« First « Previous Comments 570 - 609 of 699 Next » Last » Search these comments
Timing thing was 100% procedural, too. Always is.
The Hunter laptop shows evidence that Hunter was trading on his fathers name and Joe, the big guy, was getting a cut of the action.
You really can’t be serious. In Benghazi people died number 1 and govt incompetence had a lot to do with it.
BUT, the discussion around Benghazi was NOT about questioning judgement on security details, who made those decisions, what information was available, etc.... it was an accusation and conspiracy that a crime had been committed.... "Lock Her Up", etc.
But bad judgement, even incompetence, is not a crime!
I am not up to speed
keeprubbersidedown says
You really can’t be serious. In Benghazi people died number 1 and govt incompetence had a lot to do with it.
Oh yes, certainly people died. Questioning whether the security detail was appropriate or not is totally valid. If you think people were making bad judgements about how to run security, that's a good reason to want someone else to be making those decisions. of course hindsight is 20/20, and decisions reviewed in light of bad outcomes can always be cast as bad decisions even if the information available at the time may be more grey.
BUT, the discussion around Benghazi was NOT about questioning judgement on security details, who made those decisions, what information was available, etc.... it was an accusation and conspiracy that a crime had been committed.... "Lock Her Up", etc.
But bad judgement, even incompetence, is not a crime! w...
So, again, I AM serious. What is the crime that was alleged that led to "Lock Her Up?"
Yea. Your not serious. Maybe a troll idk. Good Luck
. You should look it up, if you actually care about America.
dude they cover up every single thing with incompetence because its not illegal. those people aren’t stupid. ive seen that excuse every year now.
I am not really in a position to gauge Hunter's professional skills, but he does seem to be a bit of a druggie and not the most intelligent person, so it seems pretty reasonable to conclude that he got hired for this job because of his family name rather than his talent. Likely in hopes of access to the VP.
The Trumps also intermingled political and business life in unethical ways (such as hosting dignitaries at Trump owned hotels for high fees), but that wasnt the primary reason I have a problem with Trump.
that wasnt the primary reason I have a problem with Trump.
DeficitHawk says
that wasnt the primary reason I have a problem with Trump.
What is your primary problem with Trump? Was it the pussy grabbing?
I bet it was the pussy grabbing.
Do you think the Trump family corruption is worse than the Biden family corruption?
Was it the pussy grabbing?
I bet it was the pussy grabbing.
FEMA camps for the unvaccinated? Re-education camps?
Trumps are richer
I dont have much visibility into either family's corruption honestly.
honestly
Truthfully
honestly
Honestly
I would prefer if neither Trump nor Biden ran for office again. I think its time for a younger generation
If Trump were corrupt, it would be exposed.
his style of loyalty/wedge politics which I think is harmful to the country's unity and democratic values.
Really? Worse than Biden's "pandemic of the unvaccinated"?
I reject the premise of your question.
DeficitHawk says
I am not really in a position to gauge Hunter's professional skills, but he does seem to be a bit of a druggie and not the most intelligent person, so it seems pretty reasonable to conclude that he got hired for this job because of his family name rather than his talent. Likely in hopes of access to the VP.
And IF this is the case, he was acting as a conduit for bribes, wasn't he, and Joe Biden was part of that, wasn't he?
Further evidence of this is that Joe Biden threatened to with hold 1 billion dollars in aid (bribes) to Ukraine if Victor Shokin, an investigator into corporate corruption, wasn't fired, and he was fired, and Burisma was on his target list.
We could find out, if this were the case, IF the government would investigate it, but they won't. In fact, they purposely bury evidence, like Hunter Biden's laptop, which has been...
BTW you rejected the premise of my question above, but did not offer any reasoning.
Why do most people agree with one set or the other set if it is not caused by conformity and tribalism?
It seems like progressives are more tribal than any other "tribe". I think people are on a continuum and I try not to label them.
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
dude they cover up every single thing with incompetence because its not illegal. those people aren’t stupid. ive seen that excuse every year now.
I guess I just dont understand what crime you think was committed...
Do you think the secretary of state took some actions intentionally to cause American diplomats to get killed?
DeficitHawk says
FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says
dude they cover up every single thing with incompetence because its not illegal. those people aren’t stupid. ive seen that excuse every year now.
I guess I just dont understand what crime you think was committed...
Do you think the secretary of state took some actions intentionally to cause American diplomats to get killed?
they lied to us man. “video sent muslims into outrage”, bullshit story. not a crime, but clear attempt to cover up incompetence.
clinton crimes are selling government access, standard practice in DC. look man all politicians are corrupt as fuck, noone holds those faggots accountable for anything. and we Americans are suffering because of them. they act like they own us, like we have owner...
mell says
why debate if someone is deliberatively obtuse?
Ya can't.
Onvacation says
mell says
why debate if someone is deliberatively obtuse?
Ya can't.
People shouldn't argue, they should discuss.
The problem with a discussion is somebody is being dishonest in it, is that you can't progress if somebody is lying to you.
« First « Previous Comments 570 - 609 of 699 Next » Last » Search these comments
By polite, I mean refraining from attacking the person in either direction, but sticking to points of argument instead. So no "You are a (whatever)" will not be allowed. The only appropriate use of "you" will be "Here you said..."
I just ran into an old guy in a cafe who pointed in the newspaper to the governor results in California, which added up to 110%. I said, "well, that's California" and so he accused me of being an "election denier". I asked if he'd seen "2000 Mules" and he said he hadn't "because it's been debunked". Uh, it's the same people who committed the election fraud who are claiming that "2000 Mules" was debunked.
Nor had he heard what was on Hunter's laptop, since he watches only corporate news.
I think I might have made a dent in his wall of denial, and I'd like to try with others.