by REpro ➕follow (0) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 4 - 43 of 45 Next » Last » Search these comments
Several persons from medical staff confirmed that recently is surge with heart attack.
30 years of taking statin........kind of disappointment.
Right, from what I've heard, statins are just one more profitable scam by the medical industry.
Patrick says
Right, from what I've heard, statins are just one more profitable scam by the medical industry.
Also, the government moved the cholesterol Goal Posts again to 200. What they don't tell you is that below 200 total your risk of cancer goes up dramatically.
I would recommend going to ER if you notice some real problem.
In ER you immediately receive right professional attention, someone going to evaluate your problem on spot, get all necessary tests and labs, receive right treatment without delay.
REpro says
I would recommend going to ER if you notice some real problem.
The trick is to know whether the problem is real or you'll spend better part of the day in the ER for something trivial like intercostal neuralgia.
I would recommend going to ER if you notice some real problem. Skip doctor regular visit. In ER you immediately receive right professional attention, someone going to evaluate your problem on spot, get all necessary tests and labs, receive right treatment without delay. Suddenly all specialists have time for you.
The top hospitals only hire the cream of the crop from medical schools.
Some of the shit is genetic
My health has nothing to do with luck or genetics. I exercise enough, take a wide range of supplements, and eat pretty healthy. There's no secret to health, no trick to avoiding cancer, diabetes or heart attacks. Just requires discipline, knowledge, and time. The piece most people are missing is knowledge.
There are people with high cholesterol in their 30s despite a lifetime of good diet and exercise and healthy weight.
They keep lowering the bar, I suppose to promote medication, like the thumb on the scale. Rumor is it is now recommended 120/70 resting, whereas the older standard was 120/80. It used to be past a certain age as high as 130/85 was OK due to loss of arterial compliance, but it is the low number that is more important than the high number. Also, 90 diastolic used to be the threshold for considering medication. However, I have heard of people taking BP meds for diastolics lower than 90 now. I think 120/70 is an artificially low standard.
I just happen to have resting of around 120/70 to 125/75 pretty routinely when I measure it at home, with a resting pulse of 55 to 60.
What is a safe blood pressure level?
If you look at the root cause of high cholesterol, inflammation, the huge uptick in auto-immune diseases, which are mostly inflammatory, and the correlation between these and diet, the logical conclusion is their diet isn't as good as you say it is. But maybe you could give me an example of a healthy diet, so we can get into specifics.
"Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Associated with Statin Use: A Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System"; odds-ratios for ALS were elevated for all statins
110/70 I think it is now. Down from 130/80. Either number too high = hypetension.
Recently when I had a weird panic attack preceded by deja vu from recalling a dream I had the night before about what I was doing right at that moment. It happened four times that day. I would start recalling the dream in more detail, then would feel like I was about to pass out or throw up. Never happened before, never happened since.
« First « Previous Comments 4 - 43 of 45 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,199,143 comments by 14,163 users - Patrick, The_Deplorable online now