent behavior to endorse attraction to one sex or another or abuse comes in a pushes that percentage up or down somewhat. Like everything in life… rarely is anything black and white.

BoomAndBustCycle says

Gender is fluid

XX
XY
not fluid at all according to SCIENCE! which seems to be ignored these days.

About OP, I don't CARE about gays UNLESS I am shoved their lifestyle propaganda from media 24/7. I don't want to hear about pride parades, about same-sex couples, about personal lives of any politicians including gay ones, I don't want to see Rayethon employees parading around in rainbow outfits after droning Afghan children, etc. Unfortunately, media plays this 24/7, so my solution is to not consume MSM. Most gay persons I know are reasonable individuals, and some of best journalists around, such as Greenwald and Rubin, are gay but they don't go around proclaiming that all the time.

People should be allowed to do whatever the hell they want if that does not hurt others, or if this hurt is mutually acceptable. I don't care if someone fucks men, women, wasp nests, or anything else. None of my business.

The picture above can apply to plenty of non-gay Bidet cabinet members.

Bd6r says

BoomAndBustCycle says

Gender is fluid

XX
XY
not fluid at all according to SCIENCE! which seems to be ignored these days.

About OP, I don't CARE about gays UNLESS I am shoved their lifestyle propaganda from media 24/7. I don't want to hear about pride parades, about same-sex couples, about personal lives of any politicians including gay ones, I don't want to see Rayethon employees parading around in rainbow outfits after droning Afghan children, etc. Unfortunately, media plays this 24/7, so my solution is to not consume MSM. Most gay persons I know are reasonable individuals, and some of best journalists around, such as Greenwald and Rubin, are gay but they don't go around proclaiming that all the time.

People should be allowed to do whatever the hell they want if that does not hurt others, or if this hurt is mutually acceptable. I don't care if someone fucks men, women, wasp nests...

I understand we all have preferences and too much propaganda is irritating.

I am not Christian but love Christmas, Easter, Halloween and other events celebrated at corporate. These are all happy things and are always objected by atheist kind of people.
Now How can I say it is OK to celebrate above and gays can't do their stuff?
Things are not that black and white... What we need which you rightly said is to differentiate between propaganda and genuine celebration.

I appreciate Christ and all the good work Christians do around world. I am also not against missionaries gently promoting their faith.
... Where it starts to irritate is when they mix up propaganda like "Jesus is only savior, Come join us or you will burn in hell"..

Christians should take a cue from "Christmas" .. It has become universal celebration due to positivity and betterment for all it brings.

BoomAndBustCycle says

Gender is fluid like most things in life and you fall on a scale. You might be 99.9% into the opposite sex or as low as .001%. Then societal norms, consistent behavior to endorse attraction to one sex or another or abuse comes in a pushes that percentage up or down somewhat. Like everything in life… rarely is anything black and white.

Normal people can always find something in common and be happy... so does religions/sects/organizations who promotes positivity.
Dirty cults will always promote divisions as they have nothing positive to offer.

I think We should give gays space to live life happily and celebrate their lifestyles.. But oppose propaganda to try to change heteros into homos.
Same applies to church and other religions trying to convert homos to heteros.

Hindooo spy agency chief were delibratly embedded in Sikhs to find moment to attack when maximum innocent Sikh causalities can be achieved.
Their aim was to create a scenario to completely eradicate Sikhs from face of Earth.
The criminality of Hindooo is well known worldwide. Hindooo cult elites are followers of Gazni and Gouri who were sent to destroy Bharat's cultural heritage.



https://caravanmagazine.in/government/ajit-doval-operation-black-thunder-excerpt

Homesexual tyranny is just the beginning. The ultimate goal is pedophilia. Homo's have no moral compass and hate god for making them so different. We either stop this tyranny or else we will suffer hugely. And it's not about space, they will not stopping pursuing kids EVER. They need to be banished back into the closet from where they came.

Bd6r says

BoomAndBustCycle says

Gender is fluid

XX
XY
not fluid at all according to SCIENCE! which seems to be ignored these days.

I guess it depends on your definition of gender. If you don’t consider SEX and GENDER to be exact synonyms. When you refer to chromosomes it’s XX and XY. But genders definition is evolving to be more about social constructs and norms of a sex. Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.

The non-reproductive lifestyle is the preferred lifestyle of the Promethian Globalists since they are hell-bent on reaping productivity within a depopulation agenda, and in our current fake monetary 'debt as money' system this furthers their cause. Homosexuality/sodomy is the inverse of usury - coins don't copulate and actually reproduce yet our modern banking system treats them as if they do. Sodomy doesn't produce a next generation, yet the pillars of our society now encourages this behavior as if it does. Both of these are horrifically destructive to society and social posterity in ways unfathomable. A society that actually promotes & encourages these things is basically nihilistic and trying to destroy itself (presumably for the benefit of a small few that sit atop). It is therefore a mistake for the commoner to fall for this spell and embrace these things as normal & perfectly acceptable when both usury & sodomy are actually extremely perverse (to use something for other than its intended purpose)..
The anus is not a sex organ - its very purpose is to excrete toxic bodily waste. Associating 'love' with rectal trauma is truly problematic - it is born from psychological trauma and will likely result in diapers and incontinence in the later years of the participants. It is not love, it's 'clown-love' (or 'clove'), its fucked up - one shouldn't wish to wreck the rectum of those they actually love, leaving them with such problems. It's a toxic, nihilistic lifestyle that will leave those who engage it as broken & suicidal spirits in the later years when the physical attractiveness of youth is over and without offspring to enjoy.
The existence of HIV/AIDS is questionable to say the least - the same people that pushed that crisis, are the same ones behind this COVAIDS panic & big-pharma NWO agenda - its almost as if that were a limited 'test-run' of a bioterror psyop confined to a small demographic. Look into how Faucci played a role with AZT, etc.
That said, its good to have compassion towards those that live with this psycho-sexual disorder, especially since many of them were victims of the vampires that bit into them which left them with such a predisposition. As long as they keep their private lives to themselves & alternate paths for recovery are available for them should they so choose, what is the problem?
However, the Renfields & promoters of this disorder should be exposed, shunned & banished for their empty virtue-signalling agenda - for putting it up in the face of the population at large, from PRIDE (actual shame) celebrations, to teaching it in public schools, to constant bombardment in advertising, to social promotion just because of sexual practices and the divisive identity-politics of divide-and-conquer - THEY need to be held accountable, for it is those that ACTUALLY promote this lifestyle that truly hate the gays.

I don't think it is the fault of all gay people that their most extreme and exhibitionist fringe elements have been deputized as part of the KommieKunt social destruction narrative.

Being slapped in the face with what has traditionally been regarded as grotesque perversion is part of the demoralization strategy. That applies to heterosexual pedophilia as well.

There will always be subcultures in society that are not approved or sanctioned by the group at large. Once basic rights were established for gays, they should accept that they will be free to operate in their subcultures, but generalized social acceptance at some level will alway elude them. They need to settle for situational acceptance amongst friends.

In California, they basically gained rights parity for couples and workplace a long time ago, but the fringes persisted with the 'gay marriage' subversions which have morphed into all of the pedophile and tranny subversions. If one outlandish depravity flaunted in the face of the public isn't enough, they invent more and worse.

BoomAndBustCycle says

Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.

LOL! Their men would have been cooking the dead bodies of their women till there was none left to cook. The tribe would have disappeared before being discovered by the outside world. Did you learn physics by postulating a universe where gravity is negative (i.e. a repulsive force)? and Action brings no Reaction? a universe that is purely random and no causality?

The pictures being shared are clownish couples and they can exist in both gay and gayless people.
The reason can be mental condition or under influence of money/propaganda to promote this idiocy.

But gays can be normal couples like hetros. A normal indvidual who accepts gays as equals will always promote this kind of gay couples then the clownish ones.
If gays want they can also find worst crazy hetro couples and do some propaganda with them.

By the way some of the people who seems to have negative view of "gay culture" also seem to not like woman too much either.
So who do they plan to be partner with?... "HATE"?


https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/dutch-couples-mark-20th-anniversary-world-s-first-same-sex-n1262753

BoomAndBustCycle says

But genders definition is evolving to be more about social constructs and norms of a sex. Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.

Nope. Genders aren't about roles. If women hunted and I cooked it, give me that life. Women can in fact do it, at least the good ones. Gets problematic when they're prego. That's why the traditional roles exist. 3-6 months during pregnancy women are useless. This is fact. Then there's caring for the kid. If you have 2, they're literally taking care of them for 2-4 years before they can back off.

Women have children. It's not a "construct." It's reality. Women cannot hunt and gather a solid portion of their life. It's not about being men or masculine, we just can't give birth. Follow the science.

WookieMan says

BoomAndBustCycle says

But genders definition is evolving to be more about social constructs and norms of a sex. Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.

Nope. Genders aren't about roles. If women hunted and I cooked it, give me that life. Women can in fact do it, at least the good ones. Gets problematic when they're prego. That's why the traditional roles exist. 3-6 months during pregnancy women are useless. This is fact. Then there's caring for the kid. If you have 2, they're literally taking care of them for 2-4 years before they can back off.

Women have children. It's not a "construct." It's reality. Women cannot hunt and gather a solid portion of their life. It's not abo...

This is good statement and reflects the nature of the game before industrialization.
Now it is possible to have a single mother or single father.. So roles are ought to change.. But saying females and males are same gender is not reflected by reality.

I have had gay neighbors in every place I have been in California. Several now in Santa Cruz. As a rule, they have always been exemplary neighbors. One exception was across the way in Santa Cruz, where a nasty piece of work, addicted gay man had a mentally incapacitated gay man living with him. The mentally incapacitated one would stand up in homeowner's meetings and talk about the thousands of men he had sex with, because the evil addicted gay man pimped him out as a male hustler. Their place has always been a crack house type hovel, which is the exception because all other gays have been meticulous in their home maintenance.

The older one died of a stroke last year, leaving the mentally incapacitated one in the house. Homeowner's finally got his parents to move him along into care, and the house (which he destroyed with insane shit) is blissfully being gutted for rebuilding as I type this.

Social services gave him a cell phone, which he was apparently using for liaisons. My wife and I came back from a walk last year to see him on the street at the entrance of the hood wearing a pleated skirt (like parochial school girls) and flouncing it up and down to show his junk to traffic while he danced along the sidewalk. El supremo bizzarre. He would go off meds and throw stuff at his neighbors house, had a restraining order. People would use him to harass neighbors by telling him that somebody wanted a worker or something to go up to their doors to rave.

He had his own Downton Abbey in the house for a while with his parents and social services coming by all the time to take care of him. Thank the higher powers he is gone now. They said his parents left him on an overheated car as a child and found him comatose but alive. Strangely, his older brother is a scientist and professor at Caltech working for JPL in Pasadena.

BoomAndBustCycle says

Gender is fluid like most things in life and you fall on a scale. You might be 99.9% into the opposite sex or as low as .001%. Then societal norms, consistent behavior to endorse attraction to one sex or another or abuse comes in a pushes that percentage up or down somewhat. Like everything in life… rarely is anything black and white.

This is a hefty load of absolute bullshit. Much like claims that children can’t die from Covid(and the protestations to the contrary that in fact .001% of children have died from Covid), the claims of gender fluidity encompassing all adults, when about 85% of adults fall in a very small range of sexual spectrum and the other 15% are heavily emotionally traumatized, rings so hollow.

BoomAndBustCycle says

Bd6r says

BoomAndBustCycle says

Gender is fluid

XX
XY
not fluid at all according to SCIENCE! which seems to be ignored these days.

I guess it depends on your definition of gender. If you don’t consider SEX and GENDER to be exact synonyms. When you refer to chromosomes it’s XX and XY. But genders definition is evolving to be more about social constructs and norms of a sex. Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.

Except this isn’t true. Gender has a super specific meaning amoung humans and just because recently some emotionally traumatized individuals have decided that changing word meanings will make them happy(lol) doesn’t actually mean the definitions have changed.

He will be minister/top-politician in Hindooo land soon. Hindooo upper circle is full of thugs.

https://twitter.com/RaviSinghKA/status/1450067293174702089
This anti Sikh thug has been deported back to India ! Thank you Australia !

DonewithDebate says

The pictures being shared are clownish couples and they can exist in both gay and gayless people.
The reason can be mental condition or under influence of money/propaganda to promote this idiocy.

But gays can be normal couples like hetros. A normal indvidual who accepts gays as equals will always promote this kind of gay couples then the clownish ones.
If gays want they can also find worst crazy hetro couples and do some propaganda with them.

By the way some of the people who seems to have negative view of "gay culture" also seem to not like woman too much either.
So who do they plan to be partner with?... "HATE"?


https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/dutch-couples-mark-20th-anniversary-world-s-first-same-sex-n1262753

I don’t disagree with you. Except so many gay people Can’t conform to that lifestyle(which would still be fine if they didn’t break laws…usually drugs)…and didn’t attempt to push an agenda onto the rest of us. They also might considering seeking out the reasons for the why of their behavior rather than therapy that only affirms the behavior and attempts to build self esteem out of nothing.

All support to followers of Bharti religions oppressed by Islamic violent cults.

https://twitter.com/RaviSinghKA/status/1450014150701289475
We are children of Guru Tegh Bahader ji. We will always protect the right to worship of all.

DonewithDebate says

porkchopexpress says

Because being gay is gay

Being not gay is gayless.

It's a joke/idiom you didn't get because you're not familiar enough with the culture. Easy mistake to make. Don't compound it by trying to read more into it than it was, a "low hanging fruit" joke. (That is, itself, a cheap pun that may induce an infinite regression loop in the non-native reader... sorry.)

It already started. Hindooo is so transparent.
They should have waited few days for their agent to lie low.. But in lawless Hindooo land who cares.

https://twitter.com/RaviSinghKA/status/1450002241092468736
This is #VishalJood ! He attacked Sikhs in #Australia ! He was charged and deported to India.

He received a heroes welcome in India! It seems that those who attack Sikhs become heroes ! This is a huge insult to all Sikhs & justice system! Absolute disgrace !
Video: @ashoswai

DonewithDebate says

I have noticed on a site that people seems really against homosexual folks.. Why is that?

You're noticing wrong, plenty of people in those very conversations you're noticing have announced countless times that they are gay.
Nobody on this site has any hostility or ill will toward gay people. We all unanimously, even the gay Paneters, despise and loath, Commie fuck face Fag boys, that want to turn our kids, and demand SCOTUS mandates an audience with Hetero White Males to watch them sodomize each other, and dare us all to fucking flinch ONCE! They will sick Merick Garland and Pencil Neck Schiff on us, to haul us in for a congressional hearing faster than you can say "Fuck that SHIT!".

It's not gay people we have a problem with, it's mentally ill people that use homosexuality to Massage their psychosis.

BoomAndBustCycle says

I guess it depends on your definition of gender. If you don’t consider SEX and GENDER to be exact synonyms. When you refer to chromosomes it’s XX and XY. But genders definition is evolving to be more about social constructs and norms of a sex. Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.

Gender=sex. Everything else is Newspeak, which is re-defining everything to fit today's ideological needs.

http://www.webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/gender

2. A sex, male or female. Hence,

3. In grammar, a difference in words to express distinction of sex; usually a difference of termination in nouns, adjectives and participles, to express the distinction of male and female. But although this was the original design of different terminations, yet in the progress of language, other words having no relation to one sex or the other, came to have genders assigned them by custom. Words expressing males are said to be of the masculine gender; those expressing females, of the feminine gender; and in some languages, words expressing things having no sex, are of the neuter or neither gender

Reality says

BoomAndBustCycle says

Like if an isolated tribe somewhere all the men wore dresses and cooked and the females hunted and fought…. You would say their gender roles swapped from the norm. So in that sense gender is fluid based on societal standards and external factors.

LOL! Their men would have been cooking the dead bodies of their women till there was none left to cook. The tribe would have disappeared before being discovered by the outside world. Did you learn physics by postulating a universe where gravity is negative (i.e. a repulsive force)? and Action brings no Reaction? a universe that is purely random and no causality?

Ok maybe the tribe analogy was poor… men have greater strength cause of bone density and testosterone. But there’s very little need for hyper aggression in modern society unless we are at war and even then future wars will be fought with robots. So humans moving toward a less gender specific society is natural to our evolution. Do robots have genders? Humans will eventually evolve to be cyborgs…. That seems obvious. In a couple more generations we will have artificial eyes, organs, chip implants, and socialize in the metaverse.

BoomAndBustCycle says

Do robots have genders?

We should consult Rin about this one.
I agree with sentiment though. The PROBLEM here is that our brains have evolved for last 100K years in a specific way, and if environment, needs, and attitudes change too fast, we are fucked mentally. If we go back to traditional societies, the incidence of Alzheimers/senility was much lower than what we have now (there was a paper which I have lost, they looked at this in Chechen society where old people are in charge of everything and there is very little senility), when men these days become feminine, womyn don't like it, are unhappy and go on antidepressants, boys acting as boys is also bad and they are put on ritalin, etc.

Tenpoundbass says

DonewithDebate says

I have noticed on a site that people seems really against homosexual folks.. Why is that?

You're noticing wrong, plenty of people in those very conversations you're noticing have announced countless times that they are gay.
Nobody on this site has any hostility or ill will toward gay people. We all unanimously, even the gay Paneters, despise and loath, Commie fuck face Fag boys, that want to turn our kids, and demand SCOTUS mandates an audience with Hetero White Males to watch them sodomize each other, and dare us all to fucking flinch ONCE! They will sick Merick Garland and Pencil Neck Schiff on us, to haul us in for a congressional hearing faster than you can say "Fuck that SHIT!".

It's not gay people we have a problem with, it's mentally ill people that use homosexuality to Massage their psychosis.

Its best to attack the root cause. Why use gay lifestyle to attack them?
If not gay, They will find something else to oppress us ... why waste energy on moving target?

We should not attack common people like us who just want to live good life and not bother anyone.

Automan Empire says

DonewithDebate says

porkchopexpress says

Because being gay is gay

Being not gay is gayless.

It's a joke/idiom you didn't get because you're not familiar enough with the culture. Easy mistake to make. Don't compound it by trying to read more into it than it was, a "low hanging fruit" joke. (That is, itself, a cheap pun that may induce an infinite regression loop in the non-native reader... sorry.)

It is still fun exercise this way.