« First « Previous Comments 538 - 577 of 1,323 Next » Last » Search these comments
Ron1234
8 hr ago
I believe that the psychological explanations for reluctance to admit mistakes about the COVID-19 "vaccines" have some validity, especially for people not in the decision-making chain. However, when it comes to the mandaters and propagandists, their motivations are more to protect themselves against financial and criminal penalties. If they admit mistakes now, they can be accused of knowingly having promoted these products at a time when their deadly effects were well known.
That's why I believe this criminal enterprise has become "Too Big to Fail". Most of the power structure was involved in this scam, and widescale admission of malfeasance (disguised as "mistakes") would result in the power structure prosecuting and penalizing itself. It will never happen, especially through the legal channels, since the prosecutors and judges themselves were and are complicit!
Advocating a Risky Experiment Generates A Motive to Conceal Its Failure
Dr. Paul Alexander asks some tough questions about Grant Wahl's death.
Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
My first true crime book—about the Austrian author, journalist, and international serial killer, Jack Unterweger—recounted a strange dilemma suffered by Austria’s intelligentsia after evidence emerged that Jack had murdered several women. The trouble for them was, they had, just a few years earlier, vehemently advocated (through letters and a petition to the Justice Ministry) Jack’s early release from his life sentence in prison for a brutal murder he’d committed in his youth. Their passionate desire to liberate him arose after he published an “autobiographical novel” titled Purgatory. They (a Who’s Who of Austrian writers, artists, journalists, and scientists) found his book so moving, and so apparently expressive of his mature self-awareness, that they asserted it was evidence of his rehabilitation.
About 18 months after he was released from prison with great fanfare, an Austrian daily newspaper reported that a warrant had been issued for his arrest for murdering 7 women in three Austrian cities. Shortly thereafter he also fell under suspicion for murdering three women in Los Angeles and one in Prague, for a total of eleven women.
The lead police investigator, Ernst Geiger, discovered that many Austrian journalists and public commentators were extremely reluctant to acknowledge the extensive circumstantial evidence that Jack was the killer. Especially embarrassing for the Austrian National Broadcasting Corporation was the strange fact that Jack had gotten an assignment to produce a major radio story on the mysterious killer who was stalking Vienna’s red light district, much like “Jack the Ripper” had done in London a century earlier.
Those who’d advocated the extremely risky social experiment did not want to face up to the fact that their gamble had gone the wrong way, resulting in the terrible deaths of eleven young women. Many even seemed to prefer that the arrest warrant be rescinded and the investigation suspended.
This afternoon I was reminded of my first book when I read Dr. Paul Alexander’s reflections on the sudden death of celebrity soccer commentator, Grant Wahl, in the press box at the World Cup in Qatar. Mr. Wahl’s wife, Dr. Celine Gounder, was a member of President Biden’s COVID-19 Advisory Board and a vehement advocate for mass vaccination using the mRNA gene transfer shots developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.
Dr. Gounder’s high profile endorsement of “The Great Gamble of COVID-19 Vaccine Development” (as Dr. McCullough characterized this massive experiment) raises the concern that she will be reluctant to examine the distinct possibility that these products caused or contributed to her fit young husband’s death.
En route to care for a dying friend in Dunakeszi, Hungary earlier this year, I was detained by Border Police in Amsterdam for failing to have received the jabs. The experience turned out to be a good one. I was held for about 45 minutes in a room and questioned by a young (20-something) officer. The interrogation provided me an opportunity to share scientific data Dr McCullough had published or cited over the course of the last year. The young officer listened attentively and expressed interest in what I was telling her. At all events, I was eventually released and able to catch my flight into Budapest. This is an excellent article, and it reminds that those of us who are in the 40-80 year range need to take time to share with young people what TRULY great minds like Dr McCullough are discovering and courageously publishing. Some are listening. Well done!
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/12/29/postcard-from-japan-where-the-population-still-lives-in-mortal-fear-of-catching-covid/
We are witnessing mass psychosis. I don’t really want to get into a debate about mass formation vs. mass psychosis vs. “this is deliberate” vs. “people are just going what they have to do to survive” vs. “elites don’t get full strength shots.”
We have all witnessed the process I have described above thousands of times over the last two years. And I think we should call it what it is — madness. We are dealing with people who are completely mad.
I don’t know what we do about this but I think it’s important to be clear that:
This is not a misunderstanding.
It’s not a difference of opinion.
The injectors are experiencing mass psychosis.
We live in a society in which millions of people have developed state-sponsored psychosis over the last three years. It is very very very strange.
BOMBSHELL docs reveal Covid-19 COVER-UP goes straight to the top | Redacted with Clayton Morris
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERvURcpg3JE
BOMBSHELL docs reveal Covid-19 COVER-UP goes straight to the top | Redacted with Clayton Morris
U.S. — A dispute regarding the nature of vaccination has arisen among faithful followers of The Science, and of Fauci its prophet. According to sources, some progressives say that the sacrament of vaccination is the literal body of Fauci, while others believe it is only symbolic.
"The mRNA juice we inject into our bodies to cover our COVID becomes the literal body of our Blessed Lord Fauci through a process called tranvaxstantiation," said progressive scholar Banz Tinkleman (he/him). "Whether it be Pfizer or Moderna, we can have faith that the real presence of Fauci is within the vax itself. To suggest otherwise is a damnable heresy. Why we..."
Tinkleman was unable to finish his sentence, as the left side of his face suddenly stopped working.
Several progressives, however, take issue with this view. "We vaccinate as a communal time of remembrance of Fauci and everything he's done for us," said a scholar Yix Mixley (she/her), who holds the opposing view. "We acknowledge that the spiritual presence of Fauci, blessings upon him, may be in with and under the vax, but reject tranvaxstantiation wholeheartedly."
Mixley then collapsed due to heart inflammation.
At publishing time, progressive leaders agreed to settle it through a holy war in which any heretics would be burned at the stake, but ultimately elected to just burn Portland down instead.
« First « Previous Comments 538 - 577 of 1,323 Next » Last » Search these comments
Liberals defend their credentials which allow them to exploit those who don't have the same credentials. Credentials create monopolies, the ability to set high prices regardless of quality of service. It is a way to defeat free market competition.
The funding of universities depends entirely on the demand for their degrees, which they control. Their biggest horror would be a system where anyone could take tests to prove competence in a subject without paying for the years of classes and subjecting themselves to obedience to professors.
- Thomas Frank
Most of academia is less about learning than about paying for a paper proof of status and conformity. Non-conformists are expelled from schools, or failed out. Most teachers do not like their authority to be questioned. Bosses like the academic proof of conformity when they hire. The most "educated" are the most obedient.
Trump was a threat to their credentials and therefore a threat to their incomes and status.
The academic elite need a reason to hate those threatening themselves, therefore they use imaginary "racism", to which there is no defense. The accusation is the conviction.
Then they don't need to worry about the real class problem, which is independent of race. They would be uncomfortable looking at class, because they'd have to look at themselves and their unearned class privileges.
So their faith in the injection is faith in the "expert class" of which they are members, and they demand that the hoi polloi submit to it as an expression of the elite's power and prestige.