by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 17,241 - 17,280 of 37,892 Next » Last » Search these comments
The original quote was that Biden administration allows Zelensky to "play for a tie" rather than win, i.e. that Biden administration is not doing enough - https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz
But I'm more concerned about how much of it's breaking, how is it being used tactically and how we can help them. I think the biggest point, though, is Zelenskyy feels like he is losing slowly, that the Biden administration is basically helping him play for a tie.
At least Zelenskyy isn't delusional, just enormously corrupt.
richwicks says
At least Zelenskyy isn't delusional, just enormously corrupt.
Ultracrepidarian to the rescue? Nice diversion, but you didn't comment on "pay for the noose". Because that's where ASB crapped their pants, and that's the part which I called out. They changed the meaning of Waltz's words to their opposite.
The original quote was that Biden administration allows Zelensky to "play for a tie" rather than win, i.e. that Biden administration is not doing enough - https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz
But I'm more concerned about how much of it's breaking, how is it being used tactically and how we can help them. I think the biggest point, though, is Zelenskyy feels like he is losing slowly, that the Biden administration is basically helping him play for a tie.
I can only raise a brow when I learn of an English speaker getting news from poor-ass bi-directional translation performed by a propaganda channel.
I consider you intentionally dishonest and deceptive at this point.
What was actually said was:
You little liar you. I'll explain.
No you won't.
richwicks says
No you won't.
I just did.
There was a reason why I pulled out a little snippet from that interview. My context was ASB making shit up, and for that context this little snippet was enough. It did the job, and it didn't change the meaning.
I don't care what ASB said.
I don't care what ASB said.
richwicks says
I don't care what ASB said.
You were responding to a post of which main point was what ASB said.
There is a reason why one of us (me) keeps posting that link to the source, the actual video: https://www.foxnews.com/media/putin-stop-ukraine-representative-mike-waltz
I'm doing this exclusively to demonstrate your blatant and habitual dishonesty.
you have been learning from ultra-left.
What you just attempted is called a "high ground maneuver". C- for trying.
richwicks says
Again, this conversation serves no purpose so I'm ending it.
That's a pattern with you when people insist upon you being held accountable for your bullshit.
mostly reader says
What you just attempted is called a "high ground maneuver". C- for trying.
Again, this conversation serves no purpose so I'm ending it.
You should've never contributed to a topic of which you have neither education not understanding.
HunterTits says
At least it is heterosexual.
How dare you presume gender!
Again, this conversation serves no purpose so I'm ending it.
You criticize me constantly, but you never correct me.
You are confused. "I don't correct you"
mostly reader says
You are confused. "I don't correct you"
Yes, I know. That's what I'm complaining about. You insult me, your criticize me, you rail against me, but you NEVER provide a basis for what, laughably, would be considered "your thinking".
So, I don't treat you seriously or give you any due consideration.
9,450 Euros for a chair set? It better come with a motor.
You obviously didn't understand the meaning of my statement. Either that, or you intentionally pulled a part of it out of context, changing it's meaning to the opposite. Either option is quite fitting for the meaningless bullshitter that you are.
My position is simply that Russia will eventually win the war against Ukraine.
richwicks says
My position is simply that Russia will eventually win the war against Ukraine.
Thanks. Knowing the quality of your predictive powers (which suck bigly) I'm now less worried about Ukraine.
mostlyreader has obviously not read "War is a Racket."
something something horses water . . .
stereotomy says
mostlyreader has obviously not read "War is a Racket."
something something horses water . . .
I think he's just working for a PR agency. His job is to promote a point of view, and to shout down the opposite point of view, it's based on psychology and not reasoning. The expectation is that who they are attacking will withdraw or fight back against insults after enough are thrown at them. They will not engage in reasoning or explanation, because that's not part of the script. It's entirely based on emotion.
I've talked to "him" for 5 months, and I've never seen "him" explain "his" position, or "his" reasoning.
I strongly suspect it's a PR agent. PR is just newspeak for propaganda, although I'm certain "he" considers "himself" as public relations and is doing the "right thing". Israel employs the same sort of propagandists, and they ...
This is another thoughtless response produced with no effort.
But of course. ANY effort spent on you is wasted effort.
« First « Previous Comments 17,241 - 17,280 of 37,892 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,205,773 comments by 14,328 users - Blue, FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden, Onvacation online now