patrick.net

Yeah, those WEF guys, what humanitarians:

https://t.me/greatreject/39658

Just like with Covid, the British are on the vanguard of hysterical, faked 'research' to stoke the monkey pox panic. Meanwhile, the largest percentage is transmitted by sexual contact between men. Whores be whores.
https://t.me/DH_newz/975

Karloff says

Was that Dailymail article sponsored by Carhartt? They mention the suspect wearing that brand name FIVE times in that one article alone. Was it really that important? It's not like he was on the loose and they were giving people a better means of identifying him.

Carhart is a brand favored by white working class who as a group trend Republican. This was an attempt by the writer to paint the shooter as right wing.

Ceffer says

Yeah, those WEF guys, what humanitarians:

Somebody actually check the book....

Ceffer says

Is there a competition for the best Trumpian bon mot not actually uttered by Trump? I think Matt Gaetz would be a contender.

I find it curious that the media hasn't savaged him for saying that. But I think the reason is twofold.
First it's a brilliant example of Cognitive Dissonance, like Scott Adams showed how Trump was using it in the 2016 election. Though I think he over complicated his assessment of what Trump was doing, and gushed that it could only take a genius to pull off such Schoolyard Statesmanship or Shithouse Lawyering. When wittier than thou people have been pulling it off for millennia, while not having the highest IQ on the hill.
A good old fashioned "Yo Mama!" comeback has always been effective. They work best when something was said, that others have been thinking, and has been a longtime coming. The LBGTQIdios have been grating hard, and spreading themselves very thin with people's patience and nerves. Folks(the sane people, that have only been going along for the ride) are starting grow weary of all of the forced Liberal trigger card feelings. And the Marxist Feminist is one of the biggest ones people are fed up with. The media now worries if they make an issue out of what Gaetz said. Calling ugly feminists bitching about Abortion rights, an unattractive out of shape Thumb, that nobody would want to fuck.
It was true and it was hilarious. So then they wanted to mitigate the story by making him Backtrack, Apologize and fear being canceled. But instead he told them, if folks get bent out of shape let them. He said it stoically and left it at that. Another thing that has been long over due to be said. It's also what people are growing tired of, being told how to think and what to be outraged about. So now they can't go out and hype it up in the news, and use it for a bad mark on those meanie Misogynists GOP republicans. When just a year ago it would have been the perfect rocket fuel to put some hyper rage, for the next two election cycles. They are stuck and they know it, it is burning them up that by reporting this story, would do more damage than good. It would probably sell another 7% of the Democrat base to change party.

So alas they to just put it on a shelf, and let it sit there and pray that by the time he makes next election move. Public sentiment and favor will have swayed back to where they could parlay what he said to create hatred toward not only him but all Republicans. Or it will be taken out of context and used against him in his next election. The story is too new and relevant for them to try that now.

But the good news is, I feel that for now, the MSM and the Socialist Networks, can't reap any political clout out of distorting sensible critique of the Democrats, no matter how off color they get to make that point.

I guess that's what happens when you expect honor from money launderers.
https://t.me/asbmil/3307

Tenpoundbass says

She probably is thinking about how the book should be updated to talk about 'Big Sister BullDyke' instead of 'Big Brother'.

She's a ginger - she has no soul.

Ceffer says

I guess that's what happens when you expect honor from money launderers.
https://t.me/asbmil/3307

You should know that "ASB Military News" made it up. The quote, that is. To be exact - it seems like the original quote by Mike Waltz was mis-translated to Russian (or perhaps another language but most likely it was Russian), to the point that it's meaning has changed, and then that mis-translation was translated back to English.

The original quote was that Biden administration allows Zelensky to "play for a tie" rather than win, i.e. that Biden administration is not doing enough - https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz

Pointing it out in the unlikely event that you didn't know who those ASB guys are. Your findings in info-dumpsters are quite fascinating.

mostly reader says

The original quote was that Biden administration allows Zelensky to "play for a tie" rather than win, i.e. that Biden administration is not doing enough - https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz

This is the original quote:

But I'm more concerned about how much of it's breaking, how is it being used tactically and how we can help them. I think the biggest point, though, is Zelenskyy feels like he is losing slowly, that the Biden administration is basically helping him play for a tie.

At least Zelenskyy isn't delusional, just enormously corrupt.

richwicks says

At least Zelenskyy isn't delusional, just enormously corrupt.

Ultracrepidarian to the rescue? Nice diversion, but you didn't comment on "pay for the noose". Because that's where ASB crapped their pants, and that's the part which I called out. They changed the meaning of Waltz's words to their opposite.

I can only raise a brow when I learn of an English speaker getting news from poor-ass bi-directional translation performed by a propaganda channel.

mostly reader says

richwicks says

At least Zelenskyy isn't delusional, just enormously corrupt.

Ultracrepidarian to the rescue? Nice diversion, but you didn't comment on "pay for the noose". Because that's where ASB crapped their pants, and that's the part which I called out. They changed the meaning of Waltz's words to their opposite.

I don't care what ASB said. I cared (well slightly) what Mike Waltz - not your characterization - of what he said. Your characterization was:

mostly reader says

The original quote was that Biden administration allows Zelensky to "play for a tie" rather than win, i.e. that Biden administration is not doing enough - https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz

What was actually said was:

From the article Putin 'will not stop' at Ukraine: Mike Waltz

But I'm more concerned about how much of it's breaking, how is it being used tactically and how we can help them. I think the biggest point, though, is Zelenskyy feels like he is losing slowly, that the Biden administration is basically helping him play for a tie.

I consider you intentionally dishonest and deceptive at this point. This conflict if it's like all the other conflicts the US has been in, is more about laundering money, stealing resources, impoverishing the US taxpayer, causing inflation, and using blood to cover that up, and it is about winning. The people that control the US government don't care about winning any war, they care about prolonging it as long as possible since that is lucrative. The longer it goes on, the more money that is stolen and laundered.

mostly reader says

I can only raise a brow when I learn of an English speaker getting news from poor-ass bi-directional translation performed by a propaganda channel.

You just bitch and moan that people don't pull water for the US military industrial complex. That's all you do.

richwicks says

I consider you intentionally dishonest and deceptive at this point.

You throw yourself into my assessment of ASB, attempt diversion, get corrected, and then, once corrected, claim that my point (about ASB) wasn't interesting to you in the first place (which didn't stop you from jumping into the conversation). You are a loudmouth who doesn't even know what he responds to, who the fuck cares what you think?? Is it your dishonesty, or stupidity, or both - it doesn't really matter. Everything, and I mean everything that you say should be either outright dismissed or at the very least subjected to extra scrutiny.

richwicks says

What was actually said was:

You little liar you. I'll explain.

There was a reason why I pulled out a little snippet from that interview. My context was ASB making shit up, and for that context this little snippet was enough. It did the job, and it didn't change the meaning.

You, on the other hand, change the context. For that new context, the snippet that you suggest is way insufficient and somewhat misleading (along with underlines of your choosing). Just one of the techniques of propaganda trolls. What did you NOT mention? You didn't mention that the entire piece is titled "Putin 'will not stop' at Ukraine" (with which I agree), and that his message is - Putin is a problem, Biden administration should be doing more. Watch the fucking video. It's less than a minute long https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz

mostly reader says

You little liar you. I'll explain.

No you won't. I just pointed out that you will mischaracterize what somebody says, instead of just quoting them. That's why I quoted Mike Waltz and demonstrated it didn't match with what you CLAIMED he said.

I've long ago determined you're not worthy of taking seriously, but I'll point out when you're trying to deceive other posters here. Nobody should trust what you say. Nobody should pay attention to what you say. You're deceptive.

richwicks says

No you won't.

I just did. Not to mention - anyone who decides to spend less than a minute and watch the video knows that you are full of shit.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz

Hey, you wouldn't happen to work for/with ASB Military, would you? The styles are somewhat similar.

mostly reader says

richwicks says

No you won't.

I just did.

No, you didn't.

You went to drone on with:

mostly reader says

There was a reason why I pulled out a little snippet from that interview. My context was ASB making shit up, and for that context this little snippet was enough. It did the job, and it didn't change the meaning.

Where I previously said:

richwicks says

I don't care what ASB said.

It's irrelevant. I'm simply pointing out the difference between what you claimed Mike Waltz said, and what he actually said.

I'm not doing it to demonstrate that you made a "mistake" so you could correct it, I did it to demonstrate to other people you engage in purpose deception knowing full well you would never correct it, knowing you'd double down on it. And you'll triple down, and quadruple down.

You aren't worth taking seriously. You are complete waste of time and the only reason I'm writing this, is so that any hapless reader reading this, will be able to learn from my mistake, I mistakenly treated you like a rational, thinking adult. It took me several months to see how purposeless that was.

richwicks says

I don't care what ASB said.

You were responding to a post of which main point was what ASB said. Were you that stupid to not understand that? Each time that I think "this guy can't get any dumber", you prove me wrong.

There is a reason why one of us (me) keeps posting that link to the source, the actual video: https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz
While the other one (you) tries to bury it under piles of self-produced horseshit.

mostly reader says

richwicks says

I don't care what ASB said.

You were responding to a post of which main point was what ASB said.

No, I was responding to you to specifically point out the exact quote. I never mentioned ASB, and I have repeatedly said I don't care about it, or know anything about it.

I only responded to demonstrate that what you claimed the quote was, and what the actual quote was, were different. I did it only to point out your dishonesty.

mostly reader says

There is a reason why one of us (me) keeps posting that link to the source, the actual video: https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz

I have referenced it multiple times and included the actual quote from Mike Waltz.

I'm doing this exclusively to demonstrate your blatant and habitual dishonesty.

richwicks says

I'm doing this exclusively to demonstrate your blatant and habitual dishonesty.

you have been learning from ultra-left. Whatever you yourself are guilty of - blame others. But you haven't been learning well enough. Keeping a discussion around the point which destroys you is an amateur mistake. So I will just leave the link here again, because it destroys you better than I need to.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz

An underestimated part of the message is were he talks about "snooze button", how Putin will want to push snooze button at some point and how we shouldn't allow him to do that, and why. Of course you will want to pile more horseshit to mute that part!

Special thanks to @Ceffer because without him I wouldn't have found it. It's probably not the effect that he expected, but thanks all the same.

mostly reader says

you have been learning from ultra-left.

left and right is a false dichotomy. It's two teams for idiots to blindly join. There is not central platform of either the "left" or the "right". The supposed position on the role of government, the morality of war, the foundation of free speech, the place of religion, etc, is entirely arbitrary and changes from decade to decade within the "left" and "right".

They are meaningless terms and they exist ONLY to get idiots to fight one another because the "enemy" is on the "other side".

What you just attempted is called a "high ground maneuver". C- for trying.

Only C- - because I clearly wasnt' talking about "decades ago" or in some perpetuity. I was talking about today. The concept of ultra-left today is very valid and well understood.

mostly reader says

What you just attempted is called a "high ground maneuver". C- for trying.

Again, this conversation serves no purpose so I'm ending it.

HunterTits says

richwicks says

Again, this conversation serves no purpose so I'm ending it.

That's a pattern with you when people insist upon you being held accountable for your bullshit.

It's a pattern I'm developing of ignoring you. I'm trying to get better at it. I trust other posters to make reasonable conclusions.

richwicks says

mostly reader says

What you just attempted is called a "high ground maneuver". C- for trying.

Again, this conversation serves no purpose so I'm ending it.

You should've never contributed to a topic of which you have neither education not understanding.

mostly reader says

You should've never contributed to a topic of which you have neither education not understanding.

Contributed? You constantly make this claim that you "contribute" but consistently show no knowledge or ability to educate. If you can, demonstrate you can.

For once, demonstrate you have some actual knowledge on this subject. You criticize me constantly, but you never correct me.

HunterTits says

At least it is heterosexual.

How dare you presume gender!

Ceffer says

HunterTits says

At least it is heterosexual.

How dare you presume gender!

Gotta take the small victories where they appear.

Right, that could be a man-vagina these days.

richwicks says

Again, this conversation serves no purpose so I'm ending it.

Aaaaand...

richwicks says

You criticize me constantly, but you never correct me.

You are confused. "I don't correct you" and " you don't understand that you've been corrected" are two different things.

Of simpler concepts, you are also confused about what it means to "end a conversation"

mostly reader says

You are confused. "I don't correct you"

Yes, I know. That's what I'm complaining about. You insult me, your criticize me, you rail against me, but you NEVER provide a basis for what, laughably, would be considered "your thinking".

So, I don't treat you seriously or give you any due consideration.

9,450 Euros for a chair set? It better come with a motor.

richwicks says

mostly reader says

You are confused. "I don't correct you"

Yes, I know. That's what I'm complaining about. You insult me, your criticize me, you rail against me, but you NEVER provide a basis for what, laughably, would be considered "your thinking".

So, I don't treat you seriously or give you any due consideration.

Ehh.. cry me a river?

You obviously didn't understand the meaning of my statement. Either that, or you intentionally pulled a part of it out of context, changing it's meaning to the opposite. Either option is quite fitting for the meaningless bullshitter that you are.