patrick.net

Johnathan Pryce gets tired of playing the Pope and wearing that itchy mask:

https://t.me/Absolute1776/14436

Guess Macron is going to have to start hustling for BJ's and torturing underage prostitutes again for clients, with his tranny handler wife.
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/69136

More embarrassing Hollywood cuckdom. Those fat Nazis around Z look like they would kill you as soon as look at you. Maybe Ben is scoring some primo coke and adrenochrome.
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/69138

https://t.me/greatreject/38013

AmericanKulak says

Bd6r says

Not a joke, but real, Fed Gov requirements for renewing their launch permit. As you can see, nothing political about it/sarc off

ULA got the FAA to delay their competitor.

That’s that bullshit. Barrier to entry and continuing business brought upon by basic monopoly corporation is standard protocol unfortunately. Also why Feds need to be limited back to actual constitutional allowance.

Jive Ass Mother Fucker giving a heart felt speech.

Tenpoundbass says

Jive Ass Mother Fucker giving a heart felt speech.

This video is edited and taken out of context. You have to get into the habit of looking for camera edits. Obama never said what this video claims he did.

https://t.me/greatreject/38036

Guarded because it would expose the Chuch's role in disguising and re-writing history to give us the false myths that we accept as history today.
https://t.me/secret_historyy/742

Vaccinated dead stimulate MAC address assignment, LOL! Guess that'll come in handy to control the zombie army.
https://t.me/DUMBSandUnderground/34278https://t.me/DUMBSandUnderground/34279

Ceffer says

Vaccinated dead stimulate MAC address assignment, LOL! Guess that'll come in handy to control the zombie army.

I don't believe this for a second.

As an engineer, I don't see how it would be possible to produce enough energy on a FLAKE of a microchip to produce a bluetooth signal. It couldn't be driven by a battery, it would have to be driven by some chemical process - and if THAT could be done, you have pacemakers that don't need batteries. I can think of a host of applications for something like that.

If I wanted to monitor the population, I'd inject an RFID chip into them, that when stimulated by an RF signal would report data collected or just its presence. It wouldn't be constantly spitting out information where 99.99999% of the time it's just going nowhere and is wasted energy.

I think you are reading intelligence disinfo - a psyop. It's BLUETOOTH, you can check this yourself. This is a propaganda called kookification. This is too easily tested. If you want to know, find out. Verify it.

OOPSIE! Herzog needs a few Jesuits to straighten him out and let him know that facts do not stand in the way of noble faith. Maybe a few hours on the rack will do it.
https://t.me/taboo_science1/1416

richwicks says

I think you are reading intelligence disinfo - a psyop.

You could be correct except the psyops stuff. Why would intels mount a psyops to convince people vaccines place some kind of reactive nanobot in their system? Their psyops is relentless that the death jabs are 'safe and effective', parroted so ad nauseam that you know it is a propaganda handle. It would rather be a psyops by anti vaxxers to scare people with techno disinformation, if untrue.

I do notice a strange trend to discredit information nowadays by using another inversion tactic. Say that Soros funded it, or the intel agencies are doing it, when the psyops defeats anything that Soros et alia or the intels would want out there.

Ceffer says

richwicks says

I think you are reading intelligence disinfo - a psyop.

You could be correct except the psyops stuff. Why would intels mount a psyops to convince people vaccines place some kind of reactive nanobot in their system?

Because it's ridiculous science fiction at this point. Because it's false.

Same reason Dr. Judy Woods was claiming the WTC complex was destroyed by directed energy weapons that can't possibly exist.

The psy-op works this way

* People are making the correct conclusions about an event the government has been lying about.
* Incorrect and easily disprovable claim is pushed and associated by NORMIES with the people making reasonable and correct conclusions that the government is trying to bury.
* People who are making reasonable correct conclusions are called "nuts" by normies because they are incorrectly associated with easily disprovable claim.

As a result, if I point out that WTC7 fell and wasn't hit by a plane, and there were taller, and larger buildings next to 1 and 2 which were FAR more damaged than 7, but remained upright, I can be dismissed when somebody says something incorrect like "I suppose you believe in DEW weapons, and that no planes hit the WTC, they were holograms, yuck yuck" - I got that ALL THE TIME.

If I wanted to track you, I'll just track your cell phone. Even if you turn off your GPS on it, or disable it, I can triangulate you based on several cell towers. This has been doable since 2005 and it's accurate within a meter or so. GPS is convenient but it's no longer needed in metropolitan areas. No need to inject you with anything.

Ceffer says

Their psyops is relentless that the death jabs are 'safe and effective', parroted so ad nauseam that you know it is a propaganda handle.

That's right, it's bullshit. They are neither safe, nor effective.

But as soon as people start claiming "these vaccines contain bluetooth transmitters in them" people have a tendency to make a "false dichotomy". Either they are safe and effective and those weirdos who don't believe that they are safe and effective ALSO believe they have nano technology in them which emits bluetooth information, OR they are safe and effective and people claiming that they aren't are saying crazy fruit loop stuff about bluetooth transmitters in the vaccines.

It's to discredit people who are saying "hey dude, those vaccines are worthless AND they MIGHT be dangerous".

I'm pointing out it's PRETTY OUT THERE to think the vaccines contain radio trackers in them. EVEN IF THEY DID THIS, why use bluetooth? Why use such a common off the shelf technology that is so trivial to detect? If you want to keep it secret, just change the pre-amble and it will never be detected by a bluetooth receiver It's not like your bluetooth receiver picks up your NAT router, or Sirius digital radio, or your television remote control - it's a different protocol. Making a different protocol is actually pretty trivial and they are all wireless operating in around the same radio frequency.

This real, methinks it applies to current White House inhabitant: