« First « Previous Comments 371 - 410 of 629 Next » Last » Search these comments
From the Spring of 2020 forward, very few people on earth were true victims of the covid-19 virus.
Allow me to explain.
Since then, the sick, the dying—indeed all of us—became victims of a far more blackhearted foe than the virus itself: unchecked greed—which has triumphed in its mission to prevent the world from ending this pandemic—when we knew full well how to do it over eighteen months ago.
In other words, this all could have been over by January or February of 2021.
All of it.
The case counts.
The hospitalizations.
The suffering.
The comas.
The despair.
The deaths.
The grieving.
The funerals.
All of it.
Instead, beginning in late Spring, 2020, as some of the world’s most gifted, published, and renowned medical minds in the field of critical care were quite literally imploring public health agencies across the globe to listen to the scientific evidence that pointed to a rapid and safe way out of the pandemic using repurposed, FDA-approved drugs, they were censored and silenced. In well-orchestrated, meticulously coordinated media campaigns, they and the organizations they represented were slandered as “fringe,” “crackpots,” “snake-oil salesmen,” and worse. Soon, physicians and many other allied health professionals began to lose their livelihoods. Their reputations suffered. Some lost their licenses to practice medicine, others were levied fines for daring to speak publicly of the science they knew would save their patients’ lives.
A few were arrested and are facing trial and potential prison time. ...
Yet, their greedy eyes turned only one way: To the blinding glow of global profit-making from vaccines meant to stop the spread of COVID-19. This was a payday that could stretch for decades—an opportunity for treasure beyond measure—unlike any other ever known. They were determined that nothing—even the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives—would get in their way.
Kennedy writes in his book:
“The following week, she spoke to Hill again, this time by Zoom. The Zoom call was recorded.
“Dr Lawrie asked Hill to explain his U-turn on ivermectin, which his own analysis found overwhelmingly effective. ‘How can you do this?’ she inquired politely. ‘You are causing irreparable harm.’ Hill explained that he was in a ‘tricky situation’ because his sponsors had put pressure on him. Hill is a University of Liverpool virologist who serves as an adviser to Bill Gates and the Clinton Foundation. He told me his sponsor was Unitaid.
“Unitaid is a quasi-governmental advocacy organization funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and several countries — France, the United Kingdom, Norway, Brazil, Spain, the Republic of Korea and Chile — to lobby governments to finance the purchase of medicines from pharmaceutical multinationals for distribution to the African poor.
“Its primary purpose seems to be protecting the patent and intellectual property rights of pharmaceutical companies — which, as we shall see, is the priority passion for Bill Gates — and to ensure their prompt and full payment. About 63 percent of its funding comes from a surtax on airline tickets.
“The BMGF holds a board seat and chairs Unitaid’s Executive Committee, and the BMGF has given Unitaid $150 million since 2005. Various Gates-funded surrogate and front organizations also contribute, as does the pharmaceutical industry.
“The BMGF and Gates personally own large stakes in many of the pharmaceutical companies that profit from this boondoggle. Gates also uses Unitaid to fund corrupt science by tame and compromised researchers like Hill that legitimizes his policy directives to the WHO.
“Unitaid gave $40 million to Andrew Hill’s employer, the University of Liverpool, four days before the publication of Hill’s study. Hill, a Ph.D., confessed that the sponsors were pressuring him to influence his conclusion. When Dr. Lawrie asked who was trying to influence him, Hill said, ‘I mean, I, I think I’m in a very sensitive position here …’”
With Ivermectin in Hand, Wife Dies While Husband Begs Hospital to Administer
BY BETH BRELJE December 11, 2021 Updated: December 11, 2021biggersmaller Print
David DeLuca of Sicklerville, New Jersey will never know if the Ivermectin prescribed by an out-of-state doctor for his wife would have saved her life. Colleen DeLuca, 62, died of COVID-19 on Oct. 10, at Jefferson Washington Township Hospital in Sewell, New Jersey, before he could get a court order to administer the drug.
This place helped me get some for my horse:
https://www.valleyvet.com/?source=patrick.net
Hospitalizations, Mortality Cut In Half After Brazilian City Offered Ivermectin To Everyone Pre-Vaccine
Between July and December of 2020, roughly 220,000 people were offered a dose of 0.2mg/kg/day (roughly 18mg for a 200lb person) as an optional treatment for 2 days, once every two weeks.
133,051 people took them up on it, while 87,466 did not.
After analyzing the data, a team of researchers spanning several Brazilian institutes, the University of Toronto, and Columbia's EAFIT concluded in a December pre-print study that hospitalization and mortality rates were cut in half over the seven month period among the Ivermectin group.
"Hero" Judge Holds Hospital in Contempt: Give Ivermectin to a Dying Woman, or Pay a $10,000-a-Day Fine
A hospital outside Washington, D.C., wouldn't give a 63-year-old woman the safe, FDA-approved drug shown highly effective against covid even after nothing else worked and her death was almost certain.
Mary Beth Pfeiffer
1 hr ago
... Whether it’s too late is the question. Kathleen Davies’ first dose was given in Fauquier Hospital in Warrenton, Virginia, about fifty miles west of Washington, D.C., on the evening of Monday, December 13. That was sixty-five days after admission; forty-one days after going on a ventilator; six days after a judge’s order to administer it, and fifteen minutes before $10,000-a-day fines would have kicked in for defying it.
The logjam broke Monday when Circuit Court Judge James P. Fisher laid down the law after a testy hearing. In a decision written as attorneys waited online, Fisher ruled the hospital was “in contempt for needlessly interposing requirements that stand in the way” of ivermectin and for violating statutes under federal and state of Virginia right-to-try laws.
The hospital’s “failure to accommodate this critical patient’s health care wishes”—as the judge had ordered on December 7—is “is particularly egregious,” he wrote.
The medical mafia and their reign of terror continues in the United States.
A very disturbing video from a woman in New Hampshire has emerged where she recorded hospital personnel and child social service agents trying to hunt down a father who reported he was giving his children Ivermectin.
There is allegedly a court order issued to remove the children from the custody of their father.
Today in the United States it is perfectly acceptable to abuse your child and attempt to murder them by injecting them with an experimental gene altering shot that is not even approved by the FDA, but if you give your child a drug that IS approved by the FDA with a safety track record of over 30 years, they will take away your children because they want to inject them with a COVID-19 shot instead.
Today in the United States it is perfectly acceptable to abuse your child and attempt to murder them by injecting them with an experimental gene altering shot that is not even approved by the FDA, but if you give your child a drug that IS approved by the FDA with a safety track record of over 30 years, they will take away your children because they want to inject them with a COVID-19 shot instead.
University of Oxford PRINCIPLE Trial Puts Ivermectin Study Arm on Hold—Purported Supply Issues
TrialSite Staff
December 15, 2021
Apparently, any study that shows that ivermectin works must be wrong.
Can anyone who works at Twitter explain how they know instantly that newly published scientific studies are wrong? It would be useful to know what mistake the authors made.
I started to get sick Monday and so loaded up on the Rin buffet.Thanks for sharing. I have family on Quercetin and Zinc who are suffering through sickness and it's making a very positive difference. No Ivermectin but they're also relatively young and healthy. My impression is that Ivermectin should be used if over 50/60 years old and/or with comorbidities, whereas Q and Z and other supplements are enough for the younger and healthy.
I'm still in my 40s and I'm sure I would have survived with no treatment at all.
A Myth is Born: How CDC, FDA, and Media Wove a Web of Ivermectin Lies That Outlives The Truth
This review article aims to discuss the probable mechanisms of action of ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2 by summarizing the available literature over the years. A schematic of the key cellular and biomolecular interactions between ivermectin, host cell, and SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 pathogenesis and prevention of complications has been proposed.
So check out “compounding pharmacies” which actually make their own medicine on site. They often have medication that’s hard to get due to supply reasons or political ones.
I found one very close to me in Westminster, CA which sells Ivermectin without a prescription. Of course it costs a lot! $540 for 90 tablets! But it’s a source at least. And many of these will sell and ship the medicine.
Just an idea.
We got quote cheaper stash from India admit went through, worked like a charm. When I got sick first and tested positive I gave 12mg per day prophylactically to my wife and she developed a very mild case with low grade fever. tiredness and a mild cough which was over within 5-7 days. That stuff works.
mell saysWe got quote cheaper stash from India admit went through, worked like a charm. When I got sick first and tested positive I gave 12mg per day prophylactically to my wife and she developed a very mild case with low grade fever. tiredness and a mild cough which was over within 5-7 days. That stuff works.
I haven't received my second order yet and it's looking doubtful.
Btw, what are you and your wife's ages?
mell saysWe got quote cheaper stash from India admit went through, worked like a charm. When I got sick first and tested positive I gave 12mg per day prophylactically to my wife and she developed a very mild case with low grade fever. tiredness and a mild cough which was over within 5-7 days. That stuff works.
I haven't received my second order yet and it's looking doubtful.
Btw, what are you and your wife's ages?
“Ivermectin is readily available globally, has been in wide use for many other infectious conditions, so it’s a well-known medicine with a good safety profile, and because of the early promising results in some studies it is already being widely used to treat COVID-19 in several countries,” Butler said in a news release.
Several doctors questioned the sudden pause on the PRINCIPLE trial as a result of the ivermectin supply.
Dr. Tess Lawrie, director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy, said the supply issue cited was “plainly ridiculous.” The WHO is one of Lawrie’s company’s clientele.
“To cite supply issues is plainly ridiculous,” Lawrie told The Epoch Times via email. “We are talking about a most abundant off-patent medicine that is produced in many countries around the world. There are many European manufacturers too, including Huvepharma in Bulgaria.”
So check out “compounding pharmacies”
« First « Previous Comments 371 - 410 of 629 Next » Last » Search these comments
And HCQ falls into that same bucket. Even worse - to admit HCQ works would be to admit Trump was right about something.
Liberals would rather that millions die than that Trump be allowed to be right about anything. They hate Trump more than they love their fellow humans.