patrick.net

A current example of this is the DARPA 'flat earth' project, which was funded to the tune of half a billion dollars. The entire purpose of this project is to position flat earth mythology adjacent to real information that they want to discredit. People see the 'flat earth' stuff and they roll their eyes and move on that the information must ALL be bogus. They have been especially aggressive about placing this flat earth stuff around information surrounding Antarctica.

The DARPA 'flat earth' disinformation project was so successful, they funded it for an additional half billion dollars.

There is something in Antarctica that they seriously don't want us to know about. The Woo has even stated that there are periods of 'no fly' in which any planes attempting to fly over the region are told to leave or they will be shot down. That's in a part of the world that is supposed to be extra governmental.

It also seems to be a hobnobbing spot for the Globalists and scientists going back aways. Werner Von Braun, John Kerry, and no less recently Klaus the Schwab and Ursula von der Leyen, who went down to Antarcica last December to Rothschild Island to engage in some Satanic shit around the 'Black Sun' solar eclipse.

One of the pundits didn't mention him by name, but it was clear he was talking about Benjamin Fulford. He analyzed Fulford's information, and said that Fulford had great sources and excellent insights, but that five to ten percent of what he publishes is an agreed amount of disinformation, that his alleged intelligence sources insist on if they are to continue to give him scoop. That likely accounts for Fulford's sometimes schizoid and contradictory reporting. I guess he thinks his readers should sort out the wheat from the chaff for themselves, because 90 to 95 percent good info is worth the bargain.

It is an old game, and supposedly even steely eyed intelligence types can't always distinguish between the real and the disinfo when it is well done.

Patrick says

The flat earth hypothesis is a psy-op. I NEVER HEARD of a flat earther until 2010, and I've been on this communication system since 1989.

People are not this uneducated or stupid.

Ceffer says

The DARPA 'flat earth' disinformation project was so successful, they funded it for an additional half billion dollars.

So you believe they spent a billion dollars to have trolls go online and fool fools about the pseudo science of flat eartherism?

I don’t believe it. Especially since that kind of work could have been done by low wage earners from overseas and bots. Not saying it isn’t a psyop, but now way they spent all that money on flat earthing efforts.

Ceffer says

There is something in Antarctica that they seriously don't want us to know about. The Woo has even stated that there are periods of 'no fly' in which any planes attempting to fly over the region are told to leave or they will be shot down. That's in a part of the world that is supposed to be extra governmental.

It also seems to be a hobnobbing spot for the Globalists and scientists going back aways. Werner Von Braun, John Kerry, and no less recently Klaus the Schwab and Ursula von der Leyen, who went down to Antarcica last December to Rothschild Island to engage in some Satanic shit around the 'Black Sun' solar eclipse.

That is what Agent Mulder said. I’m sure the lone gunmen would agree. That doesn’t make it untrue but ask yourself why would people with nearly unlimited resources need to set up shop in one of the most inhospitable places on earth? It’s very convenient to tell stories about Antarctica, because as far as access by the general public, it might as well be Area 51. The satanic aspect of it is more plausible than the other woo hysteria, but I guess to me that is because the woo appears to be controlled opposition.

Ceffer says

One of the pundits didn't mention him by name, but it was clear he was talking about Benjamin Fulford. He analyzed Fulford's information, and said that Fulford had great sources and excellent insights, but that five to ten percent of what he publishes is an agreed amount of disinformation, that his alleged intelligence sources insist on if they are to continue to give him scoop. That likely accounts for Fulford's sometimes schizoid and contradictory reporting. I guess he thinks his readers should sort out the wheat from the chaff for themselves, because 90 to 95 percent good info is worth the bargain.

It is an old game, and supposedly even steely eyed intelligence types can't always distinguish between the real and the disinfo when it is well done.

So if I read this right, you believe there are white hats within the deep state, who insist on spreading disinformation together with truth?

For what purpose would the white hats deliberately associate the truth with lies?

I agree with Patrick on this one 100%. Here's my take on all of this ...

Who was it that created the moniker 'conspiracy theory' as a means to immediately discredit any attempt to even question the 'official' story line? It was none other than the CIA.

People that are 'followers' are typically afraid to be associated with anything that appears to go against what the MAJORITY of people supposedly believe. Add to that the weird picture of wearing a 'tin foil hat' that has been effectively associated with 'conspiracy theorists' and you'll really want to disassociate yourself from what 'normal' society has determined to be ignorant weirdos. This is a very effective PSYOP, and the propaganda media, along with their sycophants in academia, etc. play right along by repeating the party line.

Just one example of one of their favorite methods ...

I'm not a fanatic when it comes to the JFK Assassination, but I know enough about guns, ballistics, etc. to know that JFK was shot in the neck and head from the front. Virtually anyone that has any experience with shooting a rifle (or a handgun) knows that he was hit from the front. Added to that, the 'magic bullet' is so preposterous, it could only fool people that believe 'my government would never lie' types. (By the way, Oswald's supposed 'rifle' model was well known to be a highly inferior military surplus weapon with a very sloppy bolt action. When the FBI received Oswald's rifle into evidence, they later noted on their report that the rifle's scope (cheap junk) wasn't even 'sighted in.' In other words, the shooter wouldn't be able to hit what they were aiming at. When the FBI sighted in the scope, they had FBI sharpshooters attempt to duplicate Oswald's feat that day and were unable to even come close).

I'll stop there. Here's how those that are involved in the PSYOP attempt to discredit the obvious evidence regarding shots from the front, and not the rear, where Oswald was supposedly perched. They needed to distract away from that evidence by concocting preposterous, planted accounts of 'shooters from the front' such as "the Secret Service DRIVER turned around and shot him from the front seat,' and another crazy one, 'the shooter was in a sewer drain and shot him from there.' This is VERY effective because it associates proponents of a shooter in the front with OBVIOUS 'conspiracy' nuts.

They have used the exact same PSYOP propaganda tactics surrounding the events of 9/11, painting EVERYONE with the distainful 'conspiracy theorist,' 'tinfoil hat' label that has the audacity to even question the official government account.

PeopleUnited says

For what purpose would the white hats deliberately associate the truth with lies?

My working theory is that almost ALL information is disinformation i.e. some form of truth mixed in with some form of manipulative fiction. Sorting is the skill, and getting closer to some version of truth is a form of targeting and triangulating. Also, the reader has a certain amount of responsibility.

I think the Fulford thing is that if he is to disperse any information at all, he has to register some of the purposeful disinformation of the sources as a kind of quid pro quo swap. in other words, putting out information with an info/ disinformation ratio of twenty to ten to one is not such a bad deal, when MSM is probably 95 to 100 percent propaganda and disinfo.

There are no angels of pure truth, but there are some who try harder than others to get as much 'truth' out as possible to the extent they can.

With the flat earth stuff, the 'flat earthers' aka DARPA shills also put out opinions on things like the moon landing (they say it was bogus for obvious reasons) and other topics. So, if the 'true' information is that the moon landings were faked, then being associated with the 'flat earthers' would tend to make people believe they were real. Once you know that flat earth is a disinfo campaign, you can inversely associate that some of the things that they talk about are actually truth that DARPA wants to 'disgrace'.

From the Corbett Report ...

Excellent informative video that exposes how the CIA controls and manipulates much of the narrative as told by the Corporate media:

The CIA and the News Media 2.0

https://www.corbettreport.com/ciamedia2/

Ceffer says

PeopleUnited says

For what purpose would the white hats deliberately associate the truth with lies?

My working theory is that almost ALL information is disinformation i.e. some form of truth mixed in with some form of manipulative fiction. Sorting is the skill, and getting closer to some version of truth is a form of targeting and triangulating. Also, the reader has a certain amount of responsibility.

I think the Fulford thing is that if he is to disperse any information at all, he has to register some of the purposeful disinformation of the sources as a kind of quid pro quo swap. in other words, putting out information with an info/ disinformation ratio of twenty to ten to one is not such a bad deal, when MSM is probably 95 to 100 percent propaganda and disinfo.

There are no angels of pure truth, but there are some who try harder than others to get as much 'tr...

So to recap, Oswald didn’t kill Kennedy, the Kennedy promised moon landings were fake, the earth is round and trump is still president.

Its all about promoting chaos which creates fear and uncertainty.

This is all part of Cloward Piven Strategy. Force failure so people beg for more Chicom-style authoritarian government to provide the solutions.

.