« First « Previous Comments 26 - 47 of 47 Search these comments
BoomAndBustCycle saysThis is stupid. If the moon landing was fake are all Elon Musks recent rocket launches fake also?
No, the fake part is humans landing on the moon. Drones can. And humans can go to earth orbit but no further because of the Van Allen radiation belt. Lead walls are too heavy to be launched.
No, the fake part is humans landing on the moon. Drones can.
tanked saysBoomAndBustCycle saysThis is stupid. If the moon landing was fake are all Elon Musks recent rocket launches fake also?
No, the fake part is humans landing on the moon. Drones can. And humans can go to earth orbit but no further because of the Van Allen radiation belt. Lead walls are too heavy to be launched.
How can you "land" anything on a frosted glass disk hanging on the inside of the sky dome? An drone would fall off immediately after engines are switched off.
FuckCCP89 saystanked saysBoomAndBustCycle saysThis is stupid. If the moon landing was fake are all Elon Musks recent rocket launches fake also?
No, the fake part is humans landing on the moon. Drones can. And humans can go to earth orbit but no further because of the Van Allen radiation belt. Lead walls are too heavy to be launched.
How can you "land" anything on a frosted glass disk hanging on the inside of the sky dome? An drone would fall off immediately after engines are switched off.
That's one of the common associations - to say that one is a flat earther because they concluded the moon landings were faked. Bart definitely believes the earth to be round.
That's one of the common associations - to say that one is a flat earther because they concluded the moon landings were faked. Bart definitely believes the earth to be round.
tanked saysThat's one of the common associations - to say that one is a flat earther because they concluded the moon landings were faked. Bart definitely believes the earth to be round.
Yes. Earth is a globe. One other reason why people believe space flight is real: flat earther disinfo agents poison the well by combining flat earth theory with legitimate takedown of space flight hoaxes.
The truth is out there, but it’s tainted. To recap:
All supposed trips to outer space are fake.
Anyone saying the trip to the moon was fake but other space exploits like the ISS and Mars rover is real, is either naive or a “limited hangout” disinfo agent.
Anyone saying trip to the moon and the “globe” earth are both fake is either naive or a “poison the well” disinfo agent.
Anyone saying any of this all has to be real because it would require too much intergovernmental cooperat...
Where do the moon rocks come from? Where do meteorites come from? How do comm, weather, and spy satellites work?
Also, all the planets are spheres except for the Earth, which alone is a flat disk.
All supposed trips to outer space are fake.
Satellites are also fake. Telecommunication is done via earthly radio transmitters and cables. If satellites were any good you wouldn’t need cell towers everywhere. “Satellite” radio and TV services is just a marketing gimmick.
Undoctored saysSatellites are also fake. Telecommunication is done via earthly radio transmitters and cables. If satellites were any good you wouldn’t need cell towers everywhere. “Satellite” radio and TV services is just a marketing gimmick.
No, satellites certainly aren't fake. Satellite communication sucks because you have to do it in geosynchronous orbit or have your dish follow the satellite (which CAN be done, that is how starlink works). It the bad old days, just 20 years ago, when you talked to somebody in Australia, you were going through a satellite link even over a computer or a phone. The delay was enormous - enough to notice.
I used to work on DSS satellite receivers. It's a lot more banal than you know.
The whole flat earth thing is new. It did not exist until 2010 on the Internet. It's a psy-op. Most people who claim to believe the earth is flat don't....
richwicks saysUndoctored saysSatellites are also fake. Telecommunication is done via earthly radio transmitters and cables. If satellites were any good you wouldn’t need cell towers everywhere. “Satellite” radio and TV services is just a marketing gimmick.
No, satellites certainly aren't fake. Satellite communication sucks because you have to do it in geosynchronous orbit or have your dish follow the satellite (which CAN be done, that is how starlink works). It the bad old days, just 20 years ago, when you talked to somebody in Australia, you were going through a satellite link even over a computer or a phone. The delay was enormous - enough to notice.
I used to work on DSS satellite receivers. It's a lot more banal than you know.
The whole flat earth thing is new. It did not exist until 2010 on th...
I suppose that is the psy op - some will advocate it as a joke and end up actually convincing some. Never considered what was going on with it before, thanks. The psy op is to say that all conspiracy theories (another CIA invented term to slander deep researchers) are equivalent to saying the earth is flat.
Satellites are also fake. Telecommunication is done via earthly radio transmitters and cables. If satellites were any good you wouldn’t need cell towers everywhere. “Satellite” radio and TV services is just a marketing gimmick.
I’m not trolling. This is what I believe. Then again I don’t know enough about ham radio to know whether a radio operator on the ground would be able to distinguish a satellite from a high altitude radio balloon.
https://www.overlookhorizon.com/radio-tracking-information/?source=patrick.net
In any case I’m happy to drop the subject of satellites and concentrate on human space travel or just the moon landing for the purposes of this topic. My point was mostly that you can have very far reaching skepticism about space technology without going “flat earth.”
So which one is it, a psy op or a running joke? Flying Spaghetti Monster also comes to mind.
tanked saysSo which one is it, a psy op or a running joke? Flying Spaghetti Monster also comes to mind.
I don't bother to worry which it might be, could be a 3rd or 4th alternative, it could be a combination.
I just know it's false. I don't care where it's coming from.
« First « Previous Comments 26 - 47 of 47 Search these comments
original link
/